Ethiopia - Ethiopia Premier LeagueAddis Ababa StadiumData current as of 23 July 2026

Mebrat Hayl vs Dire Dawa Kenema: match statistics

Mebrat Hayl crest
Mebrat Hayl
1 : 1half-time 1:0
Dire Dawa Kenema crest
Dire Dawa Kenema

Mebrat Hayl vs Dire Dawa Kenema: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Mebrat Hayl play Dire Dawa Kenema in Ethiopia Premier League (Ethiopia). The match date is 20 May 2026 at 17:00. Venue: Addis Ababa Stadium. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Mebrat Hayl: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Dire Dawa Kenema: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Mebrat Hayl scores 0.84 and concedes 0.68 goals per match. Dire Dawa Kenema scores 0.68 and concedes 1.11. League average: 1.78 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Mebrat Hayl 37%, Dire Dawa Kenema 39%. Over 2.5: Mebrat Hayl 26%, Dire Dawa Kenema 29%. League level: BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 28%.

xG, shots and style

Mebrat Hayl has higher xG: 1.12 vs 1.08. Mebrat Hayl: 7.0 shots per match, Dire Dawa Kenema: 6.7.

Match halves

Mebrat Hayl: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.50. Dire Dawa Kenema: half-time lead 16%, second-half goals 0.42.

Goals by minute

Mebrat Hayl: 46-60 (9 goals). Dire Dawa Kenema: 61-75 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ethiopia Premier League: 1.78 goals per match, BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 28%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

I back the home win. Mebrat Hayl is markedly more solid at home — conceding only 0.44 goals per home match versus Dire Dawa Kenema’s 1.13 goals conceded away. The hosts also show better attacking efficiency: average xG 1.06 and shot conversion 14% translate into 0.88 goals per match, while the visitors have xG 0.98, conversion 10% and 0.63 goals on the road. In the last 5 fixtures Mebrat scored 4 goals and averages 0.8 points per game, whereas Dire Dawa managed only 1 goal, 0.4 pts and 3 losses in five matches. Additionally, the hosts keep a clean sheet in 56% of home games, while Dire have only 31% clean sheets away; Mebrat win 44% of home matches versus Dire’s 25% away win rate, confirming the home advantage.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

40Possession (%)60
Mebrat HaylDire Dawa Kenema
5Shots10
Mebrat HaylDire Dawa Kenema
1Shots on target2
Mebrat HaylDire Dawa Kenema
0.85xG1.54
Mebrat HaylDire Dawa Kenema
3Corners9
Mebrat HaylDire Dawa Kenema
63Dangerous attacks106
Mebrat HaylDire Dawa Kenema
10Fouls9
Mebrat HaylDire Dawa Kenema
0Cards0
Mebrat HaylDire Dawa Kenema

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Mebrat HaylDire Dawa Kenema
0.84Goals scored / match0.68
Mebrat HaylDire Dawa Kenema
0.68Goals conceded / match1.11
Mebrat HaylDire Dawa Kenema
53%Average possession56%
Mebrat HaylDire Dawa Kenema
2.21Shots on target / match2.58
Mebrat HaylDire Dawa Kenema

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

7Shots per match6.66
Mebrat HaylDire Dawa Kenema
2.21Shots on target2.58
Mebrat HaylDire Dawa Kenema
12%Shot conversion10.3%
Mebrat HaylDire Dawa Kenema
53%Possession56%
Mebrat HaylDire Dawa Kenema
1.12xG for1.08
Mebrat HaylDire Dawa Kenema
1.16xG against1.18
Mebrat HaylDire Dawa Kenema

Shooting quality

Mebrat Hayl: BalancedDire Dawa Kenema: Balanced
Mebrat HaylDire Dawa Kenema
Accuracy (shots on target)32%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.160.16
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.380.26

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Mebrat Hayl is 14% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - Mebrat Hayl · 1.4 pts / match - Dire Dawa Kenema

Mebrat Hayl
LDWDW
Season result split
34% W39% R26% P
Season (W-D-L)
13-15-10
1.42 pts / match · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-10-2
Last 5 at home
1-3-1
LWDDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.06Opponent xG: 1.28BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Dire Dawa Kenema
LLWDW
Season result split
24% W39% R37% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-15-14
1.11 pts / match · goal difference -16
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-9-6
Last 5 away
0-3-2
DLDLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.27Opponent xG: 1.07BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Mebrat Hayl is 24% better for: goals scored per match.

0.84 goals / match - Mebrat Hayl · 0.68 goals / match - Dire Dawa Kenema

Mebrat Hayl is 63% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.68 goals / match - Mebrat Hayl · 1.11 goals / match - Dire Dawa Kenema

Mebrat Hayl scoring profile: mixed

Mebrat Hayl scores in 55% of matches (21 of 38 matches), while Dire Dawa Kenema keeps a clean sheet in 32% (12 of 38 matches).

Dire Dawa Kenema scoring profile: mixed

Dire Dawa Kenema scores in 50% of matches (19 of 38 matches), while Mebrat Hayl keeps a clean sheet in 47% (18 of 38 matches).

32Goals scored (season)26
Mebrat HaylDire Dawa Kenema
26Goals conceded (season)42
Mebrat HaylDire Dawa Kenema
1.53Average goals in match1.79
Mebrat HaylDire Dawa Kenema
5Goals scored (last 5)6
Mebrat HaylDire Dawa Kenema
4Goals conceded (last 5)5
Mebrat HaylDire Dawa Kenema

How often they score at least...

55%1 goal50%
Mebrat HaylDire Dawa Kenema
18%2 goals18%
Mebrat HaylDire Dawa Kenema
8%3 goals0%
Mebrat HaylDire Dawa Kenema
3%4 goals0%
Mebrat HaylDire Dawa Kenema

How often they concede at least...

53%1 goal68%
Mebrat HaylDire Dawa Kenema
16%2 goals32%
Mebrat HaylDire Dawa Kenema
0%3 goals8%
Mebrat HaylDire Dawa Kenema
0%4 goals3%
Mebrat HaylDire Dawa Kenema

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

39%
Dire Dawa Kenema - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.15 of 38 matches
40%
League average

Goal patterns

5%BTTS at half-time11%
Mebrat HaylDire Dawa Kenema
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Mebrat HaylDire Dawa Kenema
11%Scored in both halves8%
Mebrat HaylDire Dawa Kenema

BTTS and goal count

26%Min. 3 goals and BTTS21%
Mebrat HaylDire Dawa Kenema
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS8%
Mebrat HaylDire Dawa Kenema
60%BTTS - last 560%
Mebrat HaylDire Dawa Kenema

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

39%Min. 1 goal before half-time68%
Mebrat HaylDire Dawa Kenema
13%Min. 2 goals before half-time16%
Mebrat HaylDire Dawa Kenema
3%Min. 3 goals before half-time5%
Mebrat HaylDire Dawa Kenema

2nd half

63%Min. 1 goal after half-time61%
Mebrat HaylDire Dawa Kenema
26%Min. 2 goals after half-time29%
Mebrat HaylDire Dawa Kenema
5%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
Mebrat HaylDire Dawa Kenema

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Mebrat Hayl is 54% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.29 pts / match - Mebrat Hayl · 0.84 pts / match - Dire Dawa Kenema

Mebrat Hayl - half-time state
21% leading66% draw13% trailing
Dire Dawa Kenema - half-time state
16% leading37% draw47% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.29Points per match (1st half)0.84
Mebrat HaylDire Dawa Kenema
0.34Goals scored (1st half)0.26
Mebrat HaylDire Dawa Kenema
0.21Goals conceded (1st half)0.63
Mebrat HaylDire Dawa Kenema
0.55Average goals (1st half)0.89
Mebrat HaylDire Dawa Kenema
82%Clean sheet before half-time47%
Mebrat HaylDire Dawa Kenema
74%No goal before half-time74%
Mebrat HaylDire Dawa Kenema

After half-time (2nd half)

1.29Points per match (2nd half)1.18
Mebrat HaylDire Dawa Kenema
0.5Goals scored (2nd half)0.42
Mebrat HaylDire Dawa Kenema
0.47Goals conceded (2nd half)0.47
Mebrat HaylDire Dawa Kenema
0.97Average goals (2nd half)0.89
Mebrat HaylDire Dawa Kenema
61%Clean sheet after half-time63%
Mebrat HaylDire Dawa Kenema
61%No goal after half-time68%
Mebrat HaylDire Dawa Kenema

Mebrat Hayl - second-half results

26% W50% R24% P
49
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
49
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.29
PPG before half-time
Lead holding162%

Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 34%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Dire Dawa Kenema - second-half results

24% W47% R29% P
32
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-14
Goal difference (1st half)
45
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.84
PPG before half-time
Lead holding150%

Leads at half-time in 16% of matches and wins 24%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Mebrat Hayl - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.60
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match0.81.0
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference0+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Dire Dawa Kenema - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.602.20
Goals scored / match0.40.8
Goals conceded / match1.00.0
Average goals in match1.40.8
1 goal100%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet20%100%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-3+4
Half-time: 20% leading - 0% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Mebrat Hayl
ScoredConceded
4
4
0-15
4
2
16-30
5
2
31-45
9
4
46-60
5
7
61-75
5
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (9 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Dire Dawa Kenema
ScoredConceded
2
6
0-15
4
5
16-30
4
13
31-45
4
4
46-60
6
7
61-75
6
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (6 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.66
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 0.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
93%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
38%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
28%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
23%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 4 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Mebrat Hayl

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.04
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.20
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-14.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.28
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.48
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
92%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
78%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.18
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

Dire Dawa Kenema

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.10
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.33
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+10.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.40
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
78%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
122%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.29
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ethiopia Premier League).

Teams vs league

Mebrat HaylLigaDire Dawa Kenema
Average goals in match 1.531.78 1.79
Both teams scored 37%40% 39%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 26%28% 29%
Clean sheets 47%40% 32%
Goal before half-time 39%56% 68%
Goal after half-time 63%59% 61%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.78
Average goals per match
40%
Both teams scored
28%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
40%
Clean sheets
0.91
Home goals / match
0.87
Away goals / match
+5%
Home attack advantage
+4%
Home defence advantage
+1%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
56%
1 goal
22%
2 goals
4%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
59%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Mebrat Hayl 0 - 1 - 0 Dire Dawa Kenema. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Mebrat Hayl vs Dire Dawa Kenema?

The Ethiopia Premier League match finished Mebrat Hayl 1:1 Dire Dawa Kenema. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Mebrat Hayl vs Dire Dawa Kenema?

Mebrat Hayl score 0.84 goals per game on average and Dire Dawa Kenema 0.68. The Ethiopia Premier League average is 1.78 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 28% of games. Both teams score in 37% of Mebrat Hayl's matches and 39% of Dire Dawa Kenema's.

What form are Mebrat Hayl and Dire Dawa Kenema in?

Over the last 5 games Mebrat Hayl have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Dire Dawa Kenema 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Mebrat Hayl vs Dire Dawa Kenema?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.