Latvia - 1. LigaData current as of 23 July 2026

Metta - LU vs Tukums II: match statistics

Reasoning:

Full analysis and pick in the app

Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.

Check analysis and pick

Metta - LU vs Tukums II: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Metta - LU play Tukums II in 1. Liga (Latvia). The match date is 27 July 2026 at 18:00.

Current form

Metta - LU: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match. Tukums II: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Metta - LU scores 3.54 and concedes 0.85 goals per match. Tukums II scores 1.38 and concedes 2.38. League average: 3.43 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Metta - LU 54%, Tukums II 77%. Over 2.5: Metta - LU 85%, Tukums II 69%. League level: BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 68%.

xG, shots and style

Metta - LU has higher xG: 2.83 vs 1.57. Metta - LU: 20.1 shots per match, Tukums II: 10.5.

Match halves

Metta - LU: half-time lead 85%, second-half goals 1.54. Tukums II: half-time lead 15%, second-half goals 0.92.

Goals by minute

Metta - LU: 31-45+ (10 goals). Tukums II: 76-90+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

1. Liga: 3.43 goals per match, BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 68%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 1-0-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.

Before the match

1X2 odds

(-)
(-)
(-)

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Metta - LUTukums II
3.54Goals scored / match1.38
Metta - LUTukums II
0.85Goals conceded / match2.38
Metta - LUTukums II
56%Average possession42%
Metta - LUTukums II
10.69Shots on target / match4.69
Metta - LUTukums II

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

20.15Shots per match10.46
Metta - LUTukums II
10.69Shots on target4.69
Metta - LUTukums II
17.6%Shot conversion13.2%
Metta - LUTukums II
56%Possession42%
Metta - LUTukums II
2.83xG for1.57
Metta - LUTukums II
0.73xG against1.79
Metta - LUTukums II

Shooting quality

Metta - LU: DominantTukums II: Counter-attacking
Metta - LUTukums II
Accuracy (shots on target)53%45%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Metta - LU is 333% better for: last-5 form.

2.6 pts / match - Metta - LU · 0.6 pts / match - Tukums II

Metta - LU
DWWWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
85% W8% R8% P
Season (W-D-L)
11-1-1
2.62 pts / match · goal difference +35
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-0-1
Last 5 at home
4-0-1
WLWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 3.8Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 2.52Opponent xG: 0.87BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 100%
Tukums II
LLLLW
Season result split
23% W15% R62% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-2-8
0.85 pts / match · goal difference -13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-1-4
Last 5 away
1-0-4
LWLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 3.0xG: 1.85Opponent xG: 1.95BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Metta - LU is 157% better for: goals scored per match.

3.54 goals / match - Metta - LU · 1.38 goals / match - Tukums II

Metta - LU is 180% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.85 goals / match - Metta - LU · 2.38 goals / match - Tukums II

Metta - LU scoring profile: very strong

Metta - LU scores in 100% of matches (13 of 13 matches), while Tukums II keeps a clean sheet in 15% (2 of 13 matches).

Tukums II scoring profile: very strong

Tukums II scores in 92% of matches (12 of 13 matches), while Metta - LU keeps a clean sheet in 46% (6 of 13 matches).

46Goals scored (season)18
Metta - LUTukums II
11Goals conceded (season)31
Metta - LUTukums II
4.38Average goals in match3.77
Metta - LUTukums II
19Goals scored (last 5)5
Metta - LUTukums II
7Goals conceded (last 5)15
Metta - LUTukums II

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal92%
Metta - LUTukums II
85%2 goals31%
Metta - LUTukums II
69%3 goals8%
Metta - LUTukums II
38%4 goals8%
Metta - LUTukums II

How often they concede at least...

54%1 goal85%
Metta - LUTukums II
23%2 goals69%
Metta - LUTukums II
8%3 goals46%
Metta - LUTukums II
0%4 goals23%
Metta - LUTukums II

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

60%
League average

Goal patterns

8%BTTS at half-time31%
Metta - LUTukums II
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Metta - LUTukums II
77%Scored in both halves15%
Metta - LUTukums II

BTTS and goal count

54%Min. 3 goals and BTTS69%
Metta - LUTukums II
31%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Metta - LUTukums II
80%BTTS - last 560%
Metta - LUTukums II

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

85%Min. 1 goal before half-time77%
Metta - LUTukums II
46%Min. 2 goals before half-time54%
Metta - LUTukums II
31%Min. 3 goals before half-time23%
Metta - LUTukums II

2nd half

85%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
Metta - LUTukums II
69%Min. 2 goals after half-time69%
Metta - LUTukums II
46%Min. 3 goals after half-time31%
Metta - LUTukums II

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Metta - LU is 249% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2.69 pts / match - Metta - LU · 0.77 pts / match - Tukums II

Metta - LU - half-time state
85% leading15% draw0% trailing
Tukums II - half-time state
15% leading31% draw54% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2.69Points per match (1st half)0.77
Metta - LUTukums II
1.85Goals scored (1st half)0.46
Metta - LUTukums II
0.08Goals conceded (1st half)1.08
Metta - LUTukums II
1.92Average goals (1st half)1.54
Metta - LUTukums II
92%Clean sheet before half-time31%
Metta - LUTukums II
15%No goal before half-time62%
Metta - LUTukums II

After half-time (2nd half)

1.92Points per match (2nd half)1.08
Metta - LUTukums II
1.54Goals scored (2nd half)0.92
Metta - LUTukums II
0.62Goals conceded (2nd half)1.31
Metta - LUTukums II
2.15Average goals (2nd half)2.23
Metta - LUTukums II
62%Clean sheet after half-time31%
Metta - LUTukums II
15%No goal after half-time31%
Metta - LUTukums II

Metta - LU - second-half results

54% W31% R15% P
35
Half-time points
24
Half-time goals
+23
Goal difference (1st half)
25
Second-half points
+12
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.69
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 85% of matches and wins 85%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Tukums II - second-half results

31% W15% R54% P
10
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-8
Goal difference (1st half)
14
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.77
PPG before half-time
Lead holding153%

Leads at half-time in 15% of matches and wins 23%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Metta - LU - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.601.60
Goals scored / match1.81.6
Goals conceded / match0.01.0
Average goals in match1.82.6
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals20%60%
Clean sheet100%40%
No goal20%20%
Goal difference+9+3
Half-time: 80% leading - 20% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 9
Tukums II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.400.80
Goals scored / match0.01.0
Goals conceded / match1.02.0
Average goals in match1.03.0
1 goal60%100%
2 goals40%100%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal100%20%
Goal difference-5-5
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Metta - LU
ScoredConceded
9
2
0-15
7
1
16-30
10
0
31-45
5
5
46-60
5
1
61-75
10
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.

Tukums II
ScoredConceded
1
3
0-15
2
5
16-30
3
6
31-45
3
5
46-60
2
5
61-75
7
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

4.08
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
3.0 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
119%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
66%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-2%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
92%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
4+
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Metta - LU

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+2.10
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.59
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.71
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.12
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
195%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
53%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.02
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

Tukums II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.22
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.78
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.19
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.59
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
86%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
131%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.25
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
39% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
39%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).

Teams vs league

Metta - LULigaTukums II
Average goals in match 4.383.43 3.77
Both teams scored 54%60% 77%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 85%68% 69%
Clean sheets 46%23% 15%
Goal before half-time 85%71% 77%
Goal after half-time 85%84% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.43
Average goals per match
60%
Both teams scored
68%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.82
Home goals / match
1.60
Away goals / match
+14%
Home attack advantage
+12%
Home defence advantage
+7%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
64%
2 goals
35%
3 goals
14%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Metta - LU 1 - 0 - 0 Tukums II. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

When do Metta - LU and Tukums II play?

Metta - LU face Tukums II on 27 July 2026 in 1. Liga. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.

What do the goal statistics show before Metta - LU vs Tukums II?

Metta - LU score 3.54 goals per game on average and Tukums II 1.38. The 1. Liga average is 3.43 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 68% of games. Both teams score in 54% of Metta - LU's matches and 77% of Tukums II's.

What form are Metta - LU and Tukums II in?

Over the last 5 games Metta - LU have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and Tukums II 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Metta - LU vs Tukums II?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Metta - LU vs Tukums II: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.