Chile - Primera DivisiónEstadio Municipal de La CisternaData current as of 13 September 2026

Palestino vs Universidad Católica: match statistics

Palestino vs Universidad Católica: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Palestino played Universidad Católica in Primera División (Chile). The match was played on 12 September 2026. Venue: Estadio Municipal de La Cisterna. Final score: 2:3.

Current form

Palestino: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Universidad Católica: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Palestino scores 1.55 and concedes 1.36 goals per match. Universidad Católica scores 2.14 and concedes 1.41. League average: 2.86 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Palestino 59%, Universidad Católica 64%. Over 2.5: Palestino 55%, Universidad Católica 73%. League level: BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 56%.

xG, shots and style

Palestino has higher xG: 1.54 vs 1.43. Palestino: 15.2 shots per match, Universidad Católica: 13.4.

Match halves

Palestino: half-time lead 32%, second-half goals 0.86. Universidad Católica: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 1.18.

Goals by minute

Palestino: 76-90+ (11 goals). Universidad Católica: 31-45+ (14 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Primera División: 2.86 goals per match, BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 56%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-2. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Palestino have been highly solid at home, winning 64% of their matches, scoring an average of 2.18 goals and conceding just 0.91 per game. The hosts create more in front of the opposition goal, averaging 17.27 shots and 6 on target, with an xG of 1.73 compared with Universidad Católica’s 1.36 away from home. Universidad Católica do sit 2nd and have scored 47 goals this season to Palestino’s 34, but they lose as many as 36% of their away matches and concede an average of 1.36 goals. Both teams have won 3 of their last 5 matches, but Palestino have scored 9 goals in that period, compared with 7 for the visitors. The hosts’ edge in chance quality, attacking output at home and defensive solidity points towards a narrow Palestino victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Palestino has a very clear BTTS profile: both teams scored in 82% of their matches, compared with the league average of 53%, and the hosts have not recorded a single game without scoring. Universidad Católica has a lower seasonal BTTS rate of 45%, but this has risen to 60% over their last 5 appearances, identical to Palestino’s figure. The hosts average 2.64 goals per match, while the visitors average 1.64, with both teams conceding 1.45 and 1.36 goals respectively. Recent form also supports goals at both ends: Palestino scored 9 and conceded 6 goals in 5 matches, while Católica scored 7 and allowed 8. Palestino’s xG from their last five matches stands at 1.88, while the average xG against Católica is 1.58, strengthening the hosts’ chances, while the visitors should be able to exploit a defensive unit allowing an average of 1.27 xG.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Palestino’s matches average 4.09 goals, with the team scoring 2.64 and conceding 1.45, clearly favoring a high-tempo game. Universidad Católica averages 1.64 goals scored and 1.36 conceded, while both teams have surpassed 1.5 goals in 100% and 73% of their league matches, respectively. The xG model also points to chances at both ends: Palestino creates an average of 1.49 xG, while Católica records 1.36 xG, with opponents’ defensive values standing at 1.27 and 1.28. In their last five appearances, the hosts scored 9 goals and the visitors 7, while Católica conceded 8 goals during this period. The strongest signal is Over 1.5, as even with moderate finishing efficiency, the projected total of 2.76 goals provides a significant margin above this line.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a Palestino victory at the final whistle, as the hosts are averaging 1.55 goals scored after the break this season while conceding just 0.73. Their second-half performance has been even stronger across their last five matches: Palestino averaged 1.6 goals scored, allowed opponents just 0.2, and won this period in 80% of cases. Católica’s attacking output after the interval is clearly weaker, averaging 0.82 goals per match this season, while in their last five outings they conceded an average of 1.0 goal in the second half. A half-time draw is also a realistic possibility because Palestino were level at the break in 40% of their last five matches, despite scoring just 0.2 goals in the first half. Although the xG figures are similar—1.49 for Palestino and 1.36 for Católica—the hosts have a higher shot-conversion rate, 19% compared with 13%, which strengthens the case for a second-half turnaround and a decisive result in their favour.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 2
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

58Possession (%)42
PalestinoUniversidad Católica
14Shots14
PalestinoUniversidad Católica
6Shots on target6
PalestinoUniversidad Católica
1.7xG1.54
PalestinoUniversidad Católica
6Corners5
PalestinoUniversidad Católica
54Dangerous attacks32
PalestinoUniversidad Católica
9Fouls22
PalestinoUniversidad Católica
2Cards4
PalestinoUniversidad Católica

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

PalestinoUniversidad Católica
1.55Goals scored / match2.14
PalestinoUniversidad Católica
1.36Goals conceded / match1.41
PalestinoUniversidad Católica
52%Average possession54%
PalestinoUniversidad Católica
4.64Shots on target / match4.5
PalestinoUniversidad Católica

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

15.18Shots per match13.36
PalestinoUniversidad Católica
4.64Shots on target4.5
PalestinoUniversidad Católica
10.2%Shot conversion16%
PalestinoUniversidad Católica
52%Possession54%
PalestinoUniversidad Católica
1.54xG for1.43
PalestinoUniversidad Católica
1.39xG against1.27
PalestinoUniversidad Católica

Shooting quality

Palestino: AttackingUniversidad Católica: Efficient finishing
PalestinoUniversidad Católica
Accuracy (shots on target)31%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.100.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.48

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Universidad Católica is 33% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - Palestino · 2.4 pts / match - Universidad Católica

Palestino
LWWLW
Season result split
50% W14% D36% L
Season (W-D-L)
11-3-8
1.64 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-3-1
Last 5 at home
4-1-0
WDWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.91Opponent xG: 1.27BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Universidad Católica
WLWWW
Season result split
55% W14% D32% L
Season (W-D-L)
12-3-7
1.77 pts / match · goal difference +16
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-1-4
Last 5 away
4-0-1
WWLWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.27Opponent xG: 1.60BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Universidad Católica is 38% better for: goals scored per match.

1.55 goals / match - Palestino · 2.14 goals / match - Universidad Católica

Palestino scoring profile: very strong

Palestino scores in 73% of matches (16 of 22 matches), while Universidad Católica keeps a clean sheet in 23% (5 of 22 matches).

Universidad Católica scoring profile: very strong

Universidad Católica scores in 86% of matches (19 of 22 matches), while Palestino keeps a clean sheet in 23% (5 of 22 matches).

34Goals scored (season)47
PalestinoUniversidad Católica
30Goals conceded (season)31
PalestinoUniversidad Católica
2.91Average goals in match3.55
PalestinoUniversidad Católica
9Goals scored (last 5)9
PalestinoUniversidad Católica
6Goals conceded (last 5)5
PalestinoUniversidad Católica

How often they score at least...

73%1 goal86%
PalestinoUniversidad Católica
36%2 goals68%
PalestinoUniversidad Católica
18%3 goals32%
PalestinoUniversidad Católica
18%4 goals14%
PalestinoUniversidad Católica

How often they concede at least...

77%1 goal77%
PalestinoUniversidad Católica
36%2 goals45%
PalestinoUniversidad Católica
9%3 goals18%
PalestinoUniversidad Católica
5%4 goals0%
PalestinoUniversidad Católica

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

64%
Universidad Católica - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.14 of 22 matches
53%
League average

Goal patterns

23%BTTS at half-time45%
PalestinoUniversidad Católica
5%BTTS in both halves14%
PalestinoUniversidad Católica
23%Scored in both halves45%
PalestinoUniversidad Católica

BTTS and goal count

55%Min. 3 goals and BTTS64%
PalestinoUniversidad Católica
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS9%
PalestinoUniversidad Católica
60%BTTS - last 560%
PalestinoUniversidad Católica

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

77%Min. 1 goal before half-time82%
PalestinoUniversidad Católica
45%Min. 2 goals before half-time59%
PalestinoUniversidad Católica
14%Min. 3 goals before half-time36%
PalestinoUniversidad Católica

2nd half

73%Min. 1 goal after half-time77%
PalestinoUniversidad Católica
36%Min. 2 goals after half-time59%
PalestinoUniversidad Católica
23%Min. 3 goals after half-time23%
PalestinoUniversidad Católica

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Palestino - half-time state
32% leading36% draw32% trailing
Universidad Católica - half-time state
36% leading27% draw36% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.32Points per match (1st half)1.36
PalestinoUniversidad Católica
0.68Goals scored (1st half)0.95
PalestinoUniversidad Católica
0.68Goals conceded (1st half)0.91
PalestinoUniversidad Católica
1.36Average goals (1st half)1.86
PalestinoUniversidad Católica
50%Clean sheet before half-time36%
PalestinoUniversidad Católica
50%No goal before half-time36%
PalestinoUniversidad Católica

After half-time (2nd half)

1.55Points per match (2nd half)1.73
PalestinoUniversidad Católica
0.86Goals scored (2nd half)1.18
PalestinoUniversidad Católica
0.68Goals conceded (2nd half)0.5
PalestinoUniversidad Católica
1.55Average goals (2nd half)1.68
PalestinoUniversidad Católica
55%Clean sheet after half-time68%
PalestinoUniversidad Católica
55%No goal after half-time32%
PalestinoUniversidad Católica

Palestino - second-half results

41% W32% D27% L
29
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
34
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.32
PPG before half-time
Lead holding156%

Leads at half-time in 32% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Universidad Católica - second-half results

45% W36% D18% L
30
Half-time points
21
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
38
Second-half points
+15
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.36
PPG before half-time
Lead holding153%

Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 55%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.4

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Palestino - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.402.40
Goals scored / match0.21.6
Goals conceded / match1.00.2
Average goals in match1.21.8
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet20%80%
No goal80%20%
Goal difference-4+7
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 0% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Universidad Católica - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.60
Goals scored / match0.61.2
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match1.01.8
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference+1+3
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Palestino
ScoredConceded
2
1
0-15
7
7
16-30
6
7
31-45
3
1
46-60
5
6
61-75
11
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

Universidad Católica
ScoredConceded
4
7
0-15
3
5
16-30
14
8
31-45
5
4
46-60
9
3
61-75
12
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (14 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.23
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 1.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
113%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
62%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+24%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
63%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Palestino

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.15
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.04
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.01
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.03
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
94%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
112%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.16
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
32% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
32%

Universidad Católica

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.16
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.57
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-7.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.71
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.14
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
177%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
85%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.63
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Primera División).

Teams vs league

PalestinoLigaUniversidad Católica
Average goals in match 2.912.86 3.55
Both teams scored 59%53% 64%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 55%56% 73%
Clean sheets 23%26% 23%
Goal before half-time 77%73% 82%
Goal after half-time 73%77% 77%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.86
Average goals per match
53%
Both teams scored
56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.65
Home goals / match
1.21
Away goals / match
+36%
Home attack advantage
+27%
Home defence advantage
+15%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
37%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
12%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Universidad CatólicaGoalFernando Matías ZampedriAssist: Matías Palavecino
  2. Universidad CatólicaGoalDiego CorralAssist: Justo Giani
  3. PalestinoSubstitutionOn: Ian Zohar Alegría PindalOff: Marcelo Eggel
  4. Universidad CatólicaYellow cardFernando Zuqui
  5. Universidad CatólicaYellow cardCristian Alejandro Cuevas Jara
  6. PalestinoYellow cardJoe Axel Abrigo Navarro
  7. Universidad CatólicaSubstitutionOn: Carlos Agustín FaríasOff: Fernando Zuqui
  8. Universidad CatólicaSubstitutionOn: Martín Alejandro GómezOff: Diego Corral
  9. Universidad CatólicaGoalFernando Matías Zampedri
  10. Universidad CatólicaYellow cardJimmy Martinez
  11. Universidad CatólicaSubstitutionOn: Nicolás Ignacio L’Huillier WielandtOff: Fernando Matías Zampedri
  12. PalestinoSubstitutionOn: Albert GómezOff: Antonio Alejandro Ceza Gavilán
  13. Universidad CatólicaYellow cardNicolás Ignacio L’Huillier Wielandt

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Palestino 0 - 1 - 2 Universidad Católica. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Palestino vs Universidad Católica?

The Primera División match finished Palestino 2:3 Universidad Católica. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Palestino and Universidad Católica?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Palestino won 0, Universidad Católica won 2 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Palestino vs Universidad Católica?

Palestino score 1.55 goals per game on average and Universidad Católica 2.14. The Primera División average is 2.86 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 59% of Palestino's matches and 64% of Universidad Católica's.

What form are Palestino and Universidad Católica in?

Over the last 5 games Palestino have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Universidad Católica 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Palestino vs Universidad Católica?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.