Saudi Arabia - Professional LeagueData current as of 07 September 2026

Neom SC vs Al Taawon: match statistics

Neom SC crest
Neom SC
2 : 2half-time 1:0
Al Taawon crest
Al Taawon
130%(2.09)
X25%(3.22)
245%(2.93)

Al Taawon present clearly better form and stats than Neom SC. The visitors sit 5th in the table with a 50% away win rate, while the hosts are in 8th position with a mere 33% home win rate and a high 58% home loss rate. Al Taawon have a positive away goal difference (+5), whereas Neom SC have a negative goal difference in home matches (-6). The visitors' shot conversion rate (17%) is nearly twice as high as the hosts' (9%), indicating greater attacking efficiency. Form over the last 5 matches also favors the visitors (1.0 PPG) compared to the hosts' poor disposition (0.8 PPG and an LWDLL streak). Taking all these factors into account, Al Taawon have a tangible advantage and should claim three points in this clash.

Neom SC vs Al Taawon: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Neom SC played Al Taawon in Professional League (Saudi Arabia). The match was played on 12 March 2026. Final score: 2:2.

Current form

Neom SC: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Al Taawon: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Neom SC scores 1.16 and concedes 1.36 goals per match. Al Taawon scores 1.80 and concedes 1.24. League average: 3.02 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Neom SC 60%, Al Taawon 60%. Over 2.5: Neom SC 52%, Al Taawon 48%. League level: BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 56%.

xG, shots and style

Neom SC has higher xG: 1.32 vs 1.22. Neom SC: 11.9 shots per match, Al Taawon: 10.7.

Match halves

Neom SC: half-time lead 28%, second-half goals 0.60. Al Taawon: half-time lead 44%, second-half goals 0.96.

Goals by minute

Neom SC: 76-90+ (8 goals). Al Taawon: 61-75 (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Professional League: 3.02 goals per match, BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 56%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Al Taawon present clearly better form and stats than Neom SC. The visitors sit 5th in the table with a 50% away win rate, while the hosts are in 8th position with a mere 33% home win rate and a high 58% home loss rate. Al Taawon have a positive away goal difference (+5), whereas Neom SC have a negative goal difference in home matches (-6). The visitors' shot conversion rate (17%) is nearly twice as high as the hosts' (9%), indicating greater attacking efficiency. Form over the last 5 matches also favors the visitors (1.0 PPG) compared to the hosts' poor disposition (0.8 PPG and an LWDLL streak). Taking all these factors into account, Al Taawon have a tangible advantage and should claim three points in this clash.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
1 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

45Possession (%)55
Neom SCAl Taawon
17Shots14
Neom SCAl Taawon
7Shots on target6
Neom SCAl Taawon
1.89xG1.81
Neom SCAl Taawon
5Corners2
Neom SCAl Taawon
46Dangerous attacks70
Neom SCAl Taawon
11Fouls10
Neom SCAl Taawon
3Cards4
Neom SCAl Taawon

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.16Goals scored / match1.8
Neom SCAl Taawon
1.36Goals conceded / match1.24
Neom SCAl Taawon
53%Average possession51%
Neom SCAl Taawon
4.52Shots on target / match4.08
Neom SCAl Taawon

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.88Shots per match10.68
Neom SCAl Taawon
4.52Shots on target4.08
Neom SCAl Taawon
9.8%Shot conversion16.9%
Neom SCAl Taawon
53%Possession51%
Neom SCAl Taawon
1.32xG for1.22
Neom SCAl Taawon
1.27xG against1.49
Neom SCAl Taawon

Shooting quality

Neom SC: BalancedAl Taawon: Efficient finishing
Neom SCAl Taawon
Accuracy (shots on target)38%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.260.44

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Al Taawon is 25% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Neom SC · 1 pts / match - Al Taawon

Neom SC
LWDLL
Season result split
36% W20% R44% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-5-11
1.28 pts / match · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-1-7
Last 5 at home
2-0-3
LLWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.34Opponent xG: 1.29BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%
Al Taawon
LLDDW
Season result split
52% W20% R28% P
Season (W-D-L)
13-5-7
1.76 pts / match · goal difference +14
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-1-5
Last 5 away
1-1-3
WLLLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 0.96Opponent xG: 1.40BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Al Taawon is 55% better for: goals scored per match.

1.16 goals / match - Neom SC · 1.8 goals / match - Al Taawon

Al Taawon is 10% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.36 goals / match - Neom SC · 1.24 goals / match - Al Taawon

Neom SC scoring profile: very strong

Neom SC scores in 76% of matches (19 of 25 matches), while Al Taawon keeps a clean sheet in 24% (6 of 25 matches).

Al Taawon scoring profile: very strong

Al Taawon scores in 84% of matches (21 of 25 matches), while Neom SC keeps a clean sheet in 20% (5 of 25 matches).

29Goals scored (season)45
Neom SCAl Taawon
34Goals conceded (season)31
Neom SCAl Taawon
2.52Average goals in match3.04
Neom SCAl Taawon
3Goals scored (last 5)8
Neom SCAl Taawon
5Goals conceded (last 5)9
Neom SCAl Taawon

How often they score at least...

76%1 goal84%
Neom SCAl Taawon
28%2 goals48%
Neom SCAl Taawon
12%3 goals24%
Neom SCAl Taawon
0%4 goals12%
Neom SCAl Taawon

How often they concede at least...

80%1 goal76%
Neom SCAl Taawon
36%2 goals32%
Neom SCAl Taawon
20%3 goals8%
Neom SCAl Taawon
0%4 goals4%
Neom SCAl Taawon

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

59%
League average

Goal patterns

24%BTTS at half-time20%
Neom SCAl Taawon
12%BTTS in both halves4%
Neom SCAl Taawon
20%Scored in both halves32%
Neom SCAl Taawon

BTTS and goal count

44%Min. 3 goals and BTTS44%
Neom SCAl Taawon
8%Min. 3 goals without BTTS4%
Neom SCAl Taawon
40%BTTS - last 5100%
Neom SCAl Taawon

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

60%Min. 1 goal before half-time72%
Neom SCAl Taawon
32%Min. 2 goals before half-time36%
Neom SCAl Taawon
12%Min. 3 goals before half-time12%
Neom SCAl Taawon

2nd half

76%Min. 1 goal after half-time84%
Neom SCAl Taawon
48%Min. 2 goals after half-time48%
Neom SCAl Taawon
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time28%
Neom SCAl Taawon

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Al Taawon is 26% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.36 pts / match - Neom SC · 1.72 pts / match - Al Taawon

Neom SC - half-time state
28% leading52% draw20% trailing
Al Taawon - half-time state
44% leading40% draw16% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.36Points per match (1st half)1.72
Neom SCAl Taawon
0.56Goals scored (1st half)0.84
Neom SCAl Taawon
0.48Goals conceded (1st half)0.36
Neom SCAl Taawon
1.04Average goals (1st half)1.2
Neom SCAl Taawon
60%Clean sheet before half-time64%
Neom SCAl Taawon
56%No goal before half-time44%
Neom SCAl Taawon

After half-time (2nd half)

1.16Points per match (2nd half)1.36
Neom SCAl Taawon
0.6Goals scored (2nd half)0.96
Neom SCAl Taawon
0.88Goals conceded (2nd half)0.88
Neom SCAl Taawon
1.48Average goals (2nd half)1.84
Neom SCAl Taawon
40%Clean sheet after half-time44%
Neom SCAl Taawon
48%No goal after half-time40%
Neom SCAl Taawon

Neom SC - second-half results

24% W44% R32% P
34
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
29
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.36
PPG before half-time
Lead holding129%

Leads at half-time in 28% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Al Taawon - second-half results

32% W40% R28% P
43
Half-time points
21
Half-time goals
+12
Goal difference (1st half)
34
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.72
PPG before half-time
Lead holding118%

Leads at half-time in 44% of matches and wins 52%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Neom SC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.200.80
Goals scored / match0.40.2
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match0.80.8
1 goal40%80%
2 goals20%0%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference0-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Al Taawon - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.200.80
Goals scored / match0.80.8
Goals conceded / match0.81.0
Average goals in match1.61.8
1 goal100%60%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal20%60%
Goal difference0-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Neom SC
ScoredConceded
5
6
0-15
5
3
16-30
4
3
31-45
5
6
46-60
2
6
61-75
8
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Al Taawon
ScoredConceded
7
1
0-15
6
1
16-30
8
7
31-45
7
8
46-60
10
5
61-75
7
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.78
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
92%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
60%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-28%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
64%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Neom SC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.25
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.16
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.09
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
73%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
94%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.48
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
28% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
28%

Al Taawon

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.27
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.83
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.58
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.25
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
125%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
78%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.76
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Professional League).

Teams vs league

Neom SCLigaAl Taawon
Average goals in match 2.523.02 3.04
Both teams scored 60%59% 60%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 52%56% 48%
Clean sheets 20%23% 24%
Goal before half-time 60%73% 72%
Goal after half-time 76%81% 84%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.02
Average goals per match
59%
Both teams scored
56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.58
Home goals / match
1.44
Away goals / match
+10%
Home attack advantage
+9%
Home defence advantage
+8%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
51%
2 goals
25%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Neom SCYellow cardKhalifah Aldawsari
  2. Al TaawonYellow cardFlavio Medeiros da Silva
  3. Al TaawonYellow cardAndrei Girotto
  4. Neom SCSubstitutionOn: Alaa HejjiOff: Rayane Messi Tanfouri
  5. Neom SCYellow cardAlexandre Lacazette
  6. Neom SCSubstitutionOn: Ayman FallatahOff: Mohamed Saïd Benrahma
  7. Al TaawonYellow cardAngelo Fulgini
  8. Neom SCSubstitutionOn: Ahmed Abdoh JaberOff: Alexandre Lacazette
  9. Neom SCYellow cardAmadou Koné

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Mohammed Sami Al-IsmailMatches officiated: 11
4.55Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 245%Home wins27%Draws27%Away wins

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Neom SC 0 - 1 - 0 Al Taawon. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Neom SC vs Al Taawon?

The Professional League match finished Neom SC 2:2 Al Taawon. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Neom SC vs Al Taawon?

Neom SC score 1.16 goals per game on average and Al Taawon 1.80. The Professional League average is 3.02 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 60% of Neom SC's matches and 60% of Al Taawon's.

What form are Neom SC and Al Taawon in?

Over the last 5 games Neom SC have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Al Taawon 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Neom SC vs Al Taawon?

The statistical background for Neom SC vs Al Taawon — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.