Ghana - Ghana Premier LeagueData current as of 23 July 2026

Medeama vs Eleven Wonders: match statistics

Medeama crest
Medeama
2 : 0half-time 2:0
Eleven Wonders crest
Eleven Wonders
175%(1.05)
X18%(8.60)
27%(22.00)

Medeama are the clear favorites for this match, sitting in 2nd place in the table with a 62% win rate at home and an impressive goal conversion rate. The hosts have a positive goal difference of +13 in home matches, averaging 1.69 goals scored and conceding just 0.69 per match. Eleven Wonders are in disastrous form, occupying the bottom 18th place with 0% away wins and a 12-match winless streak. The visitors have a dismal goal difference of -15 in away games, averaging only 0.5 goals scored while conceding 1.75 per match, which combined with 58% of matches without scoring a goal makes them a very weak opponent. Medeama's advantage in ball possession (60% vs 44%), shots on target (7 vs 1.33), and xG values (1.95 vs 0.75) further confirms their dominance and makes the home victory highly probable.

Medeama vs Eleven Wonders: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Medeama play Eleven Wonders in Ghana Premier League (Ghana). The match date is 27 March 2026 at 16:00. Final score: 2:0.

Current form

Medeama: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Eleven Wonders: 0-0-5, 0.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Medeama scores 1.53 and concedes 0.82 goals per match. Eleven Wonders scores 0.70 and concedes 2.21. League average: 2.03 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Medeama 53%, Eleven Wonders 39%. Over 2.5: Medeama 47%, Eleven Wonders 45%. League level: BTTS 34%, Over 2.5 34%.

xG, shots and style

Medeama has higher xG: 1.43 vs 0.91. Medeama: 9.5 shots per match, Eleven Wonders: 4.0.

Match halves

Medeama: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.76. Eleven Wonders: half-time lead 6%, second-half goals 0.45.

Goals by minute

Medeama: 16-30 (14 goals). Eleven Wonders: 76-90+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ghana Premier League: 2.03 goals per match, BTTS 34%, Over 2.5 34%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 1-0-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Medeama are the clear favorites for this match, sitting in 2nd place in the table with a 62% win rate at home and an impressive goal conversion rate. The hosts have a positive goal difference of +13 in home matches, averaging 1.69 goals scored and conceding just 0.69 per match. Eleven Wonders are in disastrous form, occupying the bottom 18th place with 0% away wins and a 12-match winless streak. The visitors have a dismal goal difference of -15 in away games, averaging only 0.5 goals scored while conceding 1.75 per match, which combined with 58% of matches without scoring a goal makes them a very weak opponent. Medeama's advantage in ball possession (60% vs 44%), shots on target (7 vs 1.33), and xG values (1.95 vs 0.75) further confirms their dominance and makes the home victory highly probable.

Half-by-half

2 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

64Possession (%)36
MedeamaEleven Wonders
4Shots4
MedeamaEleven Wonders
4Shots on target0
MedeamaEleven Wonders
0.85xG0.5
MedeamaEleven Wonders
3Corners1
MedeamaEleven Wonders
42Dangerous attacks33
MedeamaEleven Wonders
-1Fouls-1
MedeamaEleven Wonders
-1Cards-1
MedeamaEleven Wonders

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

MedeamaEleven Wonders
1.53Goals scored / match0.7
MedeamaEleven Wonders
0.82Goals conceded / match2.21
MedeamaEleven Wonders
45%Average possession33%
MedeamaEleven Wonders
3.59Shots on target / match1.21
MedeamaEleven Wonders

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.5Shots per match4
MedeamaEleven Wonders
3.59Shots on target1.21
MedeamaEleven Wonders
16.1%Shot conversion17.4%
MedeamaEleven Wonders
45%Possession33%
MedeamaEleven Wonders
1.43xG for0.91
MedeamaEleven Wonders
1.07xG against1.5
MedeamaEleven Wonders

Shooting quality

Medeama: Counter-attackingEleven Wonders: Counter-attacking
MedeamaEleven Wonders
Accuracy (shots on target)38%30%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.23
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.430.58

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Medeama
WLWWL
Season result split
50% W32% R18% P
Season (W-D-L)
17-11-6
1.82 pts / match · goal difference +24
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
12-4-1
Last 5 at home
4-0-1
LWWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 0.99Opponent xG: 0.69BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Eleven Wonders
LLLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
6% W12% R82% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-4-27
0.30 pts / match · goal difference -50
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-5
0.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-2-15
Last 5 away
0-0-5
LLLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 4.0xG: 0.69Opponent xG: 1.43BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Medeama is 119% better for: goals scored per match.

1.53 goals / match - Medeama · 0.7 goals / match - Eleven Wonders

Medeama is 170% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.82 goals / match - Medeama · 2.21 goals / match - Eleven Wonders

Medeama scoring profile: very strong

Medeama scores in 82% of matches (28 of 34 matches), while Eleven Wonders keeps a clean sheet in 12% (4 of 33 matches).

Eleven Wonders scoring profile: mixed

Eleven Wonders scores in 45% of matches (15 of 33 matches), while Medeama keeps a clean sheet in 44% (15 of 34 matches).

52Goals scored (season)23
MedeamaEleven Wonders
28Goals conceded (season)73
MedeamaEleven Wonders
2.35Average goals in match2.91
MedeamaEleven Wonders
11Goals scored (last 5)6
MedeamaEleven Wonders
8Goals conceded (last 5)20
MedeamaEleven Wonders

How often they score at least...

82%1 goal45%
MedeamaEleven Wonders
44%2 goals21%
MedeamaEleven Wonders
15%3 goals3%
MedeamaEleven Wonders
9%4 goals0%
MedeamaEleven Wonders

How often they concede at least...

56%1 goal88%
MedeamaEleven Wonders
21%2 goals70%
MedeamaEleven Wonders
3%3 goals33%
MedeamaEleven Wonders
3%4 goals12%
MedeamaEleven Wonders

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

34%
League average

Goal patterns

18%BTTS at half-time15%
MedeamaEleven Wonders
3%BTTS in both halves6%
MedeamaEleven Wonders
26%Scored in both halves9%
MedeamaEleven Wonders

BTTS and goal count

38%Min. 3 goals and BTTS36%
MedeamaEleven Wonders
9%Min. 3 goals without BTTS9%
MedeamaEleven Wonders
60%BTTS - last 560%
MedeamaEleven Wonders

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

68%Min. 1 goal before half-time79%
MedeamaEleven Wonders
35%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
MedeamaEleven Wonders
12%Min. 3 goals before half-time9%
MedeamaEleven Wonders

2nd half

71%Min. 1 goal after half-time82%
MedeamaEleven Wonders
32%Min. 2 goals after half-time42%
MedeamaEleven Wonders
9%Min. 3 goals after half-time15%
MedeamaEleven Wonders

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Medeama is 225% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.56 pts / match - Medeama · 0.48 pts / match - Eleven Wonders

Medeama - half-time state
38% leading41% draw21% trailing
Eleven Wonders - half-time state
6% leading30% draw64% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.56Points per match (1st half)0.48
MedeamaEleven Wonders
0.76Goals scored (1st half)0.24
MedeamaEleven Wonders
0.38Goals conceded (1st half)1
MedeamaEleven Wonders
1.15Average goals (1st half)1.24
MedeamaEleven Wonders
65%Clean sheet before half-time27%
MedeamaEleven Wonders
50%No goal before half-time79%
MedeamaEleven Wonders

After half-time (2nd half)

1.65Points per match (2nd half)0.67
MedeamaEleven Wonders
0.76Goals scored (2nd half)0.45
MedeamaEleven Wonders
0.44Goals conceded (2nd half)1.21
MedeamaEleven Wonders
1.21Average goals (2nd half)1.67
MedeamaEleven Wonders
68%Clean sheet after half-time27%
MedeamaEleven Wonders
41%No goal after half-time67%
MedeamaEleven Wonders

Medeama - second-half results

41% W41% R18% P
53
Half-time points
26
Half-time goals
+13
Goal difference (1st half)
56
Second-half points
+11
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.56
PPG before half-time
Lead holding132%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Eleven Wonders - second-half results

12% W30% R58% P
16
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-25
Goal difference (1st half)
22
Second-half points
-25
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.48
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 6% of matches and wins 6%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Medeama - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.40
Goals scored / match1.01.2
Goals conceded / match0.61.0
Average goals in match1.62.2
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+2+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5
Eleven Wonders - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.000.20
Goals scored / match0.21.0
Goals conceded / match1.62.4
Average goals in match1.83.4
1 goal100%100%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet0%0%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-7-7
Half-time: 0% leading - 0% draw - 100% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 20% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Medeama
ScoredConceded
5
3
0-15
14
5
16-30
7
5
31-45
3
6
46-60
9
4
61-75
14
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (14 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +9 - wins late phases.

Eleven Wonders
ScoredConceded
3
8
0-15
0
17
16-30
5
8
31-45
6
8
46-60
2
15
61-75
7
17
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (17). Late-goal balance (76-90): -10 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.63
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.9 : 0.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
130%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
46%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+14%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
37%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
10%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 10 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Medeama

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.36
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.35
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-17.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.25
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
112%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
124%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.02
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

Eleven Wonders

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.59
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.92
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.21
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.71
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
106%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
161%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.30
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
30% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
30%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ghana Premier League).

Teams vs league

MedeamaLigaEleven Wonders
Average goals in match 2.352.03 2.91
Both teams scored 53%34% 39%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 47%34% 45%
Clean sheets 44%41% 12%
Goal before half-time 68%62% 79%
Goal after half-time 71%59% 82%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.03
Average goals per match
34%
Both teams scored
34%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
41%
Clean sheets
1.37
Home goals / match
0.66
Away goals / match
+108%
Home attack advantage
+52%
Home defence advantage
+42%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
62%
1 goal
26%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
59%
1 goal
28%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Medeama 1 - 0 - 0 Eleven Wonders. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Eleven Wonders
1 : 2
Medeama

FAQ

What was the result of Medeama vs Eleven Wonders?

The Ghana Premier League match finished Medeama 2:0 Eleven Wonders. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Medeama vs Eleven Wonders?

Medeama score 1.53 goals per game on average and Eleven Wonders 0.70. The Ghana Premier League average is 2.03 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 34% of games. Both teams score in 53% of Medeama's matches and 39% of Eleven Wonders's.

What form are Medeama and Eleven Wonders in?

Over the last 5 games Medeama have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Eleven Wonders 0-0-5 (0.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Medeama vs Eleven Wonders?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Medeama vs Eleven Wonders: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.