United States - USL League OneData current as of 12 November 2026

Naples vs Chattanooga Red Wolves: match statistics

Naples vs Chattanooga Red Wolves: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Naples played Chattanooga Red Wolves in USL League One (United States). The match was played on 26 September 2026. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Naples: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Chattanooga Red Wolves: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Naples scores 1.12 and concedes 1.65 goals per match. Chattanooga Red Wolves scores 1.81 and concedes 1.46. League average: 2.98 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Naples 46%, Chattanooga Red Wolves 65%. Over 2.5: Naples 50%, Chattanooga Red Wolves 62%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 60%.

xG, shots and style

Naples has higher xG: 1.53 vs 1.39. Naples: 12.8 shots per match, Chattanooga Red Wolves: 11.4.

Match halves

Naples: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 0.65. Chattanooga Red Wolves: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.96.

Goals by minute

Naples: 76-90+ (11 goals). Chattanooga Red Wolves: 46-60 (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

USL League One: 2.98 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 60%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 4 previous H2H matches were available: 0-2-2. Average goals 2.75, BTTS 75%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Chattanooga Red Wolves sit 6th, while Naples are only 14th, with the gap also reflected in their season records: 13 wins for the visitors compared with 8 victories for the hosts. The away side are unbeaten in their last five matches, collecting 11 points and conceding just 3 goals during that period, whereas Naples have managed only 5 points with a 4:8 goal difference. The visitors are also more effective away from home, averaging 1.67 goals per match compared with Naples’ 1.25 at home, while their shot conversion rate stands at 13% versus 10%. The hosts hold a slight edge in the quality of chances created on home soil, with an average xG of 1.49 compared with 1.46 for their opponents, but their recent form significantly undermines the credibility of their attacking output. Red Wolves’ away defensive performances can be error-prone, making a draw a realistic outcome, but the current trend points to a narrow victory for the visitors.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The signal for both teams to score is strengthened by Chattanooga Red Wolves’ seasonal profile, with their matches ending in BTTS in 83% of cases, compared with 50% for Naples. Both teams very rarely fail to score across the competition: Naples in 7% and Chattanooga in 8% of matches. Chattanooga also creates more chances, averaging 12.58 shots and 4.42 shots on target per match, while Naples has conceded an average of 1.6 goals in its last five appearances, with xG against at 1.96. The hosts have been less productive in terms of results over their last five matches, averaging 0.8 goals with BTTS landing only 20% of the time, but their xG remains at 1.46—practically the same as the 1.50 xG recently allowed by their opponents. Chattanooga’s defensive form, having conceded only 3 goals in five matches, reduces confidence in the pick, but the teams’ long-term consistency in scoring gives a slight edge to the BTTS scenario.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The season profile clearly favors at least two goals: Chattanooga Red Wolves matches went over 1.5 goals in 92% of cases, compared with 64% for Naples. The visitors score an average of 1.67 goals per match, while Naples concede 1.14, and the two teams record 4.42 and 3.93 shots on target per game, respectively. The xG model also points to an open game, with the visitors averaging 1.46 xG against 1.65 xG conceded by the hosts, producing a total projection of 2.60 goals. Naples’ recent form has been weaker offensively, with 0.8 goals scored per match across their last five appearances, but the team has also conceded 1.6 goals per game. Therefore, Over 1.5 remains the safest option, given the significantly less stable Over 2.5 line.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest signal comes from Chattanooga Red Wolves’ current form: the team has lost none of its last five matches, winning three of them, and has averaged 1.4 goals scored against just 0.6 conceded. The visitors were leading at the break in four of their last five matches, while Naples had a Half-Time lead only twice and averaged just 0.6 goals scored before the interval during this period. The away side’s advantage is also evident in the quality of its attacking play, with an xG of 1.46 compared with 1.32 for the hosts, while Naples allows opponents an xG of 1.65. Although the hosts have won more often over the course of the season—57% compared with 42%—their recent run consists of just one victory and an average of 1.6 goals conceded per match, further supporting the HT/FT scenario of the visitors leading at the break and securing the win.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

44Possession (%)56
NaplesChattanooga Red Wolves
12Shots17
NaplesChattanooga Red Wolves
3Shots on target5
NaplesChattanooga Red Wolves
1.37xG2.2
NaplesChattanooga Red Wolves
3Corners11
NaplesChattanooga Red Wolves
57Dangerous attacks110
NaplesChattanooga Red Wolves
17Fouls20
NaplesChattanooga Red Wolves
5Cards5
NaplesChattanooga Red Wolves

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

NaplesChattanooga Red Wolves
1.12Goals scored / match1.81
NaplesChattanooga Red Wolves
1.65Goals conceded / match1.46
NaplesChattanooga Red Wolves
51%Average possession39%
NaplesChattanooga Red Wolves
4.04Shots on target / match4.15
NaplesChattanooga Red Wolves

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.77Shots per match11.42
NaplesChattanooga Red Wolves
4.04Shots on target4.15
NaplesChattanooga Red Wolves
8.7%Shot conversion15.8%
NaplesChattanooga Red Wolves
51%Possession39%
NaplesChattanooga Red Wolves
1.53xG for1.39
NaplesChattanooga Red Wolves
1.56xG against1.7
NaplesChattanooga Red Wolves

Shooting quality

Naples: BalancedChattanooga Red Wolves: Counter-attacking
NaplesChattanooga Red Wolves
Accuracy (shots on target)32%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.280.44

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Chattanooga Red Wolves is 120% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Naples · 2.2 pts / match - Chattanooga Red Wolves

Naples
WLLDD
Season result split
31% W15% D54% L
Season (W-D-L)
8-4-14
1.08 pts / match · goal difference -14
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-1-5
Last 5 at home
2-0-3
LLWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.46Opponent xG: 2.10BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%
Chattanooga Red Wolves
WWDWD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
50% W15% D35% L
Season (W-D-L)
13-4-9
1.65 pts / match · goal difference +9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-2-5
Last 5 away
2-1-2
LWLWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.56Opponent xG: 1.50BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 20%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Chattanooga Red Wolves is 62% better for: goals scored per match.

1.12 goals / match - Naples · 1.81 goals / match - Chattanooga Red Wolves

Chattanooga Red Wolves is 13% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.65 goals / match - Naples · 1.46 goals / match - Chattanooga Red Wolves

Naples scoring profile: strong

Naples scores in 69% of matches (18 of 26 matches), while Chattanooga Red Wolves keeps a clean sheet in 27% (7 of 26 matches).

Chattanooga Red Wolves scoring profile: very strong

Chattanooga Red Wolves scores in 92% of matches (24 of 26 matches), while Naples keeps a clean sheet in 27% (7 of 26 matches).

29Goals scored (season)47
NaplesChattanooga Red Wolves
43Goals conceded (season)38
NaplesChattanooga Red Wolves
2.77Average goals in match3.27
NaplesChattanooga Red Wolves
4Goals scored (last 5)7
NaplesChattanooga Red Wolves
8Goals conceded (last 5)3
NaplesChattanooga Red Wolves

How often they score at least...

69%1 goal92%
NaplesChattanooga Red Wolves
38%2 goals54%
NaplesChattanooga Red Wolves
4%3 goals19%
NaplesChattanooga Red Wolves
0%4 goals12%
NaplesChattanooga Red Wolves

How often they concede at least...

73%1 goal73%
NaplesChattanooga Red Wolves
50%2 goals42%
NaplesChattanooga Red Wolves
27%3 goals23%
NaplesChattanooga Red Wolves
12%4 goals4%
NaplesChattanooga Red Wolves

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

65%
Chattanooga Red Wolves - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.17 of 26 matches
61%
League average

Goal patterns

8%BTTS at half-time31%
NaplesChattanooga Red Wolves
8%BTTS in both halves4%
NaplesChattanooga Red Wolves
23%Scored in both halves27%
NaplesChattanooga Red Wolves

BTTS and goal count

42%Min. 3 goals and BTTS58%
NaplesChattanooga Red Wolves
8%Min. 3 goals without BTTS4%
NaplesChattanooga Red Wolves
20%BTTS - last 560%
NaplesChattanooga Red Wolves

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

85%Min. 1 goal before half-time85%
NaplesChattanooga Red Wolves
19%Min. 2 goals before half-time42%
NaplesChattanooga Red Wolves
8%Min. 3 goals before half-time23%
NaplesChattanooga Red Wolves

2nd half

81%Min. 1 goal after half-time85%
NaplesChattanooga Red Wolves
54%Min. 2 goals after half-time46%
NaplesChattanooga Red Wolves
19%Min. 3 goals after half-time19%
NaplesChattanooga Red Wolves

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Chattanooga Red Wolves is 12% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.27 pts / match - Naples · 1.42 pts / match - Chattanooga Red Wolves

Naples - half-time state
35% leading23% draw42% trailing
Chattanooga Red Wolves - half-time state
38% leading27% draw35% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.27Points per match (1st half)1.42
NaplesChattanooga Red Wolves
0.46Goals scored (1st half)0.85
NaplesChattanooga Red Wolves
0.65Goals conceded (1st half)0.81
NaplesChattanooga Red Wolves
1.12Average goals (1st half)1.65
NaplesChattanooga Red Wolves
50%Clean sheet before half-time42%
NaplesChattanooga Red Wolves
58%No goal before half-time42%
NaplesChattanooga Red Wolves

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per match (2nd half)1.54
NaplesChattanooga Red Wolves
0.65Goals scored (2nd half)0.96
NaplesChattanooga Red Wolves
1Goals conceded (2nd half)0.65
NaplesChattanooga Red Wolves
1.65Average goals (2nd half)1.62
NaplesChattanooga Red Wolves
42%Clean sheet after half-time54%
NaplesChattanooga Red Wolves
50%No goal after half-time38%
NaplesChattanooga Red Wolves

Naples - second-half results

23% W31% D46% L
33
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
26
Second-half points
-9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.27
PPG before half-time
Lead holding89%

Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 31%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Chattanooga Red Wolves - second-half results

42% W27% D31% L
37
Half-time points
22
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
40
Second-half points
+8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.42
PPG before half-time
Lead holding132%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Naples - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.80
Goals scored / match0.60.2
Goals conceded / match0.41.2
Average goals in match1.01.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference+1-5
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3
Chattanooga Red Wolves - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.401.20
Goals scored / match1.00.4
Goals conceded / match0.20.4
Average goals in match1.20.8
1 goal100%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal20%60%
Goal difference+40
Half-time: 80% leading - 0% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Naples
ScoredConceded
2
4
0-15
5
6
16-30
5
7
31-45
1
8
46-60
5
5
61-75
11
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Chattanooga Red Wolves
ScoredConceded
8
10
0-15
6
3
16-30
8
8
31-45
12
5
46-60
4
5
61-75
9
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (12 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.02
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
101%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
56%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-9%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
63%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Naples

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.03
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.50
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.41
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.09
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
64%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
136%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.08
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
38% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
38%

Chattanooga Red Wolves

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.31
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.66
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.42
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.24
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
150%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
83%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.55
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL League One).

Teams vs league

NaplesLigaChattanooga Red Wolves
Average goals in match▼ 2.772.98▲ 3.27
Both teams scored▼ 46%61%▲ 65%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 50%60%▲ 62%
Clean sheets▲ 27%22%▲ 27%
Goal before half-time▲ 85%74%▲ 85%
Goal after half-time• 81%82%▲ 85%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.98
Average goals per match
61%
Both teams scored
60%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.76
Home goals / match
1.21
Away goals / match
+45%
Home attack advantage
+31%
Home defence advantage
+24%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
82%
1 goal
49%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. NaplesYellow cardJaylen Yearwood
  2. Chattanooga Red WolvesYellow cardAngelo Kelly-Rosales
  3. Chattanooga Red WolvesYellow cardOluwatobilba Adewole
  4. NaplesGoalRaul Miglietti
  5. Chattanooga Red WolvesSubstitutionOn: Omar GómezOff: Wynand Wessels
  6. NaplesSubstitutionOn: Andrés Ferrín JaramilloOff: Ian Cerro
  7. NaplesYellow cardJulian Cisneros
  8. Chattanooga Red WolvesYellow cardAaron Lombardi
  9. NaplesYellow cardHal Uderitz
  10. Chattanooga Red WolvesYellow cardKwamina Ropapa Mensah
  11. Chattanooga Red WolvesSubstitutionOn: Greyson MercerOff: Aaron Lombardi
  12. NaplesYellow cardEdward Delgado

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (4): Naples 0 - 2 - 2 Chattanooga Red Wolves. Average goals 2.75, both teams scored in 75% matches.

Chattanooga Red Wolves
1 : 0
Naples
FC Naples
2 : 2
Chattanooga Red Wolves SC
Chattanooga Red Wolves SC
3 : 1
FC Naples
FC Naples
1 : 1
Chattanooga Red Wolves SC

FAQ

What was the result of Naples vs Chattanooga Red Wolves?

The USL League One match finished Naples 1:0 Chattanooga Red Wolves. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Naples and Chattanooga Red Wolves?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches Naples won 0, Chattanooga Red Wolves won 2 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 2.75 goals, with both teams scoring in 75% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Naples vs Chattanooga Red Wolves?

Naples score 1.12 goals per game on average and Chattanooga Red Wolves 1.81. The USL League One average is 2.98 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 60% of games. Both teams score in 46% of Naples's matches and 65% of Chattanooga Red Wolves's.

What form are Naples and Chattanooga Red Wolves in?

Over the last 5 games Naples have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Chattanooga Red Wolves 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Naples vs Chattanooga Red Wolves?

The statistical background for Naples vs Chattanooga Red Wolves — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.