Latvia - 1. LigaData current as of 19 September 2026

Mārupe vs Riga FC II: match statistics

Reasoning:

Full analysis and pick in the app

Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.

Check analysis and pick

Mārupe vs Riga FC II: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Mārupe play Riga FC II in 1. Liga (Latvia). The match date is 20 September 2026.

Current form

Mārupe: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Riga FC II: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Mārupe scores 1.70 and concedes 1.60 goals per match. Riga FC II scores 1.45 and concedes 1.85. League average: 3.74 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Mārupe 50%, Riga FC II 65%. Over 2.5: Mārupe 75%, Riga FC II 65%. League level: BTTS 65%, Over 2.5 71%.

xG, shots and style

Mārupe has higher xG: 1.49 vs 1.30. Mārupe: 9.1 shots per match, Riga FC II: 8.1.

Match halves

Mārupe: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 1.15. Riga FC II: half-time lead 30%, second-half goals 0.70.

Goals by minute

Mārupe: 76-90+ (11 goals). Riga FC II: 76-90+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

1. Liga: 3.74 goals per match, BTTS 65%, Over 2.5 71%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 2-0-1. Average goals 2.33, BTTS 0%.

Before the match

1X2 odds

(-)
(-)
(-)

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.7Goals scored / match1.45
MārupeRiga FC II
1.6Goals conceded / match1.85
MārupeRiga FC II
43%Average possession47%
MārupeRiga FC II
3.9Shots on target / match4.2
MārupeRiga FC II

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.1Shots per match8.1
MārupeRiga FC II
3.9Shots on target4.2
MārupeRiga FC II
18.7%Shot conversion17.9%
MārupeRiga FC II
43%Possession47%
MārupeRiga FC II
1.49xG for1.3
MārupeRiga FC II
1.34xG against1.66
MārupeRiga FC II

Shooting quality

Mārupe: Counter-attackingRiga FC II: Counter-attacking
MārupeRiga FC II
Accuracy (shots on target)43%52%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.160.16
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.440.35

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Mārupe is 20% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Mārupe · 1 pts / match - Riga FC II

Mārupe
LWLLW
Season result split
45% W5% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
9-1-10
1.40 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-0-6
Last 5 at home
2-0-3
LLWLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.28Opponent xG: 1.55BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
Riga FC II
LLDWD
Season result split
35% W20% D45% L
Season (W-D-L)
7-4-9
1.25 pts / match · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-2-6
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LWLLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.29Opponent xG: 1.44BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Mārupe is 17% better for: goals scored per match.

1.7 goals / match - Mārupe · 1.45 goals / match - Riga FC II

Mārupe is 16% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.6 goals / match - Mārupe · 1.85 goals / match - Riga FC II

Mārupe scoring profile: very strong

Mārupe scores in 75% of matches (15 of 20 matches), while Riga FC II keeps a clean sheet in 10% (2 of 20 matches).

Riga FC II scoring profile: very strong

Riga FC II scores in 75% of matches (15 of 20 matches), while Mārupe keeps a clean sheet in 30% (6 of 20 matches).

34Goals scored (season)29
MārupeRiga FC II
32Goals conceded (season)37
MārupeRiga FC II
3.3Average goals in match3.3
MārupeRiga FC II
8Goals scored (last 5)6
MārupeRiga FC II
8Goals conceded (last 5)9
MārupeRiga FC II

How often they score at least...

75%1 goal75%
MārupeRiga FC II
50%2 goals50%
MārupeRiga FC II
20%3 goals15%
MārupeRiga FC II
20%4 goals5%
MārupeRiga FC II

How often they concede at least...

70%1 goal90%
MārupeRiga FC II
45%2 goals65%
MārupeRiga FC II
25%3 goals25%
MārupeRiga FC II
20%4 goals5%
MārupeRiga FC II

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

65%
League average

Goal patterns

10%BTTS at half-time35%
MārupeRiga FC II
5%BTTS in both halves5%
MārupeRiga FC II
15%Scored in both halves35%
MārupeRiga FC II

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS55%
MārupeRiga FC II
25%Min. 3 goals without BTTS10%
MārupeRiga FC II
40%BTTS - last 580%
MārupeRiga FC II

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

70%Min. 1 goal before half-time85%
MārupeRiga FC II
35%Min. 2 goals before half-time45%
MārupeRiga FC II
10%Min. 3 goals before half-time25%
MārupeRiga FC II

2nd half

85%Min. 1 goal after half-time85%
MārupeRiga FC II
60%Min. 2 goals after half-time55%
MārupeRiga FC II
50%Min. 3 goals after half-time25%
MārupeRiga FC II

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Riga FC II is 32% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.95 pts / match - Mārupe · 1.25 pts / match - Riga FC II

Mārupe - half-time state
20% leading35% draw45% trailing
Riga FC II - half-time state
30% leading35% draw35% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.95Points per match (1st half)1.25
MārupeRiga FC II
0.55Goals scored (1st half)0.75
MārupeRiga FC II
0.7Goals conceded (1st half)0.8
MārupeRiga FC II
1.25Average goals (1st half)1.55
MārupeRiga FC II
50%Clean sheet before half-time35%
MārupeRiga FC II
70%No goal before half-time45%
MārupeRiga FC II

After half-time (2nd half)

1.25Points per match (2nd half)1.25
MārupeRiga FC II
1.15Goals scored (2nd half)0.7
MārupeRiga FC II
0.9Goals conceded (2nd half)1.05
MārupeRiga FC II
2.05Average goals (2nd half)1.75
MārupeRiga FC II
45%Clean sheet after half-time45%
MārupeRiga FC II
40%No goal after half-time45%
MārupeRiga FC II

Mārupe - second-half results

35% W20% D45% L
19
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
25
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.95
PPG before half-time
Lead holding225%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 45%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Riga FC II - second-half results

35% W20% D45% L
25
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
25
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.25
PPG before half-time
Lead holding117%

Leads at half-time in 30% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Mārupe - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.00
Goals scored / match1.00.6
Goals conceded / match1.00.6
Average goals in match2.01.2
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference00
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 5
Riga FC II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.402.00
Goals scored / match0.40.8
Goals conceded / match1.40.4
Average goals in match1.81.2
1 goal100%80%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet0%60%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-5+2
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Mārupe
ScoredConceded
3
5
0-15
3
4
16-30
5
5
31-45
5
6
46-60
7
7
61-75
11
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.

Riga FC II
ScoredConceded
4
3
0-15
5
7
16-30
6
6
31-45
3
8
46-60
4
1
61-75
7
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.30
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.8 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
88%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
58%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-29%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
56%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Mārupe

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.15
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.05
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.21
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.26
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
83%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
95%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
32% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
32%

Riga FC II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.36
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.04
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.15
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.19
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
86%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
90%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.25
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).

Teams vs league

MārupeLigaRiga FC II
Average goals in match 3.303.74 3.30
Both teams scored 50%65% 65%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 75%71% 65%
Clean sheets 30%19% 10%
Goal before half-time 70%78% 85%
Goal after half-time 85%84% 85%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.74
Average goals per match
65%
Both teams scored
71%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
19%
Clean sheets
2.06
Home goals / match
1.69
Away goals / match
+22%
Home attack advantage
+18%
Home defence advantage
+8%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
62%
2 goals
36%
3 goals
13%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Mārupe 2 - 0 - 1 Riga FC II. Average goals 2.33, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Riga FC II
0 : 4
Mārupe
Riga FC II
1 : 0
FK Mārupe
FK Mārupe
2 : 0
Riga FC II

FAQ

When do Mārupe and Riga FC II play?

Mārupe face Riga FC II on 20 September 2026 in 1. Liga. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.

What is the head-to-head record between Mārupe and Riga FC II?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Mārupe won 2, Riga FC II won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Mārupe vs Riga FC II?

Mārupe score 1.70 goals per game on average and Riga FC II 1.45. The 1. Liga average is 3.74 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 71% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Mārupe's matches and 65% of Riga FC II's.

What form are Mārupe and Riga FC II in?

Over the last 5 games Mārupe have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Riga FC II 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Mārupe vs Riga FC II?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Mārupe vs Riga FC II: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.