Ghana - Ghana Premier LeagueTarkwa T&A ParkData current as of 24 July 2026

Medeama vs Heart of Lions: match statistics

Medeama crest
Medeama
5 : 2half-time 2:1
Heart of Lions crest
Heart of Lions

Medeama vs Heart of Lions: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Medeama play Heart of Lions in Ghana Premier League (Ghana). The match date is 17 May 2026 at 17:00. Venue: Tarkwa T&A Park. Final score: 5:2.

Current form

Medeama: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Heart of Lions: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Medeama scores 1.53 and concedes 0.82 goals per match. Heart of Lions scores 1.06 and concedes 0.97. League average: 2.03 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Medeama 53%, Heart of Lions 29%. Over 2.5: Medeama 47%, Heart of Lions 41%. League level: BTTS 34%, Over 2.5 34%.

xG, shots and style

Heart of Lions has higher xG: 1.44 vs 1.43. Medeama: 9.5 shots per match, Heart of Lions: 7.6.

Match halves

Medeama: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.76. Heart of Lions: half-time lead 32%, second-half goals 0.38.

Goals by minute

Medeama: 16-30 (14 goals). Heart of Lions: 31-45+ (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ghana Premier League: 2.03 goals per match, BTTS 34%, Over 2.5 34%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 1-0-0. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Medeama holds a clear advantage: they sit 1st, have 16 wins this season and win 69% of home matches, while Heart of Lions have 11 wins and only a 6% away win rate. At home Medeama average 1.88 goals per game on 16.08 shots (6.46 on target), whereas visitors away average 0.75 goals on 9 shots and 3.42 on target, indicating lower offensive efficiency. Defensively the hosts concede 0.56 goals at home and keep a clean sheet in 50% of matches, while Heart of Lions concede 1.38 goals away with 25% clean sheets. The quality gap in chances is confirmed by xG: 1.77 for Medeama at home versus 1.20 for the visitors away, and in the last 5 matches Medeama scored 10 and conceded 5, while Heart of Lions scored 7 and conceded 3. Given the superiority in chance creation (16.08 vs 9 shots, 6.46 vs 3.42 on target), higher xG (1.77 vs 1.20) and the fact that hosts fail to score in only 6% of home games versus 56% of the visitors' away matches, I predict a home win.

Half-by-half

2 : 1
1st half
3 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

-1Possession (%)-1
MedeamaHeart of Lions
-1Shots-1
MedeamaHeart of Lions
-1Shots on target-1
MedeamaHeart of Lions
0xG0
MedeamaHeart of Lions
-1Corners-1
MedeamaHeart of Lions
0Dangerous attacks0
MedeamaHeart of Lions
-1Fouls-1
MedeamaHeart of Lions
-1Cards-1
MedeamaHeart of Lions

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

MedeamaHeart of Lions
1.53Goals scored / match1.06
MedeamaHeart of Lions
0.82Goals conceded / match0.97
MedeamaHeart of Lions
45%Average possession39%
MedeamaHeart of Lions
3.59Shots on target / match2.56
MedeamaHeart of Lions

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.5Shots per match7.62
MedeamaHeart of Lions
3.59Shots on target2.56
MedeamaHeart of Lions
16.1%Shot conversion13.9%
MedeamaHeart of Lions
45%Possession39%
MedeamaHeart of Lions
1.43xG for1.44
MedeamaHeart of Lions
1.07xG against1.19
MedeamaHeart of Lions

Shooting quality

Medeama: Counter-attackingHeart of Lions: Counter-attacking
MedeamaHeart of Lions
Accuracy (shots on target)38%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.19
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.430.41

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Medeama is 29% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - Medeama · 1.4 pts / match - Heart of Lions

Medeama
WLWWL
Season result split
50% W32% R18% P
Season (W-D-L)
17-11-6
1.82 pts / match · goal difference +24
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
12-4-1
Last 5 at home
4-0-1
LWWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 0.99Opponent xG: 0.69BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Heart of Lions
DLWLW
Season result split
35% W26% R38% P
Season (W-D-L)
12-9-13
1.32 pts / match · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-7-9
Last 5 away
0-2-3
LLDDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 0.72Opponent xG: 0.95BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Medeama is 44% better for: goals scored per match.

1.53 goals / match - Medeama · 1.06 goals / match - Heart of Lions

Medeama is 18% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.82 goals / match - Medeama · 0.97 goals / match - Heart of Lions

Medeama scoring profile: strong

Medeama scores in 82% of matches (28 of 34 matches), while Heart of Lions keeps a clean sheet in 47% (16 of 34 matches).

Heart of Lions scoring profile: mixed

Heart of Lions scores in 59% of matches (20 of 34 matches), while Medeama keeps a clean sheet in 44% (15 of 34 matches).

52Goals scored (season)36
MedeamaHeart of Lions
28Goals conceded (season)33
MedeamaHeart of Lions
2.35Average goals in match2.03
MedeamaHeart of Lions
11Goals scored (last 5)8
MedeamaHeart of Lions
8Goals conceded (last 5)6
MedeamaHeart of Lions

How often they score at least...

82%1 goal59%
MedeamaHeart of Lions
44%2 goals29%
MedeamaHeart of Lions
15%3 goals15%
MedeamaHeart of Lions
9%4 goals3%
MedeamaHeart of Lions

How often they concede at least...

56%1 goal53%
MedeamaHeart of Lions
21%2 goals26%
MedeamaHeart of Lions
3%3 goals12%
MedeamaHeart of Lions
3%4 goals3%
MedeamaHeart of Lions

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

34%
League average

Goal patterns

18%BTTS at half-time9%
MedeamaHeart of Lions
3%BTTS in both halves6%
MedeamaHeart of Lions
26%Scored in both halves18%
MedeamaHeart of Lions

BTTS and goal count

38%Min. 3 goals and BTTS26%
MedeamaHeart of Lions
9%Min. 3 goals without BTTS15%
MedeamaHeart of Lions
60%BTTS - last 520%
MedeamaHeart of Lions

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

68%Min. 1 goal before half-time68%
MedeamaHeart of Lions
35%Min. 2 goals before half-time26%
MedeamaHeart of Lions
12%Min. 3 goals before half-time6%
MedeamaHeart of Lions

2nd half

71%Min. 1 goal after half-time50%
MedeamaHeart of Lions
32%Min. 2 goals after half-time26%
MedeamaHeart of Lions
9%Min. 3 goals after half-time12%
MedeamaHeart of Lions

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Medeama is 16% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.56 pts / match - Medeama · 1.35 pts / match - Heart of Lions

Medeama - half-time state
38% leading41% draw21% trailing
Heart of Lions - half-time state
32% leading38% draw29% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.56Points per match (1st half)1.35
MedeamaHeart of Lions
0.76Goals scored (1st half)0.59
MedeamaHeart of Lions
0.38Goals conceded (1st half)0.41
MedeamaHeart of Lions
1.15Average goals (1st half)1
MedeamaHeart of Lions
65%Clean sheet before half-time65%
MedeamaHeart of Lions
50%No goal before half-time59%
MedeamaHeart of Lions

After half-time (2nd half)

1.65Points per match (2nd half)1.06
MedeamaHeart of Lions
0.76Goals scored (2nd half)0.38
MedeamaHeart of Lions
0.44Goals conceded (2nd half)0.56
MedeamaHeart of Lions
1.21Average goals (2nd half)0.94
MedeamaHeart of Lions
68%Clean sheet after half-time62%
MedeamaHeart of Lions
41%No goal after half-time68%
MedeamaHeart of Lions

Medeama - second-half results

41% W41% R18% P
53
Half-time points
26
Half-time goals
+13
Goal difference (1st half)
56
Second-half points
+11
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.56
PPG before half-time
Lead holding132%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Heart of Lions - second-half results

15% W62% R24% P
46
Half-time points
20
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
36
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.35
PPG before half-time
Lead holding109%

Leads at half-time in 32% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Medeama - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.40
Goals scored / match1.01.2
Goals conceded / match0.61.0
Average goals in match1.62.2
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+2+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5
Heart of Lions - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.80
Goals scored / match0.80.2
Goals conceded / match0.60.6
Average goals in match1.40.8
1 goal60%20%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference+1-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Medeama
ScoredConceded
5
3
0-15
14
5
16-30
7
5
31-45
3
6
46-60
9
4
61-75
14
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (14 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +9 - wins late phases.

Heart of Lions
ScoredConceded
6
1
0-15
5
5
16-30
12
8
31-45
3
5
46-60
4
5
61-75
6
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (12 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.19
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
108%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
41%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-54%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
48%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Medeama

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.36
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.35
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-17.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.25
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
112%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
124%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.02
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

Heart of Lions

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.25
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.16
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-10.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.38
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.22
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
161%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
71%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.08
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ghana Premier League).

Teams vs league

MedeamaLigaHeart of Lions
Average goals in match 2.352.03 2.03
Both teams scored 53%34% 29%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 47%34% 41%
Clean sheets 44%41% 47%
Goal before half-time 68%62% 68%
Goal after half-time 71%59% 50%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.03
Average goals per match
34%
Both teams scored
34%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
41%
Clean sheets
1.37
Home goals / match
0.66
Away goals / match
+108%
Home attack advantage
+52%
Home defence advantage
+42%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
62%
1 goal
26%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
59%
1 goal
28%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Medeama 1 - 0 - 0 Heart of Lions. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Medeama vs Heart of Lions?

The Ghana Premier League match finished Medeama 5:2 Heart of Lions. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Medeama vs Heart of Lions?

Medeama score 1.53 goals per game on average and Heart of Lions 1.06. The Ghana Premier League average is 2.03 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 34% of games. Both teams score in 53% of Medeama's matches and 29% of Heart of Lions's.

What form are Medeama and Heart of Lions in?

Over the last 5 games Medeama have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Heart of Lions 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Medeama vs Heart of Lions?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.