Masar vs Proxy: match statistics
Masar vs Proxy: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Masar play Proxy in Second Division (Egypt). The match date is 30 April 2026 at 15:30. Final score: 2:2.
Current form
Masar: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Proxy: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Masar scores 1.38 and concedes 0.85 goals per match. Proxy scores 1.21 and concedes 0.91. League average: 1.95 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Masar 38%, Proxy 59%. Over 2.5: Masar 32%, Proxy 38%. League level: BTTS 41%, Over 2.5 32%.
xG, shots and style
Proxy has higher xG: 1.32 vs 1.30. Masar: 8.7 shots per match, Proxy: 8.0.
Match halves
Masar: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.71. Proxy: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.74.
Goals by minute
Masar: 76-90+ (12 goals). Proxy: 76-90+ (13 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Second Division: 1.95 goals per match, BTTS 41%, Over 2.5 32%.
Head-to-head
1 H2H matches: 1-0-0. Average goals 5.00, BTTS 100%.
Match description
I predict a draw. Masar, 3rd in the table with 42 goals this season, dominates possession (61% at home) and averages xG 1.17 per match, yet scores only 0.93 goals at home and fails to score in 67% of home matches, indicating finishing inefficiency. Proxy as visitors register more shots on target (3.67 vs 2.69) and have over twice the conversion rate (15% vs 6%), with away xG of 1.29 and 1.27 goals per away match, demonstrating high offensive efficiency. Both defenses are comparable — Masar concedes 0.93 goals at home, Proxy 1.00 on the road, and both keep 40% clean sheets, so I expect few clear-cut chances. In the last 5 matches Proxy average 2.2 points (3 wins, 2 draws), Masar 1.8 (3 wins, 2 losses); therefore the most likely outcome is a draw, with a slight edge to the visitors due to superior efficiency.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Masar | Proxy | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 39% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.15 | 0.17 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.40 | 0.40 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Proxy is 86% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - Masar · 2.6 pts / match - Proxy
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Masar is 14% better for: goals scored per match.
1.38 goals / match - Masar · 1.21 goals / match - Proxy
Masar is 7% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.85 goals / match - Masar · 0.91 goals / match - Proxy
Masar scores in 65% of matches (22 of 34 matches), while Proxy keeps a clean sheet in 38% (13 of 34 matches).
Proxy scores in 79% of matches (27 of 34 matches), while Masar keeps a clean sheet in 38% (13 of 34 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Masar
Over / Under — Proxy
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Masar is 31% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.65 pts / match - Masar · 1.26 pts / match - Proxy
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Masar - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 44%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Proxy - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +2 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 2.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +4 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Masar
Proxy
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).
Teams vs league
| Masar | Liga | Proxy | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.24 | 1.95 | ▲ 2.12 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 38% | 41% | ▲ 59% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 32% | 32% | ▲ 38% |
| Clean sheets | • 38% | 38% | • 38% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 59% | 53% | ▲ 56% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 76% | 67% | ▲ 71% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Masar 1 - 0 - 0 Proxy. Average goals 5.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Masar vs Proxy?
The Second Division match finished Masar 2:2 Proxy. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Masar vs Proxy?
Masar score 1.38 goals per game on average and Proxy 1.21. The Second Division average is 1.95 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 32% of games. Both teams score in 38% of Masar's matches and 59% of Proxy's.
What form are Masar and Proxy in?
Over the last 5 games Masar have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Proxy 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Masar vs Proxy?
The statistical background for Masar vs Proxy — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.