United States - USL ChampionshipData current as of 30 August 2026

Louisville City vs Detroit City FC: match statistics

Louisville City vs Detroit City FC: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Louisville City played Detroit City FC in USL Championship (United States). The match was played on 30 August 2026. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

Louisville City: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Detroit City FC: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Louisville City scores 1.63 and concedes 1.56 goals per match. Detroit City FC scores 1.53 and concedes 0.93. League average: 2.79 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Louisville City 56%, Detroit City FC 53%. Over 2.5: Louisville City 50%, Detroit City FC 53%. League level: BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 52%.

xG, shots and style

Louisville City has higher xG: 1.95 vs 1.64. Louisville City: 16.5 shots per match, Detroit City FC: 14.1.

Match halves

Louisville City: half-time lead 6%, second-half goals 1.00. Detroit City FC: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 1.00.

Goals by minute

Louisville City: 76-90+ (7 goals). Detroit City FC: 76-90+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

USL Championship: 2.79 goals per match, BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 52%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 7 previous H2H matches were available: 3-0-4. Average goals 2.43, BTTS 43%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Louisville City have a clear home advantage: they win 50% of their home matches, while Detroit City FC win only 30% of their away fixtures and lose as many as 40%. At home, the hosts create chances worth an average xG of 2.20, compared with just 1.46 for the visitors away from home, and they also record 19 shots per match versus Detroit’s 12.2. Detroit do sit 3rd and have conceded only 3 goals in their last five matches, but their attack has scored just 4 goals during that period. Louisville are in weaker current form, with 1 win in their last 5 appearances and 10 goals conceded, but the superior quality of chances created and home advantage slightly shift the prediction in favor of the hosts. A draw remains a realistic outcome, as both teams concede an average of 1.3 goals in their respective home and away matches.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Louisville City defend exceptionally well at home, conceding an average of just 0.4 goals per match and keeping a clean sheet in 60% of their games. Detroit City FC have averaged 1.4 goals away from home this season, but their average has dropped to 0.8 goals over the last five matches, with BTTS occurring in only 20% of those games. The hosts should have good opportunities to score, as they create an average of 1.66 xG, while Detroit allow opponents 1.43 xG and concede an average of 1.3 goals. A warning sign for the BTTS - No pick is Louisville’s recent defensive form, having conceded 10 goals in five matches, but Detroit have allowed just 0.6 goals per game over the same period. Overall, the balance of evidence points slightly more strongly towards a scenario in which at least one team—most likely the visitors—fails to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Louisville conceded an average of just 0.4 goals per home game and kept a clean sheet in 60% of matches, significantly limiting Detroit’s attacking potential. The visitors have scored only 0.8 goals per game over their last five matches, with average xG of 1.31, while Louisville’s defensive xG stands at 1.00 for the season. Historically, the hosts’ matches have never exceeded 3.5 goals, while this outcome occurred in only 20% of Detroit’s games. Although Louisville have scored 1.8 goals and conceded 2.0 per game across their last five outings, Detroit’s solid recent defensive form—allowing just 3 goals in five matches—supports keeping the total goals low. The projected total of 2.25 goals points to a clear preference for Under 3.5 goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Louisville City have been clearly stronger throughout the season: they win 70% of their matches and average 2.3 points per game, while Detroit win 30% of their matches with an average of 1.2 points. The hosts concede just 0.4 goals per match and keep a clean sheet in 60% of their games, whereas Detroit concede an average of 1.3 goals away from home and have kept clean sheets in only 30% of matches. In the first halves, Louisville led at the break in 30% of their matches, but this figure has risen to 60% over their last five games, with an average of 1.0 goal scored before half-time. Detroit have recently scored only 0.4 goals in the first half, while Louisville concede just 0.2 goals before the break during this period, which supports the hosts taking the lead at half-time. After the interval, Louisville have consistently performed best, avoiding defeat in any second half this season and conceding only 0.1 goals on average, so the most likely scenario remains a Louisville lead at the break followed by a home win at full-time: 1/1.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

-1Possession (%)-1
Louisville CityDetroit City FC
-1Shots-1
Louisville CityDetroit City FC
-1Shots on target-1
Louisville CityDetroit City FC
0xG0
Louisville CityDetroit City FC
-1Corners-1
Louisville CityDetroit City FC
0Dangerous attacks0
Louisville CityDetroit City FC
-1Fouls-1
Louisville CityDetroit City FC
-1Cards-1
Louisville CityDetroit City FC

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Louisville CityDetroit City FC
1.63Goals scored / match1.53
Louisville CityDetroit City FC
1.56Goals conceded / match0.93
Louisville CityDetroit City FC
53%Average possession53%
Louisville CityDetroit City FC
5Shots on target / match4.87
Louisville CityDetroit City FC

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

16.5Shots per match14.13
Louisville CityDetroit City FC
5Shots on target4.87
Louisville CityDetroit City FC
9.8%Shot conversion10.8%
Louisville CityDetroit City FC
53%Possession53%
Louisville CityDetroit City FC
1.95xG for1.64
Louisville CityDetroit City FC
1.18xG against1.26
Louisville CityDetroit City FC

Shooting quality

Louisville City: AttackingDetroit City FC: Attacking
Louisville CityDetroit City FC
Accuracy (shots on target)30%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.31

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Detroit City FC is 25% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - Louisville City · 2 pts / match - Detroit City FC

Louisville City
DWDWL
Season result split
44% W19% R38% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-3-6
1.50 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-1-3
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
WLLDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.87Opponent xG: 1.45BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Detroit City FC
LDWWW
Season result split
53% W20% R27% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-3-4
1.80 pts / match · goal difference +9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-2-4
Last 5 away
2-1-2
LDLWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.94Opponent xG: 1.34BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Louisville City is 7% better for: goals scored per match.

1.63 goals / match - Louisville City · 1.53 goals / match - Detroit City FC

Detroit City FC is 68% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.56 goals / match - Louisville City · 0.93 goals / match - Detroit City FC

Louisville City scoring profile: strong

Louisville City scores in 81% of matches (13 of 16 matches), while Detroit City FC keeps a clean sheet in 40% (6 of 15 matches).

Detroit City FC scoring profile: very strong

Detroit City FC scores in 80% of matches (12 of 15 matches), while Louisville City keeps a clean sheet in 25% (4 of 16 matches).

26Goals scored (season)23
Louisville CityDetroit City FC
25Goals conceded (season)14
Louisville CityDetroit City FC
3.19Average goals in match2.47
Louisville CityDetroit City FC
7Goals scored (last 5)11
Louisville CityDetroit City FC
6Goals conceded (last 5)6
Louisville CityDetroit City FC

How often they score at least...

81%1 goal80%
Louisville CityDetroit City FC
44%2 goals40%
Louisville CityDetroit City FC
25%3 goals13%
Louisville CityDetroit City FC
13%4 goals7%
Louisville CityDetroit City FC

How often they concede at least...

75%1 goal60%
Louisville CityDetroit City FC
56%2 goals33%
Louisville CityDetroit City FC
19%3 goals0%
Louisville CityDetroit City FC
6%4 goals0%
Louisville CityDetroit City FC

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

58%
League average

Goal patterns

44%BTTS at half-time20%
Louisville CityDetroit City FC
25%BTTS in both halves7%
Louisville CityDetroit City FC
31%Scored in both halves27%
Louisville CityDetroit City FC

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS47%
Louisville CityDetroit City FC
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS7%
Louisville CityDetroit City FC
60%BTTS - last 560%
Louisville CityDetroit City FC

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

63%Min. 1 goal before half-time60%
Louisville CityDetroit City FC
44%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
Louisville CityDetroit City FC
19%Min. 3 goals before half-time7%
Louisville CityDetroit City FC

2nd half

94%Min. 1 goal after half-time73%
Louisville CityDetroit City FC
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time40%
Louisville CityDetroit City FC
19%Min. 3 goals after half-time20%
Louisville CityDetroit City FC

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Detroit City FC is 28% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.88 pts / match - Louisville City · 1.13 pts / match - Detroit City FC

Louisville City - half-time state
6% leading69% draw25% trailing
Detroit City FC - half-time state
20% leading53% draw27% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.88Points per match (1st half)1.13
Louisville CityDetroit City FC
0.63Goals scored (1st half)0.53
Louisville CityDetroit City FC
0.75Goals conceded (1st half)0.53
Louisville CityDetroit City FC
1.38Average goals (1st half)1.07
Louisville CityDetroit City FC
38%Clean sheet before half-time53%
Louisville CityDetroit City FC
56%No goal before half-time67%
Louisville CityDetroit City FC

After half-time (2nd half)

1.56Points per match (2nd half)2
Louisville CityDetroit City FC
1Goals scored (2nd half)1
Louisville CityDetroit City FC
0.81Goals conceded (2nd half)0.4
Louisville CityDetroit City FC
1.81Average goals (2nd half)1.4
Louisville CityDetroit City FC
44%Clean sheet after half-time67%
Louisville CityDetroit City FC
31%No goal after half-time27%
Louisville CityDetroit City FC

Louisville City - second-half results

44% W25% R31% P
14
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
25
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.88
PPG before half-time
Lead holding733%

Leads at half-time in 6% of matches and wins 44%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Detroit City FC - second-half results

53% W40% R7% P
17
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
30
Second-half points
+9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.13
PPG before half-time
Lead holding265%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 53%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Louisville City - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.60
Goals scored / match0.41.0
Goals conceded / match0.40.8
Average goals in match0.81.8
1 goal40%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference0+1
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2
Detroit City FC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.002.60
Goals scored / match0.81.4
Goals conceded / match1.00.2
Average goals in match1.81.6
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet20%80%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference-1+6
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 20% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Louisville City
ScoredConceded
1
4
0-15
6
5
16-30
3
3
31-45
4
6
46-60
5
4
61-75
7
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

Detroit City FC
ScoredConceded
4
3
0-15
1
2
16-30
3
3
31-45
6
1
46-60
2
2
61-75
7
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.83
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
101%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
55%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-14%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
65%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Louisville City

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.77
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.70
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.32
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.38
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
106%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
125%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.10
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 4% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

Detroit City FC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.38
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.22
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.11
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.33
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
122%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
60%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
30% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
30%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL Championship).

Teams vs league

Louisville CityLigaDetroit City FC
Average goals in match 3.192.79 2.47
Both teams scored 56%58% 53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 50%52% 53%
Clean sheets 25%26% 40%
Goal before half-time 63%67% 60%
Goal after half-time 94%80% 73%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.79
Average goals per match
58%
Both teams scored
52%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.54
Home goals / match
1.25
Away goals / match
+23%
Home attack advantage
+19%
Home defence advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Louisville CityYellow cardAiden McFadden
  2. Detroit City FCYellow cardMaxi Rodríguez
  3. Louisville CitySubstitutionOn: Sean TotschOff: Aiden McFadden
  4. Detroit City FCSubstitutionOn: Chisom Charles EgbuchulamOff: Darren Smith
  5. Louisville CitySubstitutionOn: Tola ShowunmiOff: Chris Donovan
  6. Detroit City FCSubstitutionOn: Benjamin MorrisOff: Maxi Rodríguez
  7. Detroit City FCYellow cardAedan Stanley

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (7): Louisville City 3 - 0 - 4 Detroit City FC. Average goals 2.43, both teams scored in 43% matches.

Detroit City FC
2 : 1
Louisville City FC
Louisville City FC
0 : 1
Detroit City FC
Louisville City FC
0 : 1
Detroit City FC
Detroit City FC
0 : 1
Louisville City FC
Louisville City FC
2 : 0
Detroit City FC
Detroit City FC
2 : 1
Louisville City
Louisville City
5 : 1
Detroit City FC

FAQ

What was the result of Louisville City vs Detroit City FC?

The USL Championship match finished Louisville City 0:0 Detroit City FC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Louisville City and Detroit City FC?

In the last 7 head-to-head matches Louisville City won 3, Detroit City FC won 4 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.43 goals, with both teams scoring in 43% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Louisville City vs Detroit City FC?

Louisville City score 1.63 goals per game on average and Detroit City FC 1.53. The USL Championship average is 2.79 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 56% of Louisville City's matches and 53% of Detroit City FC's.

What form are Louisville City and Detroit City FC in?

Over the last 5 games Louisville City have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Detroit City FC 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Louisville City vs Detroit City FC?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Louisville City vs Detroit City FC: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.