Uruguay - Primera DivisiónParque Alfredo Víctor VieraData current as of 08 September 2026

Liverpool FC Montevideo vs Racing: match statistics

Liverpool FC Montevideo vs Racing: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Liverpool FC Montevideo played Racing in Primera División (Uruguay). The match was played on 22 May 2026. Venue: Parque Alfredo Víctor Viera. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

Liverpool FC Montevideo: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Racing: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Liverpool FC Montevideo scores 1.31 and concedes 1.25 goals per match. Racing scores 1.50 and concedes 0.88. League average: 2.51 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Liverpool FC Montevideo 50%, Racing 56%. Over 2.5: Liverpool FC Montevideo 44%, Racing 38%. League level: BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 48%.

xG, shots and style

Racing has higher xG: 1.57 vs 1.38. Liverpool FC Montevideo: 11.3 shots per match, Racing: 12.6.

Match halves

Liverpool FC Montevideo: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.50. Racing: half-time lead 44%, second-half goals 0.75.

Goals by minute

Liverpool FC Montevideo: 31-45+ (6 goals). Racing: 76-90+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Primera División: 2.51 goals per match, BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 48%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 0-2-1. Average goals 2.33, BTTS 67%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Racing is the favorite for this match: they sit 2nd in the table while Liverpool FC Montevideo are 7th; the visitors have 10 wins this season versus the hosts' 5. In their last five games Racing averages 1.6 points per game (2 wins, 2 draws, 1 loss), whereas the hosts average only 0.8 points per game (1 win, 1 draw, 3 losses). Defensively Racing performs better — they concede an average of 0.86 goals away, while Liverpool concede 1.43 at home; over the season the visitors have conceded 14 goals compared to the hosts' 20. Chance quality also favors Racing: average xG is 1.56 for the visitors versus 1.40 for the hosts, and the hosts have a higher percentage of matches without scoring (29% vs 14%) despite 54% possession at home. Considering the advantage in number of wins (10 vs 5), higher average points in the last 5 matches (1.6 vs 0.8) and lower average goals conceded (0.86 vs 1.43), I predict a Racing win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Season indicators show a moderate bias toward BTTS: home teams have BTTS in 56% of matches, away teams in 57%, with a league average of 54%. Offensively both sides generate similar xG (home 1.57 vs away 1.56) and score on average 1.56 and 1.43 goals per match, so both can create offensive threat. Defensively they concede on average 0.89 (home) and 0.86 (away) seasonally, but xG against is 1.04 for home and 1.22 for away, suggesting the away side exposes themselves to more scoring opportunities. In the last 5 matches home had BTTS in 60% (scored 6, conceded 7; avg 1.2 and 1.4), away in 40% (scored 4, conceded 4; avg 0.8 and 0.8), with home posting more shots on target 4.78 vs 3.86. Considering season BTTS ~56–57%, similar offensive xG 1.57/1.56 and higher xG against for away (1.22), I favour the 'yes' market — 62% for 'yes' and 38% for 'no'.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

After balancing attack and defense data, expected goals are 1.30 for Liverpool FC Montevideo and 1.23 for Racing, yielding a total of 2.53 goals. Home attack xG is 1.57 versus 1.56 for the away side, while xG conceded is 1.04 (home) and 1.22 (away), which supports a ~2.5 goals forecast. Seasonally, home matches have finished with over 1.5 goals in 67% of cases and away matches in 71%; additionally, the percentage of fixtures where both teams scored is 56% and 57%, respectively, increasing the likelihood of at least two goals. Poisson calculations with λ=2.53 produce roughly a 72% probability for Over 1.5, about 46% for Over 2.5 and ~25% for Over 3.5, making Over 1.5 the strongest signal. The hosts average 4.78 shots on target versus 3.86 for their opponents and have a higher conversion rate (13% vs 11%), which further supports Over 1.5 as the best option.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Racing appears the favorite for the final victory: they have a 71% win rate this season and average 2.29 points per game versus 56% and 2.0 for the home side, so the pick on the away win is the strongest. Historically the hosts have led at the break more often (56% vs 29%) and score on average 0.89 goals by half-time versus 0.57 for Racing, but the last five matches reverse the trend — the away side led at the break in 3 of 5 games (60%) while the hosts did so in 0 of 5, and the half-time points average is 2.2 vs 0.4. Additionally the visitors have scored 2 goals in minutes 0–15 versus 1 for the hosts, and the xG of both teams is almost identical (1.57 vs 1.56), which suggests current form and finishing are decisive. As a result I expect Racing to hold the lead before or shortly after half-time and to see out the win, hence 2/2 is the strongest signal.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

47Possession (%)53
Liverpool FC MontevideoRacing
10Shots12
Liverpool FC MontevideoRacing
1Shots on target3
Liverpool FC MontevideoRacing
1.13xG1.51
Liverpool FC MontevideoRacing
3Corners7
Liverpool FC MontevideoRacing
58Dangerous attacks75
Liverpool FC MontevideoRacing
18Fouls18
Liverpool FC MontevideoRacing
6Cards3
Liverpool FC MontevideoRacing

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Liverpool FC MontevideoRacing
1.31Goals scored / match1.5
Liverpool FC MontevideoRacing
1.25Goals conceded / match0.88
Liverpool FC MontevideoRacing
51%Average possession47%
Liverpool FC MontevideoRacing
4.06Shots on target / match4.38
Liverpool FC MontevideoRacing

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.25Shots per match12.63
Liverpool FC MontevideoRacing
4.06Shots on target4.38
Liverpool FC MontevideoRacing
11.7%Shot conversion11.9%
Liverpool FC MontevideoRacing
51%Possession47%
Liverpool FC MontevideoRacing
1.38xG for1.57
Liverpool FC MontevideoRacing
1.38xG against1.11
Liverpool FC MontevideoRacing

Shooting quality

Liverpool FC Montevideo: BalancedRacing: Balanced
Liverpool FC MontevideoRacing
Accuracy (shots on target)36%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.320.34

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Racing is 100% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Liverpool FC Montevideo · 1.6 pts / match - Racing

Liverpool FC Montevideo
LDWLL
Season result split
31% W31% R38% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-5-6
1.25 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-2-3
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
DDLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.39Opponent xG: 1.31BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Racing
DWDLW
Season result split
63% W25% R13% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-4-2
2.13 pts / match · goal difference +10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-1-1
Last 5 away
4-0-1
WWWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.54Opponent xG: 1.10BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Racing is 15% better for: goals scored per match.

1.31 goals / match - Liverpool FC Montevideo · 1.5 goals / match - Racing

Racing is 42% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.25 goals / match - Liverpool FC Montevideo · 0.88 goals / match - Racing

Liverpool FC Montevideo scoring profile: strong

Liverpool FC Montevideo scores in 75% of matches (12 of 16 matches), while Racing keeps a clean sheet in 38% (6 of 16 matches).

Racing scoring profile: very strong

Racing scores in 94% of matches (15 of 16 matches), while Liverpool FC Montevideo keeps a clean sheet in 31% (5 of 16 matches).

21Goals scored (season)24
Liverpool FC MontevideoRacing
20Goals conceded (season)14
Liverpool FC MontevideoRacing
2.56Average goals in match2.38
Liverpool FC MontevideoRacing
6Goals scored (last 5)4
Liverpool FC MontevideoRacing
7Goals conceded (last 5)4
Liverpool FC MontevideoRacing

How often they score at least...

75%1 goal94%
Liverpool FC MontevideoRacing
38%2 goals38%
Liverpool FC MontevideoRacing
19%3 goals13%
Liverpool FC MontevideoRacing
0%4 goals6%
Liverpool FC MontevideoRacing

How often they concede at least...

69%1 goal63%
Liverpool FC MontevideoRacing
38%2 goals13%
Liverpool FC MontevideoRacing
19%3 goals6%
Liverpool FC MontevideoRacing
0%4 goals6%
Liverpool FC MontevideoRacing

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

50%
Liverpool FC Montevideo - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.8 of 16 matches
54%
League average

Goal patterns

31%BTTS at half-time31%
Liverpool FC MontevideoRacing
13%BTTS in both halves6%
Liverpool FC MontevideoRacing
19%Scored in both halves25%
Liverpool FC MontevideoRacing

BTTS and goal count

38%Min. 3 goals and BTTS31%
Liverpool FC MontevideoRacing
6%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
Liverpool FC MontevideoRacing
60%BTTS - last 540%
Liverpool FC MontevideoRacing

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

75%Min. 1 goal before half-time75%
Liverpool FC MontevideoRacing
44%Min. 2 goals before half-time31%
Liverpool FC MontevideoRacing
19%Min. 3 goals before half-time13%
Liverpool FC MontevideoRacing

2nd half

69%Min. 1 goal after half-time69%
Liverpool FC MontevideoRacing
31%Min. 2 goals after half-time38%
Liverpool FC MontevideoRacing
6%Min. 3 goals after half-time13%
Liverpool FC MontevideoRacing

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Racing is 40% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.25 pts / match - Liverpool FC Montevideo · 1.75 pts / match - Racing

Liverpool FC Montevideo - half-time state
25% leading50% draw25% trailing
Racing - half-time state
44% leading44% draw13% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.25Points per match (1st half)1.75
Liverpool FC MontevideoRacing
0.81Goals scored (1st half)0.75
Liverpool FC MontevideoRacing
0.69Goals conceded (1st half)0.44
Liverpool FC MontevideoRacing
1.5Average goals (1st half)1.19
Liverpool FC MontevideoRacing
50%Clean sheet before half-time63%
Liverpool FC MontevideoRacing
44%No goal before half-time31%
Liverpool FC MontevideoRacing

After half-time (2nd half)

1.06Points per match (2nd half)1.5
Liverpool FC MontevideoRacing
0.5Goals scored (2nd half)0.75
Liverpool FC MontevideoRacing
0.56Goals conceded (2nd half)0.44
Liverpool FC MontevideoRacing
1.06Average goals (2nd half)1.19
Liverpool FC MontevideoRacing
50%Clean sheet after half-time69%
Liverpool FC MontevideoRacing
63%No goal after half-time50%
Liverpool FC MontevideoRacing

Liverpool FC Montevideo - second-half results

19% W50% R31% P
20
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
17
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.25
PPG before half-time
Lead holding124%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 31%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Racing - second-half results

38% W38% R25% P
28
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
24
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.75
PPG before half-time
Lead holding143%

Leads at half-time in 44% of matches and wins 63%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Liverpool FC Montevideo - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.401.60
Goals scored / match0.40.8
Goals conceded / match1.00.4
Average goals in match1.41.2
1 goal80%60%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet20%80%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-3+2
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2
Racing - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.200.60
Goals scored / match0.80.0
Goals conceded / match0.20.6
Average goals in match1.00.6
1 goal80%40%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal20%100%
Goal difference+3-3
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Liverpool FC Montevideo
ScoredConceded
5
2
0-15
2
2
16-30
6
7
31-45
2
3
46-60
4
2
61-75
2
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Racing
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
5
3
16-30
4
2
31-45
1
1
46-60
5
2
61-75
6
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.47
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
98%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
53%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-6%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
71%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Liverpool FC Montevideo

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
0.00
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.06
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.07
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.13
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
92%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
115%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.45
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
10% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 24% come in the first quarter-hour.
10%

Racing

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.46
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.16
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.07
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.23
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
138%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
62%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.53
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Primera División).

Teams vs league

Liverpool FC MontevideoLigaRacing
Average goals in match 2.562.51 2.38
Both teams scored 50%54% 56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 44%48% 38%
Clean sheets 31%25% 38%
Goal before half-time 75%73% 75%
Goal after half-time 69%76% 69%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.51
Average goals per match
54%
Both teams scored
48%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
25%
Clean sheets
1.42
Home goals / match
1.09
Away goals / match
+30%
Home attack advantage
+23%
Home defence advantage
+12%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Liverpool FC MontevideoYellow cardSantiago Laquidaín
  2. Liverpool FC MontevideoYellow cardRúben Daniel Bentancourt Morales
  3. Liverpool FC MontevideoYellow cardRamiro Matías Degregorio
  4. RacingYellow cardAgustín Álvarez Wallace
  5. Liverpool FC MontevideoSubstitutionOn: Renzo Neri Machado PertussoOff: Rúben Daniel Bentancourt Morales
  6. Liverpool FC MontevideoYellow cardLucas Acosta Moreno
  7. Liverpool FC MontevideoYellow cardNicolás Garayalde
  8. Liverpool FC MontevideoYellow cardFacundo Barcelo Viera

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Alberto Javier FeresMatches officiated: 13
6.46Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 223%Home wins38%Draws38%Away wins

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Liverpool FC Montevideo 0 - 2 - 1 Racing. Average goals 2.33, both teams scored in 67% matches.

Racing
1 : 0
Liverpool FC Montevideo
Liverpool FC Montevideo
2 : 2
Racing Club de Montevideo
Racing Club de Montevideo
1 : 1
Liverpool FC Montevideo

FAQ

What was the result of Liverpool FC Montevideo vs Racing?

The Primera División match finished Liverpool FC Montevideo 0:0 Racing. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Liverpool FC Montevideo and Racing?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Liverpool FC Montevideo won 0, Racing won 1 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 2.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Liverpool FC Montevideo vs Racing?

Liverpool FC Montevideo score 1.31 goals per game on average and Racing 1.50. The Primera División average is 2.51 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 48% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Liverpool FC Montevideo's matches and 56% of Racing's.

What form are Liverpool FC Montevideo and Racing in?

Over the last 5 games Liverpool FC Montevideo have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Racing 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Liverpool FC Montevideo vs Racing?

The statistical background for Liverpool FC Montevideo vs Racing — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.