Belgium - First Division BHerman VanderpoortenstadionData current as of 01 September 2026

Lierse Kempenzonen vs Patro Eisden: match statistics

Lierse Kempenzonen vs Patro Eisden: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Lierse Kempenzonen played Patro Eisden in First Division B (Belgium). The match was played on 22 August 2026. Venue: Herman Vanderpoortenstadion. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

Lierse Kempenzonen: 0-0-1, 0.00 points/match. Patro Eisden: 1-0-0, 3.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Lierse Kempenzonen scores 0.00 and concedes 3.00 goals per match. Patro Eisden scores 2.00 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.91 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Lierse Kempenzonen 0%, Patro Eisden 100%. Over 2.5: Lierse Kempenzonen 100%, Patro Eisden 100%. League level: BTTS 45%, Over 2.5 64%.

xG, shots and style

Patro Eisden has higher xG: 1.81 vs 1.25. Lierse Kempenzonen: 8.0 shots per match, Patro Eisden: 18.0.

Match halves

Lierse Kempenzonen: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.00. Patro Eisden: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 2.00.

Goals by minute

Lierse Kempenzonen: 0-15 (0 goals). Patro Eisden: 76-90+ (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

First Division B: 2.91 goals per match, BTTS 45%, Over 2.5 64%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-2. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Patro Eisden head into the match after winning their only game of the season, scoring 2 goals and conceding just 1, while Lierse Kempenzonen lost their opening fixture 0:3. In their last five appearances, the visitors have scored 9 goals—three times as many as the hosts’ 3—and have also averaged 1.4 points per game compared with Lierse’s 1.0. Patro have won 2 of their last 5 matches, along with 1 draw, whereas Lierse have managed just 1 win and suffered 2 defeats during that period. Both defences have conceded 7 goals over their last five matches, so the visitors’ advantage is primarily driven by their significantly greater attacking efficiency. Home advantage and the possibility of a closely contested match increase the likelihood of a draw, but a Patro Eisden victory remains the more probable outcome.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

A scenario in which both teams score is slightly more likely, as Patro Eisden have averaged 1.8 goals in their last 5 matches, while Lierse Kempenzonen have conceded 1.4 goals per game over the same period. The hosts have scored only 0.6 goals per game in their last five outings, but their average xG stands at 1.38, almost identical to the 1.38 xG allowed by Patro Eisden. The visitors also create a regular threat, recording 1.57 xG per match, while Lierse’s defence allows opponents 1.40 xG. BTTS - Yes has landed in 40% of Lierse’s and 60% of Patro’s last five matches, providing a moderate but positive signal for a goal from each side; however, the pick is not decisive, as the league-wide BTTS average is only 43%.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Patro Eisden’s latest form supports a goals-based scenario, as the team has averaged 1.8 goals scored over its last 5 matches, while Lierse Kempenzonen conceded an average of 1.4 goals per game during this period. The hosts have managed just 0.6 goals per game across their five most recent appearances, but Patro allowed opponents an average of 1.4 goals, while Lierse’s average xG stands at 1.38. The combined expected goals total of 2.65 is clearly above the 1.5 threshold, although it does not provide an equally strong edge on the 2.5 line. In Patro’s last five matches, 60% went over 2.5 goals, compared with just 20% for Lierse, which limits confidence in the higher over. The strongest selection remains Over 1.5 goals, as the projection anticipates at least two goals with a probability of 74%.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely HT/FT outcome is a draw at half-time followed by a Patro Eisden win, as Lierse have averaged just 0.6 goals per match over their last five games, compared with 1.8 for Patro. The opening phases are typically low-scoring: the hosts have averaged 0.2 goals before the break and the visitors 0.4, while neither team has recorded more than one first-half goal in any of their last five matches. After the break, the attacking advantage shifts to Patro, who average 1.4 goals in second halves, compared with 0.4 for Lierse. The hosts concede an average of 1.0 goal after half-time, while Patro have won the second half in 40% of their last matches, supporting a scenario in which the visitors complete the turnaround after a level first half.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
2 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

62Possession (%)38
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
10Shots18
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
6Shots on target5
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
1.31xG1.91
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
7Corners2
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
35Dangerous attacks60
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
15Fouls12
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
4Cards2
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
0Goals scored / match2
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
3Goals conceded / match1
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
57%Average possession38%
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
1Shots on target / match5
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

8Shots per match18
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
1Shots on target5
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
0%Shot conversion11.1%
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
57%Possession38%
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
1.25xG for1.81
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
1.08xG against0.89
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden

Shooting quality

Lierse Kempenzonen: BalancedPatro Eisden: Attacking
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
Accuracy (shots on target)13%28%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.160.10
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.000.40

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Lierse Kempenzonen
L
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W0% R100% P
Season (W-D-L)
0-0-1
0.00 pts / match · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-1
0.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-0-0
Last 5 at home
0-0-0
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.0Goals conceded: 3.0xG: 1.25Opponent xG: 1.08BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 100%
Patro Eisden
W
5 wins in a row
Season result split
100% W0% R0% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-0-0
3.00 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-0
3.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-0
Last 5 away
0-0-0
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.81Opponent xG: 0.89BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Patro Eisden is 200% better for: goals conceded per match.

3 goals / match - Lierse Kempenzonen · 1 goals / match - Patro Eisden

Lierse Kempenzonen scoring profile: mixed

Lierse Kempenzonen scores in 0% of matches (0 of 1 matches), while Patro Eisden keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 1 matches).

Patro Eisden scoring profile: very strong

Patro Eisden scores in 100% of matches (1 of 1 matches), while Lierse Kempenzonen keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 1 matches).

0Goals scored (season)2
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
3Goals conceded (season)1
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
3Average goals in match3
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
0Goals scored (last 5)2
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
3Goals conceded (last 5)1
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden

How often they score at least...

0%1 goal100%
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
0%2 goals100%
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
0%3 goals0%
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
0%4 goals0%
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal100%
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
100%2 goals0%
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
100%3 goals0%
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
0%4 goals0%
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

45%
League average

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time0%
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
0%Scored in both halves0%
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden

BTTS and goal count

0%Min. 3 goals and BTTS100%
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
100%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
0%BTTS - last 5100%
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
0%Min. 2 goals before half-time0%
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
100%Min. 2 goals after half-time100%
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Lierse Kempenzonen - half-time state
0% leading0% draw100% trailing
Patro Eisden - half-time state
0% leading0% draw100% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0Points per match (1st half)0
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
0Goals scored (1st half)0
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
1Goals conceded (1st half)1
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
1Average goals (1st half)1
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
0%Clean sheet before half-time0%
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
100%No goal before half-time100%
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden

After half-time (2nd half)

0Points per match (2nd half)3
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
0Goals scored (2nd half)2
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
2Goals conceded (2nd half)0
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
2Average goals (2nd half)2
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
0%Clean sheet after half-time100%
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
100%No goal after half-time0%
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden

Lierse Kempenzonen - second-half results

0% W0% R100% P
0
Half-time points
0
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
0
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.00
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time+1.0

Concedes 1.0 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Patro Eisden - second-half results

100% W0% R0% P
0
Half-time points
0
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
3
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.00
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time-1.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Lierse Kempenzonen - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.000.00
Goals scored / match0.00.0
Goals conceded / match1.02.0
Average goals in match1.02.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals0%100%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet0%0%
No goal100%100%
Goal difference-1-2
Half-time: 0% leading - 0% draw - 100% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 0% draw - 100% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Patro Eisden - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.003.00
Goals scored / match0.02.0
Goals conceded / match1.00.0
Average goals in match1.02.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals0%100%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet0%100%
No goal100%0%
Goal difference-1+2
Half-time: 0% leading - 0% draw - 100% trailing
2nd half: 100% won - 0% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Lierse Kempenzonen
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
0
1
31-45
0
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
0
2
76-90

Concedes most in 76-90 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Patro Eisden
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
0
1
31-45
0
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
2
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.00
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.5 : 2.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
103%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
0%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
0%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Lierse Kempenzonen

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.17
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-3.17
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
0.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-1.25
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-1.92
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
0%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
330%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Patro Eisden

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.92
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.08
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.19
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.11
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
220%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
50%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+2.0
Late goals
100% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
100%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division B).

Teams vs league

Lierse KempenzonenLigaPatro Eisden
Average goals in match 3.002.91 3.00
Both teams scored 0%45% 100%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 100%64% 100%
Clean sheets 0%27% 0%
Goal before half-time 100%91% 100%
Goal after half-time 100%73% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.91
Average goals per match
45%
Both teams scored
64%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
2.00
Home goals / match
0.91
Away goals / match
+120%
Home attack advantage
+54%
Home defence advantage
+46%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
91%
1 goal
18%
2 goals
0%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
64%
2 goals
36%
3 goals
9%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Patro EisdenYellow cardLouis Verstraete
  2. Patro EisdenGoalRadja Nainggolan
  3. Lierse KempenzonenYellow cardCristian Makate Bokoya
  4. Lierse KempenzonenYellow cardNoam Mayoka-Tika
  5. Lierse KempenzonenGoalCristian Makate BokoyaAssist: Samih El Touile
  6. Lierse KempenzonenSubstitutionOn: Thiebe Van ElsuwegeOff: Sam Vanderhallen
  7. Lierse KempenzonenGoalDaan De PeuterAssist: Marko Mitrovic
  8. Patro EisdenSubstitutionOn: Hüseyin ErtürkOff: Justin Munezero
  9. Patro EisdenSubstitutionOn: Kjetil BorryOff: Tsubasa Kasayanagi
  10. Patro EisdenYellow cardHaji Suleiman Haji Ali Mnoga
  11. Lierse KempenzonenYellow cardChristian Nsonga Fopossi Kouam
  12. Lierse KempenzonenYellow cardAlexandre Stanic

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Lierse Kempenzonen 0 - 0 - 2 Patro Eisden. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

KSK Lierse Kempenzonen
1 : 2
Patro Eisden Maasmechelen
Patro Eisden Maasmechelen
2 : 1
KSK Lierse Kempenzonen

FAQ

What was the result of Lierse Kempenzonen vs Patro Eisden?

The First Division B match finished Lierse Kempenzonen 2:1 Patro Eisden. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Lierse Kempenzonen and Patro Eisden?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Lierse Kempenzonen won 0, Patro Eisden won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Lierse Kempenzonen vs Patro Eisden?

Lierse Kempenzonen score 0.00 goals per game on average and Patro Eisden 2.00. The First Division B average is 2.91 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 64% of games. Both teams score in 0% of Lierse Kempenzonen's matches and 100% of Patro Eisden's.

What form are Lierse Kempenzonen and Patro Eisden in?

Over the last 5 games Lierse Kempenzonen have a 0-0-1 record (0.00 points per game) and Patro Eisden 1-0-0 (3.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Lierse Kempenzonen vs Patro Eisden?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Lierse Kempenzonen vs Patro Eisden: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.