Finland - YkkösliigaMikkelin UrheilupuistoData current as of 05 August 2026

MP vs KäPa: match statistics

MP crest
MP
2 : 1half-time 2:1
KäPa crest
KäPa

MP vs KäPa: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

MP played KäPa in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The match was played on 29 July 2026. Venue: Mikkelin Urheilupuisto. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

MP: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. KäPa: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

MP scores 1.06 and concedes 1.38 goals per match. KäPa scores 1.13 and concedes 1.69. League average: 2.49 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: MP 50%, KäPa 63%. Over 2.5: MP 44%, KäPa 69%. League level: BTTS 45%, Over 2.5 44%.

xG, shots and style

KäPa has higher xG: 1.38 vs 1.27. MP: 10.4 shots per match, KäPa: 11.1.

Match halves

MP: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.56. KäPa: half-time lead 31%, second-half goals 0.50.

Goals by minute

MP: 76-90+ (7 goals). KäPa: 0-15 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ykkösliiga: 2.49 goals per match, BTTS 45%, Over 2.5 44%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I back a home win for MP (1). MP averages 1.17 goals scored at home with average xG 1.20 and concedes 1.17 per game, whereas KäPa as visitors score 1.00 with xG 1.26 and concede 1.71, meaning hosts concede approximately 0.54 fewer goals. MP averages 10 shots (3.17 on target) with a conversion rate of 12%, while KäPa averages 9.86 shots (3.14 on target) with a 10% conversion; additionally MP has a lower share of goalless matches at 17% versus 29% for the visitors. In the last 5 fixtures MP scored 7 and conceded 9, earning 1.0 point per game on average, while KäPa scored 6 and conceded 11 with 0.8 points per game, which supports greater points stability for the hosts. Clean sheets occur for MP in 33% of home matches versus 14% for KäPa away, so I assess the probabilities as: MP win 55%, draw 25%, away win 20%.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I assess BTTS probability at approximately 75% vs 25%, favoring the "both teams to score" scenario (BTTS - Yes). MP has a seasonal BTTS rate of 63% and KäPa 57%, both above the league average of 44%, with MP registering BTTS in 100% of their last 5 matches (KäPa 60%). Both sides both score and concede: MP averages 1.25 goals for and 1.50 against per match, KäPa 1.00 for and 1.71 against; in the last 5 matches they conceded on average 1.8 (MP) and 2.2 (KäPa) goals. Seasonal xG confirms the exchange of chances — MP attack xG 1.53 vs 1.26 for KäPa, and xG against 1.58 and 1.57, indicating both teams generate and allow around 1.5 xG per game. The low percentage of clean sheets (MP 13%, KäPa 14%) further reduces the likelihood of a clean sheet for either side and strengthens the signal for BTTS.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

I project approximately 2.97 goals in the match, split into 1.55 for MP and 1.42 for KäPa, calculated as average xG: MP attack 1.53 vs KäPa defense 1.57 and KäPa attack 1.26 vs MP defense 1.58. A Poisson model for total 2.97 yields probabilities: Over 1.5 ≈80% (at least 2 goals ≈79.8%), Over 2.5 ≈57% and Over 3.5 ≈35%. Seasonal stats support a goal-prone profile: home side has Over 1.5 in 88% of matches, away side in 71%, and in the last 5 fixtures both teams have Over 2.5 at 80%. Additionally, MP averages 12.63 shots and 4.13 on target versus KäPa’s 9.86 and 3.14, with low clean sheet rates of 13% and 14% and BTTS 63%/57%, increasing the likelihood of goals from both sides. The strongest signal is Over 1.5 (line 1.5, pick “over”), as the expected 2.97 goals and modelled 80% combined with seasonal 88%/71% give a clear edge to this selection.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

MP has a slight offensive edge: average xG is 1.53 versus 1.26 for KäPa; the home side averages 12.63 shots and 4.13 on target compared to 9.86 and 3.14 for the visitors, and average goals are 1.25 vs 1.00. At Half-Time the data are mixed — MP are level at the break in 50% of their matches this season, while KäPa led at the break in 43% of fixtures, so a draw or an early lead for the visitors is plausible. After the break MP perform better: they earn an average of 1.0 points in second halves versus 0.29 points for KäPa, and KäPa lose second halves in 71% of cases, which supports a turnaround after Half-Time. In the last five matches MP averaged 1.2 points at the break versus 0.4 for KäPa, and the visitors were losing at Half-Time in 60% of their last five fixtures; therefore the strongest signal is X/1 (draw at Half-Time, home win at Full-Time).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

2 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

56Possession (%)44
MPKäPa
15Shots11
MPKäPa
5Shots on target2
MPKäPa
1.64xG1.34
MPKäPa
3Corners5
MPKäPa
48Dangerous attacks70
MPKäPa
14Fouls12
MPKäPa
1Cards4
MPKäPa

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.06Goals scored / match1.13
MPKäPa
1.38Goals conceded / match1.69
MPKäPa
49%Average possession50%
MPKäPa
3.81Shots on target / match3.56
MPKäPa

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.44Shots per match11.13
MPKäPa
3.81Shots on target3.56
MPKäPa
10.2%Shot conversion10.1%
MPKäPa
49%Possession50%
MPKäPa
1.27xG for1.38
MPKäPa
1.52xG against1.59
MPKäPa

Shooting quality

MP: BalancedKäPa: Balanced
MPKäPa
Accuracy (shots on target)36%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.280.32

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

MP is 25% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - MP · 0.8 pts / match - KäPa

MP
LWDLD
Season result split
31% W19% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-3-8
1.13 pts / match · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-2-2
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
LWDWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.29Opponent xG: 1.80BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 80%
KäPa
WLDLL
Season result split
25% W25% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-4-8
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-1-5
Last 5 away
0-0-5
LLLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.48Opponent xG: 1.57BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

KäPa is 7% better for: goals scored per match.

1.06 goals / match - MP · 1.13 goals / match - KäPa

MP is 22% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.38 goals / match - MP · 1.69 goals / match - KäPa

MP scoring profile: very strong

MP scores in 75% of matches (12 of 16 matches), while KäPa keeps a clean sheet in 13% (2 of 16 matches).

KäPa scoring profile: strong

KäPa scores in 69% of matches (11 of 16 matches), while MP keeps a clean sheet in 25% (4 of 16 matches).

17Goals scored (season)18
MPKäPa
22Goals conceded (season)27
MPKäPa
2.44Average goals in match2.81
MPKäPa
8Goals scored (last 5)7
MPKäPa
10Goals conceded (last 5)11
MPKäPa

How often they score at least...

75%1 goal69%
MPKäPa
25%2 goals38%
MPKäPa
6%3 goals6%
MPKäPa
0%4 goals0%
MPKäPa

How often they concede at least...

75%1 goal88%
MPKäPa
38%2 goals63%
MPKäPa
25%3 goals19%
MPKäPa
0%4 goals0%
MPKäPa

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

13%BTTS at half-time19%
MPKäPa
6%BTTS in both halves0%
MPKäPa
13%Scored in both halves19%
MPKäPa

BTTS and goal count

44%Min. 3 goals and BTTS63%
MPKäPa
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
MPKäPa
100%BTTS - last 580%
MPKäPa

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

63%Min. 1 goal before half-time75%
MPKäPa
13%Min. 2 goals before half-time56%
MPKäPa
6%Min. 3 goals before half-time6%
MPKäPa

2nd half

69%Min. 1 goal after half-time75%
MPKäPa
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time44%
MPKäPa
31%Min. 3 goals after half-time19%
MPKäPa

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

MP is 19% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.56 pts / match - MP · 1.31 pts / match - KäPa

MP - half-time state
38% leading44% draw19% trailing
KäPa - half-time state
31% leading38% draw31% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.56Points per match (1st half)1.31
MPKäPa
0.5Goals scored (1st half)0.63
MPKäPa
0.31Goals conceded (1st half)0.75
MPKäPa
0.81Average goals (1st half)1.38
MPKäPa
69%Clean sheet before half-time56%
MPKäPa
56%No goal before half-time50%
MPKäPa

After half-time (2nd half)

0.81Points per match (2nd half)0.63
MPKäPa
0.56Goals scored (2nd half)0.5
MPKäPa
1.06Goals conceded (2nd half)0.94
MPKäPa
1.63Average goals (2nd half)1.44
MPKäPa
38%Clean sheet after half-time31%
MPKäPa
56%No goal after half-time63%
MPKäPa

MP - second-half results

13% W44% R44% P
25
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
13
Second-half points
-8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.56
PPG before half-time
Lead holding82%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 31%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.8

Concedes 0.8 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

KäPa - second-half results

6% W44% R50% P
21
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
10
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.31
PPG before half-time
Lead holding81%

Leads at half-time in 31% of matches and wins 25%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

MP - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.800.40
Goals scored / match0.80.8
Goals conceded / match0.41.6
Average goals in match1.22.4
1 goal60%100%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet60%0%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+2-4
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4
KäPa - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.401.20
Goals scored / match0.41.0
Goals conceded / match1.40.8
Average goals in match1.81.8
1 goal80%80%
2 goals80%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-5+1
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

MP
ScoredConceded
2
4
0-15
2
1
16-30
4
0
31-45
0
6
46-60
2
3
61-75
7
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

KäPa
ScoredConceded
4
2
0-15
3
6
16-30
3
4
31-45
4
3
46-60
3
2
61-75
1
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -9 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.63
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
106%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
57%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-62%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
52%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

MP

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.25
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.07
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.21
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.14
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
78%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
122%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
41% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
41%

KäPa

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.21
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.35
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.25
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.10
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
100%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
124%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
6% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 22% come in the first quarter-hour.
6%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).

Teams vs league

MPLigaKäPa
Average goals in match 2.442.49 2.81
Both teams scored 50%45% 63%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 44%44% 69%
Clean sheets 25%31% 13%
Goal before half-time 63%61% 75%
Goal after half-time 69%74% 75%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.49
Average goals per match
45%
Both teams scored
44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.36
Home goals / match
1.13
Away goals / match
+20%
Home attack advantage
+17%
Home defence advantage
+10%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
61%
1 goal
26%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
11%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: MP 0 - 0 - 1 KäPa. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of MP vs KäPa?

The Ykkösliiga match finished MP 2:1 KäPa. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before MP vs KäPa?

MP score 1.06 goals per game on average and KäPa 1.13. The Ykkösliiga average is 2.49 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 50% of MP's matches and 63% of KäPa's.

What form are MP and KäPa in?

Over the last 5 games MP have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and KäPa 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for MP vs KäPa?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.