Moss vs Kongsvinger: match statistics
Moss vs Kongsvinger: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Moss played Kongsvinger in First Division (Norway). The match was played on 5 October 2026. Venue: Melløs Stadion. Final score: 0:2.
Current form
Moss: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Kongsvinger: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Moss scores 1.65 and concedes 2.26 goals per match. Kongsvinger scores 2.96 and concedes 1.52. League average: 3.83 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Moss 87%, Kongsvinger 83%. Over 2.5: Moss 91%, Kongsvinger 83%. League level: BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 72%.
xG, shots and style
Kongsvinger has higher xG: 1.74 vs 1.58. Moss: 13.0 shots per match, Kongsvinger: 13.8.
Match halves
Moss: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 1.00. Kongsvinger: half-time lead 48%, second-half goals 1.78.
Goals by minute
Moss: 76-90+ (9 goals). Kongsvinger: 46-60 (18 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
First Division: 3.83 goals per match, BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 72%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-3. Average goals 5.00, BTTS 67%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Kongsvinger sit 2nd in the table and have won 3 of their last 5 matches without suffering a defeat, while 11th-placed Moss have won 2 and lost 2 over the same period. The visitors have scored an impressive 22 goals in those five matches, compared with the hosts’ 8, and average 2.09 goals per game away from home with an 18% shot conversion rate, while Moss average 1.55 goals and 12% at home. The hosts’ defence is a significant concern: they concede an average of 2.18 goals per game at home, while Kongsvinger concede 1.27 away. The visitors also hold the edge in away wins, with a 55% win rate compared with Moss’s home win rate of just 18%. The quality of the chances they create offers the hosts some hope—their home xG is 1.60, compared with Kongsvinger’s 1.48 away—but Kongsvinger’s advantage in finishing and results points to an away win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Moss have seen both teams score in 92% of their home matches, while Kongsvinger have seen it in 73% of their away games; this scenario has occurred in each of the last 5 matches for both teams. Moss have failed to score in none of their home matches, while the visitors have drawn a blank in only 9% of their away games, so the risk of either side failing to score is low. Over their last 5 matches, Moss have averaged 1.6 goals scored and 2.0 conceded, while Kongsvinger have scored 4.4 and conceded 1.8 goals per match. Their attacking potential is also reflected in their average xG: 1.98 at home for Moss and 1.48 away for Kongsvinger, with clean sheets recorded in just 8% and 18% of their matches, respectively. These figures strongly point towards BTTS - Yes.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The strongest signal is for Over 1.5 goals: this line was reached in 100% of Moss’s home matches and 91% of Kongsvinger’s away matches. The teams’ attacking xG averages also point to goals — 1.98 for Moss and 1.48 for Kongsvinger — as does the fact that the hosts conceded in 92% of their matches and the visitors in 82%. In each team’s last five matches, Over 2.5 goals landed in 80% of cases, supporting a forecast of 3.75 total goals. Even so, I’m backing Over 1.5 as the safest line: the teams’ historical results support it more clearly than Over 2.5, which landed in 100% of Moss’s home matches but only 64% of Kongsvinger’s away matches.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest signal for the first half comes from the last five matches: Moss were trailing at half-time in four of them, while Kongsvinger led in three. During this period, the visitors averaged 1.8 goals before the break, while the hosts conceded 1.6, increasing the likelihood of Kongsvinger taking the lead. Current form also supports them holding on to that advantage: the visitors have lost none of their last five matches and scored an average of 4.4 goals, compared with Moss’s 1.6. However, the 2/2 HT/FT pick is not a clear-cut one, as Moss won 75% of their home matches over the season and averaged 2.5 goals after the break; a turnaround therefore remains a significant alternative.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Moss | Kongsvinger | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 43% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.49 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Kongsvinger is 57% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - Moss · 2.2 pts / match - Kongsvinger
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Kongsvinger is 79% better for: goals scored per match.
1.65 goals / match - Moss · 2.96 goals / match - Kongsvinger
Kongsvinger is 49% better for: goals conceded per match.
2.26 goals / match - Moss · 1.52 goals / match - Kongsvinger
Moss scores in 91% of matches (21 of 23 matches), while Kongsvinger keeps a clean sheet in 13% (3 of 23 matches).
Kongsvinger scores in 96% of matches (22 of 23 matches), while Moss keeps a clean sheet in 4% (1 of 23 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Moss
Over / Under - Kongsvinger
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Kongsvinger is 99% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.83 pts / match - Moss · 1.65 pts / match - Kongsvinger
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Moss - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 30%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Kongsvinger - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 48% of matches and wins 65%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.40 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 2.4 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -4 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.6 | 2.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 2.4 | 3.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 60% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +4 | +9 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (18 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Moss
Kongsvinger
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division).
Teams vs league
| Moss | Liga | Kongsvinger | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 3.91 | 3.83 | ▲ 4.48 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 87% | 64% | ▲ 83% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 91% | 72% | ▲ 83% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 4% | 19% | ▼ 13% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 83% | 77% | ▲ 87% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 91% | 89% | ▲ 91% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Moss 0 - 0 - 3 Kongsvinger. Average goals 5.00, both teams scored in 67% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Moss vs Kongsvinger?
The First Division match finished Moss 0:2 Kongsvinger. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Moss and Kongsvinger?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Moss won 0, Kongsvinger won 3 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 5.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Moss vs Kongsvinger?
Moss score 1.65 goals per game on average and Kongsvinger 2.96. The First Division average is 3.83 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 72% of games. Both teams score in 87% of Moss's matches and 83% of Kongsvinger's.
What form are Moss and Kongsvinger in?
Over the last 5 games Moss have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Kongsvinger 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Moss vs Kongsvinger?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.