Maccabi Netanya vs Ironi Kiryat Shmona: match statistics
Full analysis and pick in the app
Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.
Maccabi Netanya vs Ironi Kiryat Shmona: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Maccabi Netanya play Ironi Kiryat Shmona in Israeli Premier League (Israel). The match date is 17 October 2026.
Current form
Maccabi Netanya: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Ironi Kiryat Shmona: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Maccabi Netanya scores 1.17 and concedes 1.17 goals per match. Ironi Kiryat Shmona scores 1.00 and concedes 2.33. League average: 3.10 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Maccabi Netanya 67%, Ironi Kiryat Shmona 50%. Over 2.5: Maccabi Netanya 33%, Ironi Kiryat Shmona 67%. League level: BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 67%.
xG, shots and style
Maccabi Netanya has higher xG: 1.86 vs 1.37. Maccabi Netanya: 15.2 shots per match, Ironi Kiryat Shmona: 12.2.
Match halves
Maccabi Netanya: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 1.17. Ironi Kiryat Shmona: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.67.
Goals by minute
Maccabi Netanya: 46-60 (3 goals). Ironi Kiryat Shmona: 76-90+ (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Israeli Premier League: 3.10 goals per match, BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 67%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 67%.
Before the match
1X2 odds
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Maccabi Netanya | Ironi Kiryat Shmona | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 30% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.20 | 0.27 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Maccabi Netanya is 67% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / match - Maccabi Netanya · 0.6 pts / match - Ironi Kiryat Shmona
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Maccabi Netanya is 17% better for: goals scored per match.
1.17 goals / match - Maccabi Netanya · 1 goals / match - Ironi Kiryat Shmona
Maccabi Netanya is 99% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.17 goals / match - Maccabi Netanya · 2.33 goals / match - Ironi Kiryat Shmona
Maccabi Netanya scores in 67% of matches (4 of 6 matches), while Ironi Kiryat Shmona keeps a clean sheet in 17% (1 of 6 matches).
Ironi Kiryat Shmona scores in 67% of matches (4 of 6 matches), while Maccabi Netanya keeps a clean sheet in 17% (1 of 6 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Maccabi Netanya
Over / Under - Ironi Kiryat Shmona
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Ironi Kiryat Shmona is 100% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.5 pts / match - Maccabi Netanya · 1 pts / match - Ironi Kiryat Shmona
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Maccabi Netanya - second-half results
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Ironi Kiryat Shmona - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 17%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.7 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.40 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 100% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -4 | +4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -6 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (3 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (2 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Maccabi Netanya
Ironi Kiryat Shmona
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Israeli Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Maccabi Netanya | Liga | Ironi Kiryat Shmona | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.33 | 3.10 | ▲ 3.33 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 67% | 60% | ▼ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 33% | 67% | • 67% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 17% | 24% | ▼ 17% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 50% | 69% | ▲ 100% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 67% | 83% | • 83% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Maccabi Netanya 1 - 1 - 1 Ironi Kiryat Shmona. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 67% matches.
FAQ
When do Maccabi Netanya and Ironi Kiryat Shmona play?
Maccabi Netanya face Ironi Kiryat Shmona on 17 October 2026 in Israeli Premier League. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.
What is the head-to-head record between Maccabi Netanya and Ironi Kiryat Shmona?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Maccabi Netanya won 1, Ironi Kiryat Shmona won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Maccabi Netanya vs Ironi Kiryat Shmona?
Maccabi Netanya score 1.17 goals per game on average and Ironi Kiryat Shmona 1.00. The Israeli Premier League average is 3.10 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 67% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Maccabi Netanya's matches and 50% of Ironi Kiryat Shmona's.
What form are Maccabi Netanya and Ironi Kiryat Shmona in?
Over the last 5 games Maccabi Netanya have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Ironi Kiryat Shmona 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Maccabi Netanya vs Ironi Kiryat Shmona?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.