Iran - Azadegan LeagueShahid Bahonar StadiumData current as of 07 September 2026

Mes Kerman vs Nassaji Mazandaran: match statistics

Mes Kerman vs Nassaji Mazandaran: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Mes Kerman played Nassaji Mazandaran in Azadegan League (Iran). The match was played on 27 May 2026. Venue: Shahid Bahonar Stadium. Final score: 1:2.

Current form

Mes Kerman: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Nassaji Mazandaran: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Mes Kerman scores 0.56 and concedes 0.48 goals per match. Nassaji Mazandaran scores 1.40 and concedes 0.44. League average: 1.48 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Mes Kerman 20%, Nassaji Mazandaran 32%. Over 2.5: Mes Kerman 12%, Nassaji Mazandaran 36%. League level: BTTS 31%, Over 2.5 21%.

xG, shots and style

Nassaji Mazandaran has higher xG: 1.92 vs 0.96. Mes Kerman: 2.7 shots per match, Nassaji Mazandaran: 5.5.

Match halves

Mes Kerman: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.32. Nassaji Mazandaran: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.80.

Goals by minute

Mes Kerman: 46-60 (4 goals). Nassaji Mazandaran: 61-75 (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Azadegan League: 1.48 goals per match, BTTS 31%, Over 2.5 21%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I back the away win. Nassaji sit 2nd in the table vs Mes Kerman in 7th and have 35 goals this season vs the hosts’ 14, with an away goal difference of +10 vs the hosts’ +1. The visitors average 1.38 goals on the road with a conversion rate of 14% and have scored 7 goals in their last five matches, while the home side average 0.58 goals per home game, a 6% conversion rate and only 3 goals in their last 5. Chance quality is similar (xG 1.31 for the visitors vs 1.32 for the hosts, roughly 9–10 shots and about 4.1–4.3 on target), but Nassaji’s advantage comes from superior finishing and a higher points average over the last 5 matches (2.2 vs 1.6). Both teams defend solidly (hosts concede 0.5 goals per home match, visitors 0.62 away), however the high proportion of matches without scoring for the hosts (50% vs 23% for the visitors) increases the likelihood of an away victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I predict No BTTS with 75% probability versus 25% for BTTS - Yes because Mes Kerman at home has a very strong defense: seasonally they concede 0.25 goals per game, have 83% clean sheets and only 17% matches with BTTS. Nassaji Mazandaran away has season BTTS 46% and 54% clean sheets, but in the last 5 away matches the visitors’ BTTS is only 20% and they concede on average 0.2 goals, which limits the chances for both teams to score. Both teams have low recent goals conceded (last 5: home 0.2, away 0.2) and seasonally 12 and 11 goals conceded, respectively, favoring at least one side keeping a clean sheet. Although Mes Kerman has higher xG (2.15 vs 1.31) and more shots on target (7.75 vs 4.33), the gap between xG and actual goals (home 1.42 per game) suggests control and a low number of defensive errors, which further supports No.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

xG and seasonal metrics point to a moderately low-scoring outcome: (home xG 2.15 + xG conceded by away 0.82)/2 ≈ 1.49 expected goals for Mes Kerman, while (away xG 1.31 + xG conceded by home 0.70)/2 ≈ 1.01 for Nassaji. The method based on seasonal averages ((seasonScoredAVG_home 1.42 + seasonConcededAVG_away 0.62)/2 = 1.02 and (seasonScoredAVG_away 1.38 + seasonConcededAVG_home 0.25)/2 = 0.82) and recent form over the last 5 matches (Mes Kerman 3 goals in 5 = 0.6 avg, Nassaji 7 goals = 1.4) lower the forecast. A weighted average of these approaches yields expected 1.25 goals for the home side and 0.90 for the away side, totaling 2.15 goals. Additionally, Mes Kerman have 83% clean sheets this season, and the share of matches over 2.5 goals is only 33% for the home team and 38% for the away team (league over 2.5 rate = 21%), which limits the likelihood of a high-scoring game. Consequently the strongest signal is the Under 2.5 line and I recommend that side as the best selection.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

First-half statistics strongly indicate a draw at the break: Mes Kerman were level at half-time in 64% of their matches this season, and in the last five fixtures the half-time draw occurred in 80% of cases; the hosts average 0.45 goals by half-time and concede only 0.09. After the break the hosts show a clear advantage in chance creation (xG 2.15 versus 1.31 for the visitors and 7.75 shots on target vs 4.33), averaging 1.0 goal in the second half and winning the second half in 64% of matches. Overall Mes Kerman win 67% of home games compared to a 46% win rate for away teams and have a low goals-conceded rate (on average 0.25 per match), which supports converting a half-time draw into a full-time win. For these reasons the most reliable scenario is a half-time draw with the hosts winning after full-time (X/1).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

45Possession (%)55
Mes KermanNassaji Mazandaran
6Shots6
Mes KermanNassaji Mazandaran
2Shots on target3
Mes KermanNassaji Mazandaran
0.89xG0.97
Mes KermanNassaji Mazandaran
4Corners3
Mes KermanNassaji Mazandaran
51Dangerous attacks53
Mes KermanNassaji Mazandaran
17Fouls16
Mes KermanNassaji Mazandaran
0Cards0
Mes KermanNassaji Mazandaran

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Mes KermanNassaji Mazandaran
0.56Goals scored / match1.4
Mes KermanNassaji Mazandaran
0.48Goals conceded / match0.44
Mes KermanNassaji Mazandaran
23%Average possession24%
Mes KermanNassaji Mazandaran
0.8Shots on target / match2.44
Mes KermanNassaji Mazandaran

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

2.72Shots per match5.48
Mes KermanNassaji Mazandaran
0.8Shots on target2.44
Mes KermanNassaji Mazandaran
20.6%Shot conversion25.5%
Mes KermanNassaji Mazandaran
23%Possession24%
Mes KermanNassaji Mazandaran
0.96xG for1.92
Mes KermanNassaji Mazandaran
1.07xG against0.74
Mes KermanNassaji Mazandaran

Shooting quality

Mes Kerman: Counter-attackingNassaji Mazandaran: Counter-attacking
Mes KermanNassaji Mazandaran
Accuracy (shots on target)29%45%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.350.35
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.700.57

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Nassaji Mazandaran is 38% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - Mes Kerman · 2.2 pts / match - Nassaji Mazandaran

Mes Kerman
WDWLD
Season result split
32% W40% R28% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-10-7
1.36 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-5-3
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
DWLDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 0.2xG: 0.78Opponent xG: 0.66BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%
Nassaji Mazandaran
WDWDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
56% W32% R12% P
Season (W-D-L)
14-8-3
2.00 pts / match · goal difference +24
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-5-2
Last 5 away
1-3-1
WDLDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 0.2xG: 1.89Opponent xG: 0.63BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Nassaji Mazandaran is 150% better for: goals scored per match.

0.56 goals / match - Mes Kerman · 1.4 goals / match - Nassaji Mazandaran

Nassaji Mazandaran is 9% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.48 goals / match - Mes Kerman · 0.44 goals / match - Nassaji Mazandaran

Mes Kerman scoring profile: more difficult

Mes Kerman scores in 48% of matches (12 of 25 matches), while Nassaji Mazandaran keeps a clean sheet in 68% (17 of 25 matches).

Nassaji Mazandaran scoring profile: mixed

Nassaji Mazandaran scores in 76% of matches (19 of 25 matches), while Mes Kerman keeps a clean sheet in 60% (15 of 25 matches).

14Goals scored (season)35
Mes KermanNassaji Mazandaran
12Goals conceded (season)11
Mes KermanNassaji Mazandaran
1.04Average goals in match1.84
Mes KermanNassaji Mazandaran
3Goals scored (last 5)7
Mes KermanNassaji Mazandaran
1Goals conceded (last 5)1
Mes KermanNassaji Mazandaran

How often they score at least...

48%1 goal76%
Mes KermanNassaji Mazandaran
8%2 goals36%
Mes KermanNassaji Mazandaran
0%3 goals20%
Mes KermanNassaji Mazandaran
0%4 goals4%
Mes KermanNassaji Mazandaran

How often they concede at least...

40%1 goal32%
Mes KermanNassaji Mazandaran
8%2 goals12%
Mes KermanNassaji Mazandaran
0%3 goals0%
Mes KermanNassaji Mazandaran
0%4 goals0%
Mes KermanNassaji Mazandaran

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

32%
Nassaji Mazandaran - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.8 of 25 matches
31%
League average

Goal patterns

4%BTTS at half-time8%
Mes KermanNassaji Mazandaran
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Mes KermanNassaji Mazandaran
8%Scored in both halves12%
Mes KermanNassaji Mazandaran

BTTS and goal count

12%Min. 3 goals and BTTS24%
Mes KermanNassaji Mazandaran
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS12%
Mes KermanNassaji Mazandaran
0%BTTS - last 520%
Mes KermanNassaji Mazandaran

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

36%Min. 1 goal before half-time44%
Mes KermanNassaji Mazandaran
8%Min. 2 goals before half-time20%
Mes KermanNassaji Mazandaran
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time4%
Mes KermanNassaji Mazandaran

2nd half

52%Min. 1 goal after half-time56%
Mes KermanNassaji Mazandaran
8%Min. 2 goals after half-time24%
Mes KermanNassaji Mazandaran
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time12%
Mes KermanNassaji Mazandaran

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Mes Kerman - half-time state
20% leading68% draw12% trailing
Nassaji Mazandaran - half-time state
24% leading60% draw16% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.28Points per match (1st half)1.32
Mes KermanNassaji Mazandaran
0.24Goals scored (1st half)0.44
Mes KermanNassaji Mazandaran
0.2Goals conceded (1st half)0.24
Mes KermanNassaji Mazandaran
0.44Average goals (1st half)0.68
Mes KermanNassaji Mazandaran
84%Clean sheet before half-time76%
Mes KermanNassaji Mazandaran
76%No goal before half-time72%
Mes KermanNassaji Mazandaran

After half-time (2nd half)

1.28Points per match (2nd half)1.84
Mes KermanNassaji Mazandaran
0.32Goals scored (2nd half)0.8
Mes KermanNassaji Mazandaran
0.28Goals conceded (2nd half)0.12
Mes KermanNassaji Mazandaran
0.6Average goals (2nd half)0.92
Mes KermanNassaji Mazandaran
72%Clean sheet after half-time88%
Mes KermanNassaji Mazandaran
68%No goal after half-time48%
Mes KermanNassaji Mazandaran

Mes Kerman - second-half results

24% W56% R20% P
32
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
32
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.28
PPG before half-time
Lead holding160%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 32%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Nassaji Mazandaran - second-half results

44% W52% R4% P
33
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
46
Second-half points
+17
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.32
PPG before half-time
Lead holding233%

Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 56%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Mes Kerman - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.60
Goals scored / match0.20.4
Goals conceded / match0.00.2
Average goals in match0.20.6
1 goal20%60%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%80%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference+1+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Nassaji Mazandaran - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.80
Goals scored / match0.60.8
Goals conceded / match0.20.0
Average goals in match0.80.8
1 goal60%40%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%100%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+2+4
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Mes Kerman
ScoredConceded
2
1
0-15
1
0
16-30
3
4
31-45
4
1
46-60
0
3
61-75
4
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Nassaji Mazandaran
ScoredConceded
8
4
0-15
3
1
16-30
4
3
31-45
4
2
46-60
9
0
61-75
7
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (9 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.44
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.5 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
97%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
26%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-31%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
36%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
12%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 8 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Mes Kerman

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.11
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.19
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.40
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.59
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
63%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
81%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.24
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

Nassaji Mazandaran

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+1.18
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.22
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-18.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.52
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.30
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
237%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
49%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 23% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Azadegan League).

Teams vs league

Mes KermanLigaNassaji Mazandaran
Average goals in match 1.041.48 1.84
Both teams scored 20%31% 32%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 12%21% 36%
Clean sheets 60%47% 68%
Goal before half-time 36%45% 44%
Goal after half-time 52%54% 56%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.48
Average goals per match
31%
Both teams scored
21%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
47%
Clean sheets
0.89
Home goals / match
0.59
Away goals / match
+51%
Home attack advantage
+34%
Home defence advantage
+21%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
45%
1 goal
12%
2 goals
2%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
54%
1 goal
20%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Away team

Other recorded players

Ali Nasiri⚽ 1
Omid Fahimi⚽ 1

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Nassaji MazandaranGoalAli Nasiri
  2. Nassaji MazandaranGoalOmid Fahimi

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Mes Kerman 0 - 0 - 1 Nassaji Mazandaran. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Nassaji Mazandaran
1 : 0
Mes Kerman

FAQ

What was the result of Mes Kerman vs Nassaji Mazandaran?

The Azadegan League match finished Mes Kerman 1:2 Nassaji Mazandaran. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Mes Kerman vs Nassaji Mazandaran?

Mes Kerman score 0.56 goals per game on average and Nassaji Mazandaran 1.40. The Azadegan League average is 1.48 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 21% of games. Both teams score in 20% of Mes Kerman's matches and 32% of Nassaji Mazandaran's.

What form are Mes Kerman and Nassaji Mazandaran in?

Over the last 5 games Mes Kerman have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Nassaji Mazandaran 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Mes Kerman vs Nassaji Mazandaran?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Mes Kerman vs Nassaji Mazandaran: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.