Latvia - VirsligaStadions DaugavaData current as of 23 July 2026

Liepāja vs Super Nova: match statistics

Liepāja crest
Liepāja
2 : 1half-time 2:1
Super Nova crest
Super Nova

Liepāja vs Super Nova: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Liepāja play Super Nova in Virsliga (Latvia). The match date is 12 June 2026 at 18:00. Venue: Stadions Daugava. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

Liepāja: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match. Super Nova: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Liepāja scores 1.27 and concedes 1.55 goals per match. Super Nova scores 1.09 and concedes 1.52. League average: 2.98 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Liepāja 55%, Super Nova 61%. Over 2.5: Liepāja 59%, Super Nova 57%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 55%.

xG, shots and style

Liepāja has higher xG: 1.50 vs 1.19. Liepāja: 12.4 shots per match, Super Nova: 9.0.

Match halves

Liepāja: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.68. Super Nova: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.52.

Goals by minute

Liepāja: 31-45+ (7 goals). Super Nova: 76-90+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Virsliga: 2.98 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 55%.

Head-to-head

5 H2H matches: 2-1-2. Average goals 3.40, BTTS 60%.

Match description

Liepāja is the favorite in this match due to superior form and efficiency: in the last 5 matches the home side scored 11 goals (2.2 per match) and average 2.0 points per match, while Super Nova scored 7 goals in their last 5 (1.4 per match) and average 1.4 points per match. At home Liepāja averages 1.75 goals per game with 10.5 shots and 4.75 shots on target, and has a 17% conversion rate, whereas the visitors on the road average 1.00 goal with 8.33 shots and 3.33 shots on target and a 12% conversion. Defensively the hosts concede 1.00 goal at home and have an average xG against of 1.32, while Super Nova concedes 1.11 goals away and allows 1.52 xG against, giving Liepāja a slight qualitative edge in chance control. Additionally, Liepāja is less likely to be shut out (13% of home matches without scoring vs 33% for the visitors) and has a home goal difference of +6, while Super Nova have an away goal difference of -1. Given the advantage in chance creation and finishing (4.75 vs 3.33 shots on target and 17% vs 12% conversion) I predict a home win; probability distribution: 60% Liepāja, 20% draw, 20% Super Nova.

Half-by-half

2 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

52Possession (%)48
LiepājaSuper Nova
7Shots13
LiepājaSuper Nova
2Shots on target7
LiepājaSuper Nova
0.86xG1.69
LiepājaSuper Nova
2Corners4
LiepājaSuper Nova
37Dangerous attacks53
LiepājaSuper Nova
19Fouls19
LiepājaSuper Nova
4Cards4
LiepājaSuper Nova

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

LiepājaSuper Nova
1.27Goals scored / match1.09
LiepājaSuper Nova
1.55Goals conceded / match1.52
LiepājaSuper Nova
52%Average possession45%
LiepājaSuper Nova
4.32Shots on target / match3.61
LiepājaSuper Nova

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.41Shots per match9.04
LiepājaSuper Nova
4.32Shots on target3.61
LiepājaSuper Nova
10.3%Shot conversion12%
LiepājaSuper Nova
52%Possession45%
LiepājaSuper Nova
1.5xG for1.19
LiepājaSuper Nova
1.49xG against1.67
LiepājaSuper Nova

Shooting quality

Liepāja: BalancedSuper Nova: Counter-attacking
LiepājaSuper Nova
Accuracy (shots on target)35%40%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Super Nova is 100% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / match - Liepāja · 1.2 pts / match - Super Nova

Liepāja
LLLWL
Season result split
36% W18% R45% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-4-10
1.27 pts / match · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-2-3
Last 5 at home
4-0-1
WWWLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.72Opponent xG: 1.64BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 60%
Super Nova
LLWLW
Season result split
35% W13% R52% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-3-12
1.17 pts / match · goal difference -10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-1-5
Last 5 away
2-1-2
WLLDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.41Opponent xG: 1.76BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Liepāja is 17% better for: goals scored per match.

1.27 goals / match - Liepāja · 1.09 goals / match - Super Nova

Liepāja scoring profile: very strong

Liepāja scores in 68% of matches (15 of 22 matches), while Super Nova keeps a clean sheet in 22% (5 of 23 matches).

Super Nova scoring profile: very strong

Super Nova scores in 78% of matches (18 of 23 matches), while Liepāja keeps a clean sheet in 14% (3 of 22 matches).

28Goals scored (season)25
LiepājaSuper Nova
34Goals conceded (season)35
LiepājaSuper Nova
2.82Average goals in match2.61
LiepājaSuper Nova
5Goals scored (last 5)6
LiepājaSuper Nova
10Goals conceded (last 5)10
LiepājaSuper Nova

How often they score at least...

68%1 goal78%
LiepājaSuper Nova
36%2 goals26%
LiepājaSuper Nova
14%3 goals4%
LiepājaSuper Nova
9%4 goals0%
LiepājaSuper Nova

How often they concede at least...

86%1 goal78%
LiepājaSuper Nova
36%2 goals48%
LiepājaSuper Nova
18%3 goals13%
LiepājaSuper Nova
9%4 goals9%
LiepājaSuper Nova

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

56%
League average

Goal patterns

5%BTTS at half-time30%
LiepājaSuper Nova
0%BTTS in both halves0%
LiepājaSuper Nova
23%Scored in both halves9%
LiepājaSuper Nova

BTTS and goal count

41%Min. 3 goals and BTTS52%
LiepājaSuper Nova
18%Min. 3 goals without BTTS4%
LiepājaSuper Nova
20%BTTS - last 560%
LiepājaSuper Nova

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

86%Min. 1 goal before half-time61%
LiepājaSuper Nova
32%Min. 2 goals before half-time48%
LiepājaSuper Nova
18%Min. 3 goals before half-time22%
LiepājaSuper Nova

2nd half

86%Min. 1 goal after half-time87%
LiepājaSuper Nova
41%Min. 2 goals after half-time30%
LiepājaSuper Nova
14%Min. 3 goals after half-time4%
LiepājaSuper Nova

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Liepāja is 18% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.23 pts / match - Liepāja · 1.04 pts / match - Super Nova

Liepāja - half-time state
36% leading14% draw50% trailing
Super Nova - half-time state
17% leading52% draw30% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.23Points per match (1st half)1.04
LiepājaSuper Nova
0.59Goals scored (1st half)0.57
LiepājaSuper Nova
0.77Goals conceded (1st half)0.83
LiepājaSuper Nova
1.36Average goals (1st half)1.39
LiepājaSuper Nova
45%Clean sheet before half-time52%
LiepājaSuper Nova
64%No goal before half-time57%
LiepājaSuper Nova

After half-time (2nd half)

1.27Points per match (2nd half)1.22
LiepājaSuper Nova
0.68Goals scored (2nd half)0.52
LiepājaSuper Nova
0.77Goals conceded (2nd half)0.7
LiepājaSuper Nova
1.45Average goals (2nd half)1.22
LiepājaSuper Nova
36%Clean sheet after half-time48%
LiepājaSuper Nova
45%No goal after half-time57%
LiepājaSuper Nova

Liepāja - second-half results

32% W32% R36% P
27
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
28
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.23
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Super Nova - second-half results

35% W17% R48% P
24
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
28
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.04
PPG before half-time
Lead holding206%

Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Liepāja - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.800.80
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match1.01.0
Average goals in match1.61.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-2-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3
Super Nova - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.20
Goals scored / match0.40.8
Goals conceded / match0.81.2
Average goals in match1.22.0
1 goal40%100%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-2-2
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Liepāja
ScoredConceded
4
8
0-15
2
4
16-30
7
5
31-45
6
6
46-60
2
3
61-75
7
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Super Nova
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
5
5
16-30
5
12
31-45
4
6
46-60
1
3
61-75
7
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.71
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
91%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
58%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+25%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
53%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Liepāja

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.01
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.29
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.23
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.06
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
76%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
117%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.67
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

Super Nova

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.48
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.05
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
83%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
91%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.03
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.0
Late goals
28% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
28%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).

Teams vs league

LiepājaLigaSuper Nova
Average goals in match 2.822.98 2.61
Both teams scored 55%56% 61%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 59%55% 57%
Clean sheets 14%24% 22%
Goal before half-time 86%75% 61%
Goal after half-time 86%84% 87%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.98
Average goals per match
56%
Both teams scored
55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.67
Home goals / match
1.32
Away goals / match
+27%
Home attack advantage
+21%
Home defence advantage
+4%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (5): Liepāja 2 - 1 - 2 Super Nova. Average goals 3.40, both teams scored in 60% matches.

Super Nova
1 : 2
Liepāja
SK Super Nova
3 : 0
FK Liepāja
FK Liepāja
0 : 3
SK Super Nova
SK Super Nova
1 : 3
FK Liepāja
FK Liepāja
2 : 2
SK Super Nova

FAQ

What was the result of Liepāja vs Super Nova?

The Virsliga match finished Liepāja 2:1 Super Nova. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Liepāja and Super Nova?

In the last 5 head-to-head matches Liepāja won 2, Super Nova won 2 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.40 goals, with both teams scoring in 60% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Liepāja vs Super Nova?

Liepāja score 1.27 goals per game on average and Super Nova 1.09. The Virsliga average is 2.98 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 55% of Liepāja's matches and 61% of Super Nova's.

What form are Liepāja and Super Nova in?

Over the last 5 games Liepāja have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and Super Nova 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Liepāja vs Super Nova?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Liepāja vs Super Nova: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.