Ethiopia - Ethiopia Premier LeagueTigray StadiumData current as of 07 September 2026

Mekelle Kenema vs Bahardar: match statistics

Mekelle Kenema crest
Mekelle Kenema
0 : 0half-time 0:0
Bahardar crest
Bahardar

Mekelle Kenema vs Bahardar: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Mekelle Kenema played Bahardar in Ethiopia Premier League (Ethiopia). The match was played on 30 May 2026. Venue: Tigray Stadium. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

Mekelle Kenema: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Bahardar: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Mekelle Kenema scores 0.82 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Bahardar scores 0.79 and concedes 0.70. League average: 1.79 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Mekelle Kenema 42%, Bahardar 33%. Over 2.5: Mekelle Kenema 33%, Bahardar 18%. League level: BTTS 41%, Over 2.5 28%.

xG, shots and style

Bahardar has higher xG: 1.22 vs 1.10. Mekelle Kenema: 6.0 shots per match, Bahardar: 7.8.

Match halves

Mekelle Kenema: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.45. Bahardar: half-time lead 12%, second-half goals 0.55.

Goals by minute

Mekelle Kenema: 46-60 (8 goals). Bahardar: 46-60 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ethiopia Premier League: 1.79 goals per match, BTTS 41%, Over 2.5 28%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I predict a draw (X) as the most likely outcome due to the high draw rates for both teams: Mekelle Kenema has 50% draws at home, and Bahardar has 50% draws away. Bahardar is notably stronger defensively on the road — they concede on average 0.63 goals per away match and keep a clean sheet in 56% of games, whereas Mekelle concedes 1.25 goals at home and has only a 19% clean sheet rate. Offensively, the hosts are marginally more efficient at home (avg. 3 shots on target, 16% conversion rate, avg. 1.00 goal and xG 1.17), while the visitors score on average 0.81 goals away with xG 1.13, indicating similar attacking potential. Form favors the visitors — Mekelle’s last 5: 1 win, 2 draws, 2 losses (avg. 1.0 pt/match), while Bahardar are unbeaten in their last 5 (2 wins, 3 draws, avg. 1.8 pts/match). Therefore I expect a low-scoring draw or a narrow away win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Season-long metrics indicate a low BTTS rate: both teams scored in 35% of Mekelle Kenema’s matches and 31% of Bahardar’s matches, both below the league average of 41%. Both sides keep clean sheets frequently — 53% for Mekelle and 56% for Bahardar — increasing the likelihood that at least one team will keep a clean sheet. Offensively they average only 0.76 and 0.81 goals per game, and despite xG of 1.30 for Mekelle and 1.13 for Bahardar, the home side converts just 0.76 (a 0.54 gap) and the visitors 0.81 (a 0.32 gap), indicating poor conversion of created chances. In the last 5 matches Bahardar have scored 6 and conceded 2 (1.2 and 0.4 per game), while Mekelle have 3 and 5 (0.6 and 1.0), so recent form and defensive figures favor a single-team scoring outcome or one clean sheet. Given the low seasonal BTTS 35%/31%, high clean sheets 53%/56% and a league average goals of 1.79, I recommend a "No" (BTTS - No) with an estimated probability of about 70%.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Mekelle Kenema scores on average 0.76 goals per match, Bahardar 0.81; however xG is 1.30 for Mekelle and 1.13 for Bahardar, indicating higher offensive potential (combined xG ≈ 2.43). Comparing the home attack (xG 1.30) to the away defense (xG against 1.11) yields about 1.21 expected goals for Mekelle, while the away attack (1.13) versus the home defense (1.26) gives about 1.20 for Bahardar, total ≈2.41. Season shares of matches over 1.5 goals are 53% (Mekelle) and 56% (Bahardar) — average ≈54.5% — whereas over 2.5 is only 24% and 13%, and over 3.5 is 18% and 6%. Additionally, both teams have a high clean sheet rate: 53% and 56%, and a low frequency of BTTS: 35% and 31%, which reduces the likelihood of multiple goals. As a result the strongest signal is Over 1.5 (forecast Over 1.5 ≈61%), while Over 2.5 (~18%) and Over 3.5 (~8%) look unlikely; therefore I recommend a bet on Over 1.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest signal is a draw at half-time and a draw at full-time: Mekelle and Bahardar record a half-time draw in 71% and 75% of matches respectively (≈73% on average), and the average number of first-half goals is only 0.29 for the home side and 0.19 for the visitors (≈0.48 total), which increases the likelihood of a 0–0 at the break. A draw at full-time is also common — the season draw rates are 59% for Mekelle and 50% for Bahardar (≈54.5% on average), with a low share of matches where both teams scored: 35% and 31%. At the same time Bahardar shows a clear advantage in second halves: the visitors average 1.06 goals after the break versus 0.71 for the home team, and 63% of the visitors’ matches feature at least one goal in the second half (vs 35% for Mekelle), which increases the chance of a turnaround after the break in favor of the visitors. xG presents a balanced picture (1.30 xG for Mekelle vs 1.13 xG for Bahardar), but actual goal averages are low (0.76 and 0.81), so the most moderate and stable pick is X/X (draw at Half-Time and draw at Full-Time). On this basis I recommend X/X as the most likely scenario, while also acknowledging smaller chances for X/2 (~14%) and 2/2 (~9%).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

52Possession (%)48
Mekelle KenemaBahardar
13Shots11
Mekelle KenemaBahardar
2Shots on target3
Mekelle KenemaBahardar
1.37xG1.22
Mekelle KenemaBahardar
3Corners2
Mekelle KenemaBahardar
58Dangerous attacks44
Mekelle KenemaBahardar
21Fouls17
Mekelle KenemaBahardar
0Cards0
Mekelle KenemaBahardar

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Mekelle KenemaBahardar
0.82Goals scored / match0.79
Mekelle KenemaBahardar
1Goals conceded / match0.7
Mekelle KenemaBahardar
49%Average possession51%
Mekelle KenemaBahardar
2.55Shots on target / match2.52
Mekelle KenemaBahardar

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

6.03Shots per match7.82
Mekelle KenemaBahardar
2.55Shots on target2.52
Mekelle KenemaBahardar
13.6%Shot conversion10.1%
Mekelle KenemaBahardar
49%Possession51%
Mekelle KenemaBahardar
1.1xG for1.22
Mekelle KenemaBahardar
1.17xG against1.18
Mekelle KenemaBahardar

Shooting quality

Mekelle Kenema: Efficient finishingBahardar: Balanced
Mekelle KenemaBahardar
Accuracy (shots on target)42%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.180.16
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.320.31

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Bahardar is 80% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Mekelle Kenema · 1.8 pts / match - Bahardar

Mekelle Kenema
DLLDW
Season result split
21% W42% R36% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-14-12
1.06 pts / match · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-8-5
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
DLWLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 0.73Opponent xG: 0.84BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 0%
Bahardar
DWDWD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
27% W55% R18% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-18-6
1.36 pts / match · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-3-0
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-8-3
Last 5 away
3-2-0
WDDWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 0.92Opponent xG: 1.21BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Bahardar is 43% better for: goals conceded per match.

1 goals / match - Mekelle Kenema · 0.7 goals / match - Bahardar

Mekelle Kenema scoring profile: mixed

Mekelle Kenema scores in 58% of matches (19 of 33 matches), while Bahardar keeps a clean sheet in 55% (18 of 33 matches).

Bahardar scoring profile: mixed

Bahardar scores in 52% of matches (17 of 33 matches), while Mekelle Kenema keeps a clean sheet in 33% (11 of 33 matches).

27Goals scored (season)26
Mekelle KenemaBahardar
33Goals conceded (season)23
Mekelle KenemaBahardar
1.82Average goals in match1.48
Mekelle KenemaBahardar
3Goals scored (last 5)6
Mekelle KenemaBahardar
5Goals conceded (last 5)2
Mekelle KenemaBahardar

How often they score at least...

58%1 goal52%
Mekelle KenemaBahardar
21%2 goals24%
Mekelle KenemaBahardar
3%3 goals3%
Mekelle KenemaBahardar
0%4 goals0%
Mekelle KenemaBahardar

How often they concede at least...

67%1 goal45%
Mekelle KenemaBahardar
27%2 goals18%
Mekelle KenemaBahardar
6%3 goals6%
Mekelle KenemaBahardar
0%4 goals0%
Mekelle KenemaBahardar

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

41%
League average

Goal patterns

12%BTTS at half-time12%
Mekelle KenemaBahardar
3%BTTS in both halves0%
Mekelle KenemaBahardar
15%Scored in both halves9%
Mekelle KenemaBahardar

BTTS and goal count

27%Min. 3 goals and BTTS18%
Mekelle KenemaBahardar
6%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Mekelle KenemaBahardar
40%BTTS - last 540%
Mekelle KenemaBahardar

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

58%Min. 1 goal before half-time36%
Mekelle KenemaBahardar
18%Min. 2 goals before half-time18%
Mekelle KenemaBahardar
3%Min. 3 goals before half-time3%
Mekelle KenemaBahardar

2nd half

64%Min. 1 goal after half-time48%
Mekelle KenemaBahardar
33%Min. 2 goals after half-time27%
Mekelle KenemaBahardar
6%Min. 3 goals after half-time9%
Mekelle KenemaBahardar

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Mekelle Kenema is 6% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.15 pts / match - Mekelle Kenema · 1.09 pts / match - Bahardar

Mekelle Kenema - half-time state
21% leading52% draw27% trailing
Bahardar - half-time state
12% leading73% draw15% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.15Points per match (1st half)1.09
Mekelle KenemaBahardar
0.36Goals scored (1st half)0.24
Mekelle KenemaBahardar
0.42Goals conceded (1st half)0.36
Mekelle KenemaBahardar
0.79Average goals (1st half)0.61
Mekelle KenemaBahardar
64%Clean sheet before half-time76%
Mekelle KenemaBahardar
67%No goal before half-time76%
Mekelle KenemaBahardar

After half-time (2nd half)

1.09Points per match (2nd half)1.42
Mekelle KenemaBahardar
0.45Goals scored (2nd half)0.55
Mekelle KenemaBahardar
0.58Goals conceded (2nd half)0.33
Mekelle KenemaBahardar
1.03Average goals (2nd half)0.88
Mekelle KenemaBahardar
55%Clean sheet after half-time73%
Mekelle KenemaBahardar
61%No goal after half-time64%
Mekelle KenemaBahardar

Mekelle Kenema - second-half results

18% W55% R27% P
38
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
36
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.15
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 21%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Bahardar - second-half results

27% W61% R12% P
36
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
47
Second-half points
+7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.09
PPG before half-time
Lead holding225%

Leads at half-time in 12% of matches and wins 27%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Mekelle Kenema - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.00
Goals scored / match0.00.6
Goals conceded / match0.20.8
Average goals in match0.21.4
1 goal20%100%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal100%40%
Goal difference-1-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Bahardar - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.60
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match0.20.2
Average goals in match0.80.8
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+2+2
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Mekelle Kenema
ScoredConceded
3
4
0-15
6
5
16-30
3
5
31-45
8
6
46-60
2
5
61-75
5
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

Bahardar
ScoredConceded
2
2
0-15
1
5
16-30
5
5
31-45
8
2
46-60
5
4
61-75
5
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (8 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.66
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.8 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
92%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
38%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
30%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
20%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 5 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Mekelle Kenema

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.07
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.11
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.28
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.17
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
91%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
112%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.06
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

Bahardar

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.04
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.05
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-10.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.43
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.48
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
89%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
78%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.44
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ethiopia Premier League).

Teams vs league

Mekelle KenemaLigaBahardar
Average goals in match 1.821.79 1.48
Both teams scored 42%41% 33%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 33%28% 18%
Clean sheets 33%40% 55%
Goal before half-time 58%54% 36%
Goal after half-time 64%60% 48%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.79
Average goals per match
41%
Both teams scored
28%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
40%
Clean sheets
0.90
Home goals / match
0.89
Away goals / match
+1%
Home attack advantage
+1%
Home defence advantage
+0%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
54%
1 goal
22%
2 goals
5%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
60%
1 goal
28%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Mekelle Kenema 0 - 1 - 0 Bahardar. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Mekelle Kenema vs Bahardar?

The Ethiopia Premier League match finished Mekelle Kenema 0:0 Bahardar. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Mekelle Kenema vs Bahardar?

Mekelle Kenema score 0.82 goals per game on average and Bahardar 0.79. The Ethiopia Premier League average is 1.79 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 28% of games. Both teams score in 42% of Mekelle Kenema's matches and 33% of Bahardar's.

What form are Mekelle Kenema and Bahardar in?

Over the last 5 games Mekelle Kenema have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Bahardar 2-3-0 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Mekelle Kenema vs Bahardar?

The statistical background for Mekelle Kenema vs Bahardar — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.