Ukraine - Ukrainian Premier LeagueCherkasy ArenaData current as of 30 August 2026

LNZ Cherkasy vs Veres: match statistics

Reasoning:

Full analysis and pick in the app

Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.

Check analysis and pick

LNZ Cherkasy vs Veres: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

LNZ Cherkasy play Veres in Ukrainian Premier League (Ukraine). The match date is 30 August 2026. Venue: Cherkasy Arena.

Current form

LNZ Cherkasy: 1-1-1, 1.33 points/match. Veres: 0-1-2, 0.33 points/match.

Goal statistics

LNZ Cherkasy scores 0.67 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Veres scores 0.33 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.15 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: LNZ Cherkasy 0%, Veres 33%. Over 2.5: LNZ Cherkasy 33%, Veres 33%. League level: BTTS 37%, Over 2.5 44%.

xG, shots and style

LNZ Cherkasy has higher xG: 1.59 vs 0.79. LNZ Cherkasy: 11.7 shots per match, Veres: 6.0.

Match halves

LNZ Cherkasy: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.33. Veres: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.33.

Goals by minute

LNZ Cherkasy: 31-45+ (1 goals). Veres: 46-60 (1 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ukrainian Premier League: 2.15 goals per match, BTTS 37%, Over 2.5 44%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-1. Average goals 2.50, BTTS 0%.

Before the match

1X2 odds

(1.46)
(4.06)
(8.10)

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.67Goals scored / match0.33
LNZ CherkasyVeres
1Goals conceded / match1
LNZ CherkasyVeres
52%Average possession35%
LNZ CherkasyVeres
4.67Shots on target / match3
LNZ CherkasyVeres

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.67Shots per match6
LNZ CherkasyVeres
4.67Shots on target3
LNZ CherkasyVeres
5.7%Shot conversion5.6%
LNZ CherkasyVeres
52%Possession35%
LNZ CherkasyVeres
1.59xG for0.79
LNZ CherkasyVeres
0.72xG against1.54
LNZ CherkasyVeres

Shooting quality

LNZ Cherkasy: BalancedVeres: Balanced
LNZ CherkasyVeres
Accuracy (shots on target)40%50%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.140.11

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

LNZ Cherkasy is 303% better for: last-5 form.

1.33 pts / match - LNZ Cherkasy · 0.33 pts / match - Veres

LNZ Cherkasy
DLW
Season result split
33% W33% R33% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-1-1
1.33 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-1
1.33 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-0
Last 5 at home
1-0-0
W
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.7Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.59Opponent xG: 0.72BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 33%
Veres
LLD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W33% R67% P
Season (W-D-L)
0-1-2
0.33 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-2
0.33 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-1-1
Last 5 away
0-1-1
LD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.3Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 0.79Opponent xG: 1.54BTTS: 33%Over 2.5: 33%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

LNZ Cherkasy is 103% better for: goals scored per match.

0.67 goals / match - LNZ Cherkasy · 0.33 goals / match - Veres

LNZ Cherkasy scoring profile: mixed

LNZ Cherkasy scores in 33% of matches (1 of 3 matches), while Veres keeps a clean sheet in 33% (1 of 3 matches).

Veres scoring profile: more difficult

Veres scores in 33% of matches (1 of 3 matches), while LNZ Cherkasy keeps a clean sheet in 67% (2 of 3 matches).

2Goals scored (season)1
LNZ CherkasyVeres
3Goals conceded (season)3
LNZ CherkasyVeres
1.67Average goals in match1.33
LNZ CherkasyVeres
2Goals scored (last 5)1
LNZ CherkasyVeres
3Goals conceded (last 5)3
LNZ CherkasyVeres

How often they score at least...

33%1 goal33%
LNZ CherkasyVeres
33%2 goals0%
LNZ CherkasyVeres
0%3 goals0%
LNZ CherkasyVeres
0%4 goals0%
LNZ CherkasyVeres

How often they concede at least...

33%1 goal67%
LNZ CherkasyVeres
33%2 goals33%
LNZ CherkasyVeres
33%3 goals0%
LNZ CherkasyVeres
0%4 goals0%
LNZ CherkasyVeres

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time0%
LNZ CherkasyVeres
0%BTTS in both halves0%
LNZ CherkasyVeres
33%Scored in both halves0%
LNZ CherkasyVeres

BTTS and goal count

0%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
LNZ CherkasyVeres
33%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
LNZ CherkasyVeres
0%BTTS - last 533%
LNZ CherkasyVeres

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

33%Min. 1 goal before half-time33%
LNZ CherkasyVeres
0%Min. 2 goals before half-time0%
LNZ CherkasyVeres
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
LNZ CherkasyVeres

2nd half

67%Min. 1 goal after half-time67%
LNZ CherkasyVeres
33%Min. 2 goals after half-time33%
LNZ CherkasyVeres
33%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
LNZ CherkasyVeres

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

LNZ Cherkasy is 149% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.67 pts / match - LNZ Cherkasy · 0.67 pts / match - Veres

LNZ Cherkasy - half-time state
33% leading67% draw0% trailing
Veres - half-time state
0% leading67% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.67Points per match (1st half)0.67
LNZ CherkasyVeres
0.33Goals scored (1st half)0
LNZ CherkasyVeres
0Goals conceded (1st half)0.33
LNZ CherkasyVeres
0.33Average goals (1st half)0.33
LNZ CherkasyVeres
100%Clean sheet before half-time67%
LNZ CherkasyVeres
67%No goal before half-time100%
LNZ CherkasyVeres

After half-time (2nd half)

1.33Points per match (2nd half)0.67
LNZ CherkasyVeres
0.33Goals scored (2nd half)0.33
LNZ CherkasyVeres
1Goals conceded (2nd half)0.67
LNZ CherkasyVeres
1.33Average goals (2nd half)1
LNZ CherkasyVeres
67%Clean sheet after half-time33%
LNZ CherkasyVeres
67%No goal after half-time67%
LNZ CherkasyVeres

LNZ Cherkasy - second-half results

33% W33% R33% P
5
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
4
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.67
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+1.0

Concedes 1.0 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Veres - second-half results

0% W67% R33% P
2
Half-time points
0
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
2
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.67
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

LNZ Cherkasy - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.671.33
Goals scored / match0.30.3
Goals conceded / match0.01.0
Average goals in match0.31.3
1 goal33%67%
2 goals0%33%
3 goals0%33%
Clean sheet100%67%
No goal67%67%
Goal difference+1-2
Half-time: 33% leading - 67% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 33% won - 33% draw - 33% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Veres - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.670.67
Goals scored / match0.00.3
Goals conceded / match0.30.7
Average goals in match0.31.0
1 goal33%67%
2 goals0%33%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet67%33%
No goal100%67%
Goal difference-1-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 67% draw - 33% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 67% draw - 33% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

LNZ Cherkasy
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
1
0
31-45
1
0
46-60
0
1
61-75
0
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (1 goal). Concedes most in 76-90 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Veres
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
0
1
31-45
1
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
0
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (1 goal). Concedes most in 76-90 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.50
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.8 : 0.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
70%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
17%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+67%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
11%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
45%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 2 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

LNZ Cherkasy

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.87
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.20
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.92
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.28
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
56%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
104%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Veres

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.75
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.08
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.46
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.54
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
34%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
84%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ukrainian Premier League).

Teams vs league

LNZ CherkasyLigaVeres
Average goals in match 1.672.15 1.33
Both teams scored 0%37% 33%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 33%44% 33%
Clean sheets 67%43% 33%
Goal before half-time 33%52% 33%
Goal after half-time 67%74% 67%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.15
Average goals per match
37%
Both teams scored
44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
43%
Clean sheets
1.19
Home goals / match
0.96
Away goals / match
+24%
Home attack advantage
+19%
Home defence advantage
+4%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
52%
1 goal
19%
2 goals
0%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): LNZ Cherkasy 1 - 0 - 1 Veres. Average goals 2.50, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FC Veres Rivne
0 : 3
LNZ Cherkasy FC
LNZ Cherkasy FC
0 : 2
FC Veres Rivne

FAQ

When do LNZ Cherkasy and Veres play?

LNZ Cherkasy face Veres on 30 August 2026 in Ukrainian Premier League at Cherkasy Arena. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.

What is the head-to-head record between LNZ Cherkasy and Veres?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches LNZ Cherkasy won 1, Veres won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before LNZ Cherkasy vs Veres?

LNZ Cherkasy score 0.67 goals per game on average and Veres 0.33. The Ukrainian Premier League average is 2.15 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 0% of LNZ Cherkasy's matches and 33% of Veres's.

What form are LNZ Cherkasy and Veres in?

Over the last 5 games LNZ Cherkasy have a 1-1-1 record (1.33 points per game) and Veres 0-1-2 (0.33 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for LNZ Cherkasy vs Veres?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for LNZ Cherkasy vs Veres: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.