Mes Kerman vs Shenavarsazi Qeshm: match statistics
Mes Kerman displays significantly better home form with a 44% win rate and an impressive 67% clean sheet record at their venue. The hosts are unbeaten in their last five home matches (form: LWWDDWDDW), which stands in stark contrast to the visitors' catastrophic away performance – Shenavarsazi Qeshm has not won a single away match this season (0% win rate) and has lost as many as 70% of such fixtures. Offensive statistics also favor the hosts: an average of 0.67 goals per home game and a higher xG (1.32) compared to the mere 0.2 goals scored on average by the visitors away, with an xG of just 0.7. Furthermore, Shenavarsazi Qeshm fails to score in 80% of their away matches, which, combined with Mes Kerman's solid defense (averaging 0.33 goals conceded at home), makes a home victory the most probable outcome. The goal difference (+3 for the hosts at home vs -11 for the guests away) and the advantage in possession (51% vs 44%) further confirm this prediction.
Mes Kerman vs Shenavarsazi Qeshm: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Mes Kerman played Shenavarsazi Qeshm in Azadegan League (Iran). The match was played on 2 February 2026. Final score: 1:2.
Current form
Mes Kerman: 1-4-0, 1.40 points/match. Shenavarsazi Qeshm: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Mes Kerman scores 0.53 and concedes 0.47 goals per match. Shenavarsazi Qeshm scores 0.37 and concedes 1.00. League average: 1.52 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Mes Kerman 21%, Shenavarsazi Qeshm 21%. Over 2.5: Mes Kerman 11%, Shenavarsazi Qeshm 16%. League level: BTTS 33%, Over 2.5 21%.
xG, shots and style
Mes Kerman has higher xG: 1.00 vs 0.90. Mes Kerman: 3.3 shots per match, Shenavarsazi Qeshm: 1.9.
Match halves
Mes Kerman: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.26. Shenavarsazi Qeshm: half-time lead 5%, second-half goals 0.26.
Goals by minute
Mes Kerman: 31-45+ (3 goals). Shenavarsazi Qeshm: 76-90+ (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Azadegan League: 1.52 goals per match, BTTS 33%, Over 2.5 21%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Mes Kerman displays significantly better home form with a 44% win rate and an impressive 67% clean sheet record at their venue. The hosts are unbeaten in their last five home matches (form: LWWDDWDDW), which stands in stark contrast to the visitors' catastrophic away performance – Shenavarsazi Qeshm has not won a single away match this season (0% win rate) and has lost as many as 70% of such fixtures. Offensive statistics also favor the hosts: an average of 0.67 goals per home game and a higher xG (1.32) compared to the mere 0.2 goals scored on average by the visitors away, with an xG of just 0.7. Furthermore, Shenavarsazi Qeshm fails to score in 80% of their away matches, which, combined with Mes Kerman's solid defense (averaging 0.33 goals conceded at home), makes a home victory the most probable outcome. The goal difference (+3 for the hosts at home vs -11 for the guests away) and the advantage in possession (51% vs 44%) further confirm this prediction.
View the statistical overviewHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Mes Kerman | Shenavarsazi Qeshm | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 31% | 13% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.31 | 0.46 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.53 | 1.42 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Mes Kerman is 40% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - Mes Kerman · 1 pts / match - Shenavarsazi Qeshm
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Mes Kerman is 43% better for: goals scored per match.
0.53 goals / match - Mes Kerman · 0.37 goals / match - Shenavarsazi Qeshm
Mes Kerman is 113% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.47 goals / match - Mes Kerman · 1 goals / match - Shenavarsazi Qeshm
Mes Kerman scores in 47% of matches (9 of 19 matches), while Shenavarsazi Qeshm keeps a clean sheet in 37% (7 of 19 matches).
Shenavarsazi Qeshm scores in 37% of matches (7 of 19 matches), while Mes Kerman keeps a clean sheet in 58% (11 of 19 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Mes Kerman
Over / Under - Shenavarsazi Qeshm
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Mes Kerman is 57% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.32 pts / match - Mes Kerman · 0.84 pts / match - Shenavarsazi Qeshm
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Mes Kerman - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 32%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Shenavarsazi Qeshm - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 5% of matches and wins 16%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +1 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 100% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Mes Kerman
Shenavarsazi Qeshm
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Azadegan League).
Teams vs league
| Mes Kerman | Liga | Shenavarsazi Qeshm | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 1.00 | 1.52 | ▼ 1.37 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 21% | 33% | ▼ 21% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 11% | 21% | ▼ 16% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 58% | 44% | ▼ 37% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 37% | 46% | ▼ 32% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 47% | 57% | ▼ 47% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Mes Kerman 0 - 0 - 1 Shenavarsazi Qeshm. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Mes Kerman vs Shenavarsazi Qeshm?
The Azadegan League match finished Mes Kerman 1:2 Shenavarsazi Qeshm. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Mes Kerman vs Shenavarsazi Qeshm?
Mes Kerman score 0.53 goals per game on average and Shenavarsazi Qeshm 0.37. The Azadegan League average is 1.52 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 21% of games. Both teams score in 21% of Mes Kerman's matches and 21% of Shenavarsazi Qeshm's.
What form are Mes Kerman and Shenavarsazi Qeshm in?
Over the last 5 games Mes Kerman have a 1-4-0 record (1.40 points per game) and Shenavarsazi Qeshm 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Mes Kerman vs Shenavarsazi Qeshm?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Mes Kerman vs Shenavarsazi Qeshm: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.