Hungary - NB IHidegkuti Nándor StadionData current as of 19 September 2026

MTK vs Puskás: match statistics

MTK crest
MTK
2 : 3half-time 0:2
Puskás crest
Puskás

MTK vs Puskás: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

MTK played Puskás in NB I (Hungary). The match was played on 7 August 2026. Venue: Hidegkuti Nándor Stadion. Final score: 2:3.

Current form

MTK: 1-1-0, 2.00 points/match. Puskás: 1-0-1, 1.50 points/match.

Goal statistics

MTK scores 3.00 and concedes 1.50 goals per match. Puskás scores 1.00 and concedes 1.00. League average: 3.75 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: MTK 50%, Puskás 0%. Over 2.5: MTK 100%, Puskás 0%. League level: BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 67%.

xG, shots and style

MTK has higher xG: 1.33 vs 1.23. MTK: 11.0 shots per match, Puskás: 10.0.

Match halves

MTK: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 2.00. Puskás: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 0.00.

Goals by minute

MTK: 61-75 (2 goals). Puskás: 0-15 (1 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

NB I: 3.75 goals per match, BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 67%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 0-3-0. Average goals 3.33, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

MTK sit 2nd, while Puskás are 6th, and the hosts remain unbeaten this season: 1 win and 1 draw. At home, MTK won their only match so far 3:0, averaging 12 shots, including 6 on target, with an xG of 1.39. Puskás also won their only away match without conceding, but they create lower-quality chances than their opponents, with an average xG of 1.09 compared with MTK’s 1.39, while also allowing opponents an xG of 1.50. The visitors are, however, in clearly better form over their last five matches, in which they collected 10 points and scored 9 goals, whereas MTK recorded as many as 4 draws. Home advantage, a higher volume of goalscoring opportunities and a better chance-quality balance slightly favor an MTK victory, but a draw remains a realistic scenario.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The latest form of both teams favors goals at both ends: MTK and Puskás have each averaged 1.8 goals scored over their last 5 matches. During the same period, the hosts conceded 1.2 goals per game and the visitors 1.0, while their elevated xG against figures stood at 1.48 and 1.55, respectively. BTTS occurred in 60% of MTK’s last five matches and in 40% of Puskás’ games, providing a moderately positive signal for the “Yes” option overall. Seasonal data is very limited and extreme, as MTK failed to score while Puskás kept clean sheets in 100% of their matches; therefore, greater weight should be placed on current form. With the league average for BTTS at 55%, the most likely scenario is that both teams will score at least one goal.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

In their last five matches, MTK averaged 1.8 goals scored and 1.2 conceded, while Puskás also averaged 1.8 goals scored, with 1.0 conceded. Both sides clearly possess creative potential: their average xG over five matches stands at 1.52 for MTK and 1.64 for Puskás, while their opponents were allowed 1.48 and 1.55 xG, respectively. This produces a projected total of 3.07 goals, while the league averages as many as 3.45 goals per match, with 64% of games featuring at least three goals. The strongest signal remains Over 1.5 goals, as both teams have surpassed this line in 100% of their league matches so far, and their current attacking output supports a scenario with at least two goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Puskás are showing clearly stronger results-based form: they have won 60% of their last five matches and averaged 2.0 points, while MTK recorded only a 20% win rate and averaged 1.4 points. The visitors more often establish a lead at the break, leading after 45 minutes in 60% of their recent appearances and averaging 1.0 goal scored in the first half; MTK score only 0.4 goals per match during this period. In addition, the seasonal data shows that Puskás won their previous match 2–0 after leading at half-time, while MTK lost 0–2 and went into the break behind. However, MTK can respond after the interval, averaging 1.4 goals in the second halves of their last five matches, which keeps the possibility of a draw at half-time followed by an away win at full-time relevant. Nevertheless, the strongest individual scenario remains Puskás leading at half-time and maintaining their winning advantage, supported by the visitors’ superior attacking efficiency: an average of 1.8 goals scored compared with 1.0 goal conceded.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 2
1st half
2 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

58Possession (%)42
MTKPuskás
14Shots11
MTKPuskás
9Shots on target6
MTKPuskás
1.98xG1.39
MTKPuskás
8Corners4
MTKPuskás
65Dangerous attacks38
MTKPuskás
10Fouls20
MTKPuskás
2Cards4
MTKPuskás

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

3Goals scored / match1
MTKPuskás
1.5Goals conceded / match1
MTKPuskás
52%Average possession51%
MTKPuskás
5Shots on target / match4
MTKPuskás

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11Shots per match10
MTKPuskás
5Shots on target4
MTKPuskás
27.3%Shot conversion10%
MTKPuskás
52%Possession51%
MTKPuskás
1.33xG for1.23
MTKPuskás
1.29xG against1.52
MTKPuskás

Shooting quality

MTK: Efficient finishingPuskás: Balanced
MTKPuskás
Accuracy (shots on target)45%40%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.600.25

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

MTK is 33% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - MTK · 1.5 pts / match - Puskás

MTK
WD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
50% W50% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-1-0
2.00 pts / match · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-0
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-0
Last 5 at home
1-0-0
W
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 3.0Goals conceded: 1.5xG: 1.33Opponent xG: 1.29BTTS: 50%Over 2.5: 100%
Puskás
WL
Season result split
50% W0% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-0-1
1.50 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-1
1.50 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-0-0
Last 5 away
1-0-0
W
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.23Opponent xG: 1.52BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

MTK is 200% better for: goals scored per match.

3 goals / match - MTK · 1 goals / match - Puskás

Puskás is 50% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.5 goals / match - MTK · 1 goals / match - Puskás

MTK scoring profile: very strong

MTK scores in 100% of matches (2 of 2 matches), while Puskás keeps a clean sheet in 50% (1 of 2 matches).

Puskás scoring profile: mixed

Puskás scores in 50% of matches (1 of 2 matches), while MTK keeps a clean sheet in 50% (1 of 2 matches).

6Goals scored (season)2
MTKPuskás
3Goals conceded (season)2
MTKPuskás
4.5Average goals in match2
MTKPuskás
6Goals scored (last 5)2
MTKPuskás
3Goals conceded (last 5)2
MTKPuskás

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal50%
MTKPuskás
100%2 goals50%
MTKPuskás
100%3 goals0%
MTKPuskás
0%4 goals0%
MTKPuskás

How often they concede at least...

50%1 goal50%
MTKPuskás
50%2 goals50%
MTKPuskás
50%3 goals0%
MTKPuskás
0%4 goals0%
MTKPuskás

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

50%BTTS at half-time0%
MTKPuskás
50%BTTS in both halves0%
MTKPuskás
100%Scored in both halves0%
MTKPuskás

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS0%
MTKPuskás
50%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
MTKPuskás
50%BTTS - last 50%
MTKPuskás

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
MTKPuskás
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
MTKPuskás
50%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
MTKPuskás

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time50%
MTKPuskás
100%Min. 2 goals after half-time0%
MTKPuskás
50%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
MTKPuskás

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

MTK - half-time state
50% leading0% draw50% trailing
Puskás - half-time state
50% leading0% draw50% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.5Points per match (1st half)1.5
MTKPuskás
1Goals scored (1st half)1
MTKPuskás
1Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
MTKPuskás
2Average goals (1st half)1.5
MTKPuskás
50%Clean sheet before half-time50%
MTKPuskás
0%No goal before half-time50%
MTKPuskás

After half-time (2nd half)

3Points per match (2nd half)0.5
MTKPuskás
2Goals scored (2nd half)0
MTKPuskás
0.5Goals conceded (2nd half)0.5
MTKPuskás
2.5Average goals (2nd half)0.5
MTKPuskás
50%Clean sheet after half-time50%
MTKPuskás
0%No goal after half-time100%
MTKPuskás

MTK - second-half results

100% W0% D0% L
3
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
6
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.5

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Puskás - second-half results

0% W50% D50% L
3
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
1
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

MTK - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.503.00
Goals scored / match1.02.0
Goals conceded / match1.00.5
Average goals in match2.02.5
1 goal100%100%
2 goals50%100%
3 goals50%50%
Clean sheet50%50%
No goal0%0%
Goal difference0+3
Half-time: 50% leading - 0% draw - 50% trailing
2nd half: 100% won - 0% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 50% - Half-time goals total: 2
Puskás - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.500.50
Goals scored / match1.00.0
Goals conceded / match0.50.5
Average goals in match1.50.5
1 goal100%50%
2 goals50%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet50%50%
No goal50%100%
Goal difference+1-1
Half-time: 50% leading - 0% draw - 50% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 50% draw - 50% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

MTK
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
0
0
16-30
1
1
31-45
1
0
46-60
2
0
61-75
1
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (2 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Puskás
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
1
0
16-30
0
1
31-45
0
0
46-60
0
1
61-75
0
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 31-45 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.25
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
2.0 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
87%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
25%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+2%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
50%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

MTK

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.04
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.46
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+1.67
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.21
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
129%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
106%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+1.0
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

Puskás

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.29
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.29
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
0.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.23
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.52
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
70%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
43%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-1.0
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 50% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NB I).

Teams vs league

MTKLigaPuskás
Average goals in match 4.503.75 2.00
Both teams scored 50%58% 0%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 100%67% 0%
Clean sheets 50%25% 50%
Goal before half-time 100%75% 100%
Goal after half-time 100%83% 50%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.75
Average goals per match
58%
Both teams scored
67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
25%
Clean sheets
2.33
Home goals / match
1.42
Away goals / match
+64%
Home attack advantage
+39%
Home defence advantage
+33%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
33%
3 goals
17%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
83%
1 goal
75%
2 goals
33%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. PuskásGoalMartin KernAssist: Pal Dardai
  2. MTKSubstitutionOn: Csaba BelényesiOff: Ilia Beriashvili
  3. PuskásYellow cardAndrás Németh
  4. MTKYellow cardStipe Radić
  5. MTKYellow cardKrisztián László
  6. MTKSubstitutionOn: István BognárOff: Krisztián László
  7. PuskásYellow cardMartin Kern
  8. PuskásSubstitutionOn: Mikael SoisaloOff: Pal Dardai
  9. PuskásYellow cardRoland Orján
  10. PuskásYellow cardMichael Okeke
  11. PuskásSubstitutionOn: Urho NissiläOff: Laros Duarte
  12. MTKSubstitutionOn: Vilius ArmalasOff: Stipe Radić
  13. PuskásGoalLamin ColleyAssist: Urho Nissilä

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): MTK 0 - 3 - 0 Puskás. Average goals 3.33, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of MTK vs Puskás?

The NB I match finished MTK 2:3 Puskás. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between MTK and Puskás?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches MTK won 0, Puskás won 0 and 3 ended level. These games averaged 3.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before MTK vs Puskás?

MTK score 3.00 goals per game on average and Puskás 1.00. The NB I average is 3.75 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 67% of games. Both teams score in 50% of MTK's matches and 0% of Puskás's.

What form are MTK and Puskás in?

Over the last 5 games MTK have a 1-1-0 record (2.00 points per game) and Puskás 1-0-1 (1.50 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for MTK vs Puskás?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.