Nafta vs Aluminij: match statistics
Nafta vs Aluminij: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Nafta played Aluminij in PrvaLiga (Slovenia). The match was played on 28 October 2026. Venue: Športni park Lendava. Final score: 0:0.
Current form
Nafta: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Aluminij: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Nafta scores 1.50 and concedes 1.33 goals per match. Aluminij scores 1.33 and concedes 1.08. League average: 2.67 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Nafta 50%, Aluminij 42%. Over 2.5: Nafta 50%, Aluminij 33%. League level: BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 49%.
xG, shots and style
Nafta has higher xG: 1.39 vs 1.25. Nafta: 11.3 shots per match, Aluminij: 9.3.
Match halves
Nafta: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 1.00. Aluminij: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.67.
Goals by minute
Nafta: 46-60 (7 goals). Aluminij: 0-15 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
PrvaLiga: 2.67 goals per match, BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 49%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Nafta are slight favorites: they have collected 8 points and conceded just 3 goals in their last 5 matches, while Aluminij have earned 4 points and conceded 10. At home, Nafta score an average of 2 goals and register 6.33 shots on target per match, while Aluminij average 4.2 shots on target away from home. Nafta also hold the edge in chance creation, with a home xG of 1.49 compared with Aluminij’s away xG of 1.34. However, this remains an open contest, as the visitors score an average of 2.2 goals away from home and Nafta concede 1.83 goals per home match. The hosts have also won just 2 of their last 5 matches.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The strongest signal against both teams scoring is that Nafta failed to score in 71% of its home matches, averaging just 0.71 goals at home. Aluminij averages 2.2 goals away, but failed to score in 40% of those matches, so its goal is not guaranteed either. The case for BTTS - Yes is supported by Nafta’s improved attack: it averaged 2.6 goals across its last 5 matches, while Aluminij conceded 2.0. Despite this improvement, both teams scored in only 20% of Nafta’s last 5 matches, compared with 60% for Aluminij. Therefore, it is slightly more likely that at least one team will finish the match without scoring (BTTS - No).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The strongest pick is Over 1.5 goals, although the data for the two teams point in different directions on higher lines. Nafta average just 0.71 goals at home, but their xG is 1.19, while Aluminij allow opponents chances worth an average of 2.04 xG. The visitors score an average of 2.2 goals away from home, while Nafta concede 1.0 goal per home match. In their last five matches, each team averaged at least 2.6 goals, reinforcing the prediction of at least two goals. Higher lines are less certain: Over 2.5 goals landed in only 14% of Nafta's home matches, compared with 60% of Aluminij's away matches.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
A draw at half-time is the most likely outcome: Nafta went into the break level in 71% of their home matches and did not concede in the first half in 86% of them. In their last five matches, Aluminij failed to score before the break in 80% of cases, although their average of 1.2 first-half goals in away matches means an away lead cannot be ruled out. Nafta could gain the upper hand after the break, having averaged 1.8 second-half goals across their last five matches, while Aluminij conceded an average of 1.2 over the same period. Nafta’s recent form also supports a home win: they averaged 1.6 points across their last five matches, compared with the visitors’ 0.8. However, the X/1 pick remains risky, as Aluminij averaged 2.2 goals away over the season, while Nafta averaged just 0.71 at home.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Nafta | Aluminij | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 44% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.30 | 0.39 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Nafta is 100% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / match - Nafta · 1 pts / match - Aluminij
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Nafta is 13% better for: goals scored per match.
1.5 goals / match - Nafta · 1.33 goals / match - Aluminij
Aluminij is 23% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.33 goals / match - Nafta · 1.08 goals / match - Aluminij
Nafta scores in 67% of matches (8 of 12 matches), while Aluminij keeps a clean sheet in 17% (2 of 12 matches).
Aluminij scores in 42% of matches (5 of 12 matches), while Nafta keeps a clean sheet in 25% (3 of 12 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Nafta
Over / Under - Aluminij
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Aluminij is 16% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.08 pts / match - Nafta · 1.25 pts / match - Aluminij
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Nafta - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 42%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Aluminij - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 25%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.4 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Nafta
Aluminij
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (PrvaLiga).
Teams vs league
| Nafta | Liga | Aluminij | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.83 | 2.67 | ▼ 2.42 |
| Both teams scored | • 50% | 51% | ▼ 42% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 50% | 49% | ▼ 33% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 25% | 30% | ▼ 17% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 67% | 74% | ▼ 50% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 83% | 79% | ▼ 67% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Nafta 0 - 1 - 0 Aluminij. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Nafta vs Aluminij?
The PrvaLiga match finished Nafta 0:0 Aluminij. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Nafta vs Aluminij?
Nafta score 1.50 goals per game on average and Aluminij 1.33. The PrvaLiga average is 2.67 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Nafta's matches and 42% of Aluminij's.
What form are Nafta and Aluminij in?
Over the last 5 games Nafta have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Aluminij 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Nafta vs Aluminij?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.