Cyprus - Second DivisionKoinotiko Stadio Pera ChoriouData current as of 20 October 2026

MEAP Nisou vs PAEEK: match statistics

Reasoning:

Full analysis and pick in the app

Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.

Check analysis and pick

MEAP Nisou vs PAEEK: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

MEAP Nisou play PAEEK in Second Division (Cyprus). The match date is 24 October 2026. Venue: Koinotiko Stadio Pera Choriou.

Current form

MEAP Nisou: 0-1-3, 0.25 points/match. PAEEK: 3-0-1, 2.25 points/match.

Goal statistics

MEAP Nisou scores 0.25 and concedes 2.75 goals per match. PAEEK scores 2.50 and concedes 1.50. League average: 2.75 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: MEAP Nisou 25%, PAEEK 75%. Over 2.5: MEAP Nisou 50%, PAEEK 100%. League level: BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 53%.

xG, shots and style

PAEEK has higher xG: 1.32 vs 1.21. MEAP Nisou: 9.0 shots per match, PAEEK: 6.3.

Match halves

MEAP Nisou: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.25. PAEEK: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 1.25.

Goals by minute

MEAP Nisou: 76-90+ (1 goals). PAEEK: 76-90+ (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Second Division: 2.75 goals per match, BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 53%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-3. Average goals 2.67, BTTS 67%.

Before the match

1X2 odds

(-)
(-)
(-)

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.25Goals scored / match2.5
MEAP NisouPAEEK
2.75Goals conceded / match1.5
MEAP NisouPAEEK
47%Average possession34%
MEAP NisouPAEEK
3.25Shots on target / match3.75
MEAP NisouPAEEK

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9Shots per match6.25
MEAP NisouPAEEK
3.25Shots on target3.75
MEAP NisouPAEEK
2.8%Shot conversion40%
MEAP NisouPAEEK
47%Possession34%
MEAP NisouPAEEK
1.21xG for1.32
MEAP NisouPAEEK
1.89xG against1.41
MEAP NisouPAEEK

Shooting quality

MEAP Nisou: BalancedPAEEK: Counter-attacking
MEAP NisouPAEEK
Accuracy (shots on target)36%60%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.21
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.080.67

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

PAEEK is 800% better for: last-5 form.

0.25 pts / match - MEAP Nisou · 2.25 pts / match - PAEEK

MEAP Nisou
DLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W25% D75% L
Season (W-D-L)
0-1-3
0.25 pts / match · goal difference -10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-3
0.25 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-1-1
Last 5 at home
0-1-1
DL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.3Goals conceded: 2.8xG: 1.21Opponent xG: 1.89BTTS: 25%Over 2.5: 50%
PAEEK
LWWW
Season result split
75% W0% D25% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-0-1
2.25 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-1
2.25 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-0-0
Last 5 away
1-0-0
W
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.5Goals conceded: 1.5xG: 1.32Opponent xG: 1.41BTTS: 75%Over 2.5: 100%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

PAEEK is 900% better for: goals scored per match.

0.25 goals / match - MEAP Nisou · 2.5 goals / match - PAEEK

PAEEK is 83% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.75 goals / match - MEAP Nisou · 1.5 goals / match - PAEEK

MEAP Nisou scoring profile: mixed

MEAP Nisou scores in 25% of matches (1 of 4 matches), while PAEEK keeps a clean sheet in 25% (1 of 4 matches).

PAEEK scoring profile: very strong

PAEEK scores in 100% of matches (4 of 4 matches), while MEAP Nisou keeps a clean sheet in 25% (1 of 4 matches).

1Goals scored (season)10
MEAP NisouPAEEK
11Goals conceded (season)6
MEAP NisouPAEEK
3Average goals in match4
MEAP NisouPAEEK
1Goals scored (last 5)10
MEAP NisouPAEEK
11Goals conceded (last 5)6
MEAP NisouPAEEK

How often they score at least...

25%1 goal100%
MEAP NisouPAEEK
0%2 goals100%
MEAP NisouPAEEK
0%3 goals25%
MEAP NisouPAEEK
0%4 goals25%
MEAP NisouPAEEK

How often they concede at least...

75%1 goal75%
MEAP NisouPAEEK
75%2 goals25%
MEAP NisouPAEEK
50%3 goals25%
MEAP NisouPAEEK
50%4 goals25%
MEAP NisouPAEEK

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time50%
MEAP NisouPAEEK
0%BTTS in both halves25%
MEAP NisouPAEEK
0%Scored in both halves75%
MEAP NisouPAEEK

BTTS and goal count

25%Min. 3 goals and BTTS75%
MEAP NisouPAEEK
25%Min. 3 goals without BTTS25%
MEAP NisouPAEEK
25%BTTS - last 575%
MEAP NisouPAEEK

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

75%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
MEAP NisouPAEEK
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time75%
MEAP NisouPAEEK
25%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
MEAP NisouPAEEK

2nd half

75%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
MEAP NisouPAEEK
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
MEAP NisouPAEEK
25%Min. 3 goals after half-time50%
MEAP NisouPAEEK

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

PAEEK is 700% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.25 pts / match - MEAP Nisou · 2 pts / match - PAEEK

MEAP Nisou - half-time state
0% leading25% draw75% trailing
PAEEK - half-time state
50% leading50% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.25Points per match (1st half)2
MEAP NisouPAEEK
0Goals scored (1st half)1.25
MEAP NisouPAEEK
1.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
MEAP NisouPAEEK
1.5Average goals (1st half)1.75
MEAP NisouPAEEK
25%Clean sheet before half-time50%
MEAP NisouPAEEK
100%No goal before half-time0%
MEAP NisouPAEEK

After half-time (2nd half)

0.5Points per match (2nd half)1.5
MEAP NisouPAEEK
0.25Goals scored (2nd half)1.25
MEAP NisouPAEEK
1.25Goals conceded (2nd half)1
MEAP NisouPAEEK
1.5Average goals (2nd half)2.25
MEAP NisouPAEEK
25%Clean sheet after half-time50%
MEAP NisouPAEEK
75%No goal after half-time25%
MEAP NisouPAEEK

MEAP Nisou - second-half results

0% W50% D50% L
1
Half-time points
0
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
2
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.25
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

PAEEK - second-half results

50% W0% D50% L
8
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
6
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding150%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 75%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

MEAP Nisou - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.250.50
Goals scored / match0.00.3
Goals conceded / match1.51.3
Average goals in match1.51.5
1 goal75%75%
2 goals50%50%
3 goals25%25%
Clean sheet25%25%
No goal100%75%
Goal difference-6-4
Half-time: 0% leading - 25% draw - 75% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 50% draw - 50% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
PAEEK - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.001.50
Goals scored / match1.31.3
Goals conceded / match0.51.0
Average goals in match1.82.3
1 goal100%100%
2 goals75%50%
3 goals0%50%
Clean sheet50%50%
No goal0%25%
Goal difference+3+1
Half-time: 50% leading - 50% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 50% won - 0% draw - 50% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 50% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

MEAP Nisou
ScoredConceded
0
3
0-15
0
2
16-30
0
1
31-45
0
0
46-60
0
1
61-75
1
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (1 goal). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

PAEEK
ScoredConceded
2
0
0-15
2
1
16-30
1
1
31-45
1
0
46-60
1
3
61-75
3
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.50
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.9 : 2.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
127%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-24%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
25%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
4+
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

MEAP Nisou

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.68
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.82
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.96
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.86
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
18%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
199%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
100% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
100%

PAEEK

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.09
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.09
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+1.18
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.09
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
181%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
109%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
30% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
30%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).

Teams vs league

MEAP NisouLigaPAEEK
Average goals in match▲ 3.002.75▲ 4.00
Both teams scored▼ 25%47%▲ 75%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 50%53%▲ 100%
Clean sheets▼ 25%33%▼ 25%
Goal before half-time▲ 75%66%▲ 100%
Goal after half-time▼ 75%78%▲ 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.75
Average goals per match
47%
Both teams scored
53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
33%
Clean sheets
1.38
Home goals / match
1.38
Away goals / match
+0%
Home attack advantage
+0%
Home defence advantage
+-7%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
66%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
25%
3 goals
13%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): MEAP Nisou 0 - 0 - 3 PAEEK. Average goals 2.67, both teams scored in 67% matches.

FAQ

When do MEAP Nisou and PAEEK play?

MEAP Nisou face PAEEK on 24 October 2026 in Second Division at Koinotiko Stadio Pera Choriou. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.

What is the head-to-head record between MEAP Nisou and PAEEK?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches MEAP Nisou won 0, PAEEK won 3 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before MEAP Nisou vs PAEEK?

MEAP Nisou score 0.25 goals per game on average and PAEEK 2.50. The Second Division average is 2.75 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 25% of MEAP Nisou's matches and 75% of PAEEK's.

What form are MEAP Nisou and PAEEK in?

Over the last 5 games MEAP Nisou have a 0-1-3 record (0.25 points per game) and PAEEK 3-0-1 (2.25 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for MEAP Nisou vs PAEEK?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for MEAP Nisou vs PAEEK: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.