Mekelle Kenema vs Bahardar: match statistics
Mekelle Kenema vs Bahardar: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Mekelle Kenema played Bahardar in Ethiopia Premier League (Ethiopia). The match was played on 30 May 2026. Venue: Tigray Stadium. Final score: 0:0.
Current form
Mekelle Kenema: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Bahardar: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Mekelle Kenema scores 0.82 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Bahardar scores 0.79 and concedes 0.70. League average: 1.79 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Mekelle Kenema 42%, Bahardar 33%. Over 2.5: Mekelle Kenema 33%, Bahardar 18%. League level: BTTS 41%, Over 2.5 28%.
xG, shots and style
Bahardar has higher xG: 1.22 vs 1.10. Mekelle Kenema: 6.0 shots per match, Bahardar: 7.8.
Match halves
Mekelle Kenema: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.45. Bahardar: half-time lead 12%, second-half goals 0.55.
Goals by minute
Mekelle Kenema: 46-60 (8 goals). Bahardar: 46-60 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Ethiopia Premier League: 1.79 goals per match, BTTS 41%, Over 2.5 28%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict a draw (X) as the most likely outcome due to the high draw rates for both teams: Mekelle Kenema has 50% draws at home, and Bahardar has 50% draws away. Bahardar is notably stronger defensively on the road — they concede on average 0.63 goals per away match and keep a clean sheet in 56% of games, whereas Mekelle concedes 1.25 goals at home and has only a 19% clean sheet rate. Offensively, the hosts are marginally more efficient at home (avg. 3 shots on target, 16% conversion rate, avg. 1.00 goal and xG 1.17), while the visitors score on average 0.81 goals away with xG 1.13, indicating similar attacking potential. Form favors the visitors — Mekelle’s last 5: 1 win, 2 draws, 2 losses (avg. 1.0 pt/match), while Bahardar are unbeaten in their last 5 (2 wins, 3 draws, avg. 1.8 pts/match). Therefore I expect a low-scoring draw or a narrow away win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Season-long metrics indicate a low BTTS rate: both teams scored in 35% of Mekelle Kenema’s matches and 31% of Bahardar’s matches, both below the league average of 41%. Both sides keep clean sheets frequently — 53% for Mekelle and 56% for Bahardar — increasing the likelihood that at least one team will keep a clean sheet. Offensively they average only 0.76 and 0.81 goals per game, and despite xG of 1.30 for Mekelle and 1.13 for Bahardar, the home side converts just 0.76 (a 0.54 gap) and the visitors 0.81 (a 0.32 gap), indicating poor conversion of created chances. In the last 5 matches Bahardar have scored 6 and conceded 2 (1.2 and 0.4 per game), while Mekelle have 3 and 5 (0.6 and 1.0), so recent form and defensive figures favor a single-team scoring outcome or one clean sheet. Given the low seasonal BTTS 35%/31%, high clean sheets 53%/56% and a league average goals of 1.79, I recommend a "No" (BTTS - No) with an estimated probability of about 70%.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Mekelle Kenema scores on average 0.76 goals per match, Bahardar 0.81; however xG is 1.30 for Mekelle and 1.13 for Bahardar, indicating higher offensive potential (combined xG ≈ 2.43). Comparing the home attack (xG 1.30) to the away defense (xG against 1.11) yields about 1.21 expected goals for Mekelle, while the away attack (1.13) versus the home defense (1.26) gives about 1.20 for Bahardar, total ≈2.41. Season shares of matches over 1.5 goals are 53% (Mekelle) and 56% (Bahardar) — average ≈54.5% — whereas over 2.5 is only 24% and 13%, and over 3.5 is 18% and 6%. Additionally, both teams have a high clean sheet rate: 53% and 56%, and a low frequency of BTTS: 35% and 31%, which reduces the likelihood of multiple goals. As a result the strongest signal is Over 1.5 (forecast Over 1.5 ≈61%), while Over 2.5 (~18%) and Over 3.5 (~8%) look unlikely; therefore I recommend a bet on Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest signal is a draw at half-time and a draw at full-time: Mekelle and Bahardar record a half-time draw in 71% and 75% of matches respectively (≈73% on average), and the average number of first-half goals is only 0.29 for the home side and 0.19 for the visitors (≈0.48 total), which increases the likelihood of a 0–0 at the break. A draw at full-time is also common — the season draw rates are 59% for Mekelle and 50% for Bahardar (≈54.5% on average), with a low share of matches where both teams scored: 35% and 31%. At the same time Bahardar shows a clear advantage in second halves: the visitors average 1.06 goals after the break versus 0.71 for the home team, and 63% of the visitors’ matches feature at least one goal in the second half (vs 35% for Mekelle), which increases the chance of a turnaround after the break in favor of the visitors. xG presents a balanced picture (1.30 xG for Mekelle vs 1.13 xG for Bahardar), but actual goal averages are low (0.76 and 0.81), so the most moderate and stable pick is X/X (draw at Half-Time and draw at Full-Time). On this basis I recommend X/X as the most likely scenario, while also acknowledging smaller chances for X/2 (~14%) and 2/2 (~9%).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Mekelle Kenema | Bahardar | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 42% | 32% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.18 | 0.16 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.32 | 0.31 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Bahardar is 80% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / match - Mekelle Kenema · 1.8 pts / match - Bahardar
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Bahardar is 43% better for: goals conceded per match.
1 goals / match - Mekelle Kenema · 0.7 goals / match - Bahardar
Mekelle Kenema scores in 58% of matches (19 of 33 matches), while Bahardar keeps a clean sheet in 55% (18 of 33 matches).
Bahardar scores in 52% of matches (17 of 33 matches), while Mekelle Kenema keeps a clean sheet in 33% (11 of 33 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Mekelle Kenema
Over / Under - Bahardar
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Mekelle Kenema is 6% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.15 pts / match - Mekelle Kenema · 1.09 pts / match - Bahardar
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Mekelle Kenema - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 21%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Bahardar - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 12% of matches and wins 27%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 0.2 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 20% |
| No goal | 100% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (8 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Mekelle Kenema
Bahardar
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ethiopia Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Mekelle Kenema | Liga | Bahardar | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 1.82 | 1.79 | ▼ 1.48 |
| Both teams scored | • 42% | 41% | ▼ 33% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 33% | 28% | ▼ 18% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 33% | 40% | ▲ 55% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 58% | 54% | ▼ 36% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 64% | 60% | ▼ 48% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Mekelle Kenema 0 - 1 - 0 Bahardar. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Mekelle Kenema vs Bahardar?
The Ethiopia Premier League match finished Mekelle Kenema 0:0 Bahardar. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Mekelle Kenema vs Bahardar?
Mekelle Kenema score 0.82 goals per game on average and Bahardar 0.79. The Ethiopia Premier League average is 1.79 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 28% of games. Both teams score in 42% of Mekelle Kenema's matches and 33% of Bahardar's.
What form are Mekelle Kenema and Bahardar in?
Over the last 5 games Mekelle Kenema have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Bahardar 2-3-0 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Mekelle Kenema vs Bahardar?
The statistical background for Mekelle Kenema vs Bahardar — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


