Penybont vs Briton Ferry: match statistics
Penybont vs Briton Ferry: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Penybont played Briton Ferry in Welsh Premier League (Wales). The match was played on 15 September 2026. Final score: 3:2.
Current form
Penybont: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match. Briton Ferry: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Penybont scores 1.50 and concedes 0.63 goals per match. Briton Ferry scores 0.75 and concedes 1.88. League average: 3.14 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Penybont 50%, Briton Ferry 50%. Over 2.5: Penybont 50%, Briton Ferry 50%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 58%.
xG, shots and style
Briton Ferry has higher xG: 1.48 vs 1.38. Penybont: 11.0 shots per match, Briton Ferry: 12.0.
Match halves
Penybont: half-time lead 63%, second-half goals 0.50. Briton Ferry: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.38.
Goals by minute
Penybont: 31-45+ (5 goals). Briton Ferry: 31-45+ (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Welsh Premier League: 3.14 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 58%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-2-0. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 50%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Penybont remain unbeaten in the league, with a record of 4 wins and 3 draws, while they have collected 11 points from their last five matches thanks to 3 victories and 2 draws. Briton Ferry, by contrast, have lost 4 of their last 5 games, scoring just 2 goals and conceding as many as 10 during that period. At home, the hosts concede an average of 0.50 goals per match and keep a clean sheet in 50% of their appearances, while the visitors score just 0.50 goals away from home and fail to find the net in 50% of their matches. Penybont should also create more quality chances, as Briton Ferry allow opponents an average away xG of 2.02, compared with the hosts’ xG of 1.06. The advantage in current form, a more stable defence and the visitors’ poor attacking efficiency point to a Penybont win, although the hosts’ high home draw rate of 50% increases the likelihood of the points being shared.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The strongest argument for BTTS - No is not Briton Ferry’s poor finishing: the visitors score an average of just 0.5 goals per season and 0.4 over their last 5 matches, while failing to score in 50% of their league fixtures. Their BTTS rate is only 25%, dropping to 20% across their last five appearances, during which they lost four matches and scored just 2 goals in total. Penybont do not keep many clean sheets, but their current defensive form has clearly improved: over their last 5 matches, they conceded an average of 0.8 goals, with an xG against of 1.05. The hosts should nevertheless find the net, as Briton Ferry concede an average of 2.0 goals over their last 5 league fixtures, along with 1.8 xG against. Therefore, the scenario of Penybont scoring alone is more likely than both teams finding the net.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Penybont are in significantly better attacking form: they have averaged 1.8 goals over their last 5 matches, compared with just 0.4 for Briton Ferry. The visitors conceded as many as 2.0 goals per match during this period, supporting a projection of around 1.78 goals for the home side, although their own scoring efficiency limits the expected total to 0.62 goals. Briton Ferry have not scored more than one goal in any of their matches so far, and only 25% of their games have gone over 2.5 goals. Although Penybont have a high home xG average of 2.06, both teams have a 0% rate of away matches going over 3.5 goals, while only 33% of the hosts’ games have done so. With a projected total of 2.40 goals, the safest edge lies with Under 3.5, as a four-goal or higher scenario would require Briton Ferry to produce a significantly stronger attacking performance than suggested by their average of 0.4 goals over their last five appearances.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Penybont are in clearly better form: they have averaged 1.8 goals scored and 0.8 conceded over their last five matches, remaining unbeaten, while Briton Ferry have lost four of their last five and conceded an average of 2.0 goals. The strongest signal concerns the first half, as the home side held a lead at the break in 80% of their recent matches, while the visitors were trailing at half-time in 60%. Penybont averaged 1.2 goals scored before the break and allowed opponents just 0.2, whereas Briton Ferry scored only 0.2 goals in this period and conceded 0.8. The home side’s advantage should continue after the interval, as the visitors failed to win any of the second halves in their last five matches, conceding an average of 1.2 goals during that period. In addition, the hosts create significantly more chances, with an xG of 2.06 compared with their opponents’ 1.09, and average 5.33 shots on target versus 2.50. Therefore, the most likely HT/FT outcome is Penybont leading at the break and winning the match: 1/1.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Penybont | Briton Ferry | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 32% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.36 | 0.19 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Penybont is 267% better for: last-5 form.
2.2 pts / match - Penybont · 0.6 pts / match - Briton Ferry
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Penybont is 100% better for: goals scored per match.
1.5 goals / match - Penybont · 0.75 goals / match - Briton Ferry
Penybont is 198% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.63 goals / match - Penybont · 1.88 goals / match - Briton Ferry
Penybont scores in 88% of matches (7 of 8 matches), while Briton Ferry keeps a clean sheet in 13% (1 of 8 matches).
Briton Ferry scores in 63% of matches (5 of 8 matches), while Penybont keeps a clean sheet in 50% (4 of 8 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Penybont
Over / Under - Briton Ferry
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Penybont is 99% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2.25 pts / match - Penybont · 1.13 pts / match - Briton Ferry
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Penybont - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 63% of matches and wins 63%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Briton Ferry - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 25%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +3 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 0.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -6 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Penybont
Briton Ferry
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Welsh Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Penybont | Liga | Briton Ferry | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.13 | 3.14 | ▼ 2.63 |
| Both teams scored | • 50% | 50% | • 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 50% | 58% | ▼ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 50% | 26% | ▼ 13% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 75% | 78% | ▼ 75% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 63% | 84% | ▲ 88% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Penybont 0 - 2 - 0 Briton Ferry. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Penybont vs Briton Ferry?
The Welsh Premier League match finished Penybont 3:2 Briton Ferry. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Penybont and Briton Ferry?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Penybont won 0, Briton Ferry won 0 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Penybont vs Briton Ferry?
Penybont score 1.50 goals per game on average and Briton Ferry 0.75. The Welsh Premier League average is 3.14 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 58% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Penybont's matches and 50% of Briton Ferry's.
What form are Penybont and Briton Ferry in?
Over the last 5 games Penybont have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and Briton Ferry 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Penybont vs Briton Ferry?
The statistical background for Penybont vs Briton Ferry — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


