Nõmme Kalju vs Harju Jalgpallikool: match statistics
Nõmme Kalju vs Harju Jalgpallikool: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Nõmme Kalju played Harju Jalgpallikool in Meistriliiga (Estonia). The match was played on 20 May 2026. Venue: Hiiu staadion. Final score: 2:0.
Current form
Nõmme Kalju: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Harju Jalgpallikool: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Nõmme Kalju scores 2.00 and concedes 0.58 goals per match. Harju Jalgpallikool scores 1.25 and concedes 1.83. League average: 3.22 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Nõmme Kalju 33%, Harju Jalgpallikool 50%. Over 2.5: Nõmme Kalju 42%, Harju Jalgpallikool 67%. League level: BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 67%.
xG, shots and style
Nõmme Kalju has higher xG: 1.88 vs 1.45. Nõmme Kalju: 15.7 shots per match, Harju Jalgpallikool: 11.8.
Match halves
Nõmme Kalju: half-time lead 58%, second-half goals 1.17. Harju Jalgpallikool: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.67.
Goals by minute
Nõmme Kalju: 61-75 (7 goals). Harju Jalgpallikool: 76-90+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Meistriliiga: 3.22 goals per match, BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 67%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 5 previous H2H matches were available: 5-0-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 40%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Nõmme Kalju sits 2nd in the table with 8 wins, 1 draw and 3 losses and 24 goals scored, while Harju Jalgpallikool are 6th with 5 wins, 1 draw, 6 losses and 15 goals. At home Nõmme averages 2.5 goals scored and 1.0 conceded per match; home xG for is 1.97 with xG against 1.35, whereas Harju on the road averages 1.33 goals scored and 2.17 conceded with xG for 1.53 and xG against 1.95. The form gap is evident over the last 5 matches: the hosts scored 13 goals and average 1.8 points per game, while the visitors scored only 4 goals and average 0.8 points, with Harju conceding 12 goals in that period. Nõmme averages 6.5 shots on target and 16.5 attempts per home match versus the visitors' 3.5 on target and 13.17 attempts away, and 58% possession versus 48% suggests game control. Considering the superior goal difference (+9 for the hosts vs -5 for the visitors), lower goals conceded average (1.0 vs 2.17) and advantages in xG and shot metrics, I tip a Nõmme Kalju win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Statistical analysis shows that in the last 5 matches Nõmme Kalju scored 13 goals (avg 2.6 per game) and conceded 4 (0.8 per game), while Harju scored only 4 goals (0.8 per game) and conceded 12 (2.4 per game). Season BTTS rates are equal for both sides (50% each) versus a league average of 53%, but form and xG provide a clearer signal. Over the last 5 matches Nõmme’s xG is 2.02 against Harju’s xG conceded of 1.9, whereas Harju’s xG is 1.39 with xG conceded to Nõmme at 1.0, suggesting the home side generates more chances and has a favorable expected-goals balance. Additionally, Nõmme has 33% clean sheets this season versus 17% for Harju and superior form (wlwlw vs dwlll), so the likelihood is higher that the hosts will score while the visitors may remain goalless. Therefore I forecast No Goal/No BTTS as more probable (about 65% vs 35%).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG-based model projects 1.66 goals for Nõmme Kalju and 1.80 for Harju, totaling 3.46 goals. Calculations used home attack xG 1.37 and away defense xG 1.95, and away attack xG 1.53 and home defense xG 2.07. Seasonally, 83% of home matches and 100% of away matches finished over 1.5 goals, while the league average goals is 3.22, confirming a tendency toward matches with at least two goals. In the last 5 fixtures the hosts scored 13 goals (avg. 2.6) and conceded 4 (avg. 0.8), and the visitors scored 4 (avg. 0.8) and conceded 12 (avg. 2.4), indicating the hosts’ offensive form and the visitors’ susceptibility to conceding. Given the combined expectation of 3.46 goals, the fact that both teams scored in 50% of matches, and shot/conversion statistics, the strongest pick is Over 1.5 (model gives it ~86%), while Over 2.5 is about 67% and Over 3.5 about 45%.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I select 1/1 as the most likely scenario: in the last 5 matches Nõmme Kalju won 3 of 5 (60%) and held the lead at the break in 3 of 5 (60%), while Harju has only 1 win from 5 (20%) and led at the break in 1 of 5 (20%). In first halves across the last 5 fixtures Nõmme averages 1.0 goals compared to 0.6 for opponents and concedes 0.6 versus 1.6 conceded by Harju, which increases the hosts’ chance to lead at half-time. In second halves Nõmme in the last 5 matches scores an average of 1.6 goals and concedes 0.2, while Harju has only 0.2 scored and concedes 0.8, so the hosts also have a clear advantage in maintaining or extending the lead. Additionally, seasonally Harju concedes an average of 2.17 goals per match versus 1.5 for the hosts and has a lower clean sheet rate (17% vs 33%), which amplifies the signal for a Nõmme lead at half-time and win by full-time (HT/FT).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Nõmme Kalju | Harju Jalgpallikool | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.37 | 0.31 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Nõmme Kalju is 125% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / match - Nõmme Kalju · 0.8 pts / match - Harju Jalgpallikool
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Nõmme Kalju is 60% better for: goals scored per match.
2 goals / match - Nõmme Kalju · 1.25 goals / match - Harju Jalgpallikool
Nõmme Kalju is 216% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.58 goals / match - Nõmme Kalju · 1.83 goals / match - Harju Jalgpallikool
Nõmme Kalju scores in 83% of matches (10 of 12 matches), while Harju Jalgpallikool keeps a clean sheet in 25% (3 of 12 matches).
Harju Jalgpallikool scores in 75% of matches (9 of 12 matches), while Nõmme Kalju keeps a clean sheet in 50% (6 of 12 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Nõmme Kalju
Over / Under - Harju Jalgpallikool
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Nõmme Kalju is 100% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2 pts / match - Nõmme Kalju · 1 pts / match - Harju Jalgpallikool
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Nõmme Kalju - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 58% of matches and wins 67%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Harju Jalgpallikool - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 42%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 2.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 1.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +7 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 2.2 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -5 | -3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (7 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Nõmme Kalju
Harju Jalgpallikool
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Meistriliiga).
Teams vs league
| Nõmme Kalju | Liga | Harju Jalgpallikool | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.58 | 3.22 | ▼ 3.08 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 33% | 53% | ▼ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 42% | 67% | • 67% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 50% | 24% | • 25% |
| Goal before half-time | • 75% | 75% | ▲ 83% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 83% | 92% | • 92% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (5): Nõmme Kalju 5 - 0 - 0 Harju Jalgpallikool. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 40% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Nõmme Kalju vs Harju Jalgpallikool?
The Meistriliiga match finished Nõmme Kalju 2:0 Harju Jalgpallikool. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Nõmme Kalju and Harju Jalgpallikool?
In the last 5 head-to-head matches Nõmme Kalju won 5, Harju Jalgpallikool won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 40% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Nõmme Kalju vs Harju Jalgpallikool?
Nõmme Kalju score 2.00 goals per game on average and Harju Jalgpallikool 1.25. The Meistriliiga average is 3.22 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 67% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Nõmme Kalju's matches and 50% of Harju Jalgpallikool's.
What form are Nõmme Kalju and Harju Jalgpallikool in?
Over the last 5 games Nõmme Kalju have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Harju Jalgpallikool 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Nõmme Kalju vs Harju Jalgpallikool?
The statistical background for Nõmme Kalju vs Harju Jalgpallikool — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


