Slovenia - PrvaLigaMesti Stadion FazanerijaData current as of 03 September 2026

Mura vs Koper: match statistics

Mura crest
Mura
0 : 1half-time 0:0
Koper crest
Koper

Mura vs Koper: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Mura played Koper in PrvaLiga (Slovenia). The match was played on 22 August 2026. Venue: Mesti Stadion Fazanerija. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

Mura: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Koper: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Mura scores 1.60 and concedes 2.20 goals per match. Koper scores 1.00 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.58 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Mura 80%, Koper 40%. Over 2.5: Mura 80%, Koper 20%. League level: BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 42%.

xG, shots and style

xG is very similar for both teams. Mura: 12.0 shots per match, Koper: 12.6.

Match halves

Mura: half-time lead 60%, second-half goals 0.80. Koper: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.80.

Goals by minute

Mura: 16-30 (2 goals). Koper: 76-90+ (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

PrvaLiga: 2.58 goals per match, BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 42%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 4 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-3. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Mura have a slight home advantage: they have won 50% of their home matches, while Koper have won 33% of their away fixtures. The hosts average 1 goal per home game and have failed to score in none of their matches, whereas Koper have been held scoreless in 33% of their away games. The visitors’ attacking quality is reflected in their slightly higher xG of 1.31 compared with Mura’s 1.15. However, Koper are in weaker form, having failed to win any of their last five matches and scoring just 4 goals. Koper’s away defence looks more solid, conceding an average of 1.0 goals compared with Mura’s 1.5, which clearly increases the likelihood of a draw. Nevertheless, Mura have picked up 7 points in their last five league matches, compared with Koper’s 3, making a narrow home win the most likely outcome.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The BTTS signal is strengthened by current form: in Mura’s last five matches, both teams scored in 80% of fixtures, compared with 60% for Koper. Mura averaged 1.6 goals scored during this period but conceded as many as 2.2, while Koper, despite scoring only 0.8 goals, generated an average of 2.00 xG. The hosts also create more chances across the season, with 1.95 xG and 16 shots per match, while their defence allows opponents 1.59 xG. The risk to the pick is Koper’s season-long BTTS rate of 33% and the fact that they have failed to score in 33% of their matches. However, the latest attacking data and Mura’s vulnerability to conceding goals give a slight edge to the scenario in which both sides find the net.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Mura creates plenty of chances at home, averaging 1.95 xG and 16 shots per match, while Koper allows an average of 1.27 xG. In their last five matches, the visitors have generated as much as 2.00 xG per game, but scored only 0.8 goals, which limits confidence in a high-scoring outcome. Mura’s recent form has been more open, with its matches across the previous five rounds producing an average of 3.8 goals, and at least 3 goals being scored in 80% of them. At the same time, Koper have not exceeded the 2.5-goal line in any of their league matches so far, while neither team has yet played a match featuring at least 4 goals. The projected total of 2.65 goals points to a realistic chance of three goals, but the Under 3.5 goals line offers a clearer edge.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Mura’s first-half performance has been clearly stronger over their last five matches: they led at the break in 60% of games, scoring an average of 0.8 goals and conceding just 0.6, while Koper failed to lead in any match, did not score, and were behind after 45 minutes in 80% of their appearances. The hosts also create more chances, recording an average xG of 1.95 compared with Koper’s 1.31, as well as 16 shots and 4 on target per match, versus the visitors’ 10.33 shots and 2.33 on target. Mura’s form is also more favourable, averaging 1.4 points per game and winning 40% of their last five matches, while Koper remained winless during this period. After the break, Mura have kept a clean sheet in 100% of their home matches so far, while Koper average only 0.67 goals, further supporting the scenario in which the hosts maintain their lead until the final whistle. The most likely outcome is therefore an HT/FT 1/1, with Mura taking the lead before half-time and securing the win.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

46Possession (%)54
MuraKoper
16Shots10
MuraKoper
3Shots on target3
MuraKoper
1.44xG1.11
MuraKoper
5Corners5
MuraKoper
31Dangerous attacks36
MuraKoper
25Fouls17
MuraKoper
3Cards2
MuraKoper

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.6Goals scored / match1
MuraKoper
2.2Goals conceded / match1
MuraKoper
45%Average possession57%
MuraKoper
5.4Shots on target / match3
MuraKoper

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12Shots per match12.6
MuraKoper
5.4Shots on target3
MuraKoper
13.3%Shot conversion7.9%
MuraKoper
45%Possession57%
MuraKoper
1.57xG for1.57
MuraKoper
1.43xG against1.4
MuraKoper

Shooting quality

Mura: Counter-attackingKoper: Balanced
MuraKoper
Accuracy (shots on target)45%24%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Mura is 17% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Mura · 1.2 pts / match - Koper

Mura
DWLLW
Season result split
40% W20% R40% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-1
Last 5 at home
1-0-1
WL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.57Opponent xG: 1.43BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
Koper
WDDLD
Season result split
20% W60% R20% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-1-1
Last 5 away
1-1-1
WDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.57Opponent xG: 1.40BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Mura is 60% better for: goals scored per match.

1.6 goals / match - Mura · 1 goals / match - Koper

Koper is 120% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.2 goals / match - Mura · 1 goals / match - Koper

Mura scoring profile: very strong

Mura scores in 100% of matches (5 of 5 matches), while Koper keeps a clean sheet in 40% (2 of 5 matches).

Koper scoring profile: strong

Koper scores in 60% of matches (3 of 5 matches), while Mura keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 matches).

8Goals scored (season)5
MuraKoper
11Goals conceded (season)5
MuraKoper
3.8Average goals in match2
MuraKoper
8Goals scored (last 5)5
MuraKoper
11Goals conceded (last 5)5
MuraKoper

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal60%
MuraKoper
60%2 goals40%
MuraKoper
0%3 goals0%
MuraKoper
0%4 goals0%
MuraKoper

How often they concede at least...

80%1 goal60%
MuraKoper
60%2 goals40%
MuraKoper
40%3 goals0%
MuraKoper
20%4 goals0%
MuraKoper

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

20%BTTS at half-time0%
MuraKoper
20%BTTS in both halves0%
MuraKoper
60%Scored in both halves20%
MuraKoper

BTTS and goal count

80%Min. 3 goals and BTTS20%
MuraKoper
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
MuraKoper
80%BTTS - last 540%
MuraKoper

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time80%
MuraKoper
20%Min. 2 goals before half-time20%
MuraKoper
20%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
MuraKoper

2nd half

80%Min. 1 goal after half-time80%
MuraKoper
80%Min. 2 goals after half-time20%
MuraKoper
60%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
MuraKoper

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Mura is 125% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.8 pts / match - Mura · 0.8 pts / match - Koper

Mura - half-time state
60% leading0% draw40% trailing
Koper - half-time state
20% leading20% draw60% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.8Points per match (1st half)0.8
MuraKoper
0.8Goals scored (1st half)0.2
MuraKoper
0.6Goals conceded (1st half)0.8
MuraKoper
1.4Average goals (1st half)1
MuraKoper
60%Clean sheet before half-time40%
MuraKoper
20%No goal before half-time80%
MuraKoper

After half-time (2nd half)

0.4Points per match (2nd half)2
MuraKoper
0.8Goals scored (2nd half)0.8
MuraKoper
1.6Goals conceded (2nd half)0.2
MuraKoper
2.4Average goals (2nd half)1
MuraKoper
20%Clean sheet after half-time80%
MuraKoper
20%No goal after half-time40%
MuraKoper

Mura - second-half results

0% W40% R60% P
9
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
2
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.80
PPG before half-time
Lead holding67%

Leads at half-time in 60% of matches and wins 40%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+1.0

Concedes 1.0 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Koper - second-half results

60% W20% R20% P
4
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
10
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.80
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 20%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.6

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Mura - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.800.40
Goals scored / match0.80.8
Goals conceded / match0.61.6
Average goals in match1.42.4
1 goal100%80%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals20%60%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal20%20%
Goal difference+1-4
Half-time: 60% leading - 0% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
Koper - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.802.00
Goals scored / match0.20.8
Goals conceded / match0.80.2
Average goals in match1.01.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-3+3
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Mura
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
2
1
16-30
1
2
31-45
1
4
46-60
2
0
61-75
1
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (2 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

Koper
ScoredConceded
0
2
0-15
1
2
16-30
0
0
31-45
0
0
46-60
1
1
61-75
3
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.90
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
112%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
60%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+3%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
60%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Mura

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.14
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.74
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.03
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.77
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
130%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
163%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
13% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
13%

Koper

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.17
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.17
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.57
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.40
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
74%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
81%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
60% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
60%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (PrvaLiga).

Teams vs league

MuraLigaKoper
Average goals in match 3.802.58 2.00
Both teams scored 80%54% 40%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 80%42% 20%
Clean sheets 20%27% 40%
Goal before half-time 100%81% 80%
Goal after half-time 80%85% 80%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.58
Average goals per match
54%
Both teams scored
42%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.23
Home goals / match
1.35
Away goals / match
+-9%
Home attack advantage
+-10%
Home defence advantage
+-4%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
19%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
85%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. MuraYellow cardFaad Sana
  2. KoperYellow cardLuka Guček
  3. MuraYellow cardŠimun Butić
  4. KoperYellow cardFran Tomek
  5. MuraYellow cardAljaž Zalaznik
  6. MuraSubstitutionOn: Kristjan TrdinOff: Aljaž Zalaznik
  7. KoperGoalRobert Berič

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (4): Mura 1 - 0 - 3 Koper. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.

NŠ Mura
0 : 1
FC Koper
FC Koper
3 : 0
NŠ Mura
NŠ Mura
3 : 2
FC Koper
FC Koper
2 : 1
NŠ Mura

FAQ

What was the result of Mura vs Koper?

The PrvaLiga match finished Mura 0:1 Koper. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Mura and Koper?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches Mura won 1, Koper won 3 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Mura vs Koper?

Mura score 1.60 goals per game on average and Koper 1.00. The PrvaLiga average is 2.58 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 42% of games. Both teams score in 80% of Mura's matches and 40% of Koper's.

What form are Mura and Koper in?

Over the last 5 games Mura have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Koper 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Mura vs Koper?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.