Ethiopia - Ethiopia Premier LeagueData current as of 24 July 2026

Mekelle Kenema vs Arba Minch Kenema: match statistics

Mekelle Kenema vs Arba Minch Kenema: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Mekelle Kenema play Arba Minch Kenema in Ethiopia Premier League (Ethiopia). The match date is 5 May 2026 at 15:00. Final score: 0:2.

Current form

Mekelle Kenema: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. Arba Minch Kenema: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Mekelle Kenema scores 0.79 and concedes 0.95 goals per match. Arba Minch Kenema scores 0.79 and concedes 1.21. League average: 1.78 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Mekelle Kenema 37%, Arba Minch Kenema 42%. Over 2.5: Mekelle Kenema 34%, Arba Minch Kenema 29%. League level: BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 28%.

xG, shots and style

Arba Minch Kenema has higher xG: 1.12 vs 1.10. Mekelle Kenema: 6.4 shots per match, Arba Minch Kenema: 7.3.

Match halves

Mekelle Kenema: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.42. Arba Minch Kenema: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.39.

Goals by minute

Mekelle Kenema: 46-60 (9 goals). Arba Minch Kenema: 31-45+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ethiopia Premier League: 1.78 goals per match, BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 28%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 1-0-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

I predict a draw (X) — both teams show a strong propensity for draws: Mekelle Kenema records 50% draws at home, while Arba Minch Kenema has 43% draws away. Mekelle holds a slight offensive edge: scoring 1.07 goals per home match with xG 1.22, 3.29 shots on target and a conversion rate of 17%, whereas the visitors average 0.93 goals away with xG 1.20 and a lower conversion rate of 12%. Arba Minch’s defense is, however, more compact on the road — conceding 0.93 goals per match and keeping 36% clean sheets, while Mekelle concedes 1.21 goals at home and has only 21% clean sheets. Form over the last 5 matches is similar: Mekelle averages 1.4 points (results llwwd), Arba Minch 1.2 points (results wlddd), indicating a small margin likely to produce a draw or a narrow home win. Considering the higher home efficiency and the high draw rates for both sides, I allocate 40% to a draw, 35% to a Mekelle win and 25% to an Arba Minch win.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

56Possession (%)44
Mekelle KenemaArba Minch Kenema
3Shots6
Mekelle KenemaArba Minch Kenema
1Shots on target4
Mekelle KenemaArba Minch Kenema
0.68xG0.89
Mekelle KenemaArba Minch Kenema
5Corners7
Mekelle KenemaArba Minch Kenema
56Dangerous attacks30
Mekelle KenemaArba Minch Kenema
5Fouls9
Mekelle KenemaArba Minch Kenema
0Cards0
Mekelle KenemaArba Minch Kenema

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Mekelle KenemaArba Minch Kenema
0.79Goals scored / match0.79
Mekelle KenemaArba Minch Kenema
0.95Goals conceded / match1.21
Mekelle KenemaArba Minch Kenema
49%Average possession49%
Mekelle KenemaArba Minch Kenema
2.42Shots on target / match2.29
Mekelle KenemaArba Minch Kenema

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

6.37Shots per match7.26
Mekelle KenemaArba Minch Kenema
2.42Shots on target2.29
Mekelle KenemaArba Minch Kenema
12.4%Shot conversion10.9%
Mekelle KenemaArba Minch Kenema
49%Possession49%
Mekelle KenemaArba Minch Kenema
1.1xG for1.12
Mekelle KenemaArba Minch Kenema
1.17xG against1.2
Mekelle KenemaArba Minch Kenema

Shooting quality

Mekelle Kenema: BalancedArba Minch Kenema: Balanced
Mekelle KenemaArba Minch Kenema
Accuracy (shots on target)38%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.170.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.34

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Mekelle Kenema
DDDLW
Season result split
21% W45% R34% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-17-13
1.08 pts / match · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-10-5
Last 5 at home
1-3-1
LDDDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.12Opponent xG: 1.16BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 40%
Arba Minch Kenema
WWLLL
Season result split
18% W37% R45% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-14-17
0.92 pts / match · goal difference -16
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-7-6
Last 5 away
2-1-2
WDWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.20Opponent xG: 1.32BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Mekelle Kenema is 27% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.95 goals / match - Mekelle Kenema · 1.21 goals / match - Arba Minch Kenema

Mekelle Kenema scoring profile: mixed

Mekelle Kenema scores in 53% of matches (20 of 38 matches), while Arba Minch Kenema keeps a clean sheet in 29% (11 of 38 matches).

Arba Minch Kenema scoring profile: mixed

Arba Minch Kenema scores in 53% of matches (20 of 38 matches), while Mekelle Kenema keeps a clean sheet in 39% (15 of 38 matches).

30Goals scored (season)30
Mekelle KenemaArba Minch Kenema
36Goals conceded (season)46
Mekelle KenemaArba Minch Kenema
1.74Average goals in match2
Mekelle KenemaArba Minch Kenema
3Goals scored (last 5)5
Mekelle KenemaArba Minch Kenema
3Goals conceded (last 5)6
Mekelle KenemaArba Minch Kenema

How often they score at least...

53%1 goal53%
Mekelle KenemaArba Minch Kenema
21%2 goals26%
Mekelle KenemaArba Minch Kenema
5%3 goals0%
Mekelle KenemaArba Minch Kenema
0%4 goals0%
Mekelle KenemaArba Minch Kenema

How often they concede at least...

61%1 goal71%
Mekelle KenemaArba Minch Kenema
26%2 goals32%
Mekelle KenemaArba Minch Kenema
8%3 goals16%
Mekelle KenemaArba Minch Kenema
0%4 goals3%
Mekelle KenemaArba Minch Kenema

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

42%
Arba Minch Kenema - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.16 of 38 matches
40%
League average

Goal patterns

11%BTTS at half-time11%
Mekelle KenemaArba Minch Kenema
3%BTTS in both halves3%
Mekelle KenemaArba Minch Kenema
16%Scored in both halves16%
Mekelle KenemaArba Minch Kenema

BTTS and goal count

24%Min. 3 goals and BTTS26%
Mekelle KenemaArba Minch Kenema
11%Min. 3 goals without BTTS3%
Mekelle KenemaArba Minch Kenema
0%BTTS - last 540%
Mekelle KenemaArba Minch Kenema

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

55%Min. 1 goal before half-time71%
Mekelle KenemaArba Minch Kenema
18%Min. 2 goals before half-time24%
Mekelle KenemaArba Minch Kenema
3%Min. 3 goals before half-time8%
Mekelle KenemaArba Minch Kenema

2nd half

61%Min. 1 goal after half-time58%
Mekelle KenemaArba Minch Kenema
32%Min. 2 goals after half-time26%
Mekelle KenemaArba Minch Kenema
5%Min. 3 goals after half-time11%
Mekelle KenemaArba Minch Kenema

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Mekelle Kenema is 10% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.16 pts / match - Mekelle Kenema · 1.05 pts / match - Arba Minch Kenema

Mekelle Kenema - half-time state
21% leading53% draw26% trailing
Arba Minch Kenema - half-time state
24% leading34% draw42% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.16Points per match (1st half)1.05
Mekelle KenemaArba Minch Kenema
0.37Goals scored (1st half)0.39
Mekelle KenemaArba Minch Kenema
0.39Goals conceded (1st half)0.63
Mekelle KenemaArba Minch Kenema
0.76Average goals (1st half)1.03
Mekelle KenemaArba Minch Kenema
66%Clean sheet before half-time53%
Mekelle KenemaArba Minch Kenema
68%No goal before half-time66%
Mekelle KenemaArba Minch Kenema

After half-time (2nd half)

1.11Points per match (2nd half)1.11
Mekelle KenemaArba Minch Kenema
0.42Goals scored (2nd half)0.39
Mekelle KenemaArba Minch Kenema
0.55Goals conceded (2nd half)0.58
Mekelle KenemaArba Minch Kenema
0.97Average goals (2nd half)0.97
Mekelle KenemaArba Minch Kenema
58%Clean sheet after half-time58%
Mekelle KenemaArba Minch Kenema
63%No goal after half-time66%
Mekelle KenemaArba Minch Kenema

Mekelle Kenema - second-half results

18% W55% R26% P
44
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
42
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.16
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 21%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Arba Minch Kenema - second-half results

18% W55% R26% P
40
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
-9
Goal difference (1st half)
42
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.05
PPG before half-time
Lead holding75%

Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 18%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Mekelle Kenema - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.20
Goals scored / match0.40.2
Goals conceded / match0.20.4
Average goals in match0.60.6
1 goal40%40%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference+1-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Arba Minch Kenema - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.00
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match0.40.8
Average goals in match1.01.2
1 goal100%80%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+1-2
Half-time: 60% leading - 0% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Mekelle Kenema
ScoredConceded
3
4
0-15
8
5
16-30
3
6
31-45
9
7
46-60
2
5
61-75
5
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (9 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

Arba Minch Kenema
ScoredConceded
3
9
0-15
4
9
16-30
8
6
31-45
5
8
46-60
2
4
61-75
8
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.87
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
105%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
40%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+7%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
28%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
22%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 5 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Mekelle Kenema

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.07
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.09
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.31
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.22
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
87%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
109%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.12
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

Arba Minch Kenema

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.08
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.34
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.33
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.01
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
91%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
133%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.28
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ethiopia Premier League).

Teams vs league

Mekelle KenemaLigaArba Minch Kenema
Average goals in match 1.741.78 2.00
Both teams scored 37%40% 42%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 34%28% 29%
Clean sheets 39%40% 29%
Goal before half-time 55%56% 71%
Goal after half-time 61%59% 58%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.78
Average goals per match
40%
Both teams scored
28%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
40%
Clean sheets
0.91
Home goals / match
0.87
Away goals / match
+5%
Home attack advantage
+4%
Home defence advantage
+1%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
56%
1 goal
22%
2 goals
4%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
59%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Mekelle Kenema 1 - 0 - 0 Arba Minch Kenema. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Mekelle Kenema vs Arba Minch Kenema?

The Ethiopia Premier League match finished Mekelle Kenema 0:2 Arba Minch Kenema. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Mekelle Kenema vs Arba Minch Kenema?

Mekelle Kenema score 0.79 goals per game on average and Arba Minch Kenema 0.79. The Ethiopia Premier League average is 1.78 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 28% of games. Both teams score in 37% of Mekelle Kenema's matches and 42% of Arba Minch Kenema's.

What form are Mekelle Kenema and Arba Minch Kenema in?

Over the last 5 games Mekelle Kenema have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Arba Minch Kenema 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Mekelle Kenema vs Arba Minch Kenema?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Mekelle Kenema vs Arba Minch Kenema: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.