PAEEK vs Nea Salamis: match statistics
Nea Salamis displays impressive form as the league leader with a season record of 20 wins, 2 draws, and 0 defeats. The visiting team has a perfect 100% away win rate (11 consecutive victories), scoring an average of 2.27 goals while conceding just 0.55 per away match. PAEEK, although sitting in second place with a solid home record (64% win rate), is experiencing a dip in form with only one victory in their last five matches (0.8 PPG). The difference in form and quality between the teams is significant - Nea Salamis has the edge in expected goals (xG 1.88 vs 1.58 for the hosts) and ball possession efficiency (both average 57%, but the visitors are more clinical), and they never fail to score on the road (FTS% 0%). Given the visitors' dominance, their unbeaten away streak, and the hosts' weakened form, the most probable outcome is a Nea Salamis victory.
PAEEK vs Nea Salamis: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
PAEEK played Nea Salamis in Second Division (Cyprus). The match was played on 13 March 2026. Final score: 0:0.
Current form
PAEEK: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Nea Salamis: 5-0-0, 3.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
PAEEK scores 1.48 and concedes 0.91 goals per match. Nea Salamis scores 1.95 and concedes 0.45. League average: 2.62 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: PAEEK 48%, Nea Salamis 36%. Over 2.5: PAEEK 48%, Nea Salamis 41%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 47%.
xG, shots and style
Nea Salamis has higher xG: 1.93 vs 1.39. PAEEK: 8.2 shots per match, Nea Salamis: 12.7.
Match halves
PAEEK: half-time lead 30%, second-half goals 0.70. Nea Salamis: half-time lead 64%, second-half goals 0.86.
Goals by minute
PAEEK: 31-45+ (8 goals). Nea Salamis: 76-90+ (13 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Second Division: 2.62 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 47%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-2. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Nea Salamis displays impressive form as the league leader with a season record of 20 wins, 2 draws, and 0 defeats. The visiting team has a perfect 100% away win rate (11 consecutive victories), scoring an average of 2.27 goals while conceding just 0.55 per away match. PAEEK, although sitting in second place with a solid home record (64% win rate), is experiencing a dip in form with only one victory in their last five matches (0.8 PPG). The difference in form and quality between the teams is significant - Nea Salamis has the edge in expected goals (xG 1.88 vs 1.58 for the hosts) and ball possession efficiency (both average 57%, but the visitors are more clinical), and they never fail to score on the road (FTS% 0%). Given the visitors' dominance, their unbeaten away streak, and the hosts' weakened form, the most probable outcome is a Nea Salamis victory.
View the statistical overviewHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| PAEEK | Nea Salamis | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 49% | 40% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.17 | 0.15 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.37 | 0.39 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Nea Salamis is 275% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / match - PAEEK · 3 pts / match - Nea Salamis
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Nea Salamis is 32% better for: goals scored per match.
1.48 goals / match - PAEEK · 1.95 goals / match - Nea Salamis
Nea Salamis is 102% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.91 goals / match - PAEEK · 0.45 goals / match - Nea Salamis
PAEEK scores in 78% of matches (18 of 23 matches), while Nea Salamis keeps a clean sheet in 64% (14 of 22 matches).
Nea Salamis scores in 91% of matches (20 of 22 matches), while PAEEK keeps a clean sheet in 48% (11 of 23 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - PAEEK
Over / Under - Nea Salamis
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Nea Salamis is 63% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.39 pts / match - PAEEK · 2.27 pts / match - Nea Salamis
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
PAEEK - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 30% of matches and wins 48%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Nea Salamis - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 64% of matches and wins 91%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.60 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +5 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +13 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
PAEEK
Nea Salamis
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).
Teams vs league
| PAEEK | Liga | Nea Salamis | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.39 | 2.62 | ▼ 2.41 |
| Both teams scored | • 48% | 49% | ▼ 36% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 48% | 47% | ▼ 41% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 48% | 29% | ▲ 64% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 70% | 73% | • 73% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 65% | 77% | ▼ 68% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): PAEEK 0 - 0 - 2 Nea Salamis. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of PAEEK vs Nea Salamis?
The Second Division match finished PAEEK 0:0 Nea Salamis. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between PAEEK and Nea Salamis?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches PAEEK won 0, Nea Salamis won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before PAEEK vs Nea Salamis?
PAEEK score 1.48 goals per game on average and Nea Salamis 1.95. The Second Division average is 2.62 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 48% of PAEEK's matches and 36% of Nea Salamis's.
What form are PAEEK and Nea Salamis in?
Over the last 5 games PAEEK have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Nea Salamis 5-0-0 (3.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for PAEEK vs Nea Salamis?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.