Belgium - First Division BData current as of 12 September 2026

Patro Eisden vs Beerschot-Wilrijk: match statistics

125%(3.05)
X25%(3.35)
250%(2.37)

Beerschot-Wilrijk is displaying significantly better form, averaging 2.6 points per match in their last five games compared to just 1.0 point for Patro Eisden. The visitors have won four of their last five matches, while the hosts have recorded only one victory in that period. Beerschot-Wilrijk boasts an impressive away record with a 64% win rate and 43% clean sheets, demonstrating solid defensive and offensive play. The visitors' average xG (1.78) surpasses that of the hosts (1.65), and additionally, Beerschot scores more goals on average away (1.43) than Patro Eisden at home (1.36). The table position (3rd for the visitors versus 5th for the hosts) and goal difference (+7 for the visitors, +1 for the hosts) further advocate for a Beerschot-Wilrijk win.

Patro Eisden vs Beerschot-Wilrijk: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Patro Eisden played Beerschot-Wilrijk in First Division B (Belgium). The match was played on 20 March 2026. Final score: 0:4.

Current form

Patro Eisden: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Beerschot-Wilrijk: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Patro Eisden scores 1.38 and concedes 1.17 goals per match. Beerschot-Wilrijk scores 1.48 and concedes 0.93. League average: 2.79 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Patro Eisden 55%, Beerschot-Wilrijk 55%. Over 2.5: Patro Eisden 45%, Beerschot-Wilrijk 45%. League level: BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 52%.

xG, shots and style

Beerschot-Wilrijk has higher xG: 1.78 vs 1.70. Patro Eisden: 15.3 shots per match, Beerschot-Wilrijk: 15.6.

Match halves

Patro Eisden: half-time lead 34%, second-half goals 0.79. Beerschot-Wilrijk: half-time lead 41%, second-half goals 0.93.

Goals by minute

Patro Eisden: 76-90+ (10 goals). Beerschot-Wilrijk: 76-90+ (15 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

First Division B: 2.79 goals per match, BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 52%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Beerschot-Wilrijk is displaying significantly better form, averaging 2.6 points per match in their last five games compared to just 1.0 point for Patro Eisden. The visitors have won four of their last five matches, while the hosts have recorded only one victory in that period. Beerschot-Wilrijk boasts an impressive away record with a 64% win rate and 43% clean sheets, demonstrating solid defensive and offensive play. The visitors' average xG (1.78) surpasses that of the hosts (1.65), and additionally, Beerschot scores more goals on average away (1.43) than Patro Eisden at home (1.36). The table position (3rd for the visitors versus 5th for the hosts) and goal difference (+7 for the visitors, +1 for the hosts) further advocate for a Beerschot-Wilrijk win.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

0 : 2
1st half
0 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

49Possession (%)51
Patro EisdenBeerschot-Wilrijk
6Shots15
Patro EisdenBeerschot-Wilrijk
1Shots on target7
Patro EisdenBeerschot-Wilrijk
0.93xG2.08
Patro EisdenBeerschot-Wilrijk
3Corners2
Patro EisdenBeerschot-Wilrijk
67Dangerous attacks90
Patro EisdenBeerschot-Wilrijk
13Fouls7
Patro EisdenBeerschot-Wilrijk
2Cards0
Patro EisdenBeerschot-Wilrijk

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Patro EisdenBeerschot-Wilrijk
1.38Goals scored / match1.48
Patro EisdenBeerschot-Wilrijk
1.17Goals conceded / match0.93
Patro EisdenBeerschot-Wilrijk
37%Average possession54%
Patro EisdenBeerschot-Wilrijk
5.34Shots on target / match4.93
Patro EisdenBeerschot-Wilrijk

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

15.31Shots per match15.62
Patro EisdenBeerschot-Wilrijk
5.34Shots on target4.93
Patro EisdenBeerschot-Wilrijk
9%Shot conversion9.5%
Patro EisdenBeerschot-Wilrijk
37%Possession54%
Patro EisdenBeerschot-Wilrijk
1.7xG for1.78
Patro EisdenBeerschot-Wilrijk
1.07xG against1.35
Patro EisdenBeerschot-Wilrijk

Shooting quality

Patro Eisden: AttackingBeerschot-Wilrijk: Attacking
Patro EisdenBeerschot-Wilrijk
Accuracy (shots on target)35%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.260.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Beerschot-Wilrijk is 160% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Patro Eisden · 2.6 pts / match - Beerschot-Wilrijk

Patro Eisden
LLDDW
Season result split
45% W31% D24% L
Season (W-D-L)
13-9-7
1.66 pts / match · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-4-3
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
WWDLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.56Opponent xG: 0.96BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
Beerschot-Wilrijk
DWWWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
59% W21% D21% L
Season (W-D-L)
17-6-6
1.97 pts / match · goal difference +16
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
9-2-3
Last 5 away
3-1-1
DWLWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.62Opponent xG: 1.19BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Beerschot-Wilrijk is 7% better for: goals scored per match.

1.38 goals / match - Patro Eisden · 1.48 goals / match - Beerschot-Wilrijk

Beerschot-Wilrijk is 26% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.17 goals / match - Patro Eisden · 0.93 goals / match - Beerschot-Wilrijk

Patro Eisden scoring profile: strong

Patro Eisden scores in 72% of matches (21 of 29 matches), while Beerschot-Wilrijk keeps a clean sheet in 38% (11 of 29 matches).

Beerschot-Wilrijk scoring profile: very strong

Beerschot-Wilrijk scores in 86% of matches (25 of 29 matches), while Patro Eisden keeps a clean sheet in 31% (9 of 29 matches).

40Goals scored (season)43
Patro EisdenBeerschot-Wilrijk
34Goals conceded (season)27
Patro EisdenBeerschot-Wilrijk
2.55Average goals in match2.41
Patro EisdenBeerschot-Wilrijk
5Goals scored (last 5)9
Patro EisdenBeerschot-Wilrijk
8Goals conceded (last 5)3
Patro EisdenBeerschot-Wilrijk

How often they score at least...

72%1 goal86%
Patro EisdenBeerschot-Wilrijk
41%2 goals45%
Patro EisdenBeerschot-Wilrijk
14%3 goals10%
Patro EisdenBeerschot-Wilrijk
10%4 goals7%
Patro EisdenBeerschot-Wilrijk

How often they concede at least...

69%1 goal62%
Patro EisdenBeerschot-Wilrijk
34%2 goals21%
Patro EisdenBeerschot-Wilrijk
7%3 goals7%
Patro EisdenBeerschot-Wilrijk
7%4 goals3%
Patro EisdenBeerschot-Wilrijk

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

55%
Beerschot-Wilrijk - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.16 of 29 matches
54%
League average

Goal patterns

17%BTTS at half-time3%
Patro EisdenBeerschot-Wilrijk
7%BTTS in both halves0%
Patro EisdenBeerschot-Wilrijk
21%Scored in both halves28%
Patro EisdenBeerschot-Wilrijk

BTTS and goal count

45%Min. 3 goals and BTTS41%
Patro EisdenBeerschot-Wilrijk
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS3%
Patro EisdenBeerschot-Wilrijk
80%BTTS - last 540%
Patro EisdenBeerschot-Wilrijk

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

62%Min. 1 goal before half-time59%
Patro EisdenBeerschot-Wilrijk
17%Min. 2 goals before half-time10%
Patro EisdenBeerschot-Wilrijk
10%Min. 3 goals before half-time3%
Patro EisdenBeerschot-Wilrijk

2nd half

79%Min. 1 goal after half-time83%
Patro EisdenBeerschot-Wilrijk
45%Min. 2 goals after half-time55%
Patro EisdenBeerschot-Wilrijk
21%Min. 3 goals after half-time24%
Patro EisdenBeerschot-Wilrijk

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Beerschot-Wilrijk is 14% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.48 pts / match - Patro Eisden · 1.69 pts / match - Beerschot-Wilrijk

Patro Eisden - half-time state
34% leading45% draw21% trailing
Beerschot-Wilrijk - half-time state
41% leading45% draw14% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.48Points per match (1st half)1.69
Patro EisdenBeerschot-Wilrijk
0.59Goals scored (1st half)0.55
Patro EisdenBeerschot-Wilrijk
0.38Goals conceded (1st half)0.17
Patro EisdenBeerschot-Wilrijk
0.97Average goals (1st half)0.72
Patro EisdenBeerschot-Wilrijk
62%Clean sheet before half-time83%
Patro EisdenBeerschot-Wilrijk
59%No goal before half-time55%
Patro EisdenBeerschot-Wilrijk

After half-time (2nd half)

1.31Points per match (2nd half)1.59
Patro EisdenBeerschot-Wilrijk
0.79Goals scored (2nd half)0.93
Patro EisdenBeerschot-Wilrijk
0.79Goals conceded (2nd half)0.76
Patro EisdenBeerschot-Wilrijk
1.59Average goals (2nd half)1.69
Patro EisdenBeerschot-Wilrijk
45%Clean sheet after half-time48%
Patro EisdenBeerschot-Wilrijk
48%No goal after half-time31%
Patro EisdenBeerschot-Wilrijk

Patro Eisden - second-half results

31% W38% D31% L
43
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
38
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.48
PPG before half-time
Lead holding132%

Leads at half-time in 34% of matches and wins 45%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Beerschot-Wilrijk - second-half results

41% W34% D24% L
49
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
+11
Goal difference (1st half)
46
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.69
PPG before half-time
Lead holding144%

Leads at half-time in 41% of matches and wins 59%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.6

Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Patro Eisden - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.00
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match0.41.2
Average goals in match0.81.8
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference0-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Beerschot-Wilrijk - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match3.001.00
Goals scored / match1.40.4
Goals conceded / match0.00.6
Average goals in match1.41.0
1 goal100%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet100%60%
No goal0%60%
Goal difference+7-1
Half-time: 100% leading - 0% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 7

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Patro Eisden
ScoredConceded
6
4
0-15
4
4
16-30
7
3
31-45
6
8
46-60
7
6
61-75
10
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Beerschot-Wilrijk
ScoredConceded
5
2
0-15
6
2
16-30
5
1
31-45
5
3
46-60
7
7
61-75
15
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (15 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.48
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
89%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
55%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-19%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
62%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Patro Eisden

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.63
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.42
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.32
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.10
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
98%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
85%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.66
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

Beerschot-Wilrijk

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.43
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.12
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.30
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.42
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
107%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
66%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.63
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
35% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
35%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division B).

Teams vs league

Patro EisdenLigaBeerschot-Wilrijk
Average goals in match 2.552.79 2.41
Both teams scored 55%54% 55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 45%52% 45%
Clean sheets 31%26% 38%
Goal before half-time 62%72% 59%
Goal after half-time 79%78% 83%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.79
Average goals per match
54%
Both teams scored
52%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.41
Home goals / match
1.38
Away goals / match
+2%
Home attack advantage
+2%
Home defence advantage
+3%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
49%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
7%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Beerschot-WilrijkGoalArnold Vula
  2. Patro EisdenYellow cardArnaud Dony
  3. Beerschot-WilrijkGoalRajiv van La ParraAssist: Arnold Vula Lamb Luth
  4. Patro EisdenYellow cardMilan Robberechts
  5. Beerschot-WilrijkGoalGenki HaraguchiAssist: Arnold Vula
  6. Patro EisdenSubstitutionOn: Raymond AsanteOff: Kéres Masangu
  7. Beerschot-WilrijkGoalKen Masui
  8. Patro EisdenSubstitutionOn: Raphaël Boakye SarfoOff: Milan Robberechts
  9. Beerschot-WilrijkSubstitutionOn: Nilton Varela LopesOff: Colin Dagba
  10. Beerschot-WilrijkSubstitutionOn: Glenn ClaesOff: Rajiv van La Parra
  11. Beerschot-WilrijkSubstitutionOn: Lukas Van EenooOff: Ryan Sanusi
  12. Beerschot-WilrijkSubstitutionOn: Siviwe MagidigidiOff: Severin Sabri Guendouz

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Patro Eisden 1 - 0 - 0 Beerschot-Wilrijk. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Patro Eisden vs Beerschot-Wilrijk?

The First Division B match finished Patro Eisden 0:4 Beerschot-Wilrijk. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Patro Eisden vs Beerschot-Wilrijk?

Patro Eisden score 1.38 goals per game on average and Beerschot-Wilrijk 1.48. The First Division B average is 2.79 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 55% of Patro Eisden's matches and 55% of Beerschot-Wilrijk's.

What form are Patro Eisden and Beerschot-Wilrijk in?

Over the last 5 games Patro Eisden have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Beerschot-Wilrijk 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Patro Eisden vs Beerschot-Wilrijk?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Patro Eisden vs Beerschot-Wilrijk: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.