Estonia - MeistriliigaData current as of 13 September 2026

Nõmme Kalju vs Tallinna FC Flora: match statistics

Nõmme Kalju vs Tallinna FC Flora: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Nõmme Kalju played Tallinna FC Flora in Meistriliiga (Estonia). The match was played on 10 May 2026. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

Nõmme Kalju: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Tallinna FC Flora: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Nõmme Kalju scores 2.20 and concedes 0.60 goals per match. Tallinna FC Flora scores 2.10 and concedes 1.20. League average: 3.23 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Nõmme Kalju 40%, Tallinna FC Flora 30%. Over 2.5: Nõmme Kalju 50%, Tallinna FC Flora 70%. League level: BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 66%.

xG, shots and style

Tallinna FC Flora has higher xG: 1.95 vs 1.94. Nõmme Kalju: 16.3 shots per match, Tallinna FC Flora: 15.8.

Match halves

Nõmme Kalju: half-time lead 60%, second-half goals 1.30. Tallinna FC Flora: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 1.20.

Goals by minute

Nõmme Kalju: 61-75 (7 goals). Tallinna FC Flora: 61-75 (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Meistriliiga: 3.23 goals per match, BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 66%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 5 previous H2H matches were available: 3-0-2. Average goals 2.80, BTTS 60%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Nõmme Kalju has a clear attacking edge at home: they average 3.0 goals per home match with an average xG of 2.04, take 17.4 shots per game including 6.8 on target, and their shot conversion rate at home is 17%. Tallinna FC Flora are highly inefficient away — averaging just 0.75 goals per away match, with 50% of away games ending without a goal, while averaging 15 shots and 4.5 on target and an xG of 1.86. Defensively Kalju concede an average of 1.0 goals at home, whereas Flora concede 2.5 goals on the road and have a negative away goal difference (-7), indicating greater vulnerability from the visitors. The guests do have a good overall run in their last five matches — 4 wins and 14 goals scored and an average of 2.4 points per game in that period — but those numbers do not translate into away stability (25% away wins and 75% away defeats). Considering the better conversion, higher number of shots on target and the lower average goals conceded by the home side, I tip a Nõmme Kalju victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Data analysis indicates a 'no' selection for BTTS: Nõmme Kalju at home scores 3.0 goals on average and concedes only 0.33 goals per match, keeping a clean sheet in 67% of home games. Tallinna FC Flora away averages 0.75 goals and has a low shot conversion of 5% despite xG 1.86, meaning they create chances but rarely convert them. Flora concede 2.5 goals away on average and have recorded 0% clean sheets on the road, while Kalju have xG 2.01 and a conversion rate of 18%, so the hosts are favored to score while maintaining defensive solidity. Additionally, 67% of Kalju’s home matches are over 2.5, but in 50% of those BTTS does not occur (mostly one-sided scoring); considering home BTTS rate 17% vs away BTTS 50% and league BTTS level 55%, the stronger signals are local clean sheets and Flora’s poor finishing, therefore I recommend 'no' for BTTS (No Goal).

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Average xG yields approximately a 3.20 expected total: home xG 2.01 and away xG conceded 1.22 translate to ~1.62 expected goals for Nõmme Kalju, while away xG 1.86 and home xG conceded 1.31 translate to ~1.58 for Tallinna FC Flora. Hosts average 3.0 goals scored per game, visitors concede 2.5 on average, and in the last 5 meetings both teams combined for 26 goals (12 and 14), i.e. 5.2 goals per game, indicating elevated scoring potential. Season metrics show Over>1.5 in 83% of home matches and 100% of away matches, and Over>2.5 in 67% and 75% respectively, so the model assigns 92% probability to Over 1.5 and 72% to Over 2.5. Although hosts have 67% clean sheets at home and only 17% BTTS (both teams to score) matches, the hosts’ high conversion rate 18% vs. 5% for the visitors and superiority in shots on target 5.67 vs 4.5 suggest the strongest signal is backing Over 1.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The home side led at the break in 4 matches (67%) and score an average of 1.5 goals by half-time, while Tallinna FC Flora average 0.0 first-half goals. Kalju are very active in the opening phases: 3 goals in minutes 0–15 and 4 goals in 16–30, and the visitors have not scored in either interval, indicating clear home pressure before the break. Kalju’s finishing rate is 18% on an xG of 2.01 versus Flora’s 5% on an xG of 1.86, meaning the home team converts chances into goals more efficiently. Although Flora have won 80% of their last 5 matches, seasonally Kalju have 67% clean sheets and 13 points at the break compared to Flora’s 2 points, so the most likely scenario is Kalju leading at the break and winning the match (HT/FT 1/1).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

49Possession (%)51
Nõmme KaljuTallinna FC Flora
12Shots14
Nõmme KaljuTallinna FC Flora
5Shots on target6
Nõmme KaljuTallinna FC Flora
1.63xG1.99
Nõmme KaljuTallinna FC Flora
6Corners12
Nõmme KaljuTallinna FC Flora
72Dangerous attacks96
Nõmme KaljuTallinna FC Flora
12Fouls13
Nõmme KaljuTallinna FC Flora
2Cards2
Nõmme KaljuTallinna FC Flora

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Nõmme KaljuTallinna FC Flora
2.2Goals scored / match2.1
Nõmme KaljuTallinna FC Flora
0.6Goals conceded / match1.2
Nõmme KaljuTallinna FC Flora
56%Average possession59%
Nõmme KaljuTallinna FC Flora
5.6Shots on target / match5.2
Nõmme KaljuTallinna FC Flora

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

16.3Shots per match15.8
Nõmme KaljuTallinna FC Flora
5.6Shots on target5.2
Nõmme KaljuTallinna FC Flora
13.5%Shot conversion13.3%
Nõmme KaljuTallinna FC Flora
56%Possession59%
Nõmme KaljuTallinna FC Flora
1.94xG for1.95
Nõmme KaljuTallinna FC Flora
1.14xG against1.28
Nõmme KaljuTallinna FC Flora

Shooting quality

Nõmme Kalju: DominantTallinna FC Flora: Dominant
Nõmme KaljuTallinna FC Flora
Accuracy (shots on target)34%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.390.40

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Tallinna FC Flora is 71% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Nõmme Kalju · 2.4 pts / match - Tallinna FC Flora

Nõmme Kalju
DLWLW
Season result split
70% W10% D20% L
Season (W-D-L)
7-1-2
2.20 pts / match · goal difference +16
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-1-1
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
WWDWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.99Opponent xG: 1.07BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Tallinna FC Flora
WLWWW
Season result split
60% W0% D40% L
Season (W-D-L)
6-0-4
1.80 pts / match · goal difference +9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-0-3
Last 5 away
1-0-3
LLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 3.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.83Opponent xG: 1.13BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Nõmme Kalju is 5% better for: goals scored per match.

2.2 goals / match - Nõmme Kalju · 2.1 goals / match - Tallinna FC Flora

Nõmme Kalju is 100% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.6 goals / match - Nõmme Kalju · 1.2 goals / match - Tallinna FC Flora

Nõmme Kalju scoring profile: very strong

Nõmme Kalju scores in 90% of matches (9 of 10 matches), while Tallinna FC Flora keeps a clean sheet in 40% (4 of 10 matches).

Tallinna FC Flora scoring profile: mixed

Tallinna FC Flora scores in 70% of matches (7 of 10 matches), while Nõmme Kalju keeps a clean sheet in 50% (5 of 10 matches).

22Goals scored (season)21
Nõmme KaljuTallinna FC Flora
6Goals conceded (season)12
Nõmme KaljuTallinna FC Flora
2.8Average goals in match3.3
Nõmme KaljuTallinna FC Flora
12Goals scored (last 5)15
Nõmme KaljuTallinna FC Flora
5Goals conceded (last 5)5
Nõmme KaljuTallinna FC Flora

How often they score at least...

90%1 goal70%
Nõmme KaljuTallinna FC Flora
50%2 goals60%
Nõmme KaljuTallinna FC Flora
30%3 goals30%
Nõmme KaljuTallinna FC Flora
20%4 goals20%
Nõmme KaljuTallinna FC Flora

How often they concede at least...

50%1 goal60%
Nõmme KaljuTallinna FC Flora
10%2 goals30%
Nõmme KaljuTallinna FC Flora
0%3 goals20%
Nõmme KaljuTallinna FC Flora
0%4 goals10%
Nõmme KaljuTallinna FC Flora

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

30%
Tallinna FC Flora - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.3 of 10 matches
53%
League average

Goal patterns

10%BTTS at half-time0%
Nõmme KaljuTallinna FC Flora
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Nõmme KaljuTallinna FC Flora
40%Scored in both halves40%
Nõmme KaljuTallinna FC Flora

BTTS and goal count

30%Min. 3 goals and BTTS30%
Nõmme KaljuTallinna FC Flora
20%Min. 3 goals without BTTS40%
Nõmme KaljuTallinna FC Flora
60%BTTS - last 520%
Nõmme KaljuTallinna FC Flora

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

80%Min. 1 goal before half-time70%
Nõmme KaljuTallinna FC Flora
40%Min. 2 goals before half-time40%
Nõmme KaljuTallinna FC Flora
10%Min. 3 goals before half-time10%
Nõmme KaljuTallinna FC Flora

2nd half

80%Min. 1 goal after half-time90%
Nõmme KaljuTallinna FC Flora
40%Min. 2 goals after half-time70%
Nõmme KaljuTallinna FC Flora
10%Min. 3 goals after half-time20%
Nõmme KaljuTallinna FC Flora

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Nõmme Kalju is 33% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2 pts / match - Nõmme Kalju · 1.5 pts / match - Tallinna FC Flora

Nõmme Kalju - half-time state
60% leading20% draw20% trailing
Tallinna FC Flora - half-time state
40% leading30% draw30% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2Points per match (1st half)1.5
Nõmme KaljuTallinna FC Flora
0.9Goals scored (1st half)0.9
Nõmme KaljuTallinna FC Flora
0.4Goals conceded (1st half)0.4
Nõmme KaljuTallinna FC Flora
1.3Average goals (1st half)1.3
Nõmme KaljuTallinna FC Flora
70%Clean sheet before half-time70%
Nõmme KaljuTallinna FC Flora
40%No goal before half-time60%
Nõmme KaljuTallinna FC Flora

After half-time (2nd half)

2.1Points per match (2nd half)1.7
Nõmme KaljuTallinna FC Flora
1.3Goals scored (2nd half)1.2
Nõmme KaljuTallinna FC Flora
0.2Goals conceded (2nd half)0.8
Nõmme KaljuTallinna FC Flora
1.5Average goals (2nd half)2
Nõmme KaljuTallinna FC Flora
80%Clean sheet after half-time60%
Nõmme KaljuTallinna FC Flora
30%No goal after half-time30%
Nõmme KaljuTallinna FC Flora

Nõmme Kalju - second-half results

60% W30% D10% L
20
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
21
Second-half points
+11
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding117%

Leads at half-time in 60% of matches and wins 70%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Tallinna FC Flora - second-half results

50% W20% D30% L
15
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
17
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding150%

Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 60%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Nõmme Kalju - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.602.00
Goals scored / match0.81.6
Goals conceded / match0.60.4
Average goals in match1.42.0
1 goal60%100%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference+1+6
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
Tallinna FC Flora - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.402.40
Goals scored / match1.21.8
Goals conceded / match0.60.4
Average goals in match1.82.2
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%80%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference+3+7
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 0% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 6

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Nõmme Kalju
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
5
2
16-30
3
2
31-45
0
1
46-60
7
1
61-75
6
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (7 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.

Tallinna FC Flora
ScoredConceded
3
3
0-15
4
1
16-30
2
0
31-45
2
3
46-60
7
3
61-75
3
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (7 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.05
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.7 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
94%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
35%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-8%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
63%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Nõmme Kalju

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.80
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.80
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.26
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.54
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
106%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
52%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.80
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 5% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

Tallinna FC Flora

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.67
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.23
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.15
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.08
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
183%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
58%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.60
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Meistriliiga).

Teams vs league

Nõmme KaljuLigaTallinna FC Flora
Average goals in match 2.803.23 3.30
Both teams scored 40%53% 30%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 50%66% 70%
Clean sheets 50%25% 40%
Goal before half-time 80%74% 70%
Goal after half-time 80%92% 90%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.23
Average goals per match
53%
Both teams scored
66%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
25%
Clean sheets
2.08
Home goals / match
1.15
Away goals / match
+81%
Home attack advantage
+45%
Home defence advantage
+19%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
92%
1 goal
55%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
11%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Nõmme KaljuYellow cardDaniil Sõtšugov
  2. Tallinna FC FloraGoalSander TovstikAssist: Nikita Kalmõkov
  3. Tallinna FC FloraYellow cardSander Alamaa
  4. Nõmme KaljuYellow cardHenri Perk
  5. Nõmme KaljuSubstitutionOn: Kristjan KaskOff: Oleksandr Musolitin
  6. Nõmme KaljuSubstitutionOn: Tiago Azevedo BaptistaOff: Bogdan Vaštšuk
  7. Tallinna FC FloraSubstitutionOn: Oscar PihelaOff: Remo Valdmets
  8. Tallinna FC FloraYellow cardVladislav Kreida

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (5): Nõmme Kalju 3 - 0 - 2 Tallinna FC Flora. Average goals 2.80, both teams scored in 60% matches.

Tallinna FC Flora
0 : 1
Nõmme Kalju
Nõmme Kalju FC
3 : 1
Tallinna FC Flora
Tallinna FC Flora
1 : 0
Nõmme Kalju FC
Tallinna FC Flora
2 : 3
Nõmme Kalju FC
Nõmme Kalju FC
1 : 2
Tallinna FC Flora

FAQ

What was the result of Nõmme Kalju vs Tallinna FC Flora?

The Meistriliiga match finished Nõmme Kalju 0:1 Tallinna FC Flora. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Nõmme Kalju and Tallinna FC Flora?

In the last 5 head-to-head matches Nõmme Kalju won 3, Tallinna FC Flora won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.80 goals, with both teams scoring in 60% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Nõmme Kalju vs Tallinna FC Flora?

Nõmme Kalju score 2.20 goals per game on average and Tallinna FC Flora 2.10. The Meistriliiga average is 3.23 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 66% of games. Both teams score in 40% of Nõmme Kalju's matches and 30% of Tallinna FC Flora's.

What form are Nõmme Kalju and Tallinna FC Flora in?

Over the last 5 games Nõmme Kalju have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Tallinna FC Flora 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Nõmme Kalju vs Tallinna FC Flora?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Nõmme Kalju vs Tallinna FC Flora: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.