Lierse Kempenzonen vs KRC Genk II: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Lierse Kempenzonen played KRC Genk II in First Division B (Belgium). The match was played on 6 December 2025. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

Lierse Kempenzonen: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. KRC Genk II: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Lierse Kempenzonen scores 1.00 and concedes 1.21 goals per match. KRC Genk II scores 1.08 and concedes 1.92. League average: 2.69 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Lierse Kempenzonen 36%, KRC Genk II 62%. Over 2.5: Lierse Kempenzonen 29%, KRC Genk II 62%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 49%.

xG, shots and style

Lierse Kempenzonen has higher xG: 1.51 vs 1.15. Lierse Kempenzonen: 12.9 shots per match, KRC Genk II: 10.4.

Match halves

Lierse Kempenzonen: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.36. KRC Genk II: half-time lead 23%, second-half goals 0.54.

Goals by minute

Lierse Kempenzonen: 16-30 (5 goals). KRC Genk II: 31-45+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

First Division B: 2.69 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 49%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

46Possession (%)54
Lierse KempenzonenKRC Genk II
11Shots11
Lierse KempenzonenKRC Genk II
3Shots on target3
Lierse KempenzonenKRC Genk II
1.3xG1.19
Lierse KempenzonenKRC Genk II
2Corners2
Lierse KempenzonenKRC Genk II
54Dangerous attacks38
Lierse KempenzonenKRC Genk II
19Fouls12
Lierse KempenzonenKRC Genk II
1Cards2
Lierse KempenzonenKRC Genk II

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Lierse KempenzonenKRC Genk II
1Goals scored / match1.08
Lierse KempenzonenKRC Genk II
1.21Goals conceded / match1.92
Lierse KempenzonenKRC Genk II
49%Average possession46%
Lierse KempenzonenKRC Genk II
3.5Shots on target / match3.46
Lierse KempenzonenKRC Genk II

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.93Shots per match10.38
Lierse KempenzonenKRC Genk II
3.5Shots on target3.46
Lierse KempenzonenKRC Genk II
7.7%Shot conversion10.4%
Lierse KempenzonenKRC Genk II
49%Possession46%
Lierse KempenzonenKRC Genk II
1.51xG for1.15
Lierse KempenzonenKRC Genk II
1.4xG against1.89
Lierse KempenzonenKRC Genk II

Shooting quality

Lierse Kempenzonen: BalancedKRC Genk II: Balanced
Lierse KempenzonenKRC Genk II
Accuracy (shots on target)27%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.31

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Lierse Kempenzonen is 60% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - Lierse Kempenzonen · 1 pts / match - KRC Genk II

Lierse Kempenzonen
LDDWW
Season result split
29% W29% D43% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-4-6
1.14 pts / match · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-2-2
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
WDLDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.85Opponent xG: 1.59BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
KRC Genk II
WLDDL
Season result split
23% W23% D54% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-3-7
0.92 pts / match · goal difference -11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-2-3
Last 5 away
1-2-2
WLLDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.07Opponent xG: 1.85BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

KRC Genk II is 8% better for: goals scored per match.

1 goals / match - Lierse Kempenzonen · 1.08 goals / match - KRC Genk II

Lierse Kempenzonen is 59% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.21 goals / match - Lierse Kempenzonen · 1.92 goals / match - KRC Genk II

Lierse Kempenzonen scoring profile: strong

Lierse Kempenzonen scores in 57% of matches (8 of 14 matches), while KRC Genk II keeps a clean sheet in 15% (2 of 13 matches).

KRC Genk II scoring profile: strong

KRC Genk II scores in 62% of matches (8 of 13 matches), while Lierse Kempenzonen keeps a clean sheet in 36% (5 of 14 matches).

14Goals scored (season)14
Lierse KempenzonenKRC Genk II
17Goals conceded (season)25
Lierse KempenzonenKRC Genk II
2.21Average goals in match3
Lierse KempenzonenKRC Genk II
8Goals scored (last 5)8
Lierse KempenzonenKRC Genk II
7Goals conceded (last 5)8
Lierse KempenzonenKRC Genk II

How often they score at least...

57%1 goal62%
Lierse KempenzonenKRC Genk II
21%2 goals31%
Lierse KempenzonenKRC Genk II
14%3 goals15%
Lierse KempenzonenKRC Genk II
7%4 goals0%
Lierse KempenzonenKRC Genk II

How often they concede at least...

64%1 goal85%
Lierse KempenzonenKRC Genk II
43%2 goals46%
Lierse KempenzonenKRC Genk II
7%3 goals31%
Lierse KempenzonenKRC Genk II
7%4 goals23%
Lierse KempenzonenKRC Genk II

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

36%
Lierse Kempenzonen - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.5 of 14 matches
52%
League average

Goal patterns

7%BTTS at half-time23%
Lierse KempenzonenKRC Genk II
7%BTTS in both halves8%
Lierse KempenzonenKRC Genk II
7%Scored in both halves23%
Lierse KempenzonenKRC Genk II

BTTS and goal count

29%Min. 3 goals and BTTS54%
Lierse KempenzonenKRC Genk II
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS8%
Lierse KempenzonenKRC Genk II
60%BTTS - last 580%
Lierse KempenzonenKRC Genk II

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

71%Min. 1 goal before half-time77%
Lierse KempenzonenKRC Genk II
21%Min. 2 goals before half-time38%
Lierse KempenzonenKRC Genk II
14%Min. 3 goals before half-time15%
Lierse KempenzonenKRC Genk II

2nd half

64%Min. 1 goal after half-time77%
Lierse KempenzonenKRC Genk II
29%Min. 2 goals after half-time46%
Lierse KempenzonenKRC Genk II
7%Min. 3 goals after half-time23%
Lierse KempenzonenKRC Genk II

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Lierse Kempenzonen is 43% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.43 pts / match - Lierse Kempenzonen · 1 pts / match - KRC Genk II

Lierse Kempenzonen - half-time state
36% leading36% draw29% trailing
KRC Genk II - half-time state
23% leading31% draw46% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.43Points per match (1st half)1
Lierse KempenzonenKRC Genk II
0.64Goals scored (1st half)0.54
Lierse KempenzonenKRC Genk II
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.92
Lierse KempenzonenKRC Genk II
1.14Average goals (1st half)1.46
Lierse KempenzonenKRC Genk II
64%Clean sheet before half-time38%
Lierse KempenzonenKRC Genk II
57%No goal before half-time62%
Lierse KempenzonenKRC Genk II

After half-time (2nd half)

0.86Points per match (2nd half)0.85
Lierse KempenzonenKRC Genk II
0.36Goals scored (2nd half)0.54
Lierse KempenzonenKRC Genk II
0.71Goals conceded (2nd half)1
Lierse KempenzonenKRC Genk II
1.07Average goals (2nd half)1.54
Lierse KempenzonenKRC Genk II
50%Clean sheet after half-time38%
Lierse KempenzonenKRC Genk II
79%No goal after half-time54%
Lierse KempenzonenKRC Genk II

Lierse Kempenzonen - second-half results

14% W43% D43% L
20
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
12
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.43
PPG before half-time
Lead holding81%

Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 29%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

KRC Genk II - second-half results

15% W38% D46% L
13
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
11
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 23% of matches and wins 23%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Lierse Kempenzonen - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.001.20
Goals scored / match1.00.6
Goals conceded / match0.80.6
Average goals in match1.81.2
1 goal100%60%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal20%60%
Goal difference+10
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5
KRC Genk II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.60
Goals scored / match0.61.0
Goals conceded / match0.80.8
Average goals in match1.41.8
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet20%60%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference-1+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Lierse Kempenzonen
ScoredConceded
1
2
0-15
5
1
16-30
3
4
31-45
2
2
46-60
2
3
61-75
1
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

KRC Genk II
ScoredConceded
1
3
0-15
1
4
16-30
5
5
31-45
2
4
46-60
4
3
61-75
1
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.60
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
97%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
49%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
35%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
16%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 6 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Lierse Kempenzonen

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.11
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.32
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.51
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.19
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
76%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
88%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.46
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
7% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
7%

KRC Genk II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.74
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.10
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.07
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.03
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
79%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
145%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.08
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
7% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
7%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division B).

Teams vs league

Lierse KempenzonenLigaKRC Genk II
Average goals in match 2.212.69 3.00
Both teams scored 36%52% 62%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 29%49% 62%
Clean sheets 36%28% 15%
Goal before half-time 71%73% 77%
Goal after half-time 64%79% 77%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.69
Average goals per match
52%
Both teams scored
49%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
28%
Clean sheets
1.32
Home goals / match
1.37
Away goals / match
+-4%
Home attack advantage
+-4%
Home defence advantage
+-3%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
49%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Lierse KempenzonenGoalJenthe Maertens
  2. Lierse KempenzonenYellow cardBryan Adinany
  3. KRC Genk IIYellow cardManu Mocsnik
  4. Lierse KempenzonenSubstitutionOn: Vincent De VosOff: Pietro Perdichizzi
  5. KRC Genk IIGoalLuca Oyen
  6. KRC Genk IIYellow cardChristian Akpan
  7. KRC Genk IIGoalMin-Woo Kang
  8. KRC Genk IISubstitutionOn: Alpha Amadou BarryOff: Manu Mocsnik

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Lierse Kempenzonen vs KRC Genk II?

The First Division B match finished Lierse Kempenzonen 2:1 KRC Genk II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Lierse Kempenzonen vs KRC Genk II?

Lierse Kempenzonen score 1.00 goals per game on average and KRC Genk II 1.08. The First Division B average is 2.69 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 36% of Lierse Kempenzonen's matches and 62% of KRC Genk II's.

What form are Lierse Kempenzonen and KRC Genk II in?

Over the last 5 games Lierse Kempenzonen have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and KRC Genk II 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Lierse Kempenzonen vs KRC Genk II?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.