Estonia - MeistriliigaData current as of 08 September 2026

Paide vs Tallinna FC Levadia: match statistics

Paide crest
Paide
1 : 3half-time 1:3
Tallinna FC Levadia crest
Tallinna FC Levadia

Paide vs Tallinna FC Levadia: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Paide played Tallinna FC Levadia in Meistriliiga (Estonia). The match was played on 17 May 2026. Final score: 1:3.

Current form

Paide: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Tallinna FC Levadia: 5-0-0, 3.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Paide scores 1.82 and concedes 1.27 goals per match. Tallinna FC Levadia scores 2.64 and concedes 0.73. League average: 3.22 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Paide 64%, Tallinna FC Levadia 64%. Over 2.5: Paide 64%, Tallinna FC Levadia 73%. League level: BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 67%.

xG, shots and style

Tallinna FC Levadia has higher xG: 2.30 vs 1.60. Paide: 12.9 shots per match, Tallinna FC Levadia: 19.4.

Match halves

Paide: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 1.00. Tallinna FC Levadia: half-time lead 55%, second-half goals 1.45.

Goals by minute

Paide: 0-15 (4 goals). Tallinna FC Levadia: 61-75 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Meistriliiga: 3.22 goals per match, BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 67%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 5 previous H2H matches were available: 2-1-2. Average goals 3.20, BTTS 80%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I predict an away win (2): Tallinna FC Levadia holds a clear offensive advantage — 29 goals this season vs 20 for Paide and 18 goals in the last 5 matches vs Paide’s 8 in the same period. The quality gap in chances is supported by xG and shooting metrics: Levadia’s away xG averages 2.73 vs Paide’s home xG of 1.44, with overall shots 23.25 vs 11.4 and shots on target 8.25 vs 3.2. Form and momentum favor the visitors — Levadia have won all of their last 5 matches, averaging 3.0 points per game in that run, whereas Paide average 1.4 points per game in their last 5. Defensively Paide concede 0.8 goals per home match and Levadia 1.0 away, but hosts have a higher expected goals against (avg xGA 1.55 vs 0.93 for Levadia), suggesting Levadia create clearer chances. Considering 29 vs 20 goals, 2.73 vs 1.44 xG and the visitors’ superiority in shots and possession (62% vs 51%), I assign probabilities: 65% away win, 20% draw, 15% home win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I back BTTS - Yes (75% vs 25%) because Tallinna FC Levadia has a seasonal BTTS rate of 100% and seasonal clean sheets share of 0%, while the league BTTS is 54%, indicating a strong overall trend. Both teams create chances: Paide has average xG 2.05 with xG against 0.98, and Tallinna xG 2.73 with xG against 0.93 — the 2.05 vs 0.98 and 2.73 vs 0.93 profiles show both sides’ ability to score. In the last 5 matches Tallinna averaged 3.6 goals for and 0.4 against, while Paide averaged 1.6 for and 1.4 against, meaning Tallinna is very offensive (3.6) and Paide has recently been more prone to conceding (1.4). Additionally Tallinna registers more shots (23.25 vs 17.14) and shots on target (8.25 vs 6.43), although Paide has higher conversion (18% vs 9%); combined these figures increase the likelihood of goals from both sides, so the “yes” selection is the strongest signal.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

I forecast a total of 3.35 goals (Paide 1.49 vs Levadia 1.86), calculated as the average of each team’s attack and the opponent’s defense: Paide xG_for 2.05 vs Levadia xG_against 0.93 -> ~1.49; Levadia xG_for 2.73 vs Paide xG_against 0.98 -> ~1.86. Both teams have 100% of season matches over 1.5 goals, which is the strongest historical signal and justifies a very high probability for Over 1.5. The 2.5 line also favors over: Paide have 71% of matches >2.5, Levadia 75% (average ~73%), and Levadia scored 18 goals in their last 5 matches (3.6 per match). The 3.5 line is less certain – Paide have 43% of games >3.5, Levadia 25% (average ~34%) and the projected 3.35 goals sits slightly below that threshold. Therefore I recommend Over 1.5 as the best bet given the 100% historical occurrences >1.5 and the 3.35 goal projection.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Based on the statistics, Paide is a clear favorite to lead at the break: the hosts led at half-time in 5 matches (71%) and score an average of 1.57 goals in the first half versus Tallinn FC Levadia’s 0.5. The full match also favors Paide in terms of efficiency and goal balance – Paide averages 3.0 goals per game and concedes 0.57, while Tallinn averages 2.0 scored and 1.0 conceded, which supports maintaining the lead. The visitors generate higher xG (2.73 vs 2.05) and more shots on target (8.25 vs 6.43), but their conversion rate is only 9% versus the hosts’ 18%, so they less frequently turn chances into goals. Both teams often add goals after the break (100% of matches with at least one second-half goal for both sides), however Paide keep the first half clean sheet in 86% of their HT leads, increasing the chance of seeing the result through. Considering a 71% probability of Paide leading at half-time, the superior 18% conversion and a 3.0 goals-per-game average, the strongest scenario is 1/1 (Paide leading at Half-Time and winning at Full-Time).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 3
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

48Possession (%)52
PaideTallinna FC Levadia
10Shots18
PaideTallinna FC Levadia
4Shots on target4
PaideTallinna FC Levadia
1.22xG2.04
PaideTallinna FC Levadia
2Corners6
PaideTallinna FC Levadia
42Dangerous attacks87
PaideTallinna FC Levadia
9Fouls8
PaideTallinna FC Levadia
4Cards1
PaideTallinna FC Levadia

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

PaideTallinna FC Levadia
1.82Goals scored / match2.64
PaideTallinna FC Levadia
1.27Goals conceded / match0.73
PaideTallinna FC Levadia
53%Average possession60%
PaideTallinna FC Levadia
4.64Shots on target / match7.09
PaideTallinna FC Levadia

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.91Shots per match19.36
PaideTallinna FC Levadia
4.64Shots on target7.09
PaideTallinna FC Levadia
14.1%Shot conversion13.6%
PaideTallinna FC Levadia
53%Possession60%
PaideTallinna FC Levadia
1.6xG for2.3
PaideTallinna FC Levadia
1.53xG against0.96
PaideTallinna FC Levadia

Shooting quality

Paide: Efficient finishingTallinna FC Levadia: Dominant
PaideTallinna FC Levadia
Accuracy (shots on target)36%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.390.37

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Tallinna FC Levadia is 114% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Paide · 3 pts / match - Tallinna FC Levadia

Paide
WDLLW
Season result split
55% W18% R27% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-2-3
1.82 pts / match · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-0-2
Last 5 at home
3-0-2
WWWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.59Opponent xG: 1.78BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Tallinna FC Levadia
WWWWW
5 wins in a row
Season result split
73% W27% R0% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-3-0
2.45 pts / match · goal difference +21
Last 5 (W-D-L)
5-0-0
3.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-1-0
Last 5 away
3-1-0
WDWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 3.6Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 2.50Opponent xG: 0.97BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 100%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Tallinna FC Levadia is 45% better for: goals scored per match.

1.82 goals / match - Paide · 2.64 goals / match - Tallinna FC Levadia

Tallinna FC Levadia is 74% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.27 goals / match - Paide · 0.73 goals / match - Tallinna FC Levadia

Paide scoring profile: very strong

Paide scores in 91% of matches (10 of 11 matches), while Tallinna FC Levadia keeps a clean sheet in 36% (4 of 11 matches).

Tallinna FC Levadia scoring profile: very strong

Tallinna FC Levadia scores in 100% of matches (11 of 11 matches), while Paide keeps a clean sheet in 27% (3 of 11 matches).

20Goals scored (season)29
PaideTallinna FC Levadia
14Goals conceded (season)8
PaideTallinna FC Levadia
3.09Average goals in match3.36
PaideTallinna FC Levadia
7Goals scored (last 5)18
PaideTallinna FC Levadia
7Goals conceded (last 5)2
PaideTallinna FC Levadia

How often they score at least...

91%1 goal100%
PaideTallinna FC Levadia
55%2 goals82%
PaideTallinna FC Levadia
27%3 goals36%
PaideTallinna FC Levadia
9%4 goals18%
PaideTallinna FC Levadia

How often they concede at least...

73%1 goal64%
PaideTallinna FC Levadia
45%2 goals9%
PaideTallinna FC Levadia
9%3 goals0%
PaideTallinna FC Levadia
0%4 goals0%
PaideTallinna FC Levadia

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

64%
Tallinna FC Levadia - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.7 of 11 matches
53%
League average

Goal patterns

18%BTTS at half-time18%
PaideTallinna FC Levadia
18%BTTS in both halves9%
PaideTallinna FC Levadia
45%Scored in both halves73%
PaideTallinna FC Levadia

BTTS and goal count

64%Min. 3 goals and BTTS45%
PaideTallinna FC Levadia
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS27%
PaideTallinna FC Levadia
60%BTTS - last 540%
PaideTallinna FC Levadia

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

55%Min. 1 goal before half-time82%
PaideTallinna FC Levadia
36%Min. 2 goals before half-time45%
PaideTallinna FC Levadia
9%Min. 3 goals before half-time9%
PaideTallinna FC Levadia

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
PaideTallinna FC Levadia
64%Min. 2 goals after half-time82%
PaideTallinna FC Levadia
27%Min. 3 goals after half-time9%
PaideTallinna FC Levadia

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Tallinna FC Levadia is 16% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.73 pts / match - Paide · 2 pts / match - Tallinna FC Levadia

Paide - half-time state
36% leading64% draw0% trailing
Tallinna FC Levadia - half-time state
55% leading36% draw9% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.73Points per match (1st half)2
PaideTallinna FC Levadia
0.82Goals scored (1st half)1.18
PaideTallinna FC Levadia
0.18Goals conceded (1st half)0.27
PaideTallinna FC Levadia
1Average goals (1st half)1.45
PaideTallinna FC Levadia
82%Clean sheet before half-time73%
PaideTallinna FC Levadia
45%No goal before half-time27%
PaideTallinna FC Levadia

After half-time (2nd half)

1.36Points per match (2nd half)2.09
PaideTallinna FC Levadia
1Goals scored (2nd half)1.45
PaideTallinna FC Levadia
1.09Goals conceded (2nd half)0.45
PaideTallinna FC Levadia
2.09Average goals (2nd half)1.91
PaideTallinna FC Levadia
27%Clean sheet after half-time55%
PaideTallinna FC Levadia
18%No goal after half-time0%
PaideTallinna FC Levadia

Paide - second-half results

36% W27% R36% P
19
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
15
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.73
PPG before half-time
Lead holding153%

Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 55%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.9

Concedes 0.9 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Tallinna FC Levadia - second-half results

55% W45% R0% P
22
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
+10
Goal difference (1st half)
23
Second-half points
+11
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at half-time in 55% of matches and wins 73%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Paide - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.800.80
Goals scored / match0.80.6
Goals conceded / match0.21.2
Average goals in match1.01.8
1 goal60%100%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+3-3
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
Tallinna FC Levadia - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.402.60
Goals scored / match1.81.8
Goals conceded / match0.20.2
Average goals in match2.02.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals60%80%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal20%0%
Goal difference+8+8
Half-time: 80% leading - 0% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 20% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 9

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Paide
ScoredConceded
4
0
0-15
1
2
16-30
4
0
31-45
4
0
46-60
3
5
61-75
4
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

Tallinna FC Levadia
ScoredConceded
3
1
0-15
5
1
16-30
5
1
31-45
3
2
46-60
8
2
61-75
5
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (8 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.23
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 2.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
100%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
64%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-1%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
91%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Paide

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.07
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.48
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.22
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.26
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
91%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
104%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.42
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

Tallinna FC Levadia

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+1.34
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.57
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.34
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.23
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
216%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
37%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.55
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Meistriliiga).

Teams vs league

PaideLigaTallinna FC Levadia
Average goals in match 3.093.22 3.36
Both teams scored 64%53% 64%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 64%67% 73%
Clean sheets 27%24% 36%
Goal before half-time 55%74% 82%
Goal after half-time 100%93% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.22
Average goals per match
53%
Both teams scored
67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
2.00
Home goals / match
1.22
Away goals / match
+64%
Home attack advantage
+39%
Home defence advantage
+12%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
48%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
93%
1 goal
53%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Tallinna FC LevadiaGoalMark Oliver RoosnuppAssist: Rasmus Peetson
  2. Tallinna FC LevadiaGoalWendell Gabriel Mendes CraveiroAssist: Mihkel Ainsalu
  3. Tallinna FC LevadiaYellow cardRasmus Peetson
  4. PaideRed cardEbrima Jarju
  5. PaideSubstitutionOn: Henri AnierOff: Abdourahman Badamosi
  6. PaideRed cardHenri Anier

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (5): Paide 2 - 1 - 2 Tallinna FC Levadia. Average goals 3.20, both teams scored in 80% matches.

Tallinna FC Levadia
2 : 2
Paide
Tallinna FC Levadia
1 : 2
Paide Linnameeskond
Paide Linnameeskond
0 : 3
Tallinna FC Levadia
Tallinna FC Levadia
2 : 1
Paide Linnameeskond
Paide Linnameeskond
2 : 1
Tallinna FC Levadia

FAQ

What was the result of Paide vs Tallinna FC Levadia?

The Meistriliiga match finished Paide 1:3 Tallinna FC Levadia. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Paide and Tallinna FC Levadia?

In the last 5 head-to-head matches Paide won 2, Tallinna FC Levadia won 2 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.20 goals, with both teams scoring in 80% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Paide vs Tallinna FC Levadia?

Paide score 1.82 goals per game on average and Tallinna FC Levadia 2.64. The Meistriliiga average is 3.22 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 67% of games. Both teams score in 64% of Paide's matches and 64% of Tallinna FC Levadia's.

What form are Paide and Tallinna FC Levadia in?

Over the last 5 games Paide have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Tallinna FC Levadia 5-0-0 (3.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Paide vs Tallinna FC Levadia?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.