Panevėžys vs Sūduva: match statistics
Panevėžys vs Sūduva: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Panevėžys played Sūduva in A Lyga (Lithuania). The match was played on 29 June 2026. Venue: Panevėžio futbolo akademijos stadionas. Final score: 1:2.
Current form
Panevėžys: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Sūduva: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Panevėžys scores 1.00 and concedes 1.78 goals per match. Sūduva scores 1.42 and concedes 0.79. League average: 2.61 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Panevėžys 56%, Sūduva 53%. Over 2.5: Panevėžys 61%, Sūduva 47%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 54%.
xG, shots and style
Sūduva has higher xG: 1.45 vs 1.23. Panevėžys: 10.7 shots per match, Sūduva: 12.2.
Match halves
Panevėžys: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.39. Sūduva: half-time lead 32%, second-half goals 0.84.
Goals by minute
Panevėžys: 31-45+ (6 goals). Sūduva: 76-90+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
A Lyga: 2.61 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 54%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 6 previous H2H matches were available: 1-3-2. Average goals 1.33, BTTS 33%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Sūduva is the favorite based on form — the visitors have won 4 of their last 5 matches and scored 9 goals in that period (1.8 per game) with 2.6 points per match, whereas Panevėžys has only 1 win and 4 defeats in the last 5, with 5 goals and 0.6 points per game. In terms of chance quality, Sūduva generates on average 1.41 xG on the road versus Panevėžys’s 1.33 xG at home, while conceding a lower xG against (1.19 vs 1.58), which indicates more efficient chance creation and risk limitation. Defensively the disparity is significant: Panevėžys have conceded 13 goals in their last 5 matches (2.6 per game) despite an average of 1.00 goals conceded at home, whereas Sūduva have conceded 3 goals in those 5 games (0.6 per game). Differences in shots and possession are smaller (Sūduva 4.89 shots on target and 12.11 attempts per game vs Panevėžys 4.11 on target and 11.44 attempts), but the advantage in form, recent efficiency and defensive stability favors an away win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I predict BTTS - Yes with a 70% vs 30% probability because Sūduva averages 1.8 goals in the last 5 matches while Panevėžys concedes 2.6 goals in the same period. xG also indicates balanced attacking strength: Panevėžys has xG_for 1.48 versus Sūduva's 1.41, and xG_against is 1.34 for the home side and 1.19 for the away side, suggesting both teams are creating genuine scoring opportunities. Shots on target average 4.1 for Panevėžys and 4.89 for Sūduva, and total shots are similar (12.3 vs 12.11), which further supports goals from both sides. Season stats are mixed – Sūduva has BTTS in 67% of matches, the league average is 50%, while Panevėžys at home has only 40% BTTS but as many as 60% clean sheets expected, which reduces confidence in the scenario. Nevertheless, in the last 5 matches Sūduva has scored 9 goals versus Panevėžys's 5, and Panevėžys has conceded 13 goals compared to just 3 conceded by Sūduva, so form advantage and the away side's attacking potency favor BTTS - Yes.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Home xG is 1.48 and away defensive xG is 1.19 — their average yields about 1.34 goals for Panevėžys; similarly away xG 1.41 and home defensive xG 1.34 suggest about 1.38 goals for Sūduva, combined ≈2.72 goals. This season Panevėžys has 60% of matches with over 1.5 goals and Sūduva 78%, which clearly raises the probability of Over 1.5; additionally in the last 5 matches Panevėžys conceded an average of 2.6 goals (13 conceded), while Sūduva scored 9 goals in 5 fixtures. Season Over 2.5 rates are 40% for the home side and 56% for the away side, but recent 5-game runs (home 100% Over 2.5, away 80% Over 2.5) increase the chance of Over 2.5 to around 62%. Over 3.5 remains unlikely (seasonal 20%/11% for home/away with expected total 2.72), therefore the strongest and most probable signal from the data is an Over selection at the 1.5 line.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Analysis of the last five matches shows a clear advantage for Sūduva — the visitors won 4 of 5 games (80%), while Panevėžys have a 'lllwl' record with only 1 win in 5 (20%). Over the season Panevėžys draw at half-time in 70% of matches and keep a clean sheet at the break in 80% with an average of 0.2 goals conceded by half-time, but in the last 5 games the home side were trailing at the break in 4 of 5 (80%) and conceded an average of 1.6 goals by half-time. Sūduva in their last 5 matches average 0.8 goals scored by half-time and 0.2 conceded, and their average half-time points across these five matches is 1.8, which demonstrates their strength in the first half. Since the xG of both teams is similar (1.48 home vs 1.41 away), but form and half-time statistics favor Sūduva, I prefer the scenario of the visitors leading at the break and holding on to win by full-time (HT/FT 2/2).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Panevėžys | Sūduva | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.27 | 0.32 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Sūduva is 117% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / match - Panevėžys · 2.6 pts / match - Sūduva
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Sūduva is 42% better for: goals scored per match.
1 goals / match - Panevėžys · 1.42 goals / match - Sūduva
Sūduva is 125% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.78 goals / match - Panevėžys · 0.79 goals / match - Sūduva
Panevėžys scores in 67% of matches (12 of 18 matches), while Sūduva keeps a clean sheet in 42% (8 of 19 matches).
Sūduva scores in 74% of matches (14 of 19 matches), while Panevėžys keeps a clean sheet in 17% (3 of 18 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Panevėžys
Over / Under - Sūduva
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Sūduva is 25% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.22 pts / match - Panevėžys · 1.53 pts / match - Sūduva
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Panevėžys - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Sūduva - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 32% of matches and wins 42%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -4 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Panevėžys
Sūduva
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (A Lyga).
Teams vs league
| Panevėžys | Liga | Sūduva | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.78 | 2.61 | ▼ 2.21 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 56% | 49% | ▲ 53% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 61% | 54% | ▼ 47% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 17% | 31% | ▲ 42% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 83% | 69% | ▼ 58% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 72% | 77% | ▼ 68% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (6): Panevėžys 1 - 3 - 2 Sūduva. Average goals 1.33, both teams scored in 33% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Panevėžys vs Sūduva?
The A Lyga match finished Panevėžys 1:2 Sūduva. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Panevėžys and Sūduva?
In the last 6 head-to-head matches Panevėžys won 1, Sūduva won 2 and 3 ended level. These games averaged 1.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Panevėžys vs Sūduva?
Panevėžys score 1.00 goals per game on average and Sūduva 1.42. The A Lyga average is 2.61 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 56% of Panevėžys's matches and 53% of Sūduva's.
What form are Panevėžys and Sūduva in?
Over the last 5 games Panevėžys have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Sūduva 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Panevėžys vs Sūduva?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Panevėžys vs Sūduva: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


