Iran - Azadegan LeagueShahid Bahonar StadiumData current as of 05 November 2026

Mes Kerman vs Saipa: match statistics

Mes Kerman crest
Mes Kerman
0 : 1half-time 0:1
Saipa crest
Saipa

Mes Kerman vs Saipa: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Mes Kerman played Saipa in Azadegan League (Iran). The match was played on 22 September 2026. Venue: Shahid Bahonar Stadium. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

Mes Kerman: 0-1-0, 1.00 points/match. Saipa: 1-0-0, 3.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Mes Kerman scores 1.00 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Saipa scores 2.00 and concedes 0.00. League average: 1.36 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Mes Kerman 100%, Saipa 0%. Over 2.5: Mes Kerman 0%, Saipa 0%. League level: BTTS 27%, Over 2.5 18%.

xG, shots and style

xG is very similar for both teams. Mes Kerman: -1.0 shots per match, Saipa: -1.0.

Match halves

Mes Kerman: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 1.00. Saipa: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 2.00.

Goals by minute

Mes Kerman: 61-75 (1 goals). Saipa: 46-60 (1 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Azadegan League: 1.36 goals per match, BTTS 27%, Over 2.5 18%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-0. Average goals 0.50, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Saipa go into the match in 2nd place in the table and have won 4 of their last 5 matches, while Mes Kerman have recorded just 1 victory during the same period, along with 3 draws and 1 defeat. The visitors have scored 7 goals and conceded just 2 in their last five matches, giving them a clearly better goal difference than the hosts, who have scored 5 and conceded 3. The difference is also reflected in the average points haul over the last five rounds: Saipa average 2.4 points per match, compared with 1.2 for Mes Kerman. In the current season, Saipa opened with a 2:0 win, whereas Mes Kerman drew 1:1, so the more clinical and defensively reliable visitors should be given the greater chance of victory. A draw remains a realistic outcome given the early stage of the campaign and Mes Kerman’s three draws in their last five matches, but the form trend favours Saipa.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest signal points to BTTS - No, as the seasonal data for both teams shows that matches with goals scored by both sides account for 0%. Mes Kerman kept a clean sheet in 100% of their home matches so far, while Saipa have yet to score away from home, which significantly reduces the likelihood of an away goal. Recent form also points towards a low-scoring game: the hosts conceded an average of 0.6 goals, while Saipa conceded just 0.4 goals per match in their last five appearances. BTTS occurred in only 40% of Mes Kerman’s matches and 20% of Saipa’s matches during this period, compared with a league average of just 25%. Saipa have recently averaged 1.4 goals scored, but their away inefficiency and the hosts’ highly solid defense more clearly support a scenario in which at least one team fails to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Data from the last five matches points to a low-scoring profile: Mes Kerman averaged 1.0 goals scored and 0.6 conceded, while Saipa scored 1.4 goals and conceded just 0.4. The combined average goals in these runs stands at 1.6 for Mes Kerman matches and 1.8 for Saipa fixtures, respectively. For both teams, only 20% of their last five matches went over 2.5 goals, significantly reducing the likelihood of a four-goal outcome. The league-wide average is also just 1.25 goals per match, with games featuring over 2.5 goals accounting for 13% of the competition. Therefore, the strongest option is Under 3.5, as even with Saipa holding the form advantage, both teams’ defensive profiles clearly favor a match with a maximum of three goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a Saipa victory in the full match, as the visitors have been level at the break in 80% of their last five matches, compared with 50% for Mes Kerman. The first halves have been very tight: Mes Kerman have averaged 0.25 goals and Saipa 0.40, while both teams have kept a clean sheet at half-time in 75% and 80% of matches, respectively. After the break, however, the form advantage shifts to Saipa, who have won 80% of their last five matches and averaged 1.0 goal in the second half while conceding just 0.2. During the same period, Mes Kerman have scored only 0.25 goals after half-time, lost the second half in 50% of matches, and have managed just a 20% win rate across their last five games. Although the hosts’ limited seasonal data is favorable, Saipa’s current run of four consecutive victories, together with a record of 7 goals scored and 2 conceded in five matches, clearly strengthens the X/2 option.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

-1Possession (%)-1
Mes KermanSaipa
-1Shots-1
Mes KermanSaipa
-1Shots on target-1
Mes KermanSaipa
0xG0
Mes KermanSaipa
-1Corners-1
Mes KermanSaipa
0Dangerous attacks0
Mes KermanSaipa
-1Fouls-1
Mes KermanSaipa
-1Cards-1
Mes KermanSaipa

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1Goals scored / match2
Mes KermanSaipa
1Goals conceded / match0
Mes KermanSaipa
-1%Average possession-1%
Mes KermanSaipa
-1Shots on target / match-1
Mes KermanSaipa

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

-1Shots per match-1
Mes KermanSaipa
-1Shots on target-1
Mes KermanSaipa
-100%Shot conversion-200%
Mes KermanSaipa
-1%Possession-1%
Mes KermanSaipa
0xG for0
Mes KermanSaipa
0xG against0
Mes KermanSaipa

Shooting quality

Mes Kerman: BalancedSaipa: Balanced
Mes KermanSaipa
Accuracy (shots on target)0%0%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.000.00
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.000.00

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Saipa is 200% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Mes Kerman · 3 pts / match - Saipa

Mes Kerman
D
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W100% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
0-1-0
1.00 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-0
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-0-0
Last 5 at home
0-0-0
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 0.00Opponent xG: 0.00BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 0%
Saipa
W
5 wins in a row
Season result split
100% W0% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-0-0
3.00 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-0
3.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-0
Last 5 away
0-0-0
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 0.0xG: 0.00Opponent xG: 0.00BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Saipa is 100% better for: goals scored per match.

1 goals / match - Mes Kerman · 2 goals / match - Saipa

Mes Kerman scoring profile: mixed

Mes Kerman scores in 100% of matches (1 of 1 matches), while Saipa keeps a clean sheet in 100% (1 of 1 matches).

Saipa scoring profile: very strong

Saipa scores in 100% of matches (1 of 1 matches), while Mes Kerman keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 1 matches).

1Goals scored (season)2
Mes KermanSaipa
1Goals conceded (season)0
Mes KermanSaipa
2Average goals in match2
Mes KermanSaipa
1Goals scored (last 5)2
Mes KermanSaipa
1Goals conceded (last 5)0
Mes KermanSaipa

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal100%
Mes KermanSaipa
0%2 goals100%
Mes KermanSaipa
0%3 goals0%
Mes KermanSaipa
0%4 goals0%
Mes KermanSaipa

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal0%
Mes KermanSaipa
0%2 goals0%
Mes KermanSaipa
0%3 goals0%
Mes KermanSaipa
0%4 goals0%
Mes KermanSaipa

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time0%
Mes KermanSaipa
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Mes KermanSaipa
0%Scored in both halves0%
Mes KermanSaipa

BTTS and goal count

0%Min. 3 goals and BTTS0%
Mes KermanSaipa
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Mes KermanSaipa
100%BTTS - last 50%
Mes KermanSaipa

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time0%
Mes KermanSaipa
0%Min. 2 goals before half-time0%
Mes KermanSaipa
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Mes KermanSaipa

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
Mes KermanSaipa
0%Min. 2 goals after half-time100%
Mes KermanSaipa
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
Mes KermanSaipa

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Mes Kerman - half-time state
0% leading0% draw100% trailing
Saipa - half-time state
0% leading100% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0Points per match (1st half)1
Mes KermanSaipa
0Goals scored (1st half)0
Mes KermanSaipa
1Goals conceded (1st half)0
Mes KermanSaipa
1Average goals (1st half)0
Mes KermanSaipa
0%Clean sheet before half-time100%
Mes KermanSaipa
100%No goal before half-time100%
Mes KermanSaipa

After half-time (2nd half)

3Points per match (2nd half)3
Mes KermanSaipa
1Goals scored (2nd half)2
Mes KermanSaipa
0Goals conceded (2nd half)0
Mes KermanSaipa
1Average goals (2nd half)2
Mes KermanSaipa
100%Clean sheet after half-time100%
Mes KermanSaipa
0%No goal after half-time0%
Mes KermanSaipa

Mes Kerman - second-half results

100% W0% D0% L
0
Half-time points
0
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
3
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.00
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time-1.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Saipa - second-half results

100% W0% D0% L
1
Half-time points
0
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
3
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Mes Kerman - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.003.00
Goals scored / match0.01.0
Goals conceded / match1.00.0
Average goals in match1.01.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet0%100%
No goal100%0%
Goal difference-1+1
Half-time: 0% leading - 0% draw - 100% trailing
2nd half: 100% won - 0% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Saipa - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.003.00
Goals scored / match0.02.0
Goals conceded / match0.00.0
Average goals in match0.02.0
1 goal0%100%
2 goals0%100%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%100%
No goal100%0%
Goal difference0+2
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 100% won - 0% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Mes Kerman
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
1
16-30
0
0
31-45
0
0
46-60
1
0
61-75
0
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (1 goal). Concedes most in 16-30 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Saipa
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
0
0
31-45
1
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
1
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (1 goal). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.00
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.5 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
147%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-75%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
100%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Mes Kerman

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
0.00
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
0.00
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+1.00
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-1.00
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
182%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
122%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+1.0
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Saipa

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
0.00
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+2.00
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
0.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+2.00
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
0.00
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
244%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
0%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+2.0
Late goals
50% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
50%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Azadegan League).

Teams vs league

Mes KermanLigaSaipa
Average goals in match▲ 2.001.36▲ 2.00
Both teams scored▲ 100%27%▼ 0%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 0%18%▼ 0%
Clean sheets▼ 0%55%▲ 100%
Goal before half-time▲ 100%45%▼ 0%
Goal after half-time▲ 100%36%▲ 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.36
Average goals per match
27%
Both teams scored
18%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
55%
Clean sheets
0.55
Home goals / match
0.82
Away goals / match
+-33%
Home attack advantage
+-49%
Home defence advantage
+-18%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
45%
1 goal
18%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
36%
1 goal
18%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Mes Kerman 1 - 1 - 0 Saipa. Average goals 0.50, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Mes Kerman
1 : 0
Saipa
Saipa
0 : 0
Mes Kerman

FAQ

What was the result of Mes Kerman vs Saipa?

The Azadegan League match finished Mes Kerman 0:1 Saipa. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Mes Kerman and Saipa?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Mes Kerman won 1, Saipa won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 0.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Mes Kerman vs Saipa?

Mes Kerman score 1.00 goals per game on average and Saipa 2.00. The Azadegan League average is 1.36 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 18% of games. Both teams score in 100% of Mes Kerman's matches and 0% of Saipa's.

What form are Mes Kerman and Saipa in?

Over the last 5 games Mes Kerman have a 0-1-0 record (1.00 points per game) and Saipa 1-0-0 (3.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Mes Kerman vs Saipa?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Mes Kerman vs Saipa: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.