Uzbekistan - Uzbekistan Super LeaguePaxtakor Markaziy StadionData current as of 22 October 2026

Pakhtakor vs Andijan: match statistics

Pakhtakor crest
Pakhtakor
3 : 0half-time 2:0
Andijan crest
Andijan

Pakhtakor vs Andijan: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Pakhtakor played Andijan in Uzbekistan Super League (Uzbekistan). The match was played on 4 September 2026. Venue: Paxtakor Markaziy Stadion. Final score: 3:0.

Current form

Pakhtakor: 1-4-0, 1.40 points/match. Andijan: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Pakhtakor scores 1.63 and concedes 0.95 goals per match. Andijan scores 1.26 and concedes 1.05. League average: 2.60 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Pakhtakor 63%, Andijan 32%. Over 2.5: Pakhtakor 47%, Andijan 53%. League level: BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 51%.

xG, shots and style

Pakhtakor has higher xG: 1.50 vs 1.46. Pakhtakor: 12.9 shots per match, Andijan: 11.9.

Match halves

Pakhtakor: half-time lead 42%, second-half goals 0.84. Andijan: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.95.

Goals by minute

Pakhtakor: 46-60 (7 goals). Andijan: 76-90+ (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Uzbekistan Super League: 2.60 goals per match, BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 51%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-1. Average goals 4.33, BTTS 67%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Pakhtakor sit 2nd, while Andijan are 7th, and over the course of the season the hosts have recorded 11 wins and just 1 defeat, compared with the visitors’ record of 8 wins and 8 losses. At home, Pakhtakor average 1.80 goals, create chances worth 1.58 xG and maintain 60% possession, whereas Andijan score 1.22 goals away from home with 1.35 xG. The hosts also register more shots on target per match, 4.9 compared with 3.44, and are more clinical, converting 14% of their attempts compared with the visitors’ 11%. A key factor is Andijan’s attacking inconsistency: they have scored just 2 goals in their last 5 matches and fail to find the net in 44% of away games. Pakhtakor are not flawless defensively either, conceding an average of 1.20 goals at home, so a draw remains a realistic alternative; however, the hosts’ superior quality and control of the game make them the preferred choice.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The signal for BTTS - No is clear, as both teams have recorded a low percentage of matches with goals scored by both sides throughout the season: Pakhtakor 30% and Andijan 33%, compared with 53% for the league. Andijan have not recorded a single BTTS match in their last five fixtures, scoring just 2 goals—an average of 0.4 per game. Pakhtakor are particularly solid without the ball, conceding 0.9 goals per match this season and keeping a clean sheet in 50% of their matches; in their last five, they conceded just 3 goals. The visitors are also not a team that scores regularly, having failed to find the net in 44% of their league matches, while the hosts average 1.3 goals per game. Although Andijan's xG from their last five matches stands at 1.21, their poor finishing and Pakhtakor's defensive strength favor a scenario in which at least one team fails to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Pakhtakor concede an average of just 0.90 goals per match this season and have kept a clean sheet in 50% of their games, significantly limiting Andijan’s attacking potential. The visitors have scored only 2 goals in their last five matches, averaging 0.40 per game, and both teams failed to score in any of those fixtures. Pakhtakor have also shown a controlled scoring profile recently: across their last five league matches, they scored 6 and conceded only 3 goals, while the teams’ average xG over this period stands at 1.05 and 1.21, respectively. The 3.5 line has gone under in 90% of Pakhtakor’s matches and 78% of Andijan’s, while the projected total of 2.15 goals does not point towards a four-goal game. Therefore, Under 3.5 offers the clearest edge, although two goals or fewer also remains a realistic outcome.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a Pakhtakor victory at full-time, as the hosts were level after 45 minutes in 70% of their matches, while Andijan have been level at the break in 100% of their last five games. The first halves are particularly tight: Pakhtakor average 0.30 goals scored and 0.20 conceded, whereas the visitors score 0.33 and concede 0.33 goals on average. After the break, the hosts improve significantly, averaging 1.00 goals scored and 0.70 conceded, while their second-half win rate stands at 60%, compared with Andijan’s 44%. Pakhtakor also have the better full-season metrics: they win 50% of their matches compared with 33% for the visitors, create an average of 1.54 xG versus 1.35, and record 4.40 shots on target per match compared with their opponents’ 3.44. Recent form further reinforces the hosts’ advantage, with Andijan scoring just 0.4 goals per game across their last five appearances, while Pakhtakor have conceded only 0.6.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

2 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

53Possession (%)47
PakhtakorAndijan
13Shots6
PakhtakorAndijan
3Shots on target2
PakhtakorAndijan
1.55xG0.97
PakhtakorAndijan
7Corners1
PakhtakorAndijan
72Dangerous attacks61
PakhtakorAndijan
10Fouls7
PakhtakorAndijan
1Cards2
PakhtakorAndijan

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.63Goals scored / match1.26
PakhtakorAndijan
0.95Goals conceded / match1.05
PakhtakorAndijan
57%Average possession51%
PakhtakorAndijan
4.42Shots on target / match3.95
PakhtakorAndijan

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.89Shots per match11.89
PakhtakorAndijan
4.42Shots on target3.95
PakhtakorAndijan
12.7%Shot conversion10.6%
PakhtakorAndijan
57%Possession51%
PakhtakorAndijan
1.5xG for1.46
PakhtakorAndijan
1.19xG against1.22
PakhtakorAndijan

Shooting quality

Pakhtakor: BalancedAndijan: Balanced
PakhtakorAndijan
Accuracy (shots on target)34%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.370.32

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Pakhtakor
DDWDD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
58% W37% D5% L
Season (W-D-L)
11-7-1
2.11 pts / match · goal difference +13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-4-0
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-4-1
Last 5 at home
1-4-0
DDWDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.35Opponent xG: 1.15BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Andijan
DLLWW
Season result split
42% W16% D42% L
Season (W-D-L)
8-3-8
1.42 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-2-4
Last 5 away
3-1-1
WWDLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.31Opponent xG: 1.25BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 20%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Pakhtakor is 29% better for: goals scored per match.

1.63 goals / match - Pakhtakor · 1.26 goals / match - Andijan

Pakhtakor is 11% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.95 goals / match - Pakhtakor · 1.05 goals / match - Andijan

Pakhtakor scoring profile: strong

Pakhtakor scores in 84% of matches (16 of 19 matches), while Andijan keeps a clean sheet in 42% (8 of 19 matches).

Andijan scoring profile: strong

Andijan scores in 63% of matches (12 of 19 matches), while Pakhtakor keeps a clean sheet in 32% (6 of 19 matches).

31Goals scored (season)24
PakhtakorAndijan
18Goals conceded (season)20
PakhtakorAndijan
2.58Average goals in match2.32
PakhtakorAndijan
5Goals scored (last 5)2
PakhtakorAndijan
4Goals conceded (last 5)4
PakhtakorAndijan

How often they score at least...

84%1 goal63%
PakhtakorAndijan
53%2 goals37%
PakhtakorAndijan
16%3 goals21%
PakhtakorAndijan
11%4 goals5%
PakhtakorAndijan

How often they concede at least...

68%1 goal58%
PakhtakorAndijan
26%2 goals32%
PakhtakorAndijan
0%3 goals16%
PakhtakorAndijan
0%4 goals0%
PakhtakorAndijan

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

53%
League average

Goal patterns

16%BTTS at half-time0%
PakhtakorAndijan
5%BTTS in both halves0%
PakhtakorAndijan
32%Scored in both halves21%
PakhtakorAndijan

BTTS and goal count

47%Min. 3 goals and BTTS32%
PakhtakorAndijan
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS21%
PakhtakorAndijan
60%BTTS - last 50%
PakhtakorAndijan

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

63%Min. 1 goal before half-time42%
PakhtakorAndijan
32%Min. 2 goals before half-time16%
PakhtakorAndijan
5%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
PakhtakorAndijan

2nd half

79%Min. 1 goal after half-time89%
PakhtakorAndijan
53%Min. 2 goals after half-time47%
PakhtakorAndijan
16%Min. 3 goals after half-time26%
PakhtakorAndijan

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Pakhtakor is 48% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.79 pts / match - Pakhtakor · 1.21 pts / match - Andijan

Pakhtakor - half-time state
42% leading53% draw5% trailing
Andijan - half-time state
21% leading58% draw21% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.79Points per match (1st half)1.21
PakhtakorAndijan
0.79Goals scored (1st half)0.32
PakhtakorAndijan
0.26Goals conceded (1st half)0.26
PakhtakorAndijan
1.05Average goals (1st half)0.58
PakhtakorAndijan
79%Clean sheet before half-time79%
PakhtakorAndijan
42%No goal before half-time79%
PakhtakorAndijan

After half-time (2nd half)

1.47Points per match (2nd half)1.74
PakhtakorAndijan
0.84Goals scored (2nd half)0.95
PakhtakorAndijan
0.68Goals conceded (2nd half)0.79
PakhtakorAndijan
1.53Average goals (2nd half)1.74
PakhtakorAndijan
47%Clean sheet after half-time47%
PakhtakorAndijan
42%No goal after half-time37%
PakhtakorAndijan

Pakhtakor - second-half results

37% W37% D26% L
34
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
+10
Goal difference (1st half)
28
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.79
PPG before half-time
Lead holding138%

Leads at half-time in 42% of matches and wins 58%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Andijan - second-half results

53% W16% D32% L
23
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
33
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.21
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 42%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Pakhtakor - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.800.80
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match0.00.8
Average goals in match0.61.2
1 goal40%60%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+3-2
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3
Andijan - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.40
Goals scored / match0.00.4
Goals conceded / match0.00.8
Average goals in match0.01.2
1 goal0%80%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet100%60%
No goal100%60%
Goal difference0-2
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Pakhtakor
ScoredConceded
4
2
0-15
6
2
16-30
5
1
31-45
7
4
46-60
6
4
61-75
3
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Andijan
ScoredConceded
3
0
0-15
2
1
16-30
1
4
31-45
3
5
46-60
5
1
61-75
10
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.44
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
94%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
48%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+77%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
53%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Pakhtakor

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.31
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.37
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.13
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.24
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
116%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
80%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.71
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
10% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
10%

Andijan

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.24
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.03
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.20
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.17
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
106%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
74%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.02
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
42% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
42%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uzbekistan Super League).

Teams vs league

PakhtakorLigaAndijan
Average goals in match• 2.582.60▼ 2.32
Both teams scored▲ 63%53%▼ 32%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 47%51%▲ 53%
Clean sheets▲ 32%27%▲ 42%
Goal before half-time▼ 63%67%▼ 42%
Goal after half-time▲ 79%76%▲ 89%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.60
Average goals per match
53%
Both teams scored
51%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.41
Home goals / match
1.19
Away goals / match
+18%
Home attack advantage
+16%
Home defence advantage
+9%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. AndijanRed cardArtem Leonov
  2. PakhtakorSubstitutionOn: Ibrokhim IbragimovOff: Flamarion Jovino Filho
  3. AndijanSubstitutionOn: Bekzod SulaymonovOff: Doniyor Abdumannopov

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Pakhtakor 1 - 1 - 1 Andijan. Average goals 4.33, both teams scored in 67% matches.

Andijan
0 : 0
Pakhtakor
FK Andijan
2 : 6
FK Pakhtakor Tashkent
FK Pakhtakor Tashkent
2 : 3
FK Andijan

FAQ

What was the result of Pakhtakor vs Andijan?

The Uzbekistan Super League match finished Pakhtakor 3:0 Andijan. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Pakhtakor and Andijan?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Pakhtakor won 1, Andijan won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 4.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Pakhtakor vs Andijan?

Pakhtakor score 1.63 goals per game on average and Andijan 1.26. The Uzbekistan Super League average is 2.60 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 63% of Pakhtakor's matches and 32% of Andijan's.

What form are Pakhtakor and Andijan in?

Over the last 5 games Pakhtakor have a 1-4-0 record (1.40 points per game) and Andijan 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Pakhtakor vs Andijan?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.