Lithuania - A LygaPanevėžio futbolo akademijos stadionasData current as of 06 September 2026

Panevėžys vs Sūduva: match statistics

Panevėžys crest
Panevėžys
1 : 2half-time 1:0
Sūduva crest
Sūduva

Panevėžys vs Sūduva: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Panevėžys played Sūduva in A Lyga (Lithuania). The match was played on 29 June 2026. Venue: Panevėžio futbolo akademijos stadionas. Final score: 1:2.

Current form

Panevėžys: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Sūduva: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Panevėžys scores 1.00 and concedes 1.78 goals per match. Sūduva scores 1.42 and concedes 0.79. League average: 2.61 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Panevėžys 56%, Sūduva 53%. Over 2.5: Panevėžys 61%, Sūduva 47%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 54%.

xG, shots and style

Sūduva has higher xG: 1.45 vs 1.23. Panevėžys: 10.7 shots per match, Sūduva: 12.2.

Match halves

Panevėžys: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.39. Sūduva: half-time lead 32%, second-half goals 0.84.

Goals by minute

Panevėžys: 31-45+ (6 goals). Sūduva: 76-90+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

A Lyga: 2.61 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 54%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 6 previous H2H matches were available: 1-3-2. Average goals 1.33, BTTS 33%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Sūduva is the favorite based on form — the visitors have won 4 of their last 5 matches and scored 9 goals in that period (1.8 per game) with 2.6 points per match, whereas Panevėžys has only 1 win and 4 defeats in the last 5, with 5 goals and 0.6 points per game. In terms of chance quality, Sūduva generates on average 1.41 xG on the road versus Panevėžys’s 1.33 xG at home, while conceding a lower xG against (1.19 vs 1.58), which indicates more efficient chance creation and risk limitation. Defensively the disparity is significant: Panevėžys have conceded 13 goals in their last 5 matches (2.6 per game) despite an average of 1.00 goals conceded at home, whereas Sūduva have conceded 3 goals in those 5 games (0.6 per game). Differences in shots and possession are smaller (Sūduva 4.89 shots on target and 12.11 attempts per game vs Panevėžys 4.11 on target and 11.44 attempts), but the advantage in form, recent efficiency and defensive stability favors an away win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I predict BTTS - Yes with a 70% vs 30% probability because Sūduva averages 1.8 goals in the last 5 matches while Panevėžys concedes 2.6 goals in the same period. xG also indicates balanced attacking strength: Panevėžys has xG_for 1.48 versus Sūduva's 1.41, and xG_against is 1.34 for the home side and 1.19 for the away side, suggesting both teams are creating genuine scoring opportunities. Shots on target average 4.1 for Panevėžys and 4.89 for Sūduva, and total shots are similar (12.3 vs 12.11), which further supports goals from both sides. Season stats are mixed – Sūduva has BTTS in 67% of matches, the league average is 50%, while Panevėžys at home has only 40% BTTS but as many as 60% clean sheets expected, which reduces confidence in the scenario. Nevertheless, in the last 5 matches Sūduva has scored 9 goals versus Panevėžys's 5, and Panevėžys has conceded 13 goals compared to just 3 conceded by Sūduva, so form advantage and the away side's attacking potency favor BTTS - Yes.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Home xG is 1.48 and away defensive xG is 1.19 — their average yields about 1.34 goals for Panevėžys; similarly away xG 1.41 and home defensive xG 1.34 suggest about 1.38 goals for Sūduva, combined ≈2.72 goals. This season Panevėžys has 60% of matches with over 1.5 goals and Sūduva 78%, which clearly raises the probability of Over 1.5; additionally in the last 5 matches Panevėžys conceded an average of 2.6 goals (13 conceded), while Sūduva scored 9 goals in 5 fixtures. Season Over 2.5 rates are 40% for the home side and 56% for the away side, but recent 5-game runs (home 100% Over 2.5, away 80% Over 2.5) increase the chance of Over 2.5 to around 62%. Over 3.5 remains unlikely (seasonal 20%/11% for home/away with expected total 2.72), therefore the strongest and most probable signal from the data is an Over selection at the 1.5 line.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Analysis of the last five matches shows a clear advantage for Sūduva — the visitors won 4 of 5 games (80%), while Panevėžys have a 'lllwl' record with only 1 win in 5 (20%). Over the season Panevėžys draw at half-time in 70% of matches and keep a clean sheet at the break in 80% with an average of 0.2 goals conceded by half-time, but in the last 5 games the home side were trailing at the break in 4 of 5 (80%) and conceded an average of 1.6 goals by half-time. Sūduva in their last 5 matches average 0.8 goals scored by half-time and 0.2 conceded, and their average half-time points across these five matches is 1.8, which demonstrates their strength in the first half. Since the xG of both teams is similar (1.48 home vs 1.41 away), but form and half-time statistics favor Sūduva, I prefer the scenario of the visitors leading at the break and holding on to win by full-time (HT/FT 2/2).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

44Possession (%)56
PanevėžysSūduva
11Shots20
PanevėžysSūduva
4Shots on target7
PanevėžysSūduva
1.18xG2.08
PanevėžysSūduva
3Corners7
PanevėžysSūduva
27Dangerous attacks45
PanevėžysSūduva
6Fouls6
PanevėžysSūduva
0Cards1
PanevėžysSūduva

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

PanevėžysSūduva
1Goals scored / match1.42
PanevėžysSūduva
1.78Goals conceded / match0.79
PanevėžysSūduva
47%Average possession49%
PanevėžysSūduva
3.72Shots on target / match4.47
PanevėžysSūduva

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.67Shots per match12.21
PanevėžysSūduva
3.72Shots on target4.47
PanevėžysSūduva
9.4%Shot conversion11.6%
PanevėžysSūduva
47%Possession49%
PanevėžysSūduva
1.23xG for1.45
PanevėžysSūduva
1.65xG against1.27
PanevėžysSūduva

Shooting quality

Panevėžys: BalancedSūduva: Balanced
PanevėžysSūduva
Accuracy (shots on target)35%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.270.32

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Sūduva is 117% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Panevėžys · 2.6 pts / match - Sūduva

Panevėžys
WLLLW
Season result split
33% W17% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-3-9
1.17 pts / match · goal difference -14
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-3-2
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
WDWLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.21Opponent xG: 1.74BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 80%
Sūduva
WWDWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
42% W42% R16% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-8-3
1.68 pts / match · goal difference +12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-4-3
Last 5 away
2-2-1
LDDWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.50Opponent xG: 1.33BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Sūduva is 42% better for: goals scored per match.

1 goals / match - Panevėžys · 1.42 goals / match - Sūduva

Sūduva is 125% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.78 goals / match - Panevėžys · 0.79 goals / match - Sūduva

Panevėžys scoring profile: strong

Panevėžys scores in 67% of matches (12 of 18 matches), while Sūduva keeps a clean sheet in 42% (8 of 19 matches).

Sūduva scoring profile: very strong

Sūduva scores in 74% of matches (14 of 19 matches), while Panevėžys keeps a clean sheet in 17% (3 of 18 matches).

18Goals scored (season)27
PanevėžysSūduva
32Goals conceded (season)15
PanevėžysSūduva
2.78Average goals in match2.21
PanevėžysSūduva
5Goals scored (last 5)9
PanevėžysSūduva
11Goals conceded (last 5)3
PanevėžysSūduva

How often they score at least...

67%1 goal74%
PanevėžysSūduva
28%2 goals42%
PanevėžysSūduva
6%3 goals16%
PanevėžysSūduva
0%4 goals5%
PanevėžysSūduva

How often they concede at least...

83%1 goal58%
PanevėžysSūduva
44%2 goals21%
PanevėžysSūduva
33%3 goals0%
PanevėžysSūduva
17%4 goals0%
PanevėžysSūduva

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

49%
League average

Goal patterns

28%BTTS at half-time16%
PanevėžysSūduva
11%BTTS in both halves11%
PanevėžysSūduva
11%Scored in both halves37%
PanevėžysSūduva

BTTS and goal count

44%Min. 3 goals and BTTS37%
PanevėžysSūduva
17%Min. 3 goals without BTTS11%
PanevėžysSūduva
40%BTTS - last 560%
PanevėžysSūduva

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

83%Min. 1 goal before half-time58%
PanevėžysSūduva
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time26%
PanevėžysSūduva
28%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
PanevėžysSūduva

2nd half

72%Min. 1 goal after half-time68%
PanevėžysSūduva
33%Min. 2 goals after half-time53%
PanevėžysSūduva
11%Min. 3 goals after half-time16%
PanevėžysSūduva

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Sūduva is 25% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.22 pts / match - Panevėžys · 1.53 pts / match - Sūduva

Panevėžys - half-time state
33% leading22% draw44% trailing
Sūduva - half-time state
32% leading58% draw11% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.22Points per match (1st half)1.53
PanevėžysSūduva
0.61Goals scored (1st half)0.58
PanevėžysSūduva
1Goals conceded (1st half)0.26
PanevėžysSūduva
1.61Average goals (1st half)0.84
PanevėžysSūduva
33%Clean sheet before half-time74%
PanevėžysSūduva
56%No goal before half-time53%
PanevėžysSūduva

After half-time (2nd half)

1.06Points per match (2nd half)1.58
PanevėžysSūduva
0.39Goals scored (2nd half)0.84
PanevėžysSūduva
0.78Goals conceded (2nd half)0.53
PanevėžysSūduva
1.17Average goals (2nd half)1.37
PanevėžysSūduva
50%Clean sheet after half-time53%
PanevėžysSūduva
67%No goal after half-time37%
PanevėžysSūduva

Panevėžys - second-half results

22% W39% R39% P
22
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
-7
Goal difference (1st half)
19
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.22
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Sūduva - second-half results

32% W63% R5% P
29
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
30
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.53
PPG before half-time
Lead holding131%

Leads at half-time in 32% of matches and wins 42%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Panevėžys - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.00
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match1.40.8
Average goals in match2.01.2
1 goal100%80%
2 goals80%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-4-2
Half-time: 40% leading - 0% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Sūduva - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.802.20
Goals scored / match0.81.0
Goals conceded / match0.20.4
Average goals in match1.01.4
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+3+3
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Panevėžys
ScoredConceded
2
7
0-15
3
4
16-30
6
7
31-45
3
4
46-60
0
4
61-75
4
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Sūduva
ScoredConceded
3
1
0-15
6
4
16-30
2
0
31-45
3
1
46-60
4
5
61-75
9
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.50
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.9 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
96%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
55%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-47%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
50%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
9%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 11 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Panevėžys

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.42
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.36
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+8.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.23
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.13
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
70%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
151%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.03
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

Sūduva

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.18
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.45
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-11.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.03
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.48
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
120%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
55%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.92
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (A Lyga).

Teams vs league

PanevėžysLigaSūduva
Average goals in match 2.782.61 2.21
Both teams scored 56%49% 53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 61%54% 47%
Clean sheets 17%31% 42%
Goal before half-time 83%69% 58%
Goal after half-time 72%77% 68%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.61
Average goals per match
49%
Both teams scored
54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.43
Home goals / match
1.18
Away goals / match
+21%
Home attack advantage
+17%
Home defence advantage
+13%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
69%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. PanevėžysGoalKwadwo Asamoah
  2. SūduvaSubstitutionOn: Markas BenetaOff: Aleksandar Živanović
  3. SūduvaYellow cardLucky Tom
  4. SūduvaGoalSteve Lawson
  5. SūduvaSubstitutionOn: Rati GrigalavaOff: Ibrahima Seck

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (6): Panevėžys 1 - 3 - 2 Sūduva. Average goals 1.33, both teams scored in 33% matches.

Sūduva
1 : 0
Panevėžys
Panevėžys
0 : 0
Sūduva
FK Sūduva Marijampolė
1 : 1
FK Panevėžys
FK Panevėžys
1 : 2
FK Sūduva Marijampolė
FK Sūduva Marijampolė
0 : 0
FK Panevėžys
FK Panevėžys
2 : 0
FK Sūduva Marijampolė

FAQ

What was the result of Panevėžys vs Sūduva?

The A Lyga match finished Panevėžys 1:2 Sūduva. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Panevėžys and Sūduva?

In the last 6 head-to-head matches Panevėžys won 1, Sūduva won 2 and 3 ended level. These games averaged 1.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Panevėžys vs Sūduva?

Panevėžys score 1.00 goals per game on average and Sūduva 1.42. The A Lyga average is 2.61 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 56% of Panevėžys's matches and 53% of Sūduva's.

What form are Panevėžys and Sūduva in?

Over the last 5 games Panevėžys have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Sūduva 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Panevėžys vs Sūduva?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Panevėžys vs Sūduva: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.