Iran - Azadegan LeagueShahid Bahonar StadiumData current as of 23 July 2026

Mes Kerman vs Navad Urmia: match statistics

Mes Kerman crest
Mes Kerman
3 : 0half-time 0:0
Navad Urmia crest
Navad Urmia

Mes Kerman vs Navad Urmia: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Mes Kerman play Navad Urmia in Azadegan League (Iran). The match date is 16 July 2026 at 18:15. Venue: Shahid Bahonar Stadium. Final score: 3:0.

Current form

Mes Kerman: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. Navad Urmia: 0-0-5, 0.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Mes Kerman scores 0.68 and concedes 0.53 goals per match. Navad Urmia scores 0.48 and concedes 1.30. League average: 1.59 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Mes Kerman 26%, Navad Urmia 30%. Over 2.5: Mes Kerman 15%, Navad Urmia 21%. League level: BTTS 30%, Over 2.5 22%.

xG, shots and style

Mes Kerman has higher xG: 1.10 vs 0.79. Mes Kerman: 3.6 shots per match, Navad Urmia: 0.9.

Match halves

Mes Kerman: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.35. Navad Urmia: half-time lead 12%, second-half goals 0.24.

Goals by minute

Mes Kerman: 76-90+ (7 goals). Navad Urmia: 31-45+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Azadegan League: 1.59 goals per match, BTTS 30%, Over 2.5 22%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

I predict a Mes Kerman win: the team sits 9th vs 17th Navad Urmia and has 9 wins this season compared to the visitors' 4. At home Mes Kerman concedes on average 0.56 goals per match and keeps a clean sheet in 56% of games, while Navad Urmia concedes 1.25 goals on average away and records a clean sheet in only 19% of matches. Mes Kerman generates more chances (average xG 1.43 at home vs 0.79 xG for the visitors on the road) and attempts more shots (10.4 vs 6.11) and shots on target (4.8 vs 2.11). The visitors struggle with finishing and form: on average 0.31 goals away, 69% of matches without scoring, 10 goals conceded in the last 5 matches and only 0.2 points per match in that period. Considering the edge in xG, chances created and the home side’s defensive solidity against the visitors’ negative away record (goal difference -15), I assess probabilities as 60% home win, 30% draw and 10% away win.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

-1Possession (%)-1
Mes KermanNavad Urmia
-1Shots-1
Mes KermanNavad Urmia
-1Shots on target-1
Mes KermanNavad Urmia
0xG0
Mes KermanNavad Urmia
-1Corners-1
Mes KermanNavad Urmia
0Dangerous attacks0
Mes KermanNavad Urmia
-1Fouls-1
Mes KermanNavad Urmia
-1Cards-1
Mes KermanNavad Urmia

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Mes KermanNavad Urmia
0.68Goals scored / match0.48
Mes KermanNavad Urmia
0.53Goals conceded / match1.3
Mes KermanNavad Urmia
26%Average possession12%
Mes KermanNavad Urmia
1.35Shots on target / match-0.15
Mes KermanNavad Urmia

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

3.59Shots per match0.94
Mes KermanNavad Urmia
1.35Shots on target-0.15
Mes KermanNavad Urmia
18.9%Shot conversion51.6%
Mes KermanNavad Urmia
26%Possession12%
Mes KermanNavad Urmia
1.1xG for0.79
Mes KermanNavad Urmia
1.03xG against1.3
Mes KermanNavad Urmia

Shooting quality

Mes Kerman: Counter-attackingNavad Urmia: Counter-attacking
Mes KermanNavad Urmia
Accuracy (shots on target)38%-16%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.310.84
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.500.00

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Mes Kerman
DDDLW
Season result split
29% W44% R26% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-15-9
1.32 pts / match · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-8-4
Last 5 at home
1-3-1
LDDDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.87Opponent xG: 1.58BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%
Navad Urmia
LLLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
12% W36% R52% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-12-17
0.73 pts / match · goal difference -27
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-5
0.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-4-12
Last 5 away
0-1-4
LLDLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.2Goals conceded: 2.6xG: 0.00Opponent xG: 0.00BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Mes Kerman is 42% better for: goals scored per match.

0.68 goals / match - Mes Kerman · 0.48 goals / match - Navad Urmia

Mes Kerman is 145% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.53 goals / match - Mes Kerman · 1.3 goals / match - Navad Urmia

Mes Kerman scoring profile: strong

Mes Kerman scores in 53% of matches (18 of 34 matches), while Navad Urmia keeps a clean sheet in 27% (9 of 33 matches).

Navad Urmia scoring profile: more difficult

Navad Urmia scores in 42% of matches (14 of 33 matches), while Mes Kerman keeps a clean sheet in 56% (19 of 34 matches).

23Goals scored (season)16
Mes KermanNavad Urmia
18Goals conceded (season)43
Mes KermanNavad Urmia
1.21Average goals in match1.79
Mes KermanNavad Urmia
5Goals scored (last 5)1
Mes KermanNavad Urmia
3Goals conceded (last 5)13
Mes KermanNavad Urmia

How often they score at least...

53%1 goal42%
Mes KermanNavad Urmia
12%2 goals3%
Mes KermanNavad Urmia
3%3 goals3%
Mes KermanNavad Urmia
0%4 goals0%
Mes KermanNavad Urmia

How often they concede at least...

44%1 goal73%
Mes KermanNavad Urmia
9%2 goals33%
Mes KermanNavad Urmia
0%3 goals12%
Mes KermanNavad Urmia
0%4 goals6%
Mes KermanNavad Urmia

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

30%
League average

Goal patterns

6%BTTS at half-time9%
Mes KermanNavad Urmia
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Mes KermanNavad Urmia
6%Scored in both halves3%
Mes KermanNavad Urmia

BTTS and goal count

12%Min. 3 goals and BTTS9%
Mes KermanNavad Urmia
3%Min. 3 goals without BTTS12%
Mes KermanNavad Urmia
40%BTTS - last 520%
Mes KermanNavad Urmia

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

35%Min. 1 goal before half-time52%
Mes KermanNavad Urmia
9%Min. 2 goals before half-time21%
Mes KermanNavad Urmia
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time6%
Mes KermanNavad Urmia

2nd half

56%Min. 1 goal after half-time55%
Mes KermanNavad Urmia
12%Min. 2 goals after half-time21%
Mes KermanNavad Urmia
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time3%
Mes KermanNavad Urmia

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Mes Kerman is 36% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.24 pts / match - Mes Kerman · 0.91 pts / match - Navad Urmia

Mes Kerman - half-time state
18% leading71% draw12% trailing
Navad Urmia - half-time state
12% leading55% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.24Points per match (1st half)0.91
Mes KermanNavad Urmia
0.24Goals scored (1st half)0.24
Mes KermanNavad Urmia
0.21Goals conceded (1st half)0.58
Mes KermanNavad Urmia
0.44Average goals (1st half)0.82
Mes KermanNavad Urmia
82%Clean sheet before half-time61%
Mes KermanNavad Urmia
76%No goal before half-time79%
Mes KermanNavad Urmia

After half-time (2nd half)

1.24Points per match (2nd half)0.94
Mes KermanNavad Urmia
0.35Goals scored (2nd half)0.24
Mes KermanNavad Urmia
0.32Goals conceded (2nd half)0.55
Mes KermanNavad Urmia
0.68Average goals (2nd half)0.79
Mes KermanNavad Urmia
68%Clean sheet after half-time58%
Mes KermanNavad Urmia
68%No goal after half-time76%
Mes KermanNavad Urmia

Mes Kerman - second-half results

24% W53% R24% P
42
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
42
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.24
PPG before half-time
Lead holding161%

Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Navad Urmia - second-half results

12% W58% R30% P
30
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-11
Goal difference (1st half)
31
Second-half points
-10
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.91
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 12% of matches and wins 12%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Mes Kerman - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.60
Goals scored / match0.20.2
Goals conceded / match0.00.6
Average goals in match0.20.8
1 goal20%60%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%40%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference+1-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Navad Urmia - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.600.20
Goals scored / match0.20.0
Goals conceded / match0.81.2
Average goals in match1.01.2
1 goal40%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal80%100%
Goal difference-3-6
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 20% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Mes Kerman
ScoredConceded
6
2
0-15
1
0
16-30
4
5
31-45
5
2
46-60
0
4
61-75
7
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Navad Urmia
ScoredConceded
1
9
0-15
2
6
16-30
5
10
31-45
1
3
46-60
3
6
61-75
4
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.50
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 0.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
94%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
28%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+33%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
22%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
27%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 4 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Mes Kerman

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.07
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.08
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-18.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.42
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.50
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
76%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
77%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.12
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
30% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 26% come in the first quarter-hour.
30%

Navad Urmia

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.51
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.31
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+12.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.31
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
0.00
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
70%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
144%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.73
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Azadegan League).

Teams vs league

Mes KermanLigaNavad Urmia
Average goals in match 1.211.59 1.79
Both teams scored 26%30% 30%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 15%22% 21%
Clean sheets 56%46% 27%
Goal before half-time 35%46% 52%
Goal after half-time 56%57% 55%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.59
Average goals per match
30%
Both teams scored
22%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
46%
Clean sheets
0.90
Home goals / match
0.69
Away goals / match
+30%
Home attack advantage
+23%
Home defence advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
46%
1 goal
15%
2 goals
3%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
57%
1 goal
21%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
1%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Mes Kerman 0 - 1 - 0 Navad Urmia. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Mes Kerman vs Navad Urmia?

The Azadegan League match finished Mes Kerman 3:0 Navad Urmia. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Mes Kerman vs Navad Urmia?

Mes Kerman score 0.68 goals per game on average and Navad Urmia 0.48. The Azadegan League average is 1.59 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 22% of games. Both teams score in 26% of Mes Kerman's matches and 30% of Navad Urmia's.

What form are Mes Kerman and Navad Urmia in?

Over the last 5 games Mes Kerman have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Navad Urmia 0-0-5 (0.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Mes Kerman vs Navad Urmia?

The statistical background for Mes Kerman vs Navad Urmia — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.