Uganda - Uganda Premier LeagueData current as of 16 October 2026

NEC vs KCCA: match statistics

NEC crest
NEC
3 : 1half-time 1:0
KCCA crest
KCCA
135%(0.00)
X35%(0.00)
230%(0.00)

The match promises to be very evenly matched. NEC has the home field advantage with a solid record of 43% clean sheets at home and good form (1.6 points per match in the last 5 meetings). KCCA presents a better overall seasonal record (9 wins) and higher possession (58%), however, on the road they show weaker scoring statistics (0.86 goals per match) and a high FTS% rate (43%). The hosts score an average of 1.14 goals per match at home, while the visitors concede 0.86 goals away, suggesting a tight rivalry. Taking into account NEC's high percentage of draws at home (57%) and the close xG values of both teams, the most likely scenario is a split of points, although a slight edge is given to the hosts due to the home field factor.

NEC vs KCCA: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

NEC played KCCA in Uganda Premier League (Uganda). The match was played on 13 February 2026. Final score: 3:1.

Current form

NEC: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. KCCA: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

NEC scores 0.93 and concedes 0.93 goals per match. KCCA scores 1.40 and concedes 0.80. League average: 2.21 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: NEC 53%, KCCA 47%. Over 2.5: NEC 27%, KCCA 47%. League level: BTTS 42%, Over 2.5 39%.

xG, shots and style

KCCA has higher xG: 1.60 vs 1.57. NEC: 9.5 shots per match, KCCA: 11.6.

Match halves

NEC: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.47. KCCA: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 0.67.

Goals by minute

NEC: 0-15 (3 goals). KCCA: 76-90+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Uganda Premier League: 2.21 goals per match, BTTS 42%, Over 2.5 39%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

The match promises to be very evenly matched. NEC has the home field advantage with a solid record of 43% clean sheets at home and good form (1.6 points per match in the last 5 meetings). KCCA presents a better overall seasonal record (9 wins) and higher possession (58%), however, on the road they show weaker scoring statistics (0.86 goals per match) and a high FTS% rate (43%). The hosts score an average of 1.14 goals per match at home, while the visitors concede 0.86 goals away, suggesting a tight rivalry. Taking into account NEC's high percentage of draws at home (57%) and the close xG values of both teams, the most likely scenario is a split of points, although a slight edge is given to the hosts due to the home field factor.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
2 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

44Possession (%)56
NECKCCA
6Shots10
NECKCCA
3Shots on target2
NECKCCA
1.16xG1.48
NECKCCA
2Corners5
NECKCCA
78Dangerous attacks97
NECKCCA
17Fouls14
NECKCCA
0Cards0
NECKCCA

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.93Goals scored / match1.4
NECKCCA
0.93Goals conceded / match0.8
NECKCCA
45%Average possession58%
NECKCCA
3.4Shots on target / match4.33
NECKCCA

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.53Shots per match11.6
NECKCCA
3.4Shots on target4.33
NECKCCA
9.8%Shot conversion12.1%
NECKCCA
45%Possession58%
NECKCCA
1.57xG for1.6
NECKCCA
1.62xG against1.13
NECKCCA

Shooting quality

NEC: BalancedKCCA: Balanced
NECKCCA
Accuracy (shots on target)36%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.160.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.270.32

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

NEC is 14% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - NEC · 1.4 pts / match - KCCA

NEC
DWLWD
Season result split
27% W47% D27% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-7-4
1.27 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-4-1
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
WDWLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.65Opponent xG: 1.82BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%
KCCA
WLDWL
Season result split
60% W20% D20% L
Season (W-D-L)
9-3-3
2.00 pts / match · goal difference +9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-2-2
Last 5 away
2-1-2
LWWLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.97Opponent xG: 1.20BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 20%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

KCCA is 51% better for: goals scored per match.

0.93 goals / match - NEC · 1.4 goals / match - KCCA

KCCA is 16% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.93 goals / match - NEC · 0.8 goals / match - KCCA

NEC scoring profile: very strong

NEC scores in 80% of matches (12 of 15 matches), while KCCA keeps a clean sheet in 33% (5 of 15 matches).

KCCA scoring profile: strong

KCCA scores in 67% of matches (10 of 15 matches), while NEC keeps a clean sheet in 40% (6 of 15 matches).

14Goals scored (season)21
NECKCCA
14Goals conceded (season)12
NECKCCA
1.87Average goals in match2.2
NECKCCA
4Goals scored (last 5)5
NECKCCA
3Goals conceded (last 5)3
NECKCCA

How often they score at least...

80%1 goal67%
NECKCCA
13%2 goals47%
NECKCCA
0%3 goals13%
NECKCCA
0%4 goals13%
NECKCCA

How often they concede at least...

60%1 goal67%
NECKCCA
27%2 goals13%
NECKCCA
7%3 goals0%
NECKCCA
0%4 goals0%
NECKCCA

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

7%BTTS at half-time7%
NECKCCA
0%BTTS in both halves0%
NECKCCA
7%Scored in both halves33%
NECKCCA

BTTS and goal count

27%Min. 3 goals and BTTS40%
NECKCCA
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS7%
NECKCCA
20%BTTS - last 50%
NECKCCA

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

47%Min. 1 goal before half-time73%
NECKCCA
13%Min. 2 goals before half-time27%
NECKCCA
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time7%
NECKCCA

2nd half

67%Min. 1 goal after half-time67%
NECKCCA
33%Min. 2 goals after half-time40%
NECKCCA
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time7%
NECKCCA

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

NEC is 5% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.6 pts / match - NEC · 1.53 pts / match - KCCA

NEC - half-time state
33% leading60% draw7% trailing
KCCA - half-time state
40% leading33% draw27% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.6Points per match (1st half)1.53
NECKCCA
0.47Goals scored (1st half)0.73
NECKCCA
0.13Goals conceded (1st half)0.33
NECKCCA
0.6Average goals (1st half)1.07
NECKCCA
87%Clean sheet before half-time67%
NECKCCA
60%No goal before half-time53%
NECKCCA

After half-time (2nd half)

1.07Points per match (2nd half)1.47
NECKCCA
0.47Goals scored (2nd half)0.67
NECKCCA
0.73Goals conceded (2nd half)0.47
NECKCCA
1.2Average goals (2nd half)1.13
NECKCCA
53%Clean sheet after half-time67%
NECKCCA
53%No goal after half-time47%
NECKCCA

NEC - second-half results

20% W47% D33% L
24
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
16
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.60
PPG before half-time
Lead holding82%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 27%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.6

Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

KCCA - second-half results

33% W47% D20% L
23
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
22
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.53
PPG before half-time
Lead holding150%

Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 60%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

NEC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.20
Goals scored / match0.60.2
Goals conceded / match0.00.6
Average goals in match0.60.8
1 goal40%40%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet100%80%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference+3-2
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3
KCCA - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.20
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match0.20.4
Average goals in match0.80.8
1 goal60%40%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference+20
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

NEC
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
3
0
16-30
1
1
31-45
2
4
46-60
3
2
61-75
2
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

KCCA
ScoredConceded
4
1
0-15
3
1
16-30
4
3
31-45
3
4
46-60
2
3
61-75
5
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.03
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.9 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
92%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+47%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
54%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

NEC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.05
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.64
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.69
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
67%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
112%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.33
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 21% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

KCCA

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.47
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.13
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.20
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.33
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
169%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
58%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.60
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uganda Premier League).

Teams vs league

NECLigaKCCA
Average goals in match▼ 1.872.21• 2.20
Both teams scored▲ 53%42%▲ 47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 27%39%▲ 47%
Clean sheets▲ 40%36%▼ 33%
Goal before half-time▼ 47%60%▲ 73%
Goal after half-time▲ 67%60%▲ 67%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.21
Average goals per match
42%
Both teams scored
39%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
36%
Clean sheets
1.38
Home goals / match
0.83
Away goals / match
+66%
Home attack advantage
+40%
Home defence advantage
+21%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
60%
1 goal
28%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
60%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

—Richard Basangwa⚽ 1

Away team

Other recorded players

—Ivan Ahimbisibwe⚽ 1

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. NECGoalRichard Basangwa
  2. KCCAGoalIvan Ahimbisibwe

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: NEC 0 - 0 - 1 KCCA. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of NEC vs KCCA?

The Uganda Premier League match finished NEC 3:1 KCCA. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before NEC vs KCCA?

NEC score 0.93 goals per game on average and KCCA 1.40. The Uganda Premier League average is 2.21 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 39% of games. Both teams score in 53% of NEC's matches and 47% of KCCA's.

What form are NEC and KCCA in?

Over the last 5 games NEC have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and KCCA 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for NEC vs KCCA?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.