Estonia - MeistriliigaPaide linnastaadionData current as of 19 September 2026

Paide vs Harju Jalgpallikool: match statistics

Paide crest
Paide
1 : 2half-time 0:1
Harju Jalgpallikool crest
Harju Jalgpallikool

Paide vs Harju Jalgpallikool: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Paide played Harju Jalgpallikool in Meistriliiga (Estonia). The match was played on 13 September 2026. Venue: Paide linnastaadion. Final score: 1:2.

Current form

Paide: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Harju Jalgpallikool: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Paide scores 1.62 and concedes 1.27 goals per match. Harju Jalgpallikool scores 1.44 and concedes 1.67. League average: 3.13 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Paide 65%, Harju Jalgpallikool 52%. Over 2.5: Paide 50%, Harju Jalgpallikool 67%. League level: BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 65%.

xG, shots and style

Paide has higher xG: 1.71 vs 1.56. Paide: 14.4 shots per match, Harju Jalgpallikool: 12.4.

Match halves

Paide: half-time lead 31%, second-half goals 0.92. Harju Jalgpallikool: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.74.

Goals by minute

Paide: 76-90+ (10 goals). Harju Jalgpallikool: 76-90+ (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Meistriliiga: 3.13 goals per match, BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 65%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 7 previous H2H matches were available: 3-2-2. Average goals 3.43, BTTS 57%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Paide have a clearly stronger home record: they win 58% of their home matches, average 1.42 goals scored and concede just 1.00. Harju lose as many as 67% of their away fixtures, averaging 1.83 goals conceded and posting a negative goal difference of -9. The hosts also create higher-quality chances, with an average xG of 1.66 compared with 1.49 for the visitors, while Harju allow opponents an xG of 1.79. Recent form slightly favors Harju, who have won 3 of their last 5 matches compared with Paide’s 2 victories, but the visitors have failed to score in 42% of their away games. Paide’s home advantage and more stable defense should prove decisive, although Harju’s improved results leave a genuine possibility of a closely contested match.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The BTTS pick is primarily supported by current form: both teams scored in 80% of Paide’s last 5 matches and in 60% of Harju’s. During this period, the hosts averaged 1.6 goals scored and 1.8 conceded, while the visitors scored 1.4 goals and conceded 1.2. Their attacking potential is confirmed by high xG figures from the last five matches, standing at 1.95 for Paide and 1.64 for Harju. Particularly significant is the fact that Harju keeps a clean sheet in only 8% of matches, while Paide fail to score in just 14%, considerably increasing the chances of goals from both sides. The seasonal BTTS rate of 50% for both teams is below the league average of 59%, but current scoring data and chance creation support the “BTTS - Yes” scenario.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The match profile points to a high probability of at least two goals: Paide have recorded at least 2 goals in 86% of their matches, while Harju have done so in 75%. Both teams also regularly feature in games with over 2.5 goals, in 64% and 67% of cases respectively, supporting a forecast of 2.95 goals. In their last five matches, Paide averaged 1.6 goals scored and 1.8 conceded, while Harju scored 1.4 and allowed opponents 1.2 goals. The hosts have an xG of 1.57, while Harju’s defence concedes an average of 1.79 xG, so Paide should establish a solid goalscoring base. The strongest pick remains Over 1.5, as the line is clearly below the expected total goals, while only 14% of Paide’s matches and 25% of Harju’s games ended with a maximum of one goal.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely HT/FT outcome is a draw at half-time followed by a Paide victory, as the hosts were level after 45 minutes in 7 of 14 matches, or 50% of the time. Paide have a clear advantage in first-half performance over the entire season: they average 1.00 goals scored and 0.57 conceded, while Harju score just 0.42 and concede 1.00. After the break, the hosts should edge ahead, as Harju were trailing at half-time in 50% of their matches and concede an average of 1.83 goals per game in the competition, compared with Paide’s 1.64 goals scored. However, the visitors’ current form warrants caution, as they have won 3 of their last 5 matches, making the 2/2 scenario a significant alternative. Nevertheless, Paide average 4.36 shots on target per match compared with Harju’s 3.58 and have a finishing efficiency of 14% versus 9%, which strengthens the case for a post-half-time outcome in favour of the hosts.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

59Possession (%)41
PaideHarju Jalgpallikool
22Shots9
PaideHarju Jalgpallikool
9Shots on target4
PaideHarju Jalgpallikool
2.7xG1.23
PaideHarju Jalgpallikool
6Corners3
PaideHarju Jalgpallikool
95Dangerous attacks52
PaideHarju Jalgpallikool
12Fouls19
PaideHarju Jalgpallikool
4Cards7
PaideHarju Jalgpallikool

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

PaideHarju Jalgpallikool
1.62Goals scored / match1.44
PaideHarju Jalgpallikool
1.27Goals conceded / match1.67
PaideHarju Jalgpallikool
55%Average possession49%
PaideHarju Jalgpallikool
4.42Shots on target / match4.04
PaideHarju Jalgpallikool

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

14.42Shots per match12.37
PaideHarju Jalgpallikool
4.42Shots on target4.04
PaideHarju Jalgpallikool
11.2%Shot conversion11.7%
PaideHarju Jalgpallikool
55%Possession49%
PaideHarju Jalgpallikool
1.71xG for1.56
PaideHarju Jalgpallikool
1.56xG against1.86
PaideHarju Jalgpallikool

Shooting quality

Paide: DominantHarju Jalgpallikool: Balanced
PaideHarju Jalgpallikool
Accuracy (shots on target)31%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.370.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Paide is 11% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Paide · 1.8 pts / match - Harju Jalgpallikool

Paide
DWWLW
Season result split
50% W23% D27% L
Season (W-D-L)
13-6-7
1.73 pts / match · goal difference +9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-1-4
Last 5 at home
4-0-1
WWWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.84Opponent xG: 1.52BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Harju Jalgpallikool
LWWLW
Season result split
41% W4% D56% L
Season (W-D-L)
11-1-15
1.26 pts / match · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-0-8
Last 5 away
2-0-3
LLLWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.58Opponent xG: 1.75BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Paide is 13% better for: goals scored per match.

1.62 goals / match - Paide · 1.44 goals / match - Harju Jalgpallikool

Paide is 31% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.27 goals / match - Paide · 1.67 goals / match - Harju Jalgpallikool

Paide scoring profile: very strong

Paide scores in 88% of matches (23 of 26 matches), while Harju Jalgpallikool keeps a clean sheet in 22% (6 of 27 matches).

Harju Jalgpallikool scoring profile: very strong

Harju Jalgpallikool scores in 74% of matches (20 of 27 matches), while Paide keeps a clean sheet in 23% (6 of 26 matches).

42Goals scored (season)39
PaideHarju Jalgpallikool
33Goals conceded (season)45
PaideHarju Jalgpallikool
2.88Average goals in match3.11
PaideHarju Jalgpallikool
9Goals scored (last 5)7
PaideHarju Jalgpallikool
5Goals conceded (last 5)7
PaideHarju Jalgpallikool

How often they score at least...

88%1 goal74%
PaideHarju Jalgpallikool
46%2 goals48%
PaideHarju Jalgpallikool
19%3 goals15%
PaideHarju Jalgpallikool
8%4 goals4%
PaideHarju Jalgpallikool

How often they concede at least...

77%1 goal78%
PaideHarju Jalgpallikool
31%2 goals56%
PaideHarju Jalgpallikool
12%3 goals26%
PaideHarju Jalgpallikool
4%4 goals4%
PaideHarju Jalgpallikool

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

52%
Harju Jalgpallikool - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.14 of 27 matches
58%
League average

Goal patterns

27%BTTS at half-time26%
PaideHarju Jalgpallikool
8%BTTS in both halves4%
PaideHarju Jalgpallikool
38%Scored in both halves19%
PaideHarju Jalgpallikool

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS52%
PaideHarju Jalgpallikool
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS15%
PaideHarju Jalgpallikool
60%BTTS - last 560%
PaideHarju Jalgpallikool

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

62%Min. 1 goal before half-time78%
PaideHarju Jalgpallikool
35%Min. 2 goals before half-time44%
PaideHarju Jalgpallikool
15%Min. 3 goals before half-time11%
PaideHarju Jalgpallikool

2nd half

92%Min. 1 goal after half-time85%
PaideHarju Jalgpallikool
42%Min. 2 goals after half-time41%
PaideHarju Jalgpallikool
19%Min. 3 goals after half-time19%
PaideHarju Jalgpallikool

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Paide is 23% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.46 pts / match - Paide · 1.19 pts / match - Harju Jalgpallikool

Paide - half-time state
31% leading54% draw15% trailing
Harju Jalgpallikool - half-time state
26% leading41% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.46Points per match (1st half)1.19
PaideHarju Jalgpallikool
0.69Goals scored (1st half)0.7
PaideHarju Jalgpallikool
0.58Goals conceded (1st half)0.78
PaideHarju Jalgpallikool
1.27Average goals (1st half)1.48
PaideHarju Jalgpallikool
65%Clean sheet before half-time44%
PaideHarju Jalgpallikool
46%No goal before half-time52%
PaideHarju Jalgpallikool

After half-time (2nd half)

1.73Points per match (2nd half)1.07
PaideHarju Jalgpallikool
0.92Goals scored (2nd half)0.74
PaideHarju Jalgpallikool
0.69Goals conceded (2nd half)0.89
PaideHarju Jalgpallikool
1.62Average goals (2nd half)1.63
PaideHarju Jalgpallikool
50%Clean sheet after half-time37%
PaideHarju Jalgpallikool
27%No goal after half-time56%
PaideHarju Jalgpallikool

Paide - second-half results

50% W23% D27% L
38
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
45
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.46
PPG before half-time
Lead holding161%

Leads at half-time in 31% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Harju Jalgpallikool - second-half results

26% W30% D44% L
32
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
29
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.19
PPG before half-time
Lead holding158%

Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 41%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Paide - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.202.40
Goals scored / match0.41.4
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match0.82.0
1 goal60%100%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference0+4
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 0% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Harju Jalgpallikool - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.60
Goals scored / match0.41.0
Goals conceded / match0.80.6
Average goals in match1.21.6
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-2+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Paide
ScoredConceded
5
5
0-15
7
7
16-30
6
3
31-45
8
1
46-60
6
7
61-75
10
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Harju Jalgpallikool
ScoredConceded
6
3
0-15
5
7
16-30
8
11
31-45
4
7
46-60
5
9
61-75
11
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.00
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
96%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
59%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+15%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
65%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Paide

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.15
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.20
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.09
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.29
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
91%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
94%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.27
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

Harju Jalgpallikool

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.30
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.07
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.12
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.19
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
107%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
94%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.54
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
28% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
28%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Meistriliiga).

Teams vs league

PaideLigaHarju Jalgpallikool
Average goals in match 2.883.13 3.11
Both teams scored 65%58% 52%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 50%65% 67%
Clean sheets 23%22% 22%
Goal before half-time 62%76% 78%
Goal after half-time 92%88% 85%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.13
Average goals per match
58%
Both teams scored
65%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.78
Home goals / match
1.35
Away goals / match
+32%
Home attack advantage
+24%
Home defence advantage
+4%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
8%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
88%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Harju JalgpallikoolGoalMarten Henrik KelementAssist: Hugo Palutaja
  2. Harju JalgpallikoolYellow cardMoussa Seck
  3. Harju JalgpallikoolYellow cardAndreas Kaevats
  4. Harju JalgpallikoolYellow cardKaspar Roomussaar
  5. PaideSubstitutionOn: Martin MillerOff: Daniel Cabral de Oliveira
  6. PaideGoalHenri Anier
  7. PaideYellow cardPedro Andrade Drozina
  8. Harju JalgpallikoolSubstitutionOn: Idrissa Edenge BahOff: Markus Kesa
  9. Harju JalgpallikoolYellow cardSigvard Suppi
  10. PaideYellow cardMartin Miller
  11. Harju JalgpallikoolSubstitutionOn: Kaspar LaurOff: Moussa Seck
  12. Harju JalgpallikoolGoalMarten Henrik Kelement
  13. Harju JalgpallikoolYellow cardDaniil Rudenko
  14. Harju JalgpallikoolSubstitutionOn: Daniil RudenkoOff: Yann Emmanuel Assale
  15. Harju JalgpallikoolYellow cardIdrissa Edenge Bah
  16. PaideYellow cardHenri Anier

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (7): Paide 3 - 2 - 2 Harju Jalgpallikool. Average goals 3.43, both teams scored in 57% matches.

Harju Jalgpallikool
5 : 2
Paide
Paide
1 : 0
Harju Jalgpallikool
Harju Jalgpallikool
2 : 2
Paide
Harju Jalgpallikool
3 : 0
Paide Linnameeskond
Paide Linnameeskond
2 : 0
Harju Jalgpallikool
Paide Linnameeskond
2 : 2
Harju Jalgpallikool
Harju Jalgpallikool
1 : 2
Paide Linnameeskond

FAQ

What was the result of Paide vs Harju Jalgpallikool?

The Meistriliiga match finished Paide 1:2 Harju Jalgpallikool. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Paide and Harju Jalgpallikool?

In the last 7 head-to-head matches Paide won 3, Harju Jalgpallikool won 2 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 3.43 goals, with both teams scoring in 57% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Paide vs Harju Jalgpallikool?

Paide score 1.62 goals per game on average and Harju Jalgpallikool 1.44. The Meistriliiga average is 3.13 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 65% of games. Both teams score in 65% of Paide's matches and 52% of Harju Jalgpallikool's.

What form are Paide and Harju Jalgpallikool in?

Over the last 5 games Paide have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Harju Jalgpallikool 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Paide vs Harju Jalgpallikool?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Paide vs Harju Jalgpallikool: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.