Latvia - 1. LigaData current as of 03 November 2026

Metta - LU vs Mārupe: match statistics

Reasoning:

Full analysis and pick in the app

Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.

Check analysis and pick

Metta - LU vs Mārupe: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Metta - LU play Mārupe in 1. Liga (Latvia). The match date is 7 November 2026.

Current form

Metta - LU: 5-0-0, 3.00 points/match. Mārupe: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Metta - LU scores 4.00 and concedes 0.76 goals per match. Mārupe scores 1.56 and concedes 1.64. League average: 3.71 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Metta - LU 52%, Mārupe 52%. Over 2.5: Metta - LU 84%, Mārupe 68%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 70%.

xG, shots and style

Metta - LU has higher xG: 2.86 vs 1.40. Metta - LU: 18.8 shots per match, Mārupe: 8.5.

Match halves

Metta - LU: half-time lead 76%, second-half goals 1.76. Mārupe: half-time lead 16%, second-half goals 1.08.

Goals by minute

Metta - LU: 31-45+ (25 goals). Mārupe: 76-90+ (13 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

1. Liga: 3.71 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 70%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 0%.

Before the match

1X2 odds

(-)
(-)
(-)

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

4Goals scored / match1.56
Metta - LUMārupe
0.76Goals conceded / match1.64
Metta - LUMārupe
49%Average possession41%
Metta - LUMārupe
9.8Shots on target / match3.56
Metta - LUMārupe

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

18.84Shots per match8.48
Metta - LUMārupe
9.8Shots on target3.56
Metta - LUMārupe
21.2%Shot conversion18.4%
Metta - LUMārupe
49%Possession41%
Metta - LUMārupe
2.86xG for1.4
Metta - LUMārupe
0.83xG against1.42
Metta - LUMārupe

Shooting quality

Metta - LU: AttackingMārupe: Counter-attacking
Metta - LUMārupe
Accuracy (shots on target)52%42%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.17
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.410.44

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Metta - LU is 150% better for: last-5 form.

3 pts / match - Metta - LU · 1.2 pts / match - Mārupe

Metta - LU
WWWWW
5 wins in a row
Season result split
84% W12% D4% L
Season (W-D-L)
21-3-1
2.64 pts / match · goal difference +81
Last 5 (W-D-L)
5-0-0
3.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
11-0-1
Last 5 at home
5-0-0
WWWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.8Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 2.18Opponent xG: 1.18BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%
Mārupe
DWDLD
Season result split
40% W16% D44% L
Season (W-D-L)
10-4-11
1.36 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-3-4
Last 5 away
1-2-2
LLWDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.03Opponent xG: 1.76BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Metta - LU is 156% better for: goals scored per match.

4 goals / match - Metta - LU · 1.56 goals / match - Mārupe

Metta - LU is 116% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.76 goals / match - Metta - LU · 1.64 goals / match - Mārupe

Metta - LU scoring profile: very strong

Metta - LU scores in 100% of matches (25 of 25 matches), while Mārupe keeps a clean sheet in 32% (8 of 25 matches).

Mārupe scoring profile: mixed

Mārupe scores in 72% of matches (18 of 25 matches), while Metta - LU keeps a clean sheet in 48% (12 of 25 matches).

100Goals scored (season)39
Metta - LUMārupe
19Goals conceded (season)41
Metta - LUMārupe
4.76Average goals in match3.2
Metta - LUMārupe
14Goals scored (last 5)5
Metta - LUMārupe
3Goals conceded (last 5)9
Metta - LUMārupe

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal72%
Metta - LUMārupe
92%2 goals44%
Metta - LUMārupe
64%3 goals20%
Metta - LUMārupe
40%4 goals16%
Metta - LUMārupe

How often they concede at least...

52%1 goal68%
Metta - LUMārupe
20%2 goals44%
Metta - LUMārupe
4%3 goals24%
Metta - LUMārupe
0%4 goals20%
Metta - LUMārupe

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

62%
League average

Goal patterns

24%BTTS at half-time12%
Metta - LUMārupe
0%BTTS in both halves4%
Metta - LUMārupe
64%Scored in both halves16%
Metta - LUMārupe

BTTS and goal count

52%Min. 3 goals and BTTS48%
Metta - LUMārupe
32%Min. 3 goals without BTTS20%
Metta - LUMārupe
60%BTTS - last 560%
Metta - LUMārupe

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

84%Min. 1 goal before half-time68%
Metta - LUMārupe
60%Min. 2 goals before half-time36%
Metta - LUMārupe
44%Min. 3 goals before half-time12%
Metta - LUMārupe

2nd half

84%Min. 1 goal after half-time80%
Metta - LUMārupe
64%Min. 2 goals after half-time56%
Metta - LUMārupe
44%Min. 3 goals after half-time44%
Metta - LUMārupe

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Metta - LU is 195% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2.48 pts / match - Metta - LU · 0.84 pts / match - Mārupe

Metta - LU - half-time state
76% leading20% draw4% trailing
Mārupe - half-time state
16% leading36% draw48% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2.48Points per match (1st half)0.84
Metta - LUMārupe
2.16Goals scored (1st half)0.48
Metta - LUMārupe
0.28Goals conceded (1st half)0.76
Metta - LUMārupe
2.44Average goals (1st half)1.24
Metta - LUMārupe
72%Clean sheet before half-time48%
Metta - LUMārupe
20%No goal before half-time72%
Metta - LUMārupe

After half-time (2nd half)

2.16Points per match (2nd half)1.32
Metta - LUMārupe
1.76Goals scored (2nd half)1.08
Metta - LUMārupe
0.4Goals conceded (2nd half)0.88
Metta - LUMārupe
2.16Average goals (2nd half)1.96
Metta - LUMārupe
72%Clean sheet after half-time52%
Metta - LUMārupe
20%No goal after half-time40%
Metta - LUMārupe

Metta - LU - second-half results

64% W24% D12% L
62
Half-time points
54
Half-time goals
+47
Goal difference (1st half)
54
Second-half points
+34
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.48
PPG before half-time
Lead holding111%

Leads at half-time in 76% of matches and wins 84%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Mārupe - second-half results

36% W24% D40% L
21
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
-7
Goal difference (1st half)
33
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.84
PPG before half-time
Lead holding250%

Leads at half-time in 16% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Metta - LU - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.602.20
Goals scored / match2.00.8
Goals conceded / match0.60.0
Average goals in match2.60.8
1 goal100%60%
2 goals100%20%
3 goals60%0%
Clean sheet40%100%
No goal0%40%
Goal difference+7+4
Half-time: 80% leading - 20% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 10
Mārupe - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.401.60
Goals scored / match0.20.8
Goals conceded / match1.00.8
Average goals in match1.21.6
1 goal60%60%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-40
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Metta - LU
ScoredConceded
14
3
0-15
17
2
16-30
25
4
31-45
15
6
46-60
12
1
61-75
17
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (25 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +14 - wins late phases.

Mārupe
ScoredConceded
3
6
0-15
3
5
16-30
6
8
31-45
6
7
46-60
8
8
61-75
13
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.98
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
2.8 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
107%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
52%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+1%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
72%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
4+
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Metta - LU

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+2.03
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.21
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+1.14
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
194%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
46%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.36
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.4
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

Mārupe

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.02
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.06
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.16
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.22
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
95%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
80%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.16
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).

Teams vs league

Metta - LULigaMārupe
Average goals in match▲ 4.763.71▼ 3.20
Both teams scored▼ 52%62%▼ 52%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 84%70%▼ 68%
Clean sheets▲ 48%21%▲ 32%
Goal before half-time▲ 84%77%▼ 68%
Goal after half-time▲ 84%82%▼ 80%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.71
Average goals per match
62%
Both teams scored
70%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
2.06
Home goals / match
1.65
Away goals / match
+25%
Home attack advantage
+20%
Home defence advantage
+9%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
48%
2 goals
25%
3 goals
7%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
82%
1 goal
59%
2 goals
34%
3 goals
13%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Metta - LU 1 - 0 - 0 Mārupe. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

When do Metta - LU and Mārupe play?

Metta - LU face Mārupe on 7 November 2026 in 1. Liga. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.

What do the goal statistics show before Metta - LU vs Mārupe?

Metta - LU score 4.00 goals per game on average and Mārupe 1.56. The 1. Liga average is 3.71 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 70% of games. Both teams score in 52% of Metta - LU's matches and 52% of Mārupe's.

What form are Metta - LU and Mārupe in?

Over the last 5 games Metta - LU have a 5-0-0 record (3.00 points per game) and Mārupe 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Metta - LU vs Mārupe?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Metta - LU vs Mārupe: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.