Tanzania - Ligi kuu BaraData current as of 17 October 2026

Namungo vs Kitayosce: match statistics

Namungo crest
Namungo
1 : 0half-time 1:0
Kitayosce crest
Kitayosce

Namungo vs Kitayosce: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Namungo played Kitayosce in Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania). The match was played on 8 October 2026. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Namungo: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match. Kitayosce: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Namungo scores 0.86 and concedes 1.57 goals per match. Kitayosce scores 1.00 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.51 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Namungo 43%, Kitayosce 67%. Over 2.5: Namungo 43%, Kitayosce 33%. League level: BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 43%.

xG, shots and style

Kitayosce has higher xG: 1.57 vs 1.25. Namungo: 6.1 shots per match, Kitayosce: 7.8.

Match halves

Namungo: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.43. Kitayosce: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.17.

Goals by minute

Namungo: 16-30 (2 goals). Kitayosce: 0-15 (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ligi kuu Bara: 2.51 goals per match, BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 43%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Kitayosce hold a slight edge thanks to stronger attacking numbers away from home: they average 1.5 goals and generate an xG of 1.48, while Namungo average 1 goal and 1.12 xG at home. The visitors also record an average of 9.67 shots away from home, compared with the hosts’ 6.33 at home, while Namungo allow opponents chances worth an average xG of 1.98. Namungo have lost four of their last five matches and conceded 8 goals, whereas Kitayosce have suffered two defeats and conceded 5. However, the hosts’ two wins in three home matches work in their favour, so the visitors’ edge is not substantial. Kitayosce have also drawn two of their four away matches, making a share of the points a realistic outcome.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest signal against both teams scoring is Namungo’s home scoring record: an average of 0.0 goals scored and no goals in 100% of home matches. However, this does not mean the hosts will fail to create chances—their average xG is 1.71, and Kitayosce have not kept a clean sheet away from home. Meanwhile, the visitors average 1.5 goals away, while Namungo concede just 0.5 goals per home match. In the last 5 matches, both teams scored in 40% of Namungo’s games and 60% of Kitayosce’s, so the signals are mixed. Given Namungo’s lack of home goals so far, the outcome in which at least one team fails to score is marginally more likely: BTTS - No.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Namungo have yet to score at home, despite averaging 1.71 xG, so ruling out a goal from the hosts entirely would be overly cautious. Kitayosce average 1.5 goals away from home, while Namungo have conceded an average of 1.6 goals across their last five matches, pointing to a goal for the visitors. At the same time, all of Namungo’s home matches to date and 75% of Kitayosce’s away matches have finished Under 3.5 goals. The 2.30-goal projection accounts for both the attacking potential reflected in the xG and the hosts’ poor finishing, making Under 3.5 goals a stronger pick than Under 2.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Namungo were level at half-time in both of their home matches so far, scoring and conceding no goals in the first half, making a draw at the break the most likely outcome. However, Kitayosce average 1.5 goals per match compared with Namungo’s 0.0 in home fixtures, shifting the full-time forecast in the visitors’ favour. In their last five matches, Namungo have lost four times and conceded an average of 1.6 goals, while Kitayosce have lost twice and conceded an average of 1.0. A half-time draw followed by an away win therefore has the strongest overall case in the HT/FT market, although Kitayosce’s average of just 0.25 goals after the break makes a full-time draw a significant alternative. These conclusions are tentative, as the data on Namungo’s home performances covers only two matches.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

39Possession (%)61
NamungoKitayosce
8Shots11
NamungoKitayosce
1Shots on target5
NamungoKitayosce
1.1xG1.88
NamungoKitayosce
3Corners6
NamungoKitayosce
71Dangerous attacks115
NamungoKitayosce
19Fouls19
NamungoKitayosce
0Cards0
NamungoKitayosce

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.86Goals scored / match1
NamungoKitayosce
1.57Goals conceded / match1
NamungoKitayosce
41%Average possession43%
NamungoKitayosce
3.43Shots on target / match2.67
NamungoKitayosce

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

6.14Shots per match7.83
NamungoKitayosce
3.43Shots on target2.67
NamungoKitayosce
14%Shot conversion12.8%
NamungoKitayosce
41%Possession43%
NamungoKitayosce
1.25xG for1.57
NamungoKitayosce
1.84xG against1.46
NamungoKitayosce

Shooting quality

Namungo: Counter-attackingKitayosce: Counter-attacking
NamungoKitayosce
Accuracy (shots on target)56%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.200.20
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.250.37

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Kitayosce is 67% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / match - Namungo · 1 pts / match - Kitayosce

Namungo
WLLLL
Season result split
29% W0% D71% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-0-5
0.86 pts / match · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-0-1
Last 5 at home
2-0-1
LWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.32Opponent xG: 1.67BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Kitayosce
LDLDW
Season result split
17% W50% D33% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-3-2
1.00 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-2-1
Last 5 away
1-2-1
DLDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.58Opponent xG: 1.40BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Kitayosce is 16% better for: goals scored per match.

0.86 goals / match - Namungo · 1 goals / match - Kitayosce

Kitayosce is 57% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.57 goals / match - Namungo · 1 goals / match - Kitayosce

Namungo scoring profile: very strong

Namungo scores in 71% of matches (5 of 7 matches), while Kitayosce keeps a clean sheet in 17% (1 of 6 matches).

Kitayosce scoring profile: strong

Kitayosce scores in 67% of matches (4 of 6 matches), while Namungo keeps a clean sheet in 29% (2 of 7 matches).

6Goals scored (season)6
NamungoKitayosce
11Goals conceded (season)6
NamungoKitayosce
2.43Average goals in match2
NamungoKitayosce
4Goals scored (last 5)5
NamungoKitayosce
8Goals conceded (last 5)5
NamungoKitayosce

How often they score at least...

71%1 goal67%
NamungoKitayosce
14%2 goals17%
NamungoKitayosce
0%3 goals17%
NamungoKitayosce
0%4 goals0%
NamungoKitayosce

How often they concede at least...

71%1 goal83%
NamungoKitayosce
57%2 goals17%
NamungoKitayosce
29%3 goals0%
NamungoKitayosce
0%4 goals0%
NamungoKitayosce

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

14%BTTS at half-time17%
NamungoKitayosce
14%BTTS in both halves0%
NamungoKitayosce
14%Scored in both halves0%
NamungoKitayosce

BTTS and goal count

43%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
NamungoKitayosce
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
NamungoKitayosce
40%BTTS - last 560%
NamungoKitayosce

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

71%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
NamungoKitayosce
14%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
NamungoKitayosce
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time17%
NamungoKitayosce

2nd half

57%Min. 1 goal after half-time67%
NamungoKitayosce
43%Min. 2 goals after half-time0%
NamungoKitayosce
43%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
NamungoKitayosce

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Kitayosce is 16% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.29 pts / match - Namungo · 1.5 pts / match - Kitayosce

Namungo - half-time state
29% leading43% draw29% trailing
Kitayosce - half-time state
33% leading50% draw17% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.29Points per match (1st half)1.5
NamungoKitayosce
0.43Goals scored (1st half)0.83
NamungoKitayosce
0.43Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
NamungoKitayosce
0.86Average goals (1st half)1.33
NamungoKitayosce
57%Clean sheet before half-time67%
NamungoKitayosce
57%No goal before half-time50%
NamungoKitayosce

After half-time (2nd half)

0.43Points per match (2nd half)0.83
NamungoKitayosce
0.43Goals scored (2nd half)0.17
NamungoKitayosce
1.14Goals conceded (2nd half)0.5
NamungoKitayosce
1.57Average goals (2nd half)0.67
NamungoKitayosce
43%Clean sheet after half-time50%
NamungoKitayosce
57%No goal after half-time83%
NamungoKitayosce

Namungo - second-half results

0% W43% D57% L
9
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
3
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.29
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.7

Concedes 0.7 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Kitayosce - second-half results

17% W33% D50% L
9
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
5
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding52%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 17%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Namungo - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.40
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match0.61.0
Average goals in match1.01.4
1 goal80%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-1-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Kitayosce - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.00
Goals scored / match0.80.2
Goals conceded / match0.60.4
Average goals in match1.40.6
1 goal60%60%
2 goals60%0%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference+1-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Namungo
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
2
1
16-30
0
2
31-45
1
3
46-60
0
3
61-75
2
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (2 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Kitayosce
ScoredConceded
3
1
0-15
1
0
16-30
1
2
31-45
1
1
46-60
0
1
61-75
0
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.21
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.9 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
88%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
55%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-55%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
48%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
10%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 10 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Namungo

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.59
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.12
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.39
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.27
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
55%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
164%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.26
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

Kitayosce

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.11
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.11
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.57
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.46
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
104%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
65%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.7
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 50% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligi kuu Bara).

Teams vs league

NamungoLigaKitayosce
Average goals in match• 2.432.51▼ 2.00
Both teams scored▼ 43%47%▲ 67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)• 43%43%▼ 33%
Clean sheets▲ 29%27%▼ 17%
Goal before half-time▼ 71%75%▼ 67%
Goal after half-time▼ 57%73%▼ 67%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.51
Average goals per match
47%
Both teams scored
43%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.55
Home goals / match
0.96
Away goals / match
+61%
Home attack advantage
+38%
Home defence advantage
+30%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Starting lineup

Away team

Starting lineup

22John Lazarus

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Namungo 0 - 1 - 1 Kitayosce. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Namungo vs Kitayosce?

The Ligi kuu Bara match finished Namungo 1:0 Kitayosce. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Namungo and Kitayosce?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Namungo won 0, Kitayosce won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Namungo vs Kitayosce?

Namungo score 0.86 goals per game on average and Kitayosce 1.00. The Ligi kuu Bara average is 2.51 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 43% of games. Both teams score in 43% of Namungo's matches and 67% of Kitayosce's.

What form are Namungo and Kitayosce in?

Over the last 5 games Namungo have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and Kitayosce 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Namungo vs Kitayosce?

The statistical background for Namungo vs Kitayosce — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.