Lyn vs Kongsvinger: match statistics
Lyn vs Kongsvinger: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Lyn played Kongsvinger in First Division (Norway). The match was played on 16 May 2026. Final score: 0:3.
Current form
Lyn: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Kongsvinger: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Lyn scores 1.17 and concedes 2.00 goals per match. Kongsvinger scores 2.17 and concedes 1.00. League average: 3.40 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Lyn 33%, Kongsvinger 83%. Over 2.5: Lyn 67%, Kongsvinger 83%. League level: BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 71%.
xG, shots and style
Lyn has higher xG: 1.54 vs 1.49. Lyn: 11.8 shots per match, Kongsvinger: 12.0.
Match halves
Lyn: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.50. Kongsvinger: half-time lead 67%, second-half goals 1.17.
Goals by minute
Lyn: 16-30 (2 goals). Kongsvinger: 46-60 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
First Division: 3.40 goals per match, BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 71%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-2. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 50%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Kongsvinger is the clear favorite: they sit 2nd in the table and have an away record of 4 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses, scoring on average 2.0 goals per match and conceding 1.33 goals away. Lyn perform poorly at home — in home matches they have 0 wins, 0 draws and 4 losses, scoring on average 0.67 goals and conceding 3.33 goals per match, with a goal difference of -8. In terms of chance quality Kongsvinger register 3.67 shots on target and 19% conversion, with xG 1.27 away, while Lyn have 3.0 shots on target, only 6% conversion and xG 1.49 — meaning Lyn create similar expected chances (1.49 vs 1.27) but convert them very poorly (0.67 goals). Forms confirm the visitors' superiority: Kongsvinger average 2.2 points in the last 5 matches (form 'wwdwd'), while Lyn average 1.2 points (form 'wlllw'); additionally Lyn have conceded 8 goals in the last 5 matches versus 6 conceded by Kongsvinger. Considering the table, better shot conversion (19% vs 6%) and Lyn's significantly weaker home defense (3.33 conceded vs 1.33), I forecast an away win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal indicators clearly favor BTTS: Lyn has 67% of matches with both teams scoring, and Kongsvinger 100%, versus a league average of 53%. Offensively Lyn averages 2.33 goals per game (xG 1.72) and records 13.33 shots with 6.0 on target, while Kongsvinger averages 2.00 goals (xG 1.27) with 10.67 shots and 3.67 on target, so both sides create chances. Although Lyn conceded only 0.67 goals per game across the season, in the last 5 fixtures they have conceded 1.6 goals, and Kongsvinger 1.2 goals in their last 5, which increases the likelihood of goals from both teams. Mixed signals come from Lyn’s low BTTS rate in the last 5 (20%) versus Kongsvinger’s 100% in the last 5, but Kongsvinger’s seasonal edge and stable attacking metrics lead to a stronger indication for BTTS - Yes, therefore I assess BTTS at 75%.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I project 1.70 goals for Lyn and 1.30 for Kongsvinger, totaling 3.00 goals; this is based on xG 1.72 (Lyn) and 1.27 (Kongsvinger) and historical goal averages 2.33 (Lyn) and 2.00 (Kongsvinger). The strongest signal is that both teams have 100% of matches this season with more than 1.5 goals, while the league average is 3.34 goals per game, which strongly supports Over 1.5. Over 2.5 also looks likely: summed xG ~2.99 and season rates of matches over 2.5 are 100% for Lyn and 67% for Kongsvinger, so I assign roughly a 75% probability to Over 2.5. Over 3.5 is less likely — Lyn has 0% of matches over 3.5 goals versus 67% for Kongsvinger, therefore I estimate about 33% for Over 3.5 and 67% for Under 3.5. Additionally, Lyn averages 6.0 shots on target versus 3.67 for Kongsvinger with similar conversion rates (18% vs 19%), indicating more goal-scoring opportunities and further supporting an over bet, especially on the 1.5 line.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I project an X/1 scenario (draw at half-time, Lyn win full-time). Lyn possess very strong home metrics: 3.0 points per home match and 100% home win rate, averaging 2.33 goals scored and 0.67 conceded per home game. In the first half hosts average 0.67 goals and typically do not concede (average goals conceded by half-time 0.0), whereas Kongsvinger average 1.33 goals by half-time and led at the break in 3 of their last 5 matches (60%). The decisive factor is the second-half performance: Lyn score on average 1.67 goals in the second half versus 0.67 for the visitors, and the combined average goals in second halves is 2.33 vs 1.33, giving the hosts an advantage late on. Additionally, xG favors Lyn (1.72 vs 1.27) and they record 6.0 shots on target versus 3.67 for the opponent, so the most probable and strongest data signal is a draw at the break followed by a home turnaround to win.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Lyn | Kongsvinger | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 40% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.27 | 0.45 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Kongsvinger is 83% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / match - Lyn · 2.2 pts / match - Kongsvinger
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Kongsvinger is 85% better for: goals scored per match.
1.17 goals / match - Lyn · 2.17 goals / match - Kongsvinger
Kongsvinger is 100% better for: goals conceded per match.
2 goals / match - Lyn · 1 goals / match - Kongsvinger
Lyn scores in 67% of matches (4 of 6 matches), while Kongsvinger keeps a clean sheet in 17% (1 of 6 matches).
Kongsvinger scores in 100% of matches (6 of 6 matches), while Lyn keeps a clean sheet in 33% (2 of 6 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Lyn
Over / Under - Kongsvinger
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Kongsvinger is 133% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1 pts / match - Lyn · 2.33 pts / match - Kongsvinger
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Lyn - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Kongsvinger - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 67% of matches and wins 67%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Lyn
Kongsvinger
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division).
Teams vs league
| Lyn | Liga | Kongsvinger | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 3.17 | 3.40 | ▼ 3.17 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 33% | 54% | ▲ 83% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 67% | 71% | ▲ 83% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 33% | 23% | ▼ 17% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 50% | 75% | ▲ 83% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 83% | 85% | ▼ 83% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Lyn 0 - 0 - 2 Kongsvinger. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Lyn vs Kongsvinger?
The First Division match finished Lyn 0:3 Kongsvinger. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Lyn and Kongsvinger?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Lyn won 0, Kongsvinger won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Lyn vs Kongsvinger?
Lyn score 1.17 goals per game on average and Kongsvinger 2.17. The First Division average is 3.40 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 71% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Lyn's matches and 83% of Kongsvinger's.
What form are Lyn and Kongsvinger in?
Over the last 5 games Lyn have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Kongsvinger 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Lyn vs Kongsvinger?
The statistical background for Lyn vs Kongsvinger — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


