Montreal Impact vs Chicago Fire: match statistics
Montreal Impact vs Chicago Fire: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Montreal Impact played Chicago Fire in MLS (United States). The match was played on 16 May 2026. Final score: 0:2.
Current form
Montreal Impact: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Chicago Fire: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Montreal Impact scores 1.50 and concedes 2.08 goals per match. Chicago Fire scores 1.92 and concedes 1.25. League average: 3.28 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Montreal Impact 50%, Chicago Fire 58%. Over 2.5: Montreal Impact 83%, Chicago Fire 75%. League level: BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 63%.
xG, shots and style
Chicago Fire has higher xG: 1.68 vs 1.44. Montreal Impact: 13.0 shots per match, Chicago Fire: 15.2.
Match halves
Montreal Impact: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 0.50. Chicago Fire: half-time lead 42%, second-half goals 1.17.
Goals by minute
Montreal Impact: 0-15 (5 goals). Chicago Fire: 76-90+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
MLS: 3.28 goals per match, BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 63%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Montreal holds a clear home advantage: they win 60% of home matches and average 2.0 goals per game with an average xG of 1.56, while Chicago averages 1.8 goals on the road with xG 1.35. The hosts generate more shots (14 vs 11.4) and more shots on target (5.6 vs 4.8). In the last 5 matches Montreal has scored 11 goals vs Chicago’s 12, with Montreal conceding 5 and Chicago 9. Over the same 5-game sample Montreal averages 2.0 points per game (3W, 1D, 1L) versus Chicago’s 1.2 ppg (2W, 0D, 3L), indicating better form for the home side. Defensively Montreal is superior at home: 1.0 goals conceded per game and average xG against 1.14, compared to Chicago’s 1.4 goals conceded and xG against 1.6 on the road. Additionally Montreal records 40% clean sheets at home and 0% shutout-less matches, while Chicago has 20% clean sheets and 20% away matches without a goal, therefore I favor a Montreal victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
A strong signal for BTTS - Yes comes from Chicago Fire, who have a season BTTS rate of 80% (and 80% in the last 5 matches), meaning in 4 of their last 5 away games both teams scored. Montreal at home has a BTTS of 43% and as many as 57% clean sheets, which significantly limits the number of matches where the opponent scores. xG analysis shows: Montreal xG_for = 1.92 versus Chicago xG_against = 1.60 yields an expected ~1.76 goals for Montreal, while Chicago xG_for = 1.35 versus Montreal xG_against = 1.18 yields ~1.27 for Chicago. Using a Poisson approximation P(Montreal ≥1) ≈ 1 - e^-1.76 ≈ 82.8% and P(Chicago ≥1) ≈ 1 - e^-1.27 ≈ 71.7%, the product gives ~59% for BTTS = yes. Considering these numbers plus the last 5 matches (Montreal 11 goals, Chicago 12 goals) and the league average BTTS 60%, I recommend BTTS = Yes (est. 60% vs 40%).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I project 1.76 goals for Montreal and 1.27 for Chicago (total 3.03), calculated as the average of attack and defense: Montreal’s attack xG 1.92 and Chicago’s defense xG 1.60 yield 1.76, while Chicago’s attack xG 1.35 and Montreal’s defense xG 1.18 yield 1.27. Seasonal data indicate a high probability of matches with three or more goals: Over 2.5 occurred in 71% of Montreal’s games and 80% of Chicago’s games, with Chicago recording Over 2.5 in 100% of their last 5 fixtures. Montreal averages 17.86 shots (5.57 on target) per match, Chicago 11.4 (4.8 on target), with Chicago showing a higher shot conversion rate of 16% versus Montreal’s 11%, enhancing the efficiency of their chances. Considering the expected 3.03 goals, the strong seasonal Over 2.5 percentages (71% and 80%) and recent form (Montreal 60% Over 2.5 in last 5; Chicago 100%), the strongest signal is an Over 2.5 bet (implied probability 78%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Montreal holds a clear advantage in quality of chances: xG 1.92 versus Chicago's 1.35 and an average of 17.86 shots per match compared to 11.4, providing more opportunities for the home side. In their last five matches Montreal led at the break in 3 of 5 games (60%) and averaged 1.2 goals by half-time, while Chicago averaged 0.4 half-time goals and did not lead at the break in that period (0%). Montreal kept a clean sheet at half-time in 71% of their season matches, and the season shot conversion rate is 11% for Montreal versus 16% for Chicago; Chicago also has 80% of away matches with BTTS, so a second-half goal from the visitors is possible but less likely to be the first. Considering the xG advantage (1.92 vs 1.35), dominance in shot volume (17.86 vs 11.4) and the fact the hosts frequently lead at the break and have a 57% home win rate versus 40% for the visitors, the strongest scenario is 1/1 (Montreal leads at half-time and wins Full-Time).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Montreal Impact | Chicago Fire | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.31 | 0.37 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Montreal Impact is 43% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / match - Montreal Impact · 1.4 pts / match - Chicago Fire
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Chicago Fire is 28% better for: goals scored per match.
1.5 goals / match - Montreal Impact · 1.92 goals / match - Chicago Fire
Chicago Fire is 66% better for: goals conceded per match.
2.08 goals / match - Montreal Impact · 1.25 goals / match - Chicago Fire
Montreal Impact scores in 75% of matches (9 of 12 matches), while Chicago Fire keeps a clean sheet in 42% (5 of 12 matches).
Chicago Fire scores in 92% of matches (11 of 12 matches), while Montreal Impact keeps a clean sheet in 25% (3 of 12 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Montreal Impact
Over / Under - Chicago Fire
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Chicago Fire is 6% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.58 pts / match - Montreal Impact · 1.67 pts / match - Chicago Fire
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Montreal Impact - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 33%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Chicago Fire - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 42% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 2.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 3.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 80% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +5 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Montreal Impact
Chicago Fire
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).
Teams vs league
| Montreal Impact | Liga | Chicago Fire | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.58 | 3.28 | ▼ 3.17 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 50% | 60% | ▼ 58% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 83% | 63% | ▲ 75% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 25% | 23% | ▲ 42% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 92% | 76% | • 75% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 83% | 80% | ▼ 75% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Montreal Impact 0 - 0 - 1 Chicago Fire. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Montreal Impact vs Chicago Fire?
The MLS match finished Montreal Impact 0:2 Chicago Fire. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Montreal Impact vs Chicago Fire?
Montreal Impact score 1.50 goals per game on average and Chicago Fire 1.92. The MLS average is 3.28 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 63% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Montreal Impact's matches and 58% of Chicago Fire's.
What form are Montreal Impact and Chicago Fire in?
Over the last 5 games Montreal Impact have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Chicago Fire 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Montreal Impact vs Chicago Fire?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Montreal Impact vs Chicago Fire: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


