Mes Shahr-e Babak vs Nassaji Mazandaran: match statistics
Mes Shahr-e Babak vs Nassaji Mazandaran: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Mes Shahr-e Babak played Nassaji Mazandaran in Persian Gulf Pro League (Iran). The match was played on 13 September 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Mes Shahr-e Babak: 0-4-1, 0.80 points/match. Nassaji Mazandaran: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Mes Shahr-e Babak scores 0.67 and concedes 1.50 goals per match. Nassaji Mazandaran scores 0.50 and concedes 0.83. League average: 1.74 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Mes Shahr-e Babak 67%, Nassaji Mazandaran 17%. Over 2.5: Mes Shahr-e Babak 33%, Nassaji Mazandaran 0%. League level: BTTS 29%, Over 2.5 21%.
xG, shots and style
xG is very similar for both teams. Mes Shahr-e Babak: -1.0 shots per match, Nassaji Mazandaran: -1.0.
Match halves
Mes Shahr-e Babak: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.67. Nassaji Mazandaran: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.17.
Goals by minute
Mes Shahr-e Babak: 46-60 (2 goals). Nassaji Mazandaran: 16-30 (1 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Persian Gulf Pro League: 1.74 goals per match, BTTS 29%, Over 2.5 21%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 50%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Nassaji Mazandaran sit 10th, while Mes Shahr-e Babak are only 17th, and the hosts are still without a win after 6 rounds, recording 4 draws and 2 defeats. The visitors also boast the better recent record: they have won 2 of their last five matches and averaged 1.4 points per game, compared with 0 wins and 0.8 points for Mes Shahr-e Babak. Away from home, Nassaji concede just 0.67 goals per match, fewer than the hosts concede at home, averaging 1.00 goal allowed, which could prove decisive given both sides’ very limited attacking output. Both teams score 0.67 goals per game in their respective conditions and fail to score in as many as 33% of such matches, so a tight, low-scoring contest is expected, with a slight edge to the visitors.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The strongest signal points to BTTS - No: Mes Shahr-e Babak scores only 0.33 goals per match on average and failed to score in 67% of its games, while Nassaji Mazandaran averages 0.67 goals. Across the season, BTTS occurred in 0% of the hosts’ matches and just 33% of the visitors’ games, compared with a league average of only 28%. Both teams have kept a clean sheet in 33% of their matches, while the hosts concede an average of 1.00 goal and the visitors 0.67, supporting low-scoring outcomes in which at least one team fails to score. The last five appearances also show limited attacking output: Mes averaged 0.8 goals, while Nassaji averaged 0.6, although the hosts recorded BTTS in 80% of those matches. In addition, neither team has played a match with over 2.5 goals this season, so a modest scoreline such as 0:0, 1:0 or 0:1 remains the most likely.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
This match brings together two teams with very limited attacking output: the hosts score an average of 0.33 goals per match, while the visitors average 0.67. Mes Shahr-e Babak concede 1.00 goal on average, whereas Nassaji Mazandaran concede just 0.67, limiting the projection for the hosts to around 0.62 goals. In the teams’ matches so far, 100% have finished Under 2.5 goals, while this rate stood at 80% and 100%, respectively, across their last five matches. The league is also clearly defensive, averaging just 1.69 goals per match, with only 19% of games producing at least three goals. The strongest selection is Under 2.5 goals, as the expected total of 1.40 and the consistently low-scoring performances of both teams strongly support a scenario with no more than two goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a Nassaji Mazandaran win, as the visitors were level after 45 minutes in 67% of their matches and did not trail at the break in any of them. Mes Shahr-e Babak have failed to score before half-time in each of their last five matches, averaging 0.6 goals conceded in that period and trailing at the break in 60% of their appearances. The matches are expected to be tight: both teams average 1.33 goals per game this season, while only 28% of league matches end with both sides scoring. After the break, the hosts have recently been more effective offensively, averaging 0.8 goals compared with 0.2 for the visitors, but Nassaji have a clearly stronger current results record: 1.4 points per match and two wins in their last five fixtures, while Mes have not won any. The visitors’ first-half advantage and the hosts’ poor run make a draw at half-time followed by an away win the most likely single HT/FT outcome.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Mes Shahr-e Babak | Nassaji Mazandaran | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 0% | 0% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.00 | 0.00 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Nassaji Mazandaran is 75% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / match - Mes Shahr-e Babak · 1.4 pts / match - Nassaji Mazandaran
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Mes Shahr-e Babak is 34% better for: goals scored per match.
0.67 goals / match - Mes Shahr-e Babak · 0.5 goals / match - Nassaji Mazandaran
Nassaji Mazandaran is 81% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.5 goals / match - Mes Shahr-e Babak · 0.83 goals / match - Nassaji Mazandaran
Mes Shahr-e Babak scores in 67% of matches (4 of 6 matches), while Nassaji Mazandaran keeps a clean sheet in 33% (2 of 6 matches).
Nassaji Mazandaran scores in 50% of matches (3 of 6 matches), while Mes Shahr-e Babak keeps a clean sheet in 17% (1 of 6 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Mes Shahr-e Babak
Over / Under - Nassaji Mazandaran
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Nassaji Mazandaran is 355% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.33 pts / match - Mes Shahr-e Babak · 1.5 pts / match - Nassaji Mazandaran
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Mes Shahr-e Babak - second-half results
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Nassaji Mazandaran - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.40 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 100% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -3 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (1 goal). Concedes most in 76-90 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Mes Shahr-e Babak
Nassaji Mazandaran
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Persian Gulf Pro League).
Teams vs league
| Mes Shahr-e Babak | Liga | Nassaji Mazandaran | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.17 | 1.74 | ▼ 1.33 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 67% | 29% | ▼ 17% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 33% | 21% | ▼ 0% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 17% | 45% | ▼ 33% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 67% | 50% | • 50% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 83% | 66% | ▲ 83% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Mes Shahr-e Babak 1 - 0 - 1 Nassaji Mazandaran. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Mes Shahr-e Babak vs Nassaji Mazandaran?
The Persian Gulf Pro League match finished Mes Shahr-e Babak 1:1 Nassaji Mazandaran. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Mes Shahr-e Babak and Nassaji Mazandaran?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Mes Shahr-e Babak won 1, Nassaji Mazandaran won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Mes Shahr-e Babak vs Nassaji Mazandaran?
Mes Shahr-e Babak score 0.67 goals per game on average and Nassaji Mazandaran 0.50. The Persian Gulf Pro League average is 1.74 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 21% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Mes Shahr-e Babak's matches and 17% of Nassaji Mazandaran's.
What form are Mes Shahr-e Babak and Nassaji Mazandaran in?
Over the last 5 games Mes Shahr-e Babak have a 0-4-1 record (0.80 points per game) and Nassaji Mazandaran 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Mes Shahr-e Babak vs Nassaji Mazandaran?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


