Nasarawa United vs Shooting Stars: match statistics
Nasarawa United vs Shooting Stars: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Nasarawa United played Shooting Stars in NPFL (Nigeria). The match was played on 7 December 2025. Final score: 1:0.
Current form
Nasarawa United: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Shooting Stars: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Nasarawa United scores 1.07 and concedes 0.67 goals per match. Shooting Stars scores 0.87 and concedes 0.73. League average: 1.83 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Nasarawa United 33%, Shooting Stars 40%. Over 2.5: Nasarawa United 27%, Shooting Stars 13%. League level: BTTS 37%, Over 2.5 25%.
xG, shots and style
Nasarawa United has higher xG: 1.57 vs 1.34. Nasarawa United: 8.7 shots per match, Shooting Stars: 7.3.
Match halves
Nasarawa United: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.47. Shooting Stars: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.40.
Goals by minute
Nasarawa United: 31-45+ (6 goals). Shooting Stars: 76-90+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
NPFL: 1.83 goals per match, BTTS 37%, Over 2.5 25%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Nasarawa United | Shooting Stars | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.18 | 0.18 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.36 | 0.34 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Nasarawa United is 23% better for: goals scored per match.
1.07 goals / match - Nasarawa United · 0.87 goals / match - Shooting Stars
Nasarawa United is 9% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.67 goals / match - Nasarawa United · 0.73 goals / match - Shooting Stars
Nasarawa United scores in 67% of matches (10 of 15 matches), while Shooting Stars keeps a clean sheet in 33% (5 of 15 matches).
Shooting Stars scores in 67% of matches (10 of 15 matches), while Nasarawa United keeps a clean sheet in 40% (6 of 15 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Nasarawa United
Over / Under - Shooting Stars
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Nasarawa United is 10% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.4 pts / match - Nasarawa United · 1.27 pts / match - Shooting Stars
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Nasarawa United - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 53%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Shooting Stars - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 80% |
| No goal | 20% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 0.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 0% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 100% |
| No goal | 40% | 100% |
| Goal difference | +1 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Nasarawa United
Shooting Stars
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NPFL).
Teams vs league
| Nasarawa United | Liga | Shooting Stars | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 1.73 | 1.83 | ▼ 1.60 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 33% | 37% | ▲ 40% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 27% | 25% | ▼ 13% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 40% | 38% | ▼ 33% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 87% | 63% | ▲ 73% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 53% | 55% | ▼ 40% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- Nasarawa UnitedGoalMoyi Hassan
FAQ
What was the result of Nasarawa United vs Shooting Stars?
The NPFL match finished Nasarawa United 1:0 Shooting Stars. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Nasarawa United vs Shooting Stars?
Nasarawa United score 1.07 goals per game on average and Shooting Stars 0.87. The NPFL average is 1.83 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 25% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Nasarawa United's matches and 40% of Shooting Stars's.
What form are Nasarawa United and Shooting Stars in?
Over the last 5 games Nasarawa United have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Shooting Stars 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Nasarawa United vs Shooting Stars?
The statistical background for Nasarawa United vs Shooting Stars — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.