Indonesia - Liga 1Data current as of 23 July 2026

Persik Kediri vs Arema: match statistics

Persik Kediri crest
Persik Kediri
3 : 2half-time 3:0
Arema crest
Arema

Persik Kediri vs Arema: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Persik Kediri play Arema in Liga 1 (Indonesia). The match date is 3 May 2026 at 10:30. Final score: 3:2.

Current form

Persik Kediri: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Arema: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Persik Kediri scores 1.24 and concedes 1.79 goals per match. Arema scores 1.56 and concedes 1.38. League average: 2.80 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Persik Kediri 68%, Arema 65%. Over 2.5: Persik Kediri 71%, Arema 62%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 54%.

xG, shots and style

Arema has higher xG: 1.46 vs 1.42. Persik Kediri: 10.9 shots per match, Arema: 12.2.

Match halves

Persik Kediri: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.59. Arema: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 1.00.

Goals by minute

Persik Kediri: 31-45+ (10 goals). Arema: 76-90+ (17 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Liga 1: 2.80 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 54%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

I back Persik to win (1): at home they average 1.53 goals per match with xG 1.67 and maintain 57% possession, whereas Arema away averages only 1.07 goals and xG 1.32 with 45% possession. Persik creates more high-quality chances — 12.53 shots per match, including 5.13 on target and 12% conversion, versus Arema’s 11.33 shots, 3.8 on target and 9% conversion on the road. Recent form over the last five matches favors the visitors (Arema: 2 wins, 2 draws, 1 loss, averaging 1.6 points per match), while Persik has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses (0.8 points per match), which reduces but does not eliminate the home advantage. Defensively Persik concedes 1.27 goals at home with xG against 1.32, while Arema concedes 1.13 goals away but with a higher xG against of 1.78, indicating Arema allows more dangerous opportunities. Considering the season totals (Persik 35 scored/51 conceded, Arema 40/41) and Persik’s superior home metrics, I give the hosts the higher probability.

Half-by-half

3 : 0
1st half
0 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

38Possession (%)62
Persik KediriArema
10Shots15
Persik KediriArema
7Shots on target6
Persik KediriArema
1.35xG1.71
Persik KediriArema
1Corners10
Persik KediriArema
31Dangerous attacks47
Persik KediriArema
13Fouls15
Persik KediriArema
3Cards3
Persik KediriArema

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Persik KediriArema
1.24Goals scored / match1.56
Persik KediriArema
1.79Goals conceded / match1.38
Persik KediriArema
55%Average possession48%
Persik KediriArema
4.18Shots on target / match4.44
Persik KediriArema

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.91Shots per match12.15
Persik KediriArema
4.18Shots on target4.44
Persik KediriArema
11.3%Shot conversion12.8%
Persik KediriArema
55%Possession48%
Persik KediriArema
1.42xG for1.46
Persik KediriArema
1.48xG against1.57
Persik KediriArema

Shooting quality

Persik Kediri: BalancedArema: Balanced
Persik KediriArema
Accuracy (shots on target)38%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.35

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Arema is 50% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Persik Kediri · 1.8 pts / match - Arema

Persik Kediri
LWWLL
Season result split
32% W18% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
11-6-17
1.15 pts / match · goal difference -19
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
8-5-4
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
DWLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.41Opponent xG: 1.51BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 80%
Arema
LLWWW
Season result split
38% W26% R35% P
Season (W-D-L)
13-9-12
1.41 pts / match · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-7-5
Last 5 away
2-1-2
LWDLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.6Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.81Opponent xG: 1.59BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 100%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Arema is 26% better for: goals scored per match.

1.24 goals / match - Persik Kediri · 1.56 goals / match - Arema

Arema is 30% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.79 goals / match - Persik Kediri · 1.38 goals / match - Arema

Persik Kediri scoring profile: very strong

Persik Kediri scores in 76% of matches (26 of 34 matches), while Arema keeps a clean sheet in 24% (8 of 34 matches).

Arema scoring profile: very strong

Arema scores in 82% of matches (28 of 34 matches), while Persik Kediri keeps a clean sheet in 12% (4 of 34 matches).

42Goals scored (season)53
Persik KediriArema
61Goals conceded (season)47
Persik KediriArema
3.03Average goals in match2.94
Persik KediriArema
7Goals scored (last 5)13
Persik KediriArema
11Goals conceded (last 5)10
Persik KediriArema

How often they score at least...

76%1 goal82%
Persik KediriArema
35%2 goals47%
Persik KediriArema
12%3 goals18%
Persik KediriArema
0%4 goals6%
Persik KediriArema

How often they concede at least...

88%1 goal76%
Persik KediriArema
53%2 goals41%
Persik KediriArema
26%3 goals15%
Persik KediriArema
9%4 goals6%
Persik KediriArema

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

52%
League average

Goal patterns

15%BTTS at half-time12%
Persik KediriArema
6%BTTS in both halves3%
Persik KediriArema
12%Scored in both halves24%
Persik KediriArema

BTTS and goal count

56%Min. 3 goals and BTTS53%
Persik KediriArema
15%Min. 3 goals without BTTS9%
Persik KediriArema
40%BTTS - last 560%
Persik KediriArema

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

65%Min. 1 goal before half-time74%
Persik KediriArema
41%Min. 2 goals before half-time26%
Persik KediriArema
12%Min. 3 goals before half-time9%
Persik KediriArema

2nd half

91%Min. 1 goal after half-time85%
Persik KediriArema
62%Min. 2 goals after half-time56%
Persik KediriArema
26%Min. 3 goals after half-time24%
Persik KediriArema

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Arema is 7% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.32 pts / match - Persik Kediri · 1.41 pts / match - Arema

Persik Kediri - half-time state
29% leading44% draw26% trailing
Arema - half-time state
35% leading35% draw29% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.32Points per match (1st half)1.41
Persik KediriArema
0.65Goals scored (1st half)0.56
Persik KediriArema
0.56Goals conceded (1st half)0.62
Persik KediriArema
1.21Average goals (1st half)1.18
Persik KediriArema
62%Clean sheet before half-time59%
Persik KediriArema
59%No goal before half-time56%
Persik KediriArema

After half-time (2nd half)

0.71Points per match (2nd half)1.74
Persik KediriArema
0.59Goals scored (2nd half)1
Persik KediriArema
1.24Goals conceded (2nd half)0.76
Persik KediriArema
1.82Average goals (2nd half)1.76
Persik KediriArema
15%Clean sheet after half-time47%
Persik KediriArema
53%No goal after half-time38%
Persik KediriArema

Persik Kediri - second-half results

12% W35% R53% P
45
Half-time points
22
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
24
Second-half points
-22
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.32
PPG before half-time
Lead holding110%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 32%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.7

Concedes 0.7 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Arema - second-half results

50% W24% R26% P
48
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
59
Second-half points
+8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.41
PPG before half-time
Lead holding109%

Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Persik Kediri - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.600.60
Goals scored / match1.00.4
Goals conceded / match0.61.6
Average goals in match1.62.0
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%80%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference+2-6
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 0% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5
Arema - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.002.40
Goals scored / match1.21.4
Goals conceded / match1.01.0
Average goals in match2.22.4
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals40%40%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+1+2
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 0% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 6

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Persik Kediri
ScoredConceded
4
4
0-15
8
6
16-30
10
9
31-45
5
12
46-60
6
14
61-75
9
16
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (16). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.

Arema
ScoredConceded
4
9
0-15
6
5
16-30
9
7
31-45
11
7
46-60
6
4
61-75
17
15
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (17 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.99
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
107%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
67%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+1%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
62%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Persik Kediri

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.06
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.49
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+6.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.18
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.31
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
78%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
147%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.05
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

Arema

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.11
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.29
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.19
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
128%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
87%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.39
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
32% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
32%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 1).

Teams vs league

Persik KediriLigaArema
Average goals in match 3.032.80 2.94
Both teams scored 68%52% 65%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 71%54% 62%
Clean sheets 12%27% 24%
Goal before half-time 65%72% 74%
Goal after half-time 91%81% 85%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.80
Average goals per match
52%
Both teams scored
54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.58
Home goals / match
1.22
Away goals / match
+30%
Home attack advantage
+23%
Home defence advantage
+14%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
24%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Persik Kediri 0 - 0 - 1 Arema. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Persik Kediri vs Arema?

The Liga 1 match finished Persik Kediri 3:2 Arema. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Persik Kediri vs Arema?

Persik Kediri score 1.24 goals per game on average and Arema 1.56. The Liga 1 average is 2.80 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 68% of Persik Kediri's matches and 65% of Arema's.

What form are Persik Kediri and Arema in?

Over the last 5 games Persik Kediri have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Arema 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Persik Kediri vs Arema?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.