Tanzania - Ligi kuu BaraCCM Kirumba StadiumData current as of 09 September 2026

Pamba Jiji vs Kitayosce: match statistics

Reasoning:

Full analysis and pick in the app

Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.

Check analysis and pick

Pamba Jiji vs Kitayosce: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Pamba Jiji play Kitayosce in Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania). The match date is 13 September 2026. Venue: CCM Kirumba Stadium.

Current form

Pamba Jiji: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match. Kitayosce: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Pamba Jiji scores 0.60 and concedes 2.00 goals per match. Kitayosce scores 0.60 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.51 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Pamba Jiji 60%, Kitayosce 60%. Over 2.5: Pamba Jiji 60%, Kitayosce 20%. League level: BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 41%.

xG, shots and style

Kitayosce has higher xG: 1.69 vs 0.79. Pamba Jiji: 2.8 shots per match, Kitayosce: 8.2.

Match halves

Pamba Jiji: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.20. Kitayosce: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.20.

Goals by minute

Pamba Jiji: 16-30 (1 goals). Kitayosce: 0-15 (1 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ligi kuu Bara: 2.51 goals per match, BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 41%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-1. Average goals 0.50, BTTS 0%.

Before the match

1X2 odds

(-)
(-)
(-)

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.6Goals scored / match0.6
Pamba JijiKitayosce
2Goals conceded / match1
Pamba JijiKitayosce
43%Average possession42%
Pamba JijiKitayosce
1.2Shots on target / match2.6
Pamba JijiKitayosce

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

2.8Shots per match8.2
Pamba JijiKitayosce
1.2Shots on target2.6
Pamba JijiKitayosce
21.4%Shot conversion7.3%
Pamba JijiKitayosce
43%Possession42%
Pamba JijiKitayosce
0.79xG for1.69
Pamba JijiKitayosce
1.58xG against1.51
Pamba JijiKitayosce

Shooting quality

Pamba Jiji: Counter-attackingKitayosce: Balanced
Pamba JijiKitayosce
Accuracy (shots on target)43%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.280.21
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.500.23

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Kitayosce is 200% better for: last-5 form.

0.2 pts / match - Pamba Jiji · 0.6 pts / match - Kitayosce

Pamba Jiji
DLLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W20% D80% L
Season (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-1-1
Last 5 at home
0-1-1
DL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 0.79Opponent xG: 1.58BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Kitayosce
DLDLD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W60% D40% L
Season (W-D-L)
0-3-2
0.60 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-3-2
0.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-2-1
Last 5 away
0-2-1
DLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.69Opponent xG: 1.51BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Kitayosce is 100% better for: goals conceded per match.

2 goals / match - Pamba Jiji · 1 goals / match - Kitayosce

Pamba Jiji scoring profile: strong

Pamba Jiji scores in 60% of matches (3 of 5 matches), while Kitayosce keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 matches).

Kitayosce scoring profile: very strong

Kitayosce scores in 60% of matches (3 of 5 matches), while Pamba Jiji keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 5 matches).

3Goals scored (season)3
Pamba JijiKitayosce
10Goals conceded (season)5
Pamba JijiKitayosce
2.6Average goals in match1.6
Pamba JijiKitayosce
3Goals scored (last 5)3
Pamba JijiKitayosce
10Goals conceded (last 5)5
Pamba JijiKitayosce

How often they score at least...

60%1 goal60%
Pamba JijiKitayosce
0%2 goals0%
Pamba JijiKitayosce
0%3 goals0%
Pamba JijiKitayosce
0%4 goals0%
Pamba JijiKitayosce

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal80%
Pamba JijiKitayosce
80%2 goals20%
Pamba JijiKitayosce
20%3 goals0%
Pamba JijiKitayosce
0%4 goals0%
Pamba JijiKitayosce

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

46%
League average

Goal patterns

40%BTTS at half-time20%
Pamba JijiKitayosce
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Pamba JijiKitayosce
0%Scored in both halves0%
Pamba JijiKitayosce

BTTS and goal count

40%Min. 3 goals and BTTS20%
Pamba JijiKitayosce
20%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Pamba JijiKitayosce
60%BTTS - last 560%
Pamba JijiKitayosce

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time60%
Pamba JijiKitayosce
100%Min. 2 goals before half-time40%
Pamba JijiKitayosce
20%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Pamba JijiKitayosce

2nd half

40%Min. 1 goal after half-time60%
Pamba JijiKitayosce
0%Min. 2 goals after half-time0%
Pamba JijiKitayosce
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
Pamba JijiKitayosce

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Kitayosce is 200% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.4 pts / match - Pamba Jiji · 1.2 pts / match - Kitayosce

Pamba Jiji - half-time state
0% leading40% draw60% trailing
Kitayosce - half-time state
20% leading60% draw20% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.4Points per match (1st half)1.2
Pamba JijiKitayosce
0.4Goals scored (1st half)0.4
Pamba JijiKitayosce
1.8Goals conceded (1st half)0.6
Pamba JijiKitayosce
2.2Average goals (1st half)1
Pamba JijiKitayosce
0%Clean sheet before half-time60%
Pamba JijiKitayosce
60%No goal before half-time60%
Pamba JijiKitayosce

After half-time (2nd half)

1.2Points per match (2nd half)1
Pamba JijiKitayosce
0.2Goals scored (2nd half)0.2
Pamba JijiKitayosce
0.2Goals conceded (2nd half)0.4
Pamba JijiKitayosce
0.4Average goals (2nd half)0.6
Pamba JijiKitayosce
80%Clean sheet after half-time60%
Pamba JijiKitayosce
80%No goal after half-time80%
Pamba JijiKitayosce

Pamba Jiji - second-half results

20% W60% D20% L
2
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-7
Goal difference (1st half)
6
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.40
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time-1.6

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Kitayosce - second-half results

20% W40% D40% L
6
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
5
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.20
PPG before half-time
Lead holding0%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 0%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Pamba Jiji - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.401.20
Goals scored / match0.40.2
Goals conceded / match1.80.2
Average goals in match2.20.4
1 goal100%40%
2 goals100%0%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet0%80%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference-70
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2
Kitayosce - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.00
Goals scored / match0.40.2
Goals conceded / match0.60.4
Average goals in match1.00.6
1 goal60%60%
2 goals40%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference-1-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Pamba Jiji
ScoredConceded
0
2
0-15
1
5
16-30
1
2
31-45
0
0
46-60
1
1
61-75
0
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (1 goal). Concedes most in 16-30 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Kitayosce
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
1
0
16-30
0
2
31-45
1
1
46-60
0
1
61-75
0
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.10
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.8 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
84%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
60%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-76%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
36%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
16%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 6 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Pamba Jiji

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.79
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.61
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.19
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.42
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
39%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
204%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Kitayosce

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.18
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.58
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-1.09
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.51
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
61%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
65%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 33% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligi kuu Bara).

Teams vs league

Pamba JijiLigaKitayosce
Average goals in match 2.602.51 1.60
Both teams scored 60%46% 60%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 60%41% 20%
Clean sheets 0%28% 20%
Goal before half-time 100%76% 60%
Goal after half-time 40%73% 60%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.51
Average goals per match
46%
Both teams scored
41%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
28%
Clean sheets
1.54
Home goals / match
0.98
Away goals / match
+57%
Home attack advantage
+36%
Home defence advantage
+25%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
37%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Pamba Jiji 0 - 1 - 1 Kitayosce. Average goals 0.50, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Kitayosce
1 : 0
Pamba Jiji
Pamba Jiji
0 : 0
Kitayosce

FAQ

When do Pamba Jiji and Kitayosce play?

Pamba Jiji face Kitayosce on 13 September 2026 in Ligi kuu Bara at CCM Kirumba Stadium. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.

What is the head-to-head record between Pamba Jiji and Kitayosce?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Pamba Jiji won 0, Kitayosce won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 0.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Pamba Jiji vs Kitayosce?

Pamba Jiji score 0.60 goals per game on average and Kitayosce 0.60. The Ligi kuu Bara average is 2.51 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 41% of games. Both teams score in 60% of Pamba Jiji's matches and 60% of Kitayosce's.

What form are Pamba Jiji and Kitayosce in?

Over the last 5 games Pamba Jiji have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and Kitayosce 0-3-2 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Pamba Jiji vs Kitayosce?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.