Poland - 3 Liga Group 1Stadion MOSiRData current as of 15 October 2026

Mławianka Mława vs Swit: match statistics

Mławianka Mława crest
Mławianka Mława
2 : 4half-time 1:1
Swit crest
Swit

Mławianka Mława vs Swit: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Mławianka Mława played Swit in 3 Liga Group 1 (Poland). The match was played on 3 October 2026. Venue: Stadion MOSiR. Final score: 2:4.

Current form

Mławianka Mława: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Swit: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Mławianka Mława scores 2.00 and concedes 2.80 goals per match. Swit scores 1.60 and concedes 1.00. League average: 3.65 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Mławianka Mława 70%, Swit 50%. Over 2.5: Mławianka Mława 70%, Swit 70%. League level: BTTS 70%, Over 2.5 66%.

xG, shots and style

Swit has higher xG: 2.06 vs 1.92. Mławianka Mława: 14.7 shots per match, Swit: 13.0.

Match halves

Mławianka Mława: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 1.30. Swit: half-time lead 30%, second-half goals 0.80.

Goals by minute

Mławianka Mława: 46-60 (6 goals). Swit: 16-30 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

3 Liga Group 1: 3.65 goals per match, BTTS 70%, Over 2.5 66%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-1. Average goals 4.50, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Świt have won 3 of their last 5 matches, compared with 2 for Mławianka, although the hosts have scored more goals over that period — 15 to 9. The key difference is in defence: Mławianka have conceded 18 goals in those matches, while the visitors have let in only 7. At home, the hosts have lost 75% of their matches and have yet to keep a clean sheet, whereas Świt have lost 20% of their away games and kept a clean sheet in 40% of them. The visitors create chances worth an average xG of 2.16 away from home, compared with Mławianka’s 1.86 at home, but score only 1 goal per match on average on the road, so a draw remains a realistic possibility. Despite this lack of cutting edge, Świt’s sturdier defence and stronger recent results make them the more convincing pick.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The case for BTTS - Yes is supported by recent form: BTTS landed in 80% of Mławianka’s and 60% of Świt’s matches over the last five games. Mławianka scored an average of 3.0 goals during this period but conceded as many as 3.6, increasing the visitors’ chances of finding the net. Świt has recently averaged 1.8 goals, with an xG of 1.89, so despite a season average of 1.0 goals per away game, there is reason to believe they can exploit the hosts’ defensive problems. Meanwhile, Mławianka scores an average of 2.2 goals at home, while Świt concedes 1.2 away, supporting the prediction that the hosts will score. The risk to the Yes pick is that Świt has failed to score in 40% of its away matches, but the recent results of both teams and the league BTTS rate of 70% tip the assessment in favor of both teams scoring.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Mławianka average 2.2 goals scored, with an xG of 1.97; Świt post even higher xG at 2.16, although they average just 1.0 goal. Over their last five matches, Mławianka scored 3.0 and conceded 3.6 goals per game, while Świt scored 1.8 and conceded 1.4, pointing to goal-scoring potential on both sides. In this period, at least three goals were scored in 80% of each team’s matches, but the 3.5-goal line was exceeded in 40% and 20% of matches respectively in the season data. Therefore, with a forecast of 3.30 goals, Over 1.5 offers the clearest edge: it requires just two goals and is better supported by the data than the higher lines.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely scenario is that Mławianka lead at the break and maintain their advantage until the end of the match. The hosts were ahead at half-time in 50% of their matches and averaged 1.25 goals before the break, while Świt averaged 0.4 goals in that period. Their ability to hold on to the lead is also supported by their performances after half-time: Mławianka averaged 1.25 goals scored and 0.25 conceded, compared with Świt’s 0.6 and 1.0, respectively. Across full matches, the hosts averaged 2.2 goals to the visitors’ 1.0, but this HT/FT pick is not certain: Mławianka conceded an average of as many as 3.6 goals over their last five matches, while Świt posted a higher xG, 2.16 compared with the hosts’ 1.97. A half-time draw followed by a Mławianka win therefore remains a significant alternative, particularly as Świt were level at half-time in 60% of their matches.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
1 : 3
2nd half

Match statistics

-1Possession (%)-1
Mławianka MławaSwit
-1Shots-1
Mławianka MławaSwit
-1Shots on target-1
Mławianka MławaSwit
0xG0
Mławianka MławaSwit
-1Corners-1
Mławianka MławaSwit
0Dangerous attacks0
Mławianka MławaSwit
-1Fouls-1
Mławianka MławaSwit
-1Cards-1
Mławianka MławaSwit

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

2Goals scored / match1.6
Mławianka MławaSwit
2.8Goals conceded / match1
Mławianka MławaSwit
44%Average possession42%
Mławianka MławaSwit
5.9Shots on target / match4.5
Mławianka MławaSwit

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

14.7Shots per match13
Mławianka MławaSwit
5.9Shots on target4.5
Mławianka MławaSwit
13.6%Shot conversion12.3%
Mławianka MławaSwit
44%Possession42%
Mławianka MławaSwit
1.92xG for2.06
Mławianka MławaSwit
1.94xG against1.23
Mławianka MławaSwit

Shooting quality

Mławianka Mława: Counter-attackingSwit: Counter-attacking
Mławianka MławaSwit
Accuracy (shots on target)40%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.16
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.340.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Swit is 50% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Mławianka Mława · 1.8 pts / match - Swit

Mławianka Mława
LLLWW
Season result split
30% W10% D60% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-1-6
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-3
Last 5 at home
1-0-3
LLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 3.0Goals conceded: 3.6xG: 2.03Opponent xG: 2.53BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
Swit
WLLWW
Season result split
50% W20% D30% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-2-3
1.70 pts / match · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-2-1
Last 5 away
2-2-1
WDDLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.89Opponent xG: 1.34BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Mławianka Mława is 25% better for: goals scored per match.

2 goals / match - Mławianka Mława · 1.6 goals / match - Swit

Swit is 180% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.8 goals / match - Mławianka Mława · 1 goals / match - Swit

Mławianka Mława scoring profile: strong

Mławianka Mława scores in 70% of matches (7 of 10 matches), while Swit keeps a clean sheet in 40% (4 of 10 matches).

Swit scoring profile: very strong

Swit scores in 70% of matches (7 of 10 matches), while Mławianka Mława keeps a clean sheet in 10% (1 of 10 matches).

20Goals scored (season)16
Mławianka MławaSwit
28Goals conceded (season)10
Mławianka MławaSwit
4.8Average goals in match2.6
Mławianka MławaSwit
15Goals scored (last 5)9
Mławianka MławaSwit
18Goals conceded (last 5)7
Mławianka MławaSwit

How often they score at least...

70%1 goal70%
Mławianka MławaSwit
60%2 goals50%
Mławianka MławaSwit
40%3 goals20%
Mławianka MławaSwit
30%4 goals20%
Mławianka MławaSwit

How often they concede at least...

90%1 goal60%
Mławianka MławaSwit
60%2 goals20%
Mławianka MławaSwit
50%3 goals10%
Mławianka MławaSwit
30%4 goals10%
Mławianka MławaSwit

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

70%
Mławianka Mława - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.7 of 10 matches
70%
League average

Goal patterns

20%BTTS at half-time0%
Mławianka MławaSwit
10%BTTS in both halves0%
Mławianka MławaSwit
40%Scored in both halves20%
Mławianka MławaSwit

BTTS and goal count

70%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
Mławianka MławaSwit
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS20%
Mławianka MławaSwit
80%BTTS - last 560%
Mławianka MławaSwit

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

80%Min. 1 goal before half-time50%
Mławianka MławaSwit
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time30%
Mławianka MławaSwit
30%Min. 3 goals before half-time10%
Mławianka MławaSwit

2nd half

90%Min. 1 goal after half-time70%
Mławianka MławaSwit
60%Min. 2 goals after half-time40%
Mławianka MławaSwit
60%Min. 3 goals after half-time20%
Mławianka MławaSwit

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Swit is 40% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / match - Mławianka Mława · 1.4 pts / match - Swit

Mławianka Mława - half-time state
20% leading40% draw40% trailing
Swit - half-time state
30% leading50% draw20% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per match (1st half)1.4
Mławianka MławaSwit
0.7Goals scored (1st half)0.7
Mławianka MławaSwit
1Goals conceded (1st half)0.2
Mławianka MławaSwit
1.7Average goals (1st half)0.9
Mławianka MławaSwit
40%Clean sheet before half-time80%
Mławianka MławaSwit
60%No goal before half-time70%
Mławianka MławaSwit

After half-time (2nd half)

1.1Points per match (2nd half)1.5
Mławianka MławaSwit
1.3Goals scored (2nd half)0.8
Mławianka MławaSwit
1.8Goals conceded (2nd half)0.6
Mławianka MławaSwit
3.1Average goals (2nd half)1.4
Mławianka MławaSwit
20%Clean sheet after half-time60%
Mławianka MławaSwit
30%No goal after half-time50%
Mławianka MławaSwit

Mławianka Mława - second-half results

30% W20% D50% L
10
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
11
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding150%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 30%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.8

Concedes 0.8 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Swit - second-half results

40% W30% D30% L
14
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
15
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.40
PPG before half-time
Lead holding167%

Leads at half-time in 30% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Mławianka Mława - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.20
Goals scored / match1.21.8
Goals conceded / match1.22.4
Average goals in match2.44.2
1 goal100%100%
2 goals60%80%
3 goals60%80%
Clean sheet40%0%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference0-3
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 6
Swit - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.20
Goals scored / match0.81.0
Goals conceded / match0.41.0
Average goals in match1.22.0
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference+20
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Mławianka Mława
ScoredConceded
5
2
0-15
0
3
16-30
2
5
31-45
6
7
46-60
4
5
61-75
3
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (6 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

Swit
ScoredConceded
2
2
0-15
6
2
16-30
0
0
31-45
5
0
46-60
2
1
61-75
1
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.70
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 2.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
101%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
60%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+22%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
49%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
9%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 11 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Mławianka Mława

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.02
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.78
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.08
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.86
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
100%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
170%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
15% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 25% come in the first quarter-hour.
15%

Swit

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.83
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.23
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.46
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.23
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
97%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
50%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.10
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
6% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
6%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (3 Liga Group 1).

Teams vs league

Mławianka MławaLigaSwit
Average goals in match▲ 4.803.65▼ 2.60
Both teams scored• 70%70%▼ 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 70%66%▲ 70%
Clean sheets▼ 10%17%▲ 40%
Goal before half-time▲ 80%73%▼ 50%
Goal after half-time▲ 90%83%▼ 70%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.65
Average goals per match
70%
Both teams scored
66%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
17%
Clean sheets
2.00
Home goals / match
1.65
Away goals / match
+21%
Home attack advantage
+18%
Home defence advantage
+5%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
24%
3 goals
7%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
83%
1 goal
58%
2 goals
38%
3 goals
17%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

—Marcel Bykowski⚽ 1

Away team

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Mławianka MławaGoalMarcel Bykowski

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Mławianka Mława 0 - 1 - 1 Swit. Average goals 4.50, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Swit
1 : 1
Mławianka Mława
Mławianka Mława
3 : 4
Swit

FAQ

What was the result of Mławianka Mława vs Swit?

The 3 Liga Group 1 match finished Mławianka Mława 2:4 Swit. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Mławianka Mława and Swit?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Mławianka Mława won 0, Swit won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 4.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Mławianka Mława vs Swit?

Mławianka Mława score 2.00 goals per game on average and Swit 1.60. The 3 Liga Group 1 average is 3.65 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 66% of games. Both teams score in 70% of Mławianka Mława's matches and 50% of Swit's.

What form are Mławianka Mława and Swit in?

Over the last 5 games Mławianka Mława have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Swit 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Mławianka Mława vs Swit?

The statistical background for Mławianka Mława vs Swit — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.