Finland - YkkösliigaMikkelin UrheilupuistoData current as of 23 October 2026

MP vs SJK Akatemia: match statistics

MP crest
MP
1 : 1half-time 0:1
SJK Akatemia crest
SJK Akatemia

MP vs SJK Akatemia: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

MP played SJK Akatemia in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The match was played on 12 September 2026. Venue: Mikkelin Urheilupuisto. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

MP: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match. SJK Akatemia: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

MP scores 1.09 and concedes 1.50 goals per match. SJK Akatemia scores 0.59 and concedes 1.64. League average: 2.58 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: MP 45%, SJK Akatemia 32%. Over 2.5: MP 45%, SJK Akatemia 32%. League level: BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 47%.

xG, shots and style

MP has higher xG: 1.35 vs 1.22. MP: 11.3 shots per match, SJK Akatemia: 9.8.

Match halves

MP: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.45. SJK Akatemia: half-time lead 9%, second-half goals 0.45.

Goals by minute

MP: 31-45+ (8 goals). SJK Akatemia: 76-90+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ykkösliiga: 2.58 goals per match, BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 47%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-1. Average goals 1.50, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

MP have the home advantage, winning 40% of their matches on home soil, while SJK Akatemia win just 9% of their away fixtures and lose as many as 64%. The hosts average 1.20 goals at home with an xG of 1.39, whereas the visitors score only 0.64 goals away from home and fail to find the net in 55% of such matches. MP also create slightly more danger, averaging 3.6 shots on target compared with SJK Akatemia’s 2.82. Both teams have lost 4 of their last 5 matches, but the visitors’ defence conceded 14 goals during this period, compared with 10 conceded by MP. The hosts’ poor run limits confidence in the pick, but SJK Akatemia’s significantly lower scoring efficiency and very weak away record clearly support an MP victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest signal points to BTTS - No, as MP score an average of just 0.55 goals per match, while SJK Akatemia average 0.64. Both teams regularly fail to score: MP draw a blank in 64% of matches, compared with 55% for SJK Akatemia. The seasonal BTTS rate is just 27% for the home side and 36% for the visitors, well below the league average of 44%. In their last five matches, each team scored 5 goals, but BTTS occurred in only 20% of MP’s games and 40% of SJK Akatemia’s. The weaker defensive records of both sides, with 2.0 and 2.8 goals conceded per match respectively in the latest run, increase the chances of a one-sided result but do not offset the very low attacking efficiency. BTTS - No means that at least one team is expected not to score; it does not automatically indicate a 0-0 result or that neither team will score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The seasonal profile of both teams clearly limits the prospect of a very high-scoring game: fewer than 3.5 goals were scored in 82% of their matches. MP averages only 0.55 goals per game and SJK Akatemia 0.64, with a shot conversion rate of just 6% for both sides. Their last five matches increase the scoring potential, as each team conceded 2.0 and 2.8 goals per game respectively, but both scored only 1.0 goal per game during this period. The combined xG, taking attacking output and defensive weaknesses into account, suggests approximately 2.54 goals, making 1:1, 1:2 or 2:1 realistic scorelines, but not necessarily a four-goal game. Under 3.5 therefore has the strongest support from both the 82% seasonal frequency and the low quality of finishing.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A half-time draw is the most likely outcome, as MP were level at the break in 45% of their matches, compared with 55% for SJK Akatemia; both teams score very little before half-time, averaging 0.18 and 0.09 goals per game, respectively. SJK Akatemia have not led at the break on any occasion, but they average 0.55 goals after the interval, while MP concede as many as 1.18 goals in that period. The visitors also have a slightly better average xG, 1.25 compared with 1.18, while MP’s defence allows opponents an average of 1.96 xG, versus 1.78 for SJK Akatemia. Both teams have won just 9% of their matches, but the hosts’ weaker second-half performance, with no wins in this phase of the season, strengthens the scenario of a half-time draw followed by an away win in the match.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

64Possession (%)36
MPSJK Akatemia
20Shots11
MPSJK Akatemia
5Shots on target2
MPSJK Akatemia
2.07xG1.1
MPSJK Akatemia
6Corners7
MPSJK Akatemia
65Dangerous attacks36
MPSJK Akatemia
13Fouls6
MPSJK Akatemia
3Cards0
MPSJK Akatemia

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.09Goals scored / match0.59
MPSJK Akatemia
1.5Goals conceded / match1.64
MPSJK Akatemia
50%Average possession49%
MPSJK Akatemia
3.86Shots on target / match2.73
MPSJK Akatemia

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.27Shots per match9.82
MPSJK Akatemia
3.86Shots on target2.73
MPSJK Akatemia
9.7%Shot conversion6%
MPSJK Akatemia
50%Possession49%
MPSJK Akatemia
1.35xG for1.22
MPSJK Akatemia
1.57xG against1.87
MPSJK Akatemia

Shooting quality

MP: BalancedSJK Akatemia: Balanced
MPSJK Akatemia
Accuracy (shots on target)34%28%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.280.22

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

MP
LLLLW
Season result split
32% W14% D55% L
Season (W-D-L)
7-3-12
1.09 pts / match · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-2-4
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
WDWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.52Opponent xG: 1.77BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%
SJK Akatemia
LWLLL
Season result split
9% W27% D64% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-6-14
0.55 pts / match · goal difference -23
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-3-7
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LDLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.8xG: 1.15Opponent xG: 2.28BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

MP is 85% better for: goals scored per match.

1.09 goals / match - MP · 0.59 goals / match - SJK Akatemia

MP is 9% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.5 goals / match - MP · 1.64 goals / match - SJK Akatemia

MP scoring profile: very strong

MP scores in 68% of matches (15 of 22 matches), while SJK Akatemia keeps a clean sheet in 18% (4 of 22 matches).

SJK Akatemia scoring profile: mixed

SJK Akatemia scores in 41% of matches (9 of 22 matches), while MP keeps a clean sheet in 23% (5 of 22 matches).

24Goals scored (season)13
MPSJK Akatemia
33Goals conceded (season)36
MPSJK Akatemia
2.59Average goals in match2.23
MPSJK Akatemia
5Goals scored (last 5)5
MPSJK Akatemia
10Goals conceded (last 5)14
MPSJK Akatemia

How often they score at least...

68%1 goal41%
MPSJK Akatemia
32%2 goals18%
MPSJK Akatemia
9%3 goals0%
MPSJK Akatemia
0%4 goals0%
MPSJK Akatemia

How often they concede at least...

77%1 goal82%
MPSJK Akatemia
41%2 goals50%
MPSJK Akatemia
27%3 goals18%
MPSJK Akatemia
5%4 goals5%
MPSJK Akatemia

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

18%BTTS at half-time5%
MPSJK Akatemia
5%BTTS in both halves0%
MPSJK Akatemia
14%Scored in both halves5%
MPSJK Akatemia

BTTS and goal count

41%Min. 3 goals and BTTS23%
MPSJK Akatemia
5%Min. 3 goals without BTTS9%
MPSJK Akatemia
20%BTTS - last 540%
MPSJK Akatemia

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

73%Min. 1 goal before half-time55%
MPSJK Akatemia
27%Min. 2 goals before half-time23%
MPSJK Akatemia
18%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
MPSJK Akatemia

2nd half

55%Min. 1 goal after half-time77%
MPSJK Akatemia
36%Min. 2 goals after half-time32%
MPSJK Akatemia
23%Min. 3 goals after half-time14%
MPSJK Akatemia

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

MP is 83% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.41 pts / match - MP · 0.77 pts / match - SJK Akatemia

MP - half-time state
36% leading32% draw32% trailing
SJK Akatemia - half-time state
9% leading50% draw41% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.41Points per match (1st half)0.77
MPSJK Akatemia
0.64Goals scored (1st half)0.14
MPSJK Akatemia
0.73Goals conceded (1st half)0.64
MPSJK Akatemia
1.36Average goals (1st half)0.77
MPSJK Akatemia
55%Clean sheet before half-time55%
MPSJK Akatemia
55%No goal before half-time86%
MPSJK Akatemia

After half-time (2nd half)

0.95Points per match (2nd half)0.64
MPSJK Akatemia
0.45Goals scored (2nd half)0.45
MPSJK Akatemia
0.77Goals conceded (2nd half)1
MPSJK Akatemia
1.23Average goals (2nd half)1.45
MPSJK Akatemia
55%Clean sheet after half-time32%
MPSJK Akatemia
64%No goal after half-time68%
MPSJK Akatemia

MP - second-half results

14% W55% D32% L
31
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
21
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.41
PPG before half-time
Lead holding89%

Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 32%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

SJK Akatemia - second-half results

9% W36% D55% L
17
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-11
Goal difference (1st half)
14
Second-half points
-12
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.77
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 9% of matches and wins 9%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

MP - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.601.40
Goals scored / match0.80.2
Goals conceded / match2.00.0
Average goals in match2.80.2
1 goal100%20%
2 goals60%0%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet20%100%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference-6+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 0% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 80% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
SJK Akatemia - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.800.60
Goals scored / match0.20.8
Goals conceded / match1.01.8
Average goals in match1.22.6
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-4-5
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 0% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

MP
ScoredConceded
3
8
0-15
3
5
16-30
8
3
31-45
0
6
46-60
2
3
61-75
8
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

SJK Akatemia
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
0
5
16-30
1
6
31-45
2
12
46-60
2
5
61-75
6
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.41
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
93%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
39%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-38%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
28%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
19%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 5 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

MP

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.22
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.19
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.26
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
83%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
119%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.49
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

SJK Akatemia

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.65
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.40
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.63
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.23
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
47%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
124%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.05
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
46% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
46%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).

Teams vs league

MPLigaSJK Akatemia
Average goals in match• 2.592.58▼ 2.23
Both teams scored• 45%44%▼ 32%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 45%47%▼ 32%
Clean sheets▼ 23%31%▼ 18%
Goal before half-time▲ 73%65%▼ 55%
Goal after half-time▼ 55%73%▲ 77%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.58
Average goals per match
44%
Both teams scored
47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.32
Home goals / match
1.26
Away goals / match
+5%
Home attack advantage
+5%
Home defence advantage
+4%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
65%
1 goal
31%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
11%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. MPYellow cardAaron Traore
  2. SJK AkatemiaGoalAnge Christ AchiAssist: Ilyes Berjali
  3. MPYellow cardRohun Kawale
  4. SJK AkatemiaSubstitutionOn: Aniis MachaalOff: Oskar Pihlaja
  5. MPSubstitutionOn: Mohamad Al-SheikhOff: Rohun Kawale
  6. MPYellow cardNiila Forsell
  7. MPSubstitutionOn: Eero YlönenOff: Santtu Seppänen
  8. SJK AkatemiaSubstitutionOn: Danila BulgakovOff: Ilyes Berjali

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): MP 0 - 1 - 1 SJK Akatemia. Average goals 1.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of MP vs SJK Akatemia?

The Ykkösliiga match finished MP 1:1 SJK Akatemia. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between MP and SJK Akatemia?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches MP won 0, SJK Akatemia won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before MP vs SJK Akatemia?

MP score 1.09 goals per game on average and SJK Akatemia 0.59. The Ykkösliiga average is 2.58 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 45% of MP's matches and 32% of SJK Akatemia's.

What form are MP and SJK Akatemia in?

Over the last 5 games MP have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and SJK Akatemia 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for MP vs SJK Akatemia?

The statistical background for MP vs SJK Akatemia — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.