Japan - J-League CupToyota StadiumData current as of 17 October 2026

Nagoya Grampus vs Fagiano Okayama: match statistics

Nagoya Grampus vs Fagiano Okayama: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Nagoya Grampus played Fagiano Okayama in J-League Cup (Japan). The match was played on 14 October 2026. Venue: Toyota Stadium. Final score: 3:3.

Current form

Nagoya Grampus: 1-0-0, 3.00 points/match. Fagiano Okayama: 1-0-0, 3.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Nagoya Grampus scores 3.00 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Fagiano Okayama scores 2.00 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.85 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Nagoya Grampus 100%, Fagiano Okayama 100%. Over 2.5: Nagoya Grampus 100%, Fagiano Okayama 100%. League level: BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 54%.

xG, shots and style

Nagoya Grampus has higher xG: 2.01 vs 1.75. Nagoya Grampus: 18.0 shots per match, Fagiano Okayama: 13.0.

Match halves

Nagoya Grampus: half-time lead 100%, second-half goals 1.00. Fagiano Okayama: half-time lead 100%, second-half goals 1.00.

Goals by minute

Nagoya Grampus: 16-30 (2 goals). Fagiano Okayama: 31-45+ (1 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

J-League Cup: 2.85 goals per match, BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 54%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 2-1-0. Average goals 1.33, BTTS 33%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Fagiano Okayama come into the match in clearly better form, having won 4 of their last 5 games, while Nagoya Grampus have lost 4 of 5. During this period, the visitors scored 9 goals and conceded 6, whereas the hosts scored 4 and conceded 10, highlighting Nagoya’s defensive issues. In the only away match included in the data, Fagiano recorded 13 shots, including 4 on target, scored 2 goals and conceded once. The visitors’ chance quality also looks promising: their away xG was 1,75, compared with their opponents’ 0,73, although the sample is too small for firm conclusions. Nagoya won their only match so far this season 3:1, so they should not be written off, but the last-five-match record points to an away win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

In their last 5 matches, both teams scored in 80% of Fagiano Okayama’s games, compared with just 40% of Nagoya Grampus’s, so the signal is not clear-cut. However, the case for BTTS - Yes is supported by Fagiano averaging 1.8 goals scored and Nagoya conceding 2.0 goals per match over this period. Nagoya scored a more modest 0.8 goals per match, but Fagiano conceded an average of 1.2, giving the visitors a chance to get on the scoresheet. Similar average xG figures for both teams across their last 5 matches — 1.31 for Nagoya and 1.26 for Fagiano — suggest that both can create chances, although Nagoya’s lower scoring rate limits confidence in the prediction.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Nagoya's last five matches averaged 2.8 goals, while Okayama's averaged 3.0, pointing towards at least two goals. During this period, Nagoya conceded an average of 2.0 goals per match, while Okayama scored 1.8, so I expect the visitors to contribute more of the goals. The Over 2.5 goals line landed in 60% of the hosts' last five matches and 80% of the visitors' last five, although the projected total of 2.90 goals offers a less convincing edge than a lower line. I’m backing Over 1.5 goals because, with Nagoya projected to score 1.15 and Okayama 1.75, it is the most likely outcome among the bets considered. Nagoya’s cup average of 0.0 is not a reliable reflection of its attacking threat, so I place greater weight on its last five appearances.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A half-time draw followed by a Fagiano Okayama win is the most likely outcome: the visitors were level at the break in 3 of their last 5 matches, compared with Nagoya in 2 of 5. Fagiano won 4 of those 5 matches, while Nagoya lost 4, which points clearly towards an away win at full time. After the break, the hosts conceded an average of 1.6 goals, while the visitors scored 0.8, so a balanced start does not necessarily mean the game will remain even until the end. The 2/2 scenario is also credible, as Fagiano led at the break in 2 of their last 5 matches; however, the more frequent half-time draws give a slight edge to X/2. Cup competition data is limited: the visitors have played only one match in those competitions, while no statistics have yet been recorded for the hosts, so the prediction remains cautious.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
2 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

59Possession (%)41
Nagoya GrampusFagiano Okayama
26Shots17
Nagoya GrampusFagiano Okayama
6Shots on target8
Nagoya GrampusFagiano Okayama
2.77xG2.22
Nagoya GrampusFagiano Okayama
6Corners7
Nagoya GrampusFagiano Okayama
99Dangerous attacks81
Nagoya GrampusFagiano Okayama
10Fouls15
Nagoya GrampusFagiano Okayama
3Cards3
Nagoya GrampusFagiano Okayama

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Nagoya GrampusFagiano Okayama
3Goals scored / match2
Nagoya GrampusFagiano Okayama
1Goals conceded / match1
Nagoya GrampusFagiano Okayama
67%Average possession48%
Nagoya GrampusFagiano Okayama
6Shots on target / match4
Nagoya GrampusFagiano Okayama

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

18Shots per match13
Nagoya GrampusFagiano Okayama
6Shots on target4
Nagoya GrampusFagiano Okayama
16.7%Shot conversion15.4%
Nagoya GrampusFagiano Okayama
67%Possession48%
Nagoya GrampusFagiano Okayama
2.01xG for1.75
Nagoya GrampusFagiano Okayama
0.92xG against0.73
Nagoya GrampusFagiano Okayama

Shooting quality

Nagoya Grampus: DominantFagiano Okayama: Efficient finishing
Nagoya GrampusFagiano Okayama
Accuracy (shots on target)33%31%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.500.50

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Nagoya Grampus
W
5 wins in a row
Season result split
100% W0% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-0-0
3.00 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-0
3.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-0-0
Last 5 at home
0-0-0
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 3.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 2.01Opponent xG: 0.92BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%
Fagiano Okayama
W
5 wins in a row
Season result split
100% W0% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-0-0
3.00 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-0
3.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-0-0
Last 5 away
1-0-0
W
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.75Opponent xG: 0.73BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Nagoya Grampus is 50% better for: goals scored per match.

3 goals / match - Nagoya Grampus · 2 goals / match - Fagiano Okayama

Nagoya Grampus scoring profile: very strong

Nagoya Grampus scores in 100% of matches (1 of 1 matches), while Fagiano Okayama keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 1 matches).

Fagiano Okayama scoring profile: very strong

Fagiano Okayama scores in 100% of matches (1 of 1 matches), while Nagoya Grampus keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 1 matches).

3Goals scored (season)2
Nagoya GrampusFagiano Okayama
1Goals conceded (season)1
Nagoya GrampusFagiano Okayama
4Average goals in match3
Nagoya GrampusFagiano Okayama
3Goals scored (last 5)2
Nagoya GrampusFagiano Okayama
1Goals conceded (last 5)1
Nagoya GrampusFagiano Okayama

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal100%
Nagoya GrampusFagiano Okayama
100%2 goals100%
Nagoya GrampusFagiano Okayama
100%3 goals0%
Nagoya GrampusFagiano Okayama
0%4 goals0%
Nagoya GrampusFagiano Okayama

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal100%
Nagoya GrampusFagiano Okayama
0%2 goals0%
Nagoya GrampusFagiano Okayama
0%3 goals0%
Nagoya GrampusFagiano Okayama
0%4 goals0%
Nagoya GrampusFagiano Okayama

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

44%
League average

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time0%
Nagoya GrampusFagiano Okayama
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Nagoya GrampusFagiano Okayama
100%Scored in both halves100%
Nagoya GrampusFagiano Okayama

BTTS and goal count

100%Min. 3 goals and BTTS100%
Nagoya GrampusFagiano Okayama
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Nagoya GrampusFagiano Okayama
100%BTTS - last 5100%
Nagoya GrampusFagiano Okayama

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
Nagoya GrampusFagiano Okayama
100%Min. 2 goals before half-time0%
Nagoya GrampusFagiano Okayama
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Nagoya GrampusFagiano Okayama

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
Nagoya GrampusFagiano Okayama
100%Min. 2 goals after half-time100%
Nagoya GrampusFagiano Okayama
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
Nagoya GrampusFagiano Okayama

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Nagoya Grampus - half-time state
100% leading0% draw0% trailing
Fagiano Okayama - half-time state
100% leading0% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

3Points per match (1st half)3
Nagoya GrampusFagiano Okayama
2Goals scored (1st half)1
Nagoya GrampusFagiano Okayama
0Goals conceded (1st half)0
Nagoya GrampusFagiano Okayama
2Average goals (1st half)1
Nagoya GrampusFagiano Okayama
100%Clean sheet before half-time100%
Nagoya GrampusFagiano Okayama
0%No goal before half-time0%
Nagoya GrampusFagiano Okayama

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per match (2nd half)1
Nagoya GrampusFagiano Okayama
1Goals scored (2nd half)1
Nagoya GrampusFagiano Okayama
1Goals conceded (2nd half)1
Nagoya GrampusFagiano Okayama
2Average goals (2nd half)2
Nagoya GrampusFagiano Okayama
0%Clean sheet after half-time0%
Nagoya GrampusFagiano Okayama
0%No goal after half-time0%
Nagoya GrampusFagiano Okayama

Nagoya Grampus - second-half results

0% W100% D0% L
3
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
1
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
3.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 100% of matches and wins 100%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+1.0

Concedes 1.0 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Fagiano Okayama - second-half results

0% W100% D0% L
3
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
1
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
3.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 100% of matches and wins 100%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+1.0

Concedes 1.0 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Nagoya Grampus - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match3.001.00
Goals scored / match2.01.0
Goals conceded / match0.01.0
Average goals in match2.02.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals100%100%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%0%
No goal0%0%
Goal difference+20
Half-time: 100% leading - 0% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 100% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Fagiano Okayama - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match3.001.00
Goals scored / match1.01.0
Goals conceded / match0.01.0
Average goals in match1.02.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals0%100%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%0%
No goal0%0%
Goal difference+10
Half-time: 100% leading - 0% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 100% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Nagoya Grampus
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
2
0
16-30
0
0
31-45
0
0
46-60
1
0
61-75
0
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Fagiano Okayama
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
1
0
31-45
0
1
46-60
0
0
61-75
1
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (1 goal). Concedes most in 46-60 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.50
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
2.0 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
123%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
100%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-62%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
100%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Nagoya Grampus

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+1.09
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.91
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.99
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.08
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
268%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
58%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-1.0
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Fagiano Okayama

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+1.02
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.02
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.25
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.27
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
116%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
89%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
50% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
50%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (J-League Cup).

Teams vs league

Nagoya GrampusLigaFagiano Okayama
Average goals in match▲ 4.002.85▲ 3.00
Both teams scored▲ 100%44%▲ 100%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 100%54%▲ 100%
Clean sheets▼ 0%32%▼ 0%
Goal before half-time▲ 100%71%▲ 100%
Goal after half-time▲ 100%80%▲ 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.85
Average goals per match
44%
Both teams scored
54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
32%
Clean sheets
1.12
Home goals / match
1.73
Away goals / match
+-35%
Home attack advantage
+-54%
Home defence advantage
+-32%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
49%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Fagiano OkayamaYellow cardRui Sueyoshi
  2. Nagoya GrampusYellow cardMateus dos Santos Castro
  3. Fagiano OkayamaAssistYuta Kamiya
  4. Nagoya GrampusGoalHidemasa KodaAssist: Yuya Yamagishi
  5. Nagoya GrampusGoalHidemasa KodaAssist: Yuya Yamagishi
  6. Fagiano OkayamaSubstitutionOn: Hiroshi OmoriOff: Towa Yamane
  7. Fagiano OkayamaGoalYota FujiiAssist: Yuta Kamiya
  8. Fagiano OkayamaSubstitutionOn: Ataru EsakaOff: Kota Kawano
  9. Nagoya GrampusGoalMasahito Ono
  10. Nagoya GrampusSubstitutionOn: Shungo SugiuraOff: Mateus dos Santos Castro
  11. Fagiano OkayamaSubstitutionOn: Oberdan Alionco de LimaOff: Ryo Takeuchi
  12. Fagiano OkayamaYellow cardYuta Kamiya
  13. Nagoya GrampusYellow cardYota Sato
  14. Nagoya GrampusSubstitutionOn: Sakuto FukayaOff: Masahito Ono
  15. Fagiano OkayamaGoalLeonardo Andriel dos SantosAssist: Ataru Esaka
  16. Fagiano OkayamaSubstitutionOn: Haruka MotoyamaOff: Rui Sueyoshi
  17. Nagoya GrampusYellow cardYudai Kimura

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Nagoya Grampus 2 - 1 - 0 Fagiano Okayama. Average goals 1.33, both teams scored in 33% matches.

Nagoya Grampus
2 : 1
Fagiano Okayama
Fagiano Okayama
0 : 1
Nagoya Grampus
Nagoya Grampus
0 : 0
Fagiano Okayama

FAQ

What was the result of Nagoya Grampus vs Fagiano Okayama?

The J-League Cup match finished Nagoya Grampus 3:3 Fagiano Okayama. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Nagoya Grampus and Fagiano Okayama?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Nagoya Grampus won 2, Fagiano Okayama won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Nagoya Grampus vs Fagiano Okayama?

Nagoya Grampus score 3.00 goals per game on average and Fagiano Okayama 2.00. The J-League Cup average is 2.85 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 100% of Nagoya Grampus's matches and 100% of Fagiano Okayama's.

What form are Nagoya Grampus and Fagiano Okayama in?

Over the last 5 games Nagoya Grampus have a 1-0-0 record (3.00 points per game) and Fagiano Okayama 1-0-0 (3.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Nagoya Grampus vs Fagiano Okayama?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Nagoya Grampus vs Fagiano Okayama: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.