Cyprus - Second DivisionData current as of 23 July 2026

MEAP Nisou vs Nea Salamis: match statistics

MEAP Nisou crest
MEAP Nisou
2 : 4half-time 0:1
Nea Salamis crest
Nea Salamis
110%(0.00)
X15%(0.00)
275%(0.00)

Nea Salamis is the decisive favorite for this meeting, sitting in 1st place with an impressive record of 19 wins, 2 draws, and not a single defeat this season. The visiting team displays phenomenal away form with 100% efficiency (10 consecutive away wins) and an average of 2.1 goals per game against merely 0.4 conceded. MEAP Nisou occupies the 7th position with very poor home form (27% wins, 64% losses at home) and a negative goal difference of -11 in home matches. The difference in class is immense – Nea Salamis has 70% clean sheets away, while the hosts failed to score in 36% of their home games. All statistics, from possession (57% vs 50%), through xG (1.84 vs 1.36), to the last 5 matches (15 points vs 4 points), unequivocally indicate a certain victory for the visitors.

MEAP Nisou vs Nea Salamis: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

MEAP Nisou play Nea Salamis in Second Division (Cyprus). The match date is 7 March 2026 at 14:30. Final score: 2:4.

Current form

MEAP Nisou: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match. Nea Salamis: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

MEAP Nisou scores 1.07 and concedes 1.72 goals per match. Nea Salamis scores 1.93 and concedes 0.54. League average: 2.72 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: MEAP Nisou 48%, Nea Salamis 39%. Over 2.5: MEAP Nisou 48%, Nea Salamis 46%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 49%.

xG, shots and style

Nea Salamis has higher xG: 1.81 vs 1.42. MEAP Nisou: 7.5 shots per match, Nea Salamis: 10.2.

Match halves

MEAP Nisou: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.45. Nea Salamis: half-time lead 61%, second-half goals 0.79.

Goals by minute

MEAP Nisou: 31-45+ (8 goals). Nea Salamis: 16-30 (13 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Second Division: 2.72 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 49%.

Head-to-head

2 H2H matches: 0-0-2. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 50%.

Match description

Nea Salamis is the decisive favorite for this meeting, sitting in 1st place with an impressive record of 19 wins, 2 draws, and not a single defeat this season. The visiting team displays phenomenal away form with 100% efficiency (10 consecutive away wins) and an average of 2.1 goals per game against merely 0.4 conceded. MEAP Nisou occupies the 7th position with very poor home form (27% wins, 64% losses at home) and a negative goal difference of -11 in home matches. The difference in class is immense – Nea Salamis has 70% clean sheets away, while the hosts failed to score in 36% of their home games. All statistics, from possession (57% vs 50%), through xG (1.84 vs 1.36), to the last 5 matches (15 points vs 4 points), unequivocally indicate a certain victory for the visitors.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
2 : 3
2nd half

Match statistics

43Possession (%)57
MEAP NisouNea Salamis
10Shots17
MEAP NisouNea Salamis
4Shots on target9
MEAP NisouNea Salamis
1.22xG2.12
MEAP NisouNea Salamis
1Corners4
MEAP NisouNea Salamis
42Dangerous attacks58
MEAP NisouNea Salamis
-1Fouls-1
MEAP NisouNea Salamis
-1Cards-1
MEAP NisouNea Salamis

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

MEAP NisouNea Salamis
1.07Goals scored / match1.93
MEAP NisouNea Salamis
1.72Goals conceded / match0.54
MEAP NisouNea Salamis
40%Average possession40%
MEAP NisouNea Salamis
2.9Shots on target / match3.93
MEAP NisouNea Salamis

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

7.55Shots per match10.18
MEAP NisouNea Salamis
2.9Shots on target3.93
MEAP NisouNea Salamis
14.2%Shot conversion18.9%
MEAP NisouNea Salamis
40%Possession40%
MEAP NisouNea Salamis
1.42xG for1.81
MEAP NisouNea Salamis
1.48xG against0.94
MEAP NisouNea Salamis

Shooting quality

MEAP Nisou: Counter-attackingNea Salamis: Counter-attacking
MEAP NisouNea Salamis
Accuracy (shots on target)38%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.190.18
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.370.49

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Nea Salamis is 900% better for: last-5 form.

0.2 pts / match - MEAP Nisou · 2 pts / match - Nea Salamis

MEAP Nisou
LLLLD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
28% W17% R55% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-5-16
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -19
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-2-10
Last 5 at home
0-2-3
DLLLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.10Opponent xG: 1.05BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Nea Salamis
WDWLW
Season result split
82% W14% R4% P
Season (W-D-L)
23-4-1
2.61 pts / match · goal difference +39
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
11-2-1
Last 5 away
2-2-1
WWDDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 0.73Opponent xG: 0.82BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Nea Salamis is 80% better for: goals scored per match.

1.07 goals / match - MEAP Nisou · 1.93 goals / match - Nea Salamis

Nea Salamis is 219% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.72 goals / match - MEAP Nisou · 0.54 goals / match - Nea Salamis

MEAP Nisou scoring profile: mixed

MEAP Nisou scores in 66% of matches (19 of 29 matches), while Nea Salamis keeps a clean sheet in 57% (16 of 28 matches).

Nea Salamis scoring profile: very strong

Nea Salamis scores in 86% of matches (24 of 28 matches), while MEAP Nisou keeps a clean sheet in 24% (7 of 29 matches).

31Goals scored (season)54
MEAP NisouNea Salamis
50Goals conceded (season)15
MEAP NisouNea Salamis
2.79Average goals in match2.46
MEAP NisouNea Salamis
5Goals scored (last 5)11
MEAP NisouNea Salamis
10Goals conceded (last 5)5
MEAP NisouNea Salamis

How often they score at least...

66%1 goal86%
MEAP NisouNea Salamis
28%2 goals68%
MEAP NisouNea Salamis
10%3 goals25%
MEAP NisouNea Salamis
3%4 goals14%
MEAP NisouNea Salamis

How often they concede at least...

76%1 goal43%
MEAP NisouNea Salamis
52%2 goals11%
MEAP NisouNea Salamis
24%3 goals0%
MEAP NisouNea Salamis
10%4 goals0%
MEAP NisouNea Salamis

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

49%
League average

Goal patterns

31%BTTS at half-time21%
MEAP NisouNea Salamis
3%BTTS in both halves7%
MEAP NisouNea Salamis
17%Scored in both halves46%
MEAP NisouNea Salamis

BTTS and goal count

41%Min. 3 goals and BTTS39%
MEAP NisouNea Salamis
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS7%
MEAP NisouNea Salamis
60%BTTS - last 560%
MEAP NisouNea Salamis

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

83%Min. 1 goal before half-time71%
MEAP NisouNea Salamis
52%Min. 2 goals before half-time39%
MEAP NisouNea Salamis
10%Min. 3 goals before half-time14%
MEAP NisouNea Salamis

2nd half

69%Min. 1 goal after half-time71%
MEAP NisouNea Salamis
34%Min. 2 goals after half-time25%
MEAP NisouNea Salamis
14%Min. 3 goals after half-time7%
MEAP NisouNea Salamis

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Nea Salamis is 115% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.03 pts / match - MEAP Nisou · 2.21 pts / match - Nea Salamis

MEAP Nisou - half-time state
21% leading41% draw38% trailing
Nea Salamis - half-time state
61% leading39% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.03Points per match (1st half)2.21
MEAP NisouNea Salamis
0.62Goals scored (1st half)1.14
MEAP NisouNea Salamis
0.9Goals conceded (1st half)0.21
MEAP NisouNea Salamis
1.52Average goals (1st half)1.36
MEAP NisouNea Salamis
34%Clean sheet before half-time79%
MEAP NisouNea Salamis
52%No goal before half-time29%
MEAP NisouNea Salamis

After half-time (2nd half)

0.93Points per match (2nd half)1.89
MEAP NisouNea Salamis
0.45Goals scored (2nd half)0.79
MEAP NisouNea Salamis
0.83Goals conceded (2nd half)0.32
MEAP NisouNea Salamis
1.28Average goals (2nd half)1.11
MEAP NisouNea Salamis
48%Clean sheet after half-time71%
MEAP NisouNea Salamis
66%No goal after half-time39%
MEAP NisouNea Salamis

MEAP Nisou - second-half results

17% W41% R41% P
30
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
-8
Goal difference (1st half)
27
Second-half points
-11
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.03
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 28%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Nea Salamis - second-half results

50% W39% R11% P
62
Half-time points
32
Half-time goals
+26
Goal difference (1st half)
53
Second-half points
+13
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.21
PPG before half-time
Lead holding134%

Leads at half-time in 61% of matches and wins 82%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

MEAP Nisou - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.600.40
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match1.01.0
Average goals in match1.61.4
1 goal100%80%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet0%20%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference-2-3
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 3
Nea Salamis - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.201.00
Goals scored / match1.60.6
Goals conceded / match0.20.8
Average goals in match1.81.4
1 goal80%100%
2 goals80%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference+7-1
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 8

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

MEAP Nisou
ScoredConceded
3
4
0-15
7
6
16-30
8
16
31-45
5
4
46-60
3
6
61-75
5
14
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (16). Late-goal balance (76-90): -9 - late phases are a weakness.

Nea Salamis
ScoredConceded
10
1
0-15
13
3
16-30
9
2
31-45
4
3
46-60
5
4
61-75
13
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (13 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +11 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.63
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.8 : 1.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
97%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
44%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+14%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
57%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

MEAP Nisou

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.06
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.59
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.35
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.24
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
77%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
129%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.80
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

Nea Salamis

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.87
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.52
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.12
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.40
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
145%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
39%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.61
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).

Teams vs league

MEAP NisouLigaNea Salamis
Average goals in match 2.792.72 2.46
Both teams scored 48%49% 39%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 48%49% 46%
Clean sheets 24%30% 57%
Goal before half-time 83%72% 71%
Goal after half-time 69%77% 71%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.72
Average goals per match
49%
Both teams scored
49%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.39
Home goals / match
1.33
Away goals / match
+5%
Home attack advantage
+4%
Home defence advantage
+0%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): MEAP Nisou 0 - 0 - 2 Nea Salamis. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.

Nea Salamis
1 : 0
MEAP Nisou
MEAP Nisou
1 : 4
Nea Salamis

FAQ

What was the result of MEAP Nisou vs Nea Salamis?

The Second Division match finished MEAP Nisou 2:4 Nea Salamis. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between MEAP Nisou and Nea Salamis?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches MEAP Nisou won 0, Nea Salamis won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before MEAP Nisou vs Nea Salamis?

MEAP Nisou score 1.07 goals per game on average and Nea Salamis 1.93. The Second Division average is 2.72 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 48% of MEAP Nisou's matches and 39% of Nea Salamis's.

What form are MEAP Nisou and Nea Salamis in?

Over the last 5 games MEAP Nisou have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and Nea Salamis 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for MEAP Nisou vs Nea Salamis?

The statistical background for MEAP Nisou vs Nea Salamis — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.